Sunday, 19 February 2012

Allstate update

My question post in the post a few days ago elicited quite a spirited response. No fewer than 120 comments at the latest count. My question was a genuine one. Why would an insurance company in the USA predominantly use blacks in their ads when that population ratio is only 13%, most of which probably don't buy insurance anyway?

Some very interesting and informative responses which definitely gave me greater insight, although not fully explaining the conundrum. Here's an abstracted selection of the most interesting explanations.

"Television sets trends.It matters not what or who is shown in these advertising ventures.The masses are so dumbed down they will follow what ever is shown on the TV in lock step.It is hip to act like a nigger in the US now. All the music ect. is focused around blacks. Therefore useing them in advertisments works."

"Affirmative action is promoting a rising black middle class and a racially blind white female working class, while downgrading the white male middle class."

"Maybe these ads are targeted at the growing "wigger" generation of degenerate American youth."

"With most Americans it could be an ape and they'd still be saying "I SIMPLY MUST HAVE ONE!" so IMO nothing will change in the US till the supermarket shelves are showing a problem"

"Anybody who speaks up and points out the obvious fact that these ads aren't good for business will be fired."

"Most of the actors octoroon mulattos and/or with extremely European features"

"It's not about the money or the sales or success! We, who struggle for money, think it's important. It's not. What is important is power and influence ... with those two things, money comes.This the jews know in their very bones."

The truth lies within those comments, I believe. Don't know the respective weights to be assigned to the various factors though. In any event it's a bloody tragedy.


Anonymous said...

This may be a bit obvious. If blacks are the ones not buying insurance wouldn't this be who you targeted when advertising?

Anonymous said...


Thanks for the follow-up post with possible answers. All weigh in as serious food for thought. I personally tend to think that the most plausible suggestions are the "'wigger' generation of degenerate American youth" and "octoroon mulattos...European features" ones.

Oddjob said...

The serious black face with the seemingly command presence is the image of strength that is presented. The reality is less than suggested by the commercial. Why intelligent liberal types ignore reality is the real confusing issue...

Anonymous said...

Notice that the blacks in the ads are attractive and respectable looking.

It's a way of flattering the white audience: You are the kind of person who's not put off by the sight of black people, unlike those raaaaacist hicks.

Remember, all the really interesting arguments, the ones that result in real change, occur within the white race in America.

This has nothing to do with the blacks themselves. It has to do with white tribes using black people - and their acceptance of black people - as proxies in an intra-racial war.

Notice how they're not using, y'know, real African Americans. Because, ew. No one wants to associate with people like that.

Anonymous said...

The First Boog is really taking the piss, now. He is giving chunks of America away.

And no ... I am not exaggerating.

Obama's giveaway: Oil-rich islands to Russia

Exclusive: Joe Miller sounds alarm over deal to put land in hands of Putin's Kremlin
Published: 3 days ago

By Joe Miller

The Obama administration, despite the nation’s economic woes, effectively killed the job-producing Keystone Pipeline last month. The Arab Spring is turning the oil production of Libya and other Arab nations over to the Muslim Brotherhood. Iraq is distancing itself from the U.S. And everyone recognizes that Iran, whose crude supplies are critical to the European economy, will do anything it can to frustrate America’s strategic interests. In the face of all of this, Obama insists on cutting back U.S. oil potential with outrageous restrictions.

Part of Obama’s apparent war against U.S. energy independence includes a foreign-aid program that directly threatens my state’s sovereign territory. Obama’s State Department is giving away seven strategic, resource-laden Alaskan islands to the Russians. Yes, to the Putin regime in the Kremlin.

The seven endangered islands in the Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea include one the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined. The Russians are also to get the tens of thousands of square miles of oil-rich seabeds surrounding the islands. The Department of Interior estimates billions of barrels of oil are at stake.

The State Department has undertaken the giveaway in the guise of a maritime boundary agreement between Alaska and Siberia. Astoundingly, our federal government itself drew the line to put these seven Alaskan islands on the Russian side. But as an executive agreement, it could be reversed with the stroke of a pen by President Obama or Secretary Clinton.

The agreement was negotiated in total secrecy. The state of Alaska was not allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given any opportunity for comment. This is despite the fact the Alaska Legislature has passed resolutions of opposition – but the State Department doesn’t seem to care.

Truly, sleepwalking to the cliff edge.


barry said...

It's a fascinating question and one that's ultra important. I've read every one of the responses and I too think that there's a combination of all the ones identified in this post.

Comes from the top in the form of a general 'we must show diversity' then over to the agencies where lefties/libtards predominate, and there's then the genuine believe by wiggers and deluded white females that blacks really are desirable.

Anyway, it's a sad state of affairs.

barry said...

UN - about that Alaskan giveaway. I'm 99.99999% certain that there's a lot more to this than the excerpt shows. Such deals are done and dusted before they ever reach a President. The State and/or Defenze Departments don't just give away land to Russia or anyone else. I do know that there has beena long standing dispute over this area. I feel fairly sure that this is one thing that Obama cannot be blamed for.

Shaunantijihad said...

Blacks don't need insurance. The White man just keeps on giving when disaster strikes. Until...

Anonymous said...

barry said...

Such deals are done and dusted before they ever reach a President. The State and/or Defenze Departments don't just give away land to Russia or anyone else.

Barry, fair enough. A re-read of the article does not lay the blame at the feet of the anointed one. In fact common sense dictates that like all of them, he is merely an obnoxious patsy who will be tossed to the wolves when the time is ripe.

Still, it should be pointed out that someone in the US misgovernment is doing this, and that person, group, whatever are skating on the thin ice of treason in the real sense of the word.

Foolish me. I just naively used the word "treason."

"Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

Sir John Harrington (1600)


Anonymous said...

I think both of these are relevant ...

Fox Business News Closes Freedom Watch with Judge Napolitano

Fox Business Network is dropping three of their prime time shows, one including the top-rated show "Freedom Watch" hosted by Judge Napolitano.

Judge Napolitano covers topics from Occupy Wall street, to the National Defense Authorization Act. In fact he has been consistently pro-Ron Paul and anti-war.

I am sure that anyone who has watched a Napolitano broadcast, is amazed that he lasted as long as he did.


Media Control Is Real (And Always Has been)

As terrible as it is to live in a nation where the press i(s) known to be controlled by the government, at least one now has the advantage of knowing the bias is present, and to adjust for it.

In the United States of America, we are taught from birth that our press is free from such government meddling. This is an insidious lie about the very nature of the news institution in this country. One that allows the government to lie to us while denying the very fact of the lie itself.

The argument has been put forward by many in the group, that why would a company willfully, and with eyes wide open, make decisions that cost them money?

Note the words: "Top-rated" in regard to the Fox/Napolitano thing.

And I reiterate ... to these people money is not important.

They control it, they create it from nothing, they supply it to those they deem worthy.

They have fooled us into thinking that money is wealth.


Dixieland said...

Great comment on today's (British) Telegraph:

The catastrophic consequences of: (i) failing to maintain proper border controls;
(ii) hunting down and deporting the illegal immigrants;
(iii) deportation of criminals; and
(iv) throwing out passports like confetti to unemployable, useless Third Worlders are everywhere to be seen. I cannot recall having heard some xenophile-Quisling’s whining on about “diversity is our strength” for some time. Diversity is a curse, an act of war initiated by traitors with the aim of rendering whites a cowed minority in their ancestral lands. See Coleman’s forecasts. They make grim reading if you are white.

On every occasion when Migration Watch warned about the mass invasion of illegals all we heard from the treacherous, corrupt and mendacious Guardian–reading classes and very many Tories, including Cameron and his preposterous equal-opportunity appointee Warsi, were viciously racist comments about the members of the white indigenous population who objected to their being physically, racially and culturally dispossessed by the Third World. Mass immigration is destroying this country. What happened in August 2011 is a warning of what is to come.

One reason why the drought forecast for the South East will impose a severe strain is, yet again, mass immigration (legal or illegal). Housing is another problem exacerbated by Third Worlders who bring their sexually delinquent breeding habits with them from Africa, Pakistan, Somalia and India. Have 10 children in Somalia and find that you are unable to feed them: they die. Come to Britain and the white man pays for the lot (and for the hordes of “wives”).

The Telegraph

J Bull said...

Wow!! That's a brilliant comment from the Telegraph. Wonder if it will survive?

Anonymous said...

The government owns the press, but who owns the government?

The answer is obvious. Today is Washington's birthday. For whom is it a holiday?


Banks, and ancillary finance.

Nobody else.

Anonymous said...

Regarding the guardian quote, one part of me says that the holes in the agenda grow so large, that even the great unwashed are allowed to criticise.

The more cynical side of me, however, notes that the bitching and moaning and effing and blinding will not do one smidgen of good, and that the good ship Multicultitanic will not deviate from its catastrophic course by one fraction of a degree.

Secondly, I feel that allowing such seemingly anarchic comments -- especially in the Grauniad -- is merely throwing an occasional bone to the disaffected, buying ever more time (day by day, if necessary) until Armageddon dawns.

Someone once said that a week is an eternity in politics, so in politician years, a fortnight's grace is two eternities.

Just because they are privy to the workings of the system, does not make them very bright. The system is handed to them ... generation after generation.

After all if the negroid was not being perpetually propped up by a corrupt system of relentless western aid, untrammeled immigration and cynical spoon-feeding, they would have consumed each other into extinction, decades -- if not centuries -- ago.

So ... do not rejoice yet.


Anonymous said...

Meanwhile, back in Ireland ....

""Reports and surveys massively contradict the official figures of racist incidents recorded by the gardaĆ­ which are low.
This supports our view that only the smallest sample of racism is being captured and recorded."

TRANSLATION- If there aren't enough racist incidents happening to justify our quango jobs then we will have to make some more up or expand the definition of racism if possible.

"Respectable websites such as and regularly have discussion threads derailed by racist commentary."

TRANSLATION- If these websites don't censor free speech that we don't like more heavily then something will have to be done.

blueboy said...

"Respectable websites such as and regularly have discussion threads derailed by racist commentary."

Jesus, I love that. Derailed by racist commentary

As you say, if it's not part of the accepted discourse it's "derailed".

awakened said...

UN - don't worry. I for one am most certainly not 'rejoicing yet'.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Meanwhile, back in Ireland ....

""Reports and surveys massively contradict the official figures of racist incidents recorded by the gardaĆ­ which are low.
This supports our view that only the smallest sample of racism is being captured and recorded."

The alternative is too ghastly to contemplate ... it would mean that racism is dropping, and that I would have to ... start looking for a real job.

Can you imagine, six weeks into the collapse, this prat standing in the job queue?

"Previous work experience?"

"I was a ... aah ... an affirmative action consultant, new immigrant advisor and racism spotter."



Corkonian said...

"I was a ... aah ... an affirmative action consultant, new immigrant advisor and racism spotter."


UN - it's happened to a degree. One of the Equality Industry's leaders, Niall Crowley, resigned in protest at funding cuts for his quango. He's currently just scratching around looking for something useful (NOT) to do.

Anonymous said...

If you think this all state stuff is bad:

A few saturdays ago i was drinking in a late pub/club in a small town in the west of Ireland.
It was packed and everyone in there was white. Mostly locals and a few eastern europeans too.

there was a large poster on one wall advertising the large back room for wedding receptions, birthdays, things like that. Guess what couple was on the poster ...
blonde, blue-eyed woman and mixed race man.

Anonymous said...

Here's one.

Border scandal: 500,000 passengers allowed to enter Britain without checks

More than 500,000 people were allowed into Britain unchecked due to the repeated suspension of vital checks, opening up an “unacceptable” breach in the country’s defences against terrorists and criminals, an official investigation has found.

At times immigration staff acted potentially illegally by relaxing the supervision of travellers entering this country at least 15,000 times in the last five years, John Vine, the independent inspector of the Border Agency, found.

Such was the confusion and mismanagement uncovered that Mr Vine raised concerns about security during the London Olympics.

His report, published yesterday afternoon, left Theresa May, the Home Secretary, facing fresh questions about her grip on border security and the Coalition’s failure to get a grip on problems she claimed had began under Labour.

From what I am told, you won't find many white faces in the hallowed halls of Customs and Immigration at Heathrow and Gatwick.


Piet said...

'From what I am told, you won't find many white faces in the hallowed halls of Customs and Immigration at Heathrow and Gatwick.'

UN - write that fucking down. A porch monkey berated the shit out of me there because I'd been talking in the phone. She shouted to 'turn it off'. I swear I culd have stangled the bitch there and then. But I had to fucking do it.