Friday, 10 February 2012

Damn Vikings at it again!

There was a time, not so long ago, when being naughty in Scandinavia involved having an extra cup of Ovaltine before retiring to bed at 10 p.m. If you really wanted to push the envelope you nipped over at a pedestrian crossing when the light was red. But, as the man said, that was then, this is now. Nowadays those damn Nordics are burning, looting, murdering, genital mutilating like, well, Africans or Muslims. Despite that country’s impressive social study resources, nobody seems to know what the problem is. Police are perennially ‘perplexed’, politicians ‘concerned’, editorialists ‘baffled’ on the rising tide of moral turpitude.

Speaking of moral turpitude, the following story would chill the blood of even a Christian Brother. In an act of depravity that almost defies belief, a Norwegian woman slowly drowned her one year old child in a bucket of water while her British boyfriend looked on approvingly over Skype. As the Daily Telegraph put it “Norwegian Mother drowns baby while British boyfriend watches online”. Isn’t that something? Guess she wanted to prove she loved him, or maybe he just didn’t like the idea of her having a child by another man.

According to the DT “Police officers flew from Oslo to Britain to question the British man – who has not been named – with the help of Scotland Yard shortly before Christmas. Norwegian police prosecutor Kristin Rusdel told the newspaper, ‘They have the same story, but with some differences.’ Read that sentence again and you start to gain a better understanding as to why the police are always ‘perplexed’ up there.

Apart from its ghastly nature, there was something odd about this crime. You see the name of the Norwegian ‘mother’ was Yasmin Chaudhry, a Pakistani name, certainly not Norwegian. And what all the media referred to as her British boyfriend fled to Pakistan once the crime was uncovered. Why would Wayne, Gary, or whatever his name is, do that? Maybe I'm suspicious, cynical or whatever, but an idea crossed my mind. Maybe the ‘Norwegian’ mother and the ‘British’ lover were in fact Pakistani! After all, killing members of one’s own family is something of a national sport there.

But then I thought, no way. For that to happen multiple media outlets would have had to deliberately fabricated a grotesque misrepresentation of the actual facts of the story. This would have represented such a fundamental betrayal and unconscionable degradation of journalistic principles as to be beyond comprehension.

Nah, professional journalists in conservative British media wouldn’t do that.

Would they?

Meanwhile those damned Vikings slide further along the road to hell. Maybe some immigrants from a different culture might help?

58 comments:

James Lord said...

Pakistanis in immigrant communities have a huge level of mental disorders from marrying their first cousins.

Anonymous said...

Norway and Sweden are both becoming muslim occupied territory but who is behind it all:

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=3372

Elaine said...

Omy God. This is deeply upsetting. I don't care what religion or race they are. I won't sleep tonight.

Anonymous said...

Yes they wanted to marry but as he was her first cousin but she wasn't his .... .

Anonymous said...

We live in a post racial, pre noachide world.

The Barbarous Spectre leads the stupid goyim to their own destruction.

Those with voices who whisper like Grima Wormtongue in the ear of the deceived need to leave our legislature and instruments of governance in an aerobic manner similar to that of the gormless Grima WormTongue.

Especially..... Get them out of schools where their tutelage is akin to the child abuse of innocents who deserve and would demand if they could, the protections of their parents.

Cassius said...

Whay depresses me, apart from the ghastly story itself, is (are?) the comments on the various media.

Hardly any of them mention the elephant in the room, that the so-called British and Norwegian creatures are in fact Pakistani. They don't mention what Savant has been focusing on - that this is a monstrous conspiracy to mislead the public into believing that white Europeans did the deed.

People just cannot seem to see how they're being duped.

Sometimes I really despair.

Anonymous said...

Why oppose the impost of Judaism more so the Islam ?

The reality is that Islam has no power over the collective mind of European derived peoples. Their only threat is that of numbers. If educated as to the reason and with mutual understanding of the nature of the forces in play, a voluntary and amicable repatriation is a likely outcome.

The Judaics have control of virtually all mechanisms and inputs into the mind of others.

Judaism, the idea, views the 'goyim' of whatever colour, as little more than contemptible beasts in human form who have a future in 'the world to come' only as noachides. Does anyone out there feel as bestial as judaism feels them to be ?

When we beleieve their lies we prove to them that we are. When we behave as cohards and not call them on their lies we again prove to them their belief that they are 'entitled' to rule over others whom they feel to be filth.

That concept is in itself is a lie. We thrive and create and make families without them. Like beasts in a zoo, constrained by the mind control of a Judaic noachide corral we no longer propogate, because there is something situationally wrong.

Christain Zionists, like impure mind f***ed over Noachide brides in waiting behave as if kapos and willingly protect the lies of the judaics from public scrutiny, also wailing about 'anti-semitism' should we find that the 'jews' lie to us in a manner consistent with the licences and entitlements granted to them in the religion.

The kapo is universally despised above and below ,like judas iscariot, for his low price and compromised existence, just so that he may live in relative comfort and favour at the expense of others.

The seek to destroy our identity because they seek to destroy us althogether.

Oliver Cromwell was financed by the same out of Amsterdam. Today's raceless 'britain' is his legacy as a kapo protector of the 'british' noachides.

Bemused stare said...

Notice how the only "stock photo" available on the entire internet when the "journalist" needed one was of an all to obviously white guy.

Cracks me up it does.

Dave C said...

Sav, we see it in the local rag "Kilkenny man detained" then further down "Mohammed Obongo was charged with"...

Seneca said...

anon 00.12. Well said. I see things exactly this way. The Muslims' only weapon is demographic. Counter that and they're toast.

No, it's clear to me now that we are like microbes in a petri dish, the subjects of an ongoing experiment ultimately geared towards our destruction as an ethnic civilization. And we're just as unconscious of the experiment as are the said microbes.

Some on this site are optimistic about our chances. I'm not.

Bemused stare said...

Cassius said...

Whay depresses me, apart from the ghastly story itself, is (are?) the comments on the various media.

Hardly any of them mention the elephant in the room, that the so-called British and Norwegian creatures are in fact Pakistani. They don't mention what Savant has been focusing on - that this is a monstrous conspiracy to mislead the public into believing that white Europeans did the deed.

People just cannot seem to see how they're being duped.

Sometimes I really despair.


What I do, is post a little innocent comment like "These people aren't from Britain, they came from Pakistan, why does the reporter portray them as British people doing something bad?". Yes, I get banned so often I have email accounts with callouses on them. Hopefully though, I occasionally wake someone up. If you get a bunch of emails and do the same maybe we can wake more of them up.

Gem Junior said...

They're really getting desperate now. The only problem with their little plan is having to name the person. And when it isn't Kristin Hansonson or whatever some of us catch on. Actually I worked as a nurse in a burn center where the majority of patients are minority, mostly black but plenty of muslims. Seems that a common method of discipline is to boil the children. (some people even call the kids ghetto lobsters, which I don't find very funny myself, specially since many of them die). These people are whacked. They are not in any way related to us, or of us; there is no commonality. Anything that we had in common vanished, what was it?, 40 or 60,000 years ago when Indo-Europeans moved out of Africa. The elites and their joo masters won't back off it seems. Eventually we will have to go out into the streets and go after them, and string their bodies up. It's scary. I used to think that the final solution was an absolutely horrific, awful, barbaric thing.

Rob said...

But diversity is strength!

Er, it's also...giving instructions on how to take a shit.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099460/Toilet-training-18-YEAR-OLDS-University-puts-posters-giving-foreign-students-lessons-use-Western-loos.html

Anonymous said...

Says it all really ...

http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=16241651&postID=5667129055188319440

who+dares+wings said...

Definition of Anglo-American Main-Stream Media

A Jew or Jews debating with another Jew or other Jews on or in a Jew-produced show or article on or in a Jew-owned-and/or-run network or publication, about something some other Jew or other Jews said about another Jew or other Jews on or in another Jew-produced show or article on or in a Jew-owned-and/or-run network or publication in relation to the activities of another Jew or other Jews.*

[Plus the active and/or passive collaboration of those who serve, assist, enable, deny and/or defend Jewish domination of public discourse and non-organic culture.]


Please check it out ... it's living proof that Jews have no influence ... It names names.

Hi jocomo. How're ya goin'?

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Following on my last post ...

* For example: Charles Krauthammer and Jonah Goldberg and David Horowitz debating with Michael Lerner and Naomi Klein and Amy Goodman on ABC or CNN or CBS or NBC about something Bill Kristol and Dennis Prager and Norman Podhoretz wrote about Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein in The New York Times or The LA Times or The Boston Globe or The New York Daily News or US News and World Report or Foreign Affairs orForeign Policy or The National Post or The Washington Post in relation to Ruth Bader Ginsburg or Susan Sontag or Karl Marx or Howie Levey / “Anton Szandor LaVey” or Lev Bronstein / “Trostky” or Benjamin Satanyahoo or Honest Abe Foxman or Rosa Luxemburg or Ben Stein or Theodor Herzl or Ike Turner or Joe Lieberman or Bill Maher or David Miliband or Jakob Rosenfel / “General 羅” or Nicholas Sarkozy or Naomi Wolf or Erica Jong or Paul Gottfried or Andrea Dworkin or Gloria Allred or Daniel Ellsberg or Harvey Milk or Yousef “al-Qaeda” al-Khattab or Larry “Pull It” Silverstein or Marianne Faithful or Gloria Steinem or Emma Goldman or William Kunstler or George Soros or Rabbi Meir Kahane or Alisa Rosenbaum / Ayn Rand or Leon Uris or Rabbi Schmuley Boteach or Rahm Israel Emanuel or Benjamin Shalom Bernanke or Alan Greenspan or Betty Friedan or Adam Yahiye “al-Qaeda” Gadahn or Murray Rothstein / Sumner Redstone or Larry Kramer or Fairuza Balk or Jonathan Adhout or Rob Reiner

2/09/2012 10:46:00 PM


I could go on ...

UN
.

Anonymous said...

In fact, I think I will ...

who+dares+wings said...

or Kivie Kaplan or Stanley Levison or Allen “naked kids have been a staple of delight for centuries … to label pedophilia as criminal is ridiculous” Ginsberg or Barry Levinson or Joseph Levitch / Jerry Lewis or Michael Mann or Elaine May or Dick Wolf or Paul Mazursky or John Milius or Paul Newman or Sandra Bernhard or Steven Spielberg or David Geffen or Jeffrey Katzenberg or Murray Rothbard or Felix Frankfurter or Irving Kristol or John Podhoretz or Abbie Hoffman or Bill Graham or Jerry Rubin or Marty Peretz or Jeff Jacoby or Irv Rubin or Norman Ornstein or Bennet Cerf or Richard Perle or John Stewart Liebowitz or Ken Roth or Jerry Zucker or Christopher Hitchens or Peter Hitchens or Annie Liebowitz orMarcel Mangel/Marceau or David Brooks or Michael King or David Frum or Michael Eisner or Bernard Kouchner or Shimon Persky/Peres or Wolf Blitzer or Ted Koppel or Dennis Ross or Larry King or Andrea Koppel or Mike Wallace or Barbara Walters or Ilana Mercer or Michael Ledeen or Heather Graham or Phil Bronstein or Michael Savage or Michael Medved or David Reznik or Samuel “Sandy” “Burglar” Berger or Allen Konigsberg/”Woody Allen” or Rajmund Liebling/”Roman Polanski” or Richard Cohen or Ariel Cohen or Mortimer Zuckerman or Alan Dershowitz or Jeffrey Goldberg or Henry Kissinger or Robert Reich or John Deutch or Robert Rubin or Mickey Kantor or Madeleine Albright or William S. Cohen or Larry Summers or Ari Fleischer or Elliott Abrams or Paul Wolfowitz or Douglas Feith or Irve Lewis “Scooter” Libby or Sidney Joseph Perelman or Michael Chertoff or Joshua Bolten or Michael Mukasey or Carl Levin or Arlen Specter or Frank Lautenberg or Dianne Feinstein or Barbara Boxer or Russ Feingold or Charles “Chucky” Schumer or Bernie Sanders or Henny Youngman or Teddy Kaufman or Al Franken or Barry Goldwater or Jacob Javits or Paul Wellstone or Norm Coleman or Henry Waxman or Barney Frank or Gary Ackerman or Ileana Ros-Lehtinen or Jane Harman or Jerry Nadler or Steve Rothman or Yehudi Menuin or Robert Wexler or Shelley Berkley or Jan Schakowsky or Brad Sherman or Anthony D. Weiner or Eric Cantor or David Paymer or Susan Davis or Steve Israel or Adam Schiff or Allyson Schwartz or Debbie Wasserman Schultz or Steve Cohen or Gabrielle Giffords or Paul Hodes or Steve Kagen or Moe Berg or Ron Klein or John Yarmuth or Ed Perlmutter or John Adler or Alan Grayson or Jared Poli or Tom Lantos or Ben Cardin or Mark Levin or Ron Lauder or Michael Bloomberg or Laura Schlessinger or Milton Friedman or Alan Shatter or Joseph Stiglitz or James Wolfensohn or Paul Krugman or Lawrence Kaplan or Marvin Hier or Eli Rosenbaum or Elliot Spitzer or Samuel Gompers ...

2/09/2012 11:00:00 PM


Don't know about you, but I'm beginning to think Covington has a point, here ....

UN
.

Anonymous said...

... and a few more. And there's lots more where that came from ...

or Kathy Boudinor Isaac Deutscher or Sir Martin Gilbert or Eric Hobsbawm or Harold Laski or Tony Judt or Bernard Lewis or Simon Schama or Kurt Weill or Simon Sebag Montefiore or Sir Karl Popper or Ludwig “Hitler’s Schoolmate” Wittgenstein or Sigmund Freud or Nathan Mayer Rothschild or Danny Cohen or Sasha Baron Cohen or Nigella Lawson or Aaron Brown or Matt Drudge or Thomas Friedman or Lew Grade or Joseph Moses Levy or Robert Maxwell or Melanie Phillips or Jacob Rothschild or Baron Saatchi or Charles Saatchi or Simon Cowell or Sharon Lévy/”Arden”/Osbourne or Chaim Weizmann or Ian Buruma or Jackie Collins or Arthur Koestler or Will Self or Israel Zangwill or Harold Pinter or Tom Stoppard or Barbra Amiel or Paddy Chayefsky or Samuel Montagu or Melissa “Dexter Twilight” Rosenberg or Herbert Samuel or Vivian (Chaim) Herzog or Dame Shirley Porter or Sir Julius Vogel or Stephen Frears or Henry Jaglom or Wilhelm Weiller or Mike Leigh or Sam Mendes or Alan Yentob or Ben Elton or Edwin Samuel Montagu or Leslie Hore-Belisha or Sir Gerald Kaufman or Sir Clement Freud or Baron Brittan or Baron Lawson or Joel Schumacher or Bryan Singer or Todd Solondz or Barbra Streisand or James Toback or Billy Wilder or Sir Malcolm Rifkind or Manó Kertész Kaminer or Howard Koch or Edwina Currie or Michael Howard orChristopher Cerf or Oona King or Irving Thalberg or Ed Miliband or ...

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Okay ... enough.

More than enough, in fact.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

George Lucas has been pissing on his die-hard fans for quite a few years, now ... and getting rather publicly pissed-off with them.

Both of them.

And these, I might add, are the people who actually like his shitty movies.
He's going to get really snarky, now.

Red Tails flops at the box office.

Even though historians keep debunking the Tuskegee Airmen myths over and over, the movie keeps bringing them back.

Despite the absurd claim by George Lucas that Red Tails is a groundbreaking movie about race, that “white Hollywood” didn’t want him to make, the movie is actually just a remake of a 1995 version.

The movie re-invents the usual* Tuskegee Airmen myths. The actual* story of the Tuskegee Airmen is dramatically less grandiose. White pilots flying the same planes and the same missions had a victory rate 350% higher than the black pilots.

When you compare the records of fighter groups flying the advanced P-51 planes in the 15th Air Force, we see that white fighter groups scored 2.26 victories for every plane lost. This is 3.5 times the rate of the black fighter group.

In other words, white pilots flying the same planes and the same missions were 350% more effective. Think of this as an investment. For every dollar you invest in the black pilots yields $.66, while every dollar invested in the white pilots yields $2.26.

TABLE VII: COMPARISON OF FIFTEENTH AIR FORCE P-51 FIGHTER GROUPS

Fighter Group
Predominant race
Victories per aircraft lost in combat

31st White 2.49
52nd White 2.08
325th White 2.22
332nd Black 0.66

Red Tails had a production budget of $58 million. After three weeks in theaters it has grossed $41 million. The movie end(s)* up getting about 50% of the box office gross. This means the movie is still nearly $38 million in the hole and viewers at the theater have dried up.


(*my edits)

http://cofcc.org/2012/02/red-tails-flops-at-the-box-office/#comments

Wasn't there once a popular song in the fifties?
Red Tails in the Sunset?

UN
.

Anonymous said...

I see the taxpayers of Britain are being forced to pay for the consequences of more multi-culti enrichment:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16975835

Anonymous said...

Didjewknow this is exactly like the switcheroo they pulled in Roman Palestine a few millenia ago?

The province of Judea is named for the Tribe - Judah. But an enclave ( a ruling elite actually ) of the motley crew also resided there as immigrants from the time of the Maccabees. The Romans who lived in Judea called themselves Romans. The Greeks who lived there called themselves Greeks. The members of the Tribe of Judah called themselves Judeans after their land and tribe.

And the motley crew called themselves Jews after the name of the province. They always impose this strict 'no talk' rule on outsiders trying to figure out who they are exactly. That is for them to know and the others to find out.

Today they still call themselves by the name of that province and their media monopoly imposes the same confusion about the immigration invasion they want to cloak.

justme said...

Uncle Nasty - have read through all your names. Some very interesting ones in there about which I was unaware.

Eric Hobsbawn - that figures

Bill Maher That's a Tipperary name????

Ike Turner?? he be black

Mike Wallace Wallace is a Scottish name

Simon Sebag Montefiore - never knew that. But again, it figures

Thanks. Duly noted.

potgieter said...

Bemused Stare - you're not surprised at the stock photo message are you?

In South Africa they showed a white burglar about to break into a black household!

Anonymous said...

Hi Justme.

The writer Irving Wallace

Wallace was born in Chicago, Illinois to Bessie Liss and Alexander Wallace (an Americanized version of the original family name of Wallechinsky). The family was Jewish[3] and originally from Russia.

(Wikipedia)

...(Bill) Maher was born in New York City, the son of Julie (née Berman), a nurse, and William Maher, Sr., a network news editor and radio announcer.[6] He was raised in his Irish American father's Catholic religion, remaining unaware that his mother was Jewish until his early teenage years.

(Wikipedia)


Never forget the hebes are matrilinear. If Mama was a Red Sea Pedestrian, you're one too.

I had always wondered about that until it was pointed out (by my mother) that motherhood is a certainty ... while fatherhood is, at best, an educated guess.

UN
.

AnalogMan said...

Potgieter: re stock photos.

I'm visiting Virginia USA at the moment, and, as usual, my son-in-law took me to a gun show. One of the items on sale was the NRA basic self-defence book.

The cover illustration shows a coolly competent Babuntu man nonchalantly defending himself from a masked White attacker. Yeah, that's the NRA. Pathetic.

Franz said...

So Pakistani specimen A is drowning specimen B while specimen C is looking on via skype... and people are shocked by this?

Ecologist John Calhoun already researched the phenomenon of "behavioral sink" in the 60s.

The degradation that occurs when myriads of wholly different people are thrown together in cramped living conditions has not been exactly... unpredictable.

Bemused stare said...

Potgieter, not shocked at all. A bit bemused really;) I ceased being shocked long ago when I saw the article about the niglet that got pot roasted by its mammy sow with the obligatory headline pic of the platinum blond lady holding her baby in her arms.

Andreas said...

anon 00.10. Yes, we are being destroyed. and the people doing it are 'hiding on plane sight'.

Iron Felix said...

Justme, the name Montefiore is the Italian equivalent of Blumenberg; should bring it into focus.

Anonymous said...

It's strange, Cheech and Chong referred to their band Alice Bowie as "different but the same". All I can conclude from the "they have the same story but with differences" statement, is the cop must be on the same thing as Cheech and Chong.

Henry IX said...

Good poibt about the comments (DM anyway). No mention that the Norwegian and the Brit were Paki's.

Iron Felix said...

Come to think of it,the Irish got a thorough bollocking from the same Simon Sebag Montefiore on foot of not doing enough for the Jews pre-war, and next thing we know they get a second bollocking from Shatter for not plunging into WW2 on behalf of the Jews. And both these blokes are, well, well, well and why am I not surprised? We aristocratic Poles know a thing or two.

Olda said...

Iron Felix - I thought all the aristocratic Poles had been liquidated by the Bolsheviks?

Iron Felix said...

I am getting really brassed off with the likes of Shatter and many of his ilk both kosher and goy. Do you wish to know why? Yes, of course you do. It is the insolent way in which they appropriate the moral high ground right from the start. They have taken the moral rectitude position before anyone has a chance to so much as speak. You find yourself wrongfooted before you have even opened your mouth. Slick operators aren't they?
But if a crowd of guys desert their own country's armed forces to take the queens shekel, let them by all means get their nuts shot off by the Leibstandarte, but please let us have no crap about their moral superiority over the rest of us.
Fact is, the mere concept that a proper narrative history of that whole period of which the two great wars are the salient has not so much as been dreamed of, and if certain interests have their way it never will.
Oh, Olda, yes we blueblooded Poles know quite a few things, survival being one of them. (See my interim incarnation in Hollywood under the name "Lee van Cleef"--google us both up, there's a superficial resemblance).

Dr. Wassell said...

Shatter and his ilk have a simple morality: 'Is it good for the jews?'

Anonymous said...

Hi Jocomo, was curious to your take onthis short story.

A mother and her young boy are gathering mushrooms in the German forest. The boy finds some poisonous ones. The mother explains that there are good mushrooms and poisonous ones, and, as they go home, says:

“Look, Franz, human beings in this world are like the mushrooms in the forest. There are good mushrooms and there are good people. There are poisonous, bad mushrooms and there are bad people. And we have to be on our guard against bad people just as we have to be on guard against poisonous mushrooms. Do you understand that?”

“Yes, mother,” Franz replies. “I understand that in dealing with bad people trouble may arise, just as when one eats a poisonous mushroom. One may even die!”

“And do you know, too, who these bad men are, these poisonous mushrooms of mankind?” the mother continued.

Franz slaps his chest in pride:
“Of course I know, mother! They are the Jews! Our teacher has often told us about them.”

The mother praises her boy for his intelligence, and goes on to explain the different kinds of “poisonous” Jews: the Jewish pedlar, the Jewish cattle-dealer, the Kosher butcher, the Jewish doctor, the baptised Jew, and so on.

“However they disguise themselves, or however friendly they try to be, affirming a thousand times their good intentions to us, one must not believe them. Jews they are and Jews they remain. For our Volk they are poison.”

“Like the poisonous mushroom!” says Franz.

“Yes, my child! Just as a single poisonous mushrooms can kill a whole family, so a solitary Jew can destroy a whole village, a whole city, even an entire Volk.”

Franz has understood.

“Tell me, mother, do all non-Jews know that the Jew is as dangerous as a poisonous mushroom?”

Mother shakes her head.

“Unfortunately not, my child. There are millions of non-Jews who do not yet know the Jews. So we have to enlighten people and warn them against the Jews. Our young people, too, must be warned. Our boys and girls must learn to know the Jew. They must learn that the Jew is the most dangerous poison-mushroom in existence. Just as poisonous mushrooms spring up everywhere, so the Jew is found in every country in the world. Just as poisonous mushrooms often lead to the most dreadful calamity, so the Jew is the cause of misery and distress, illness and death.”

The author then concludes this story by pointing the moral:

German youth must learn to recognise the Jewish poison-mushroom. They must learn what a danger the Jew is for the German Volk and for the whole world. They must learn that the Jewish problem involves the destiny of us all.

“The following tales tell the truth about the Jewish poison-mushroom. They show the many shapes the Jew assumes. They show the depravity and baseness of the Jewish race. They show the Jew for what he really is:

Anonymous said...

''If a cows born in a stable it doesn't make it a horse''. Bernard Manning

Anonymous said...

WTF does noachide mean?

Anonymous said...

Re:- Anonymous Red Tails. I love this sort of post. It reveals facts that I would never have thought about. Statistics I didn't know. Exactly why the PTB will try and censor the internet.

Iron Felix said...

Anon, your quote from Bernard Manning---actually big fat Bernie almost certainly got it from the Duke of Wellington, he of Waterloo, thus; "A man may born in a stable; does it follow, Sir, that he is therefore a horse?". This, by the by, was in reference to his Irish birth

Anonymous said...

anon 01:41

anon, jocomo hasn't been posting much because he's busy compiling a really really really long list of all the jews throughout history who have put the general white interest above the particular jewish interest.

Isn't that right jocomo ???

Gem Junior said...

UN ata 5:40: that was so mind-blowingly frightening. Not that I didn't know that the Jews have a stealthy death grip on the US Media but having it spelled out has really gotten my panties in a bunch. Damn, the patient scheming that it must have taken to OWN the place, lock stock and barrel like they do. I'm compelled (unwillingly of course) to a reluctant sort of "admiration" for want of a better word... perhaps someone could help me out here? How the >#CK did the confederacy of dunces known as the USA allow this? Good God. How to unravel such a monstrosity? How in the world can anyone not see the characteristics of this bunch leading to their total world domination. I'm so depressed. And nauseous. Pass the sick bag.

Iron Felix said...

In reflective mood today, got to thinking about this pimp Shatter. Of course what he is at is a further undermining of whatever shreds of self respect the Irish may have, this time by stigmatising the only occasion in a millenium when, through their leadership, they chose NOT to see Ireland become a battleground in someone else's quarrel. We are asked, it seems, to believe that our deserters were the honourable ones, going off to fight a moral crusade against the Nazis; those who served faithfully at home being simply contemptible.
Ok; throughout the '30's there was close cooperation between the Nazis and Zionism in trying to reach a decent modus vivendi; as late as 1940 Avraham Stern, of the eponymous gang, was proposing to raise an Irgun military unit to fight alongside the Germans; the Swedish Interior Minister was telling the SS that if the Germans promised favourable conditions to Sweden in the event of occupation, he would provide the Gestapo with the names, addresses and all details of every Jew living in that citadel of enlightenment; across the way in Slovakia, when the Germans walked in, the Slovak government not only turned every Jew in that country over to the Gestapo, they paid the Gestapo a headage emolument to defray the latter's expenses in shipping Jews to the camps, without even being asked so to do; while all these brave Micks were joining in Churchill's crusade to destroy Germany by fighting down to the last Greek, Mick, Pole and Russian, it was not until 1942 that anyone ever heard of a "Final Solution",
the Wannsee Conference being where it was first promulgated. Lastly, and I wish I could trace this, in recent years a Rabbi in Israel said that the Jews who died in the Shoah were the scum of the earth and fully deserved what happened to them. In the middle of all this and more besides we are obliged to hang our heads in shame as Shatter denigrates our people who actually kept their word and served. faithfully. 'twould make you puke.

Anonymous said...

Ajax football club who make a great deal about their jewishh originsh removed all the namesh of the jewsh who had played for them even though they were not ashked to do sho by the nazish.
A lisht of all jewsh who lived in the Netherlandsh was alsho handed over but shomehow hishtoriansh overloook thish.

johan said...

Gem Junior talks about monstrous conspiracy and all that. How did the americans let them get away with it etc.

I think it was Nathan Rothschild who said 'give me control of a country's money supply and all else follows.'

Enter the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. Privately owned by the Tribe, and they have control of the nations' money suppy.

Verstehen sie jetzt?

Anonymous said...

Norway’s Progress Party used to be a real alternative to the MultiCulti mainstream parties in Norway. But all that has changed now: FrP, like so many other parties, finds itself in urgent need of the Muslim vote.

It's now become all lovey dovey to them.

Norway is finished.

Bemused stare said...

I despair sometimes, I really do.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2100070/Muslim-hate-preacher-Abu-Qatada-Security-operation-costing-10-000-week.html

Looking at this I begin to feel that nothing will fix the problem other than a world war.

Anonymous said...

"Would they?"

NEVER. Rest assured, Savant, that that sort of thing could never be perpetrated by the pragmatic and conservative citizenry of any northern European country.
Just tune into the Beeb to be assured. The Beeb consistently does a superb job in its journalistic watchdog efforts of keeping listeners and viewers informed about the true color of crime in the dear old UK and elsewhere.

Anonymous said...

Iron Felix 20:30


When did Shatter's family move to Britain?

Did his grandfather, or granduncles, or anyone related to him, risk their lives to fight in the war?

I do not know the answer to these questions. They may well have. But I think it is indicative that if anyone in the media or politics had actually asked these questions publically when Shatter was slurring Ireland's good name they would have no doubt been called antisemites, vilified and hounded out of their job.

Anonymous said...

Bemused stare said...

I despair sometimes, I really do.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2100070/Muslim-hate-preacher-Abu-Qatada-Security-operation-costing-10-000-week.html

Looking at this I begin to feel that nothing will fix the problem other than a world war.


Good old Willie Wikkelspies had a phrase for it: **

“So foul a sky clears not without a storm.”

Shakespeare’s “Life and Death of King John”


UN

** Bad South African joke. Sorry.
.

James Lord said...

Bemused Stare. And the way that cleric is being treated is the very thing that could drive people to sucha war.

SAVANT said...

“So foul a sky clears not without a storm.”

This has often crossed my mind w/r/t the same subject. Gird your loins.

Anonymous said...

Could this be the key?

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/jewish_crime_network_shekels

Robert Steuckers circulated me today with his Euro-Synergies URL to a short interview for Alternative Right with Gianluca Iannone of the Italian culturist organisation CasaPound. The interviewer is the Tokyo-based Colin Liddell. The two longest and most interesting answers given by Iannone are repeated here.

Founded in 2003, CasaPound is doing successfully what some in British nationalism consider to be essential at this time of nationalist disintegration. Iannone explains:

CPI works on everything that concerns the life of our nation: from sport to solidarity, culture and of course politics. For sports, we have a soccer teams and academy, we do hockey, rugby, skydiving, boxing, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, scuba diving, hiking groups, caving, climbing. For solidarity, we have first aid teams, we do fundraising activities for the Karen people, and we provide help to orphans and single-mums. A phone line called “Dillo to CasaPound” (tell it to CasaPound) is active 24/7 to give free advises on legal and tax issues. On the cultural ground, we host authors and organize book presentations; we have an artist club, a theater school, free guitar, bass guitar and drum lessons, we created an artistic trend called Turbodinamismo, we have a publishing company, dozens of bookshops and websites. Politically we propose various laws like the Mutuo sociale (social mortgage), Tempo di essere Madri (Time to be a mother) or against water privatisation and so many more. Speaking about CPI is never easy because all these things are CASAPOUND. All of these represent our challenges and projects for now and the millennium.


Use their weapons against them.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

It must be a real bitch when you work so hard at manufacturing a seamless history ... and some bastard comes along, tugs on a thread, and the whole thing begins to unravel.

51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With The Nazis, Edited by Lenni Brenner, Fort Lee, NJ (Barricade Books, 2002), 342 pages.

A Review by William Hughes of Lenni Brenner's book, "51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis"

History can be deceptive. It’s fair to say that some of the sensational never-published-before documents, in this book, will shock those who have accepted Zionism and its supposed history, at face value, as a political movement that was the hope of the Jews. Lenni Brenner, the intrepid author of “Zionism in the Age of Dictators,” reveals disturbing new evidence in his latest effort, that suggest just the opposite. In fact, he makes a compelling case that the Zionist record was “dishonorable.” You can consider this excellent tome as a worthy sequel to his first expose’ on the myopic Zionist zealots of that bygone era.

For openers, Brenner showed how the Zionists had a long history of shameless cooperation with the Nazis, especially after the dictator Adolph Hitler had came to power in 1933. The Zionists were also in bed, to some extent, with the other members of what later became known as WWII’s “Axis of Evil,” that included Benito Mussolini’s Italy, and Tojo Hideki’s Japan. For example, on March 29,1936, Zionists praised Il Duce, and his regime, at the opening of a maritime school, funded by the Fascist government, at Civitavecchia. This is where a Zionist youth group, the “Betar,” trained its sailors for the future Revisionist state. The speakers ignored the fact that on Oct. 3, 1935, Italian troops had invaded Abyssinia.


Oh, revisionism ... thou canst be such an heartless bitch.

Hey, jocomo. How ya goin'?

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Apologies, folks.

The link for the previous post:-

http://baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/5200

UN
.

Anonymous said...

I am still trying to discern the tone of this blog ... but for now, I recommend it.

http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/

An example:- Build yourself a Drone NOW (before they become illegal)

Francis Fukuyama isn't your standard tech guy. He's a policy guy at Stanford that writes hefty books on very philosophical topics. That's why his detailed blog post on his efforts to build a surveillance drone are so cool. Here's a little video of the test of his drone outside of his office at Stanford.

Francis makes two simple observations that are worth repeating. Here's the first one:

"I don’t have to spell out the implications of this. I want to have my drone before the government makes them illegal."

The Inevitable Ban on Drone Tech

I agree with Francis, it's pretty clear that drones will become illegal sooner than later. Let me run through a scenario for you. I'm going to have some fun with it:

The ban will likely start by closing down the drone flight amateur loophole -- under 400ft, line of site, away from built up areas (which Francis obviously violated with his test flight). You will need a license to fly even small drones. Commercial licenses will be very restrictive (right now it's illegal to take pictures from a drone for commercial purposes).

However, that's not going to last. There will be too many violations as people build and use drones without regard to the legal restrictions. It will then be made illegal to own a drone w/o a very restrictive license.

Of course, that won't last long either. People will continue to build and use them using generic parts. This technology will prove way to useful and too easy to access. At that point, like we have seen recently with efforts to put limits on general purpose computing (ACTA, SOPA, etc.), we are going to see the following:
Bans on general purpose robotic technology from hardware to software.
Controls on general purpose fabrication technology (since parts can be made with these technologies). There will be lots of support from commercial patent and copyright holders for government bans on 3D fabrication.
Controls on people that know how to build drones. Dangerous people must be tracked and monitored (I had a physics teacher once who designed nuclear bombs, he couldn't travel more than 50 miles w/o government authorization -- it would be much easier to do that for many more people now using modern tech).

Now, all of these steps will accelerate to the end point if a single terrorist incident is based on drone tech.

So, what should you do?

Build yourself a drone. Before they are made illegal.


The main reason I got into computing; get on top of them before they get on top of you.

UN
.

Eimear said...

CasaPound seems brilliant, but so difficult to scale up into a western-sized country, all of which of course are now multi-ethnic, making the task infinitely harder.

But the social solidarity thinking behind it it its strength.

Anonymous said...

"Mike Wallace Wallace is a Scottish name"

his confession