My question post in the post a few days ago elicited quite a spirited response. No fewer than 120 comments at the latest count. My question was a genuine one. Why would an insurance company in the USA predominantly use blacks in their ads when that population ratio is only 13%, most of which probably don't buy insurance anyway?
Some very interesting and informative responses which definitely gave me greater insight, although not fully explaining the conundrum. Here's an abstracted selection of the most interesting explanations.
"Television sets trends.It matters not what or who is shown in these advertising ventures.The masses are so dumbed down they will follow what ever is shown on the TV in lock step.It is hip to act like a nigger in the US now. All the music ect. is focused around blacks. Therefore useing them in advertisments works."
"Affirmative action is promoting a rising black middle class and a racially blind white female working class, while downgrading the white male middle class."
"Maybe these ads are targeted at the growing "wigger" generation of degenerate American youth."
"With most Americans it could be an ape and they'd still be saying "I SIMPLY MUST HAVE ONE!" so IMO nothing will change in the US till the supermarket shelves are showing a problem"
"Anybody who speaks up and points out the obvious fact that these ads aren't good for business will be fired."
"Most of the actors octoroon mulattos and/or with extremely European features"
"It's not about the money or the sales or success! We, who struggle for money, think it's important. It's not. What is important is power and influence ... with those two things, money comes.This the jews know in their very bones."
The truth lies within those comments, I believe. Don't know the respective weights to be assigned to the various factors though. In any event it's a bloody tragedy.