I just had to reproduce this comment from Seanantijihad in the previous post. It brilliantly but simply illustrates the utter fatuousness and illogicality of judicial systems in the West.
Read and enjoy!
Judge: Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
Shaun: Are there any circumstances under Hate Crime laws whereby I would be convicted for telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
Judge: Such as?
Shaun: Such as saying Islam is not a religion of peace, or, that Negro brains are smaller than Caucasian brains, which accounts for their lower mean IQ. So that a Caucasian woman who has a child with a Negro has in effect genetically lobotomised her offspring.
Judge: Yes, clearly, that is a Hate crime.
Shaun: But it is the truth.
Judge: The truth is no defence.
Shaun: It was not a defence, merely a statement of fact. I repeat, can I be convicted and imprisoned for telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
Shaun: Then I cannot receive a fair trial, and you are not impartial, for you have insisted upon threat of imprisonment that I convict myself as a condition of my own defence.
Judge: I am sentencing you to six months imprisonment for contempt of court.
Shaun: Is the court in contempt of the truth, or the truth in contempt of the court?
[Shaunantijihad is dragged away to be locked in a cage with Negroes and Muslim maniacs]