The Trayvon (where do they get those names?) Martin killing is Florida has followed the ordained script to perfection. The ‘victim’ was straight from central casting. A “beautiful, beautiful boy”, an ‘honor student’ (i.e. he hasn’t killed a teacher yet) laid low by a ‘white Hispanic’. Now what the hell is a white Hispanic? Is Obama a white blackman? But you see, such a categorisation is necessary for the designated scenario to play out.
On cue the ‘reverend’ race pimps crawled out from the lairs to explore the opportunity for yet another shake-down. ‘Blacks are under attack’ the ‘Reverend’ Jesse Jackson thundered. And for once the race-pimping horn dog wasn’t lying. Because blacks are indeed under attack……. but from their bruthas. About 90% of black murder victims get sent to the Great McDonalds in the sky by their own kind. And the inter-racial bit? Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent. And Hispanics, who commit most of the murders in this cohort, are included among the Whites. Gotta' make the figures look as good as possible.
The ‘news’ media that virtually ignored the recent Tulsa horror attack, the Derrick King and Edward Schaefer incidents, the Knoxville Horror and the young white man beaten to death by three black thugs in Philadelphia recently, well many outlets of said media went back to 1955 to resurrect, yet again, Emmet Till. “Is Trayvon the new Emmett Till?” they asked plaintively. And, in a nice touch, they published pictures of a smiling, prepubescent 13 year-old Trayvon, not the hulking 17 year-old, 6'2'' brute who, according to the only independent witness, was beating up Zimmerman when he got shot.
And of course Mein Obama jumped in feet first. “I see the son I never had when I see Trayvon’s picture’. Really? Well presumably then the picture shown here would also remind of the son he never had. Except that this guy pulled a gun and shot a cop who was about to question him. I’m not holding my breath.
There’s noting new in any of this of course. It’s the same utterly lopsided response to everything that involves blacks. But a few questions arise. Will this set them off on a renewed orgy of violence? (This seems the only response blacks are capable of to any perceived problem). Already we’ve had a spectacular chimpout by a young scholar at a Florida 'university' upset at Trayvon's demise. In the link I provide here the report says, without a trace of irony, that “a woman who has apparently had enough with senseless violence in her home state of Florida, attacks her teacher and fellow students in class.” Yes, they actually said that! Typical of the comments was “I feel for her because the young woman is upset, at least she cares about whats happening and is’nt afraid to say what she thinks”. Well, there’s no arguing that she’s not afraid to say what she thinks. If thinks isn’t too strong a word here.
So will blacks use this as the spark – literally – to effect a little urban renewal during the Summer? That’s the first question. But I also ask if there’s a major change in whites’ attitudes. I say this because my admittedly unscientific survey of comments in a whole range of media outlets shows a sea-change has taken place. Whites are speaking out very strongly on this issue and avoiding PC Speak cliches. So is there an actual change or is it just that the MSM moderators are becoming more indulgent? And if there is such a change, will this manifest itself in more overt form in due course?
I’d like to think the answers here are in the affirmative. Interested in your views.