Sunday, 15 January 2012

This is the way

A comment by Kilburn High Road directed us to this site. Good news to see that a group of 300 or so English people can walk relatively unmolested in the Queen's Realm. Progress of a kind, I suppose. What I particularly liked was the way, based on the pic here, they turned elements of the PC vocabulary to their own advantage.

"Extremists off our streets" Beautiful!

This is how to do it, not by way of crudities along the lines of 'niggers out'. Remember, it's the invaders (for the most part violent, ignorant and intolerant parasites) that are doing the things that ordinary decent citizens object to. It follows that innocuous and desirable slogans along the lines of "Extremists off our streets" brings the demonstrators into the respectable mainstream. I mean if you have a demo with banners like "Make out streets safe again", "Yes to religious freedom, no to intolerance", "The same laws for everyone", interspersed with a goodly proportion of national flags and banners........who could object to that?

It's the way forward, no question about that. Congrats to the EDL.

By the way I was amused that a motley collection of Jamaicans, Arabs and Pakistanis shouted at the marchers "to s*d off back to East Anglia". Is that ironical or what?

31 comments:

whitevanman said...

Agreed 100%.

Mick McManus said...

"a motley collection of Jamaicans, Arabs and Pakistanis shouted at the marchers "to s*d off back to East Anglia"....

It hardly needs saying but these dusky invaders now consider most of London to be their territory, most of the original inhabitants having been ethnically cleansed out to Essex, and even on to Suffolk and Norfolk.

Barking and Dagenham were until relatively recently, white, working-class strongholds but, the continuing flood of African immigrants into Britain, combined with the anti-white housing policies of the local council, means that these two areas are now becoming enriched at a frighteningly fast pace.

When the blacks and Asians start moving into Essex and then East Anglia, in massive numbers, where will white-flight head for then?

Dave C said...

"When the blacks and Asians start moving into Essex and then East Anglia, in massive numbers, where will white-flight head for then?"

The Scottish highlands?

Ireland??

Anonymous said...

@DaveC

One hopes it never happens but you are welcome in Ireland.

Unfortunately we are experiencing an accelerated,VERY accelerated version of what took 50 years to destroy Britain.

Its why I never criticize Eastern Europeans:they are white and dilute the proportion of the african influx.

Our problem is,so far,african.The proportion of muslims is small though destined to grow of course.As per the plan.

I notice that the spell check on my computer now tells me not to spell african or muslim without capitalization.

mr.a

Anonymous said...

Funny, that. I would have thought that "Sod off back to East Anglia" would be regarded as hate speech ... but then, what would I know?

The most interesting part of all this nonsense, is that the british flatfoots have been reduced to irrelevance ... as far as law enforcement is concerned, anyway.

They are now nothing more than muscle for the coagulation -- and are seen to be as such.

So, by implication, when (not if) the present system collapses, so do the police. Their only remaining reason for being disappears and they become a slightly better-dressed and more recognisable gang, with more expensive toys.

Any advantage their more expensive -- and dangerous -- toys may afford them is negated by their diversity.

Can you imagine a fifty-year-old poof or a porky forty-year-old lesbian being a threat when the streets are aflame?

Look at their performance during the recent riots and there's your answer.

UN
.

Hector said...

The police in Britain are just PC enforcers. Nothing more. And the ambitious know that this, not what we know as good policework, is the path to advancement. They act accordingly.

Anonymous said...

Savant,

Off topic, but an interesting video re 9/11 from Dr. Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan), Former Director of Studies, US Army War College: US Military Knows Israel did 9/11.

Frank_Galton

Anonymous said...

Exactly. Beat the bastards at their own game.

Bemused stare said...

Your question,

I mean if you have a demo with banners like "Make out streets safe again", "Yes to religious freedom, no to intolerance", "The same laws for everyone", interspersed with a goodly proportion of national flags and banners........who could object to that?

the answer,

By the way I was amused that a motley collection of Jamaicans, Arabs and Pakistanis shouted at the marchers "to s*d off back to East Anglia".

Interestingly, few seem to get it.

Jeremy said...

Clever response BS but I think IS is basically right in that the great mass of the country, even the 'liberals' could hardly object to such aspirations.

Bemused stare said...

Jeremy said...

Clever response BS but I think IS is basically right in that the great mass of the country, even the 'liberals' could hardly object to such aspirations.


*sigh*
Jeremy, the libby's are the problem here. You might be astounded at what they would find offensive. Liberalism is a mental perversion, not a form of retardation. They are well aware of what the enrichers are about. The problem is that they like the idea of living in their enricher free areas, while reading about ordinary people being robbed, raped and murdered in job lots every day. They get off on it.

eh said...

Thanks for the link.

Here you see the math they use:

“Auschwitz” she cried.
“Never again” was the response.
The Holocaust – Never again.
Stephen Lawrence – Never again.
Dauchau – Never again.


Opposition to immigration = xenophobia = racism = ethnic nationalism = racially motivated persecution = future genocide.

It's pathetic really. But it's as close to an argument that they usually have to put up -- the media do the rest.

Anonymous said...

Jeremy said...

Clever response BS but I think IS is basically right in that the great mass of the country, even the 'liberals' could hardly object to such aspirations.

Someone, I forget who, once stated that "Their arguments, not being based in logic, cannot be refuted by logic."

To argue with a liberal is to argue with a spoiled, wilful five-year-old.

To win an argument with a liberal one has to argue the same way as you would with a nigger. Listen to what he says, hear him out ... then smack him on the side of the head with the flat of a cricket bat.

Crude, but effective.

Do not waste breath and logic on them.

UN
.

Jeremy said...

BS and UN. I'm not really focused on the libbies. I'm focusing on the great mass of 'ordinary' people out there who will look at those signs (assuming of course that the MSM show them - big assumption) and say that they are perfectly reasonable. The libbies can scream racism as they do, but how can an 'end intolerance' banner be racist?

Anonymous said...

Savant,

Forgot to post the link.

Re: Off topic, but an interesting video re 9/11 from Dr. Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan), Former Director of Studies, US Army War College: US Military Knows Israel did 9/11.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alMC9AoF9I8


Frank_Galton

SAVANT said...

Thanks anon for that link to Dr. Sabrosky. I came across it when researching 9/11. Isn't it amazing it has echieved greater prominence?

Anonymous said...

Some movie was made about a guy who turned a school around and made it a success so that the state of New Jersey did not take it over,
He was in it!
And it turned out that the real school was not under threat of being taken over by the state but it was two years later after being saved.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naLMuvR6Xp4&feature=related

not in their disguises!

gala said...

anon 18.28. You realise this guy is taking the piss?

Bay Area Guy said...

Excellent post, and a message that I think needs to be sent to more pro-white/Western activists.

Too many are consumed by ideological purity and a militant attitude, and as a result their actions alienate mainstream whites who otherwise share their fundamental grievances over immigration, multiculturalism, etc.

This is a step in the right direction.

Ann on a mouse said...

May I humbly suggest that you also follow this sensible example with your fine blog? Your blog raises many important topics that need to be discussed in ever widening circles. However, the overt racist language used commonly here (and blogs such as'Puppy love' below) will instantly turn away the majority of folk browsing and possibly looking to engage with 'non MSM' views.

Whilst I would in no way suggest limiting free speech, I personally think that a few house rules regarding denigrating language should be instituted. This blog is too smart, too important, to throw about idle slurs, turn potential fellow travellers off and possibly get into hot water with the powers that be.

I agree with a lot of what Savant says, and admire him for saying it so proudly, and whilst I am utterly against the destructive effects of mass third world immigration, I also have educated black friends (most of whom agree with our logic and thinking), but I would be ashamed if they new that I perused a site that often referred to them as 'Erectus' 'porch monkey' et al. That for me, and believe me I'm no liberal, is a step too far, and therefore a step too far for many, many more potential readers.

Apologies Savant, if this seems overvstepping the Mark. Just something I thought I'd express. Good work in general though. Good on you.

Anonymous said...

Ann on a Mouse

- I agree.

Anonymous said...

"a motley collection of Jamaicans, Arabs and Pakistanis shouted at the marchers "to s*d off back to East Anglia"

I always try to ask, where possible, if people who hold that point of view would consider a vote on who to allow into their community, those outsider troublemakers not being wanted.

Because if they do, well, we can extend that line of thinking a lot further.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, Mark, real life's not like the movies: Wahlberg apologises for 'ridiculous' claim that he could have fought 9/11 terrorists and landed plane

'If I was on that plane with my kids, it wouldn't have went down like it did. There would have been a lot of blood in that first class cabin and then me saying "OK, we're going to land somewhere safely, don't worry".'


Read more: Dude is not black

Jabba the Pizza Hut Moore stated that the reason the planeswere hi-jacked was because there was not enough athletic American-Africans on the flight. And this guy knows about athleticizm.

Anonymous said...

Ann on a mouse said ...

Quite a few things, actually

May I humbly suggest ...

... overt racist language used commonly here ...

... looking to engage with 'non MSM' views.

... Whilst I would in no way suggest limiting free speech, I personally think that a few house rules regarding denigrating language should be instituted ...

... possibly get into hot water with the powers that be ...


and my favourite:-

I also have educated black friends (most of whom agree with our logic and thinking)

Short answer -- from me anyway:-

No.

You do not want to hear my long answer.

Just for fun, nip back to this post and count the lefty buzzwords. It clangs like a New York Times editorial.

UN
.

SAVANT said...

Ann on a mouse - thanks for the comment and meant to get back sooner.

You make an interesting point. You could be right and I could be wrong, and I do want this blog's, and that of similar blogs, to grow as much as possible.

My policy is that - you'll agree - I don't use those terms you refer to myself. However I believe in letting commentators have their say. In fact if you check out even some of the MSM blogs you'll see that they allow words similar to those you disapprove of.

Anyway, stay with us!

Ann on a mouse said...

UN,

I'd be only too happy to hear your long answer.

Just to point out though, I wasn't asking you.

Glad you found it entertaining,, the thought of having educated black friends must just crack you up.

Once again I suggest, humbly, that the more a blog like this becomes replete with petty, childish racial slurs, the more it will SOLELY attract angry, bitter men who through their inability to move beyond name calling do more harm than good.

I doubt 'nigger' is a term that would last long on any msm blog. Rise above it!

Ann on a mouse.

Elaine said...

Ann on a mouse - I'm with you on this. Even though I'm not racist or xenophobic I enjoy this blog because it's stimulating, original and very amusing. Not an easy combination to achieve.

Like you I get turned off by the ugly racist comment by some readers.

You echo my sentiments.

Krokodil said...

Only checking Savant's blog after several days - wish I'd been here earlier - and, here here, quite agree with you Ann on a mouse.

Not to dis any other fellow travellers on this blog, but your comment is a welcome bit of balance, in my opinion.

My main issue is with our wondrous elected representatives allowing the mega-inflow of non-Whites into White countries, and the propaganda of so-called multiculturalism, plus the distorted bullshit of the MSM - NOT about Blacks, Mozzies, whoever per se.

I also have one or two Black friends (and at least one or two Mozzie acquaintances), and don't go along with some of the more racially-insulting comments.

Krokodil said...

Here here ... where, there?

LOL, hear hear, I meant of course.

Anonymous said...

<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2127848/Louise-Mensch-Frank-Zimmerman-sent-chilling-email-Tory-MP-threatening-children.html>Agoraphobis idiot sends Tory MP a threat to kill one of her children</a>

If this guy gets less than 56 days in prison, which will do him the world of good, be sure to complain to any national media that you can think of!