I’ve been thinking lately about the hierarchy of victims. As every university undergraduate learns within weeks of arriving, everyone is a victim – apart of course from straight, white Christian males. But who are the top victims? This, like the Premiership, is dominated by a small number of clubs who move up and down relative to one another, but never out of the top six. And remember, just like the Premiership, your place in the hierarchy has a very major impact on your financial wellbeing. In fact, that’s what it’s ultimately all about.
For a few decades after WW II Jews almost had the title to themselves, but even they don’t have the chutzpah to claim they’re downtrodden victims today. In any event they’ve cornered the genocide/holocaust market and can trot this out any time a new genocide/holocaust is imminent (e.g. if there’s talk of reducing US aid to Israel or Palestinians getting their own state).
Women have had a great run, most definitely displacing blacks from the top rung for a while. But again, who can seriously claim victimhood status for them? Polar opposite, they’ll clean out men in a divorce, any complaint of sexual harassment will be accepted and the unfortunate able-bodied straight white Christian male gets the book thrown at him. They’re promoted way beyond their capabilities in every organisation, and have been forced into those where they have no business whatsoever (military, police, fire fighters).
Despite having hairy-chested foul-smelling dykes like Andrea Dworkin leading their cause, Perverts United (gays, lesbians, trans-sexuals) have been climbing the table strongly in recent years. They’ve surpassed females for sure. Remember the case during the Summer when two sheboons kicked the lard out of a trans-sexual ‘woman’ in a McDonald’s somewhere? Well, this hardly raised a peep in the Lamestream Media until it was discovered that she/he was a gender changer. Then all hell broke loose.
So straight women have been passed by Perverts United and also by blacks. Remember there wasn’t a peep when it was thought that the victim here was an ordinary straight (admittedly white) female, largely because the attackers were victim aristocracy - blacks. And the last US Presidential Election underlined that. Do you think for one instant that, had Obama been white, he’d have got even 20% of the votes that he did? So black trumps female, and it’s likely to stay that way for a long time given their chronic inability to succeed in anything, even to provide basic necessities for themselves, without heavy ongoing white commitment.
So who takes the top spot, the kings of victimhood? It’s got to be Muslims. Look, most of the groups I've mentioned do have some claim to victimhood - they’ve all been kept down to one degree or another at some time. But it’s hard to image a less likely collection of victims than violent, intolerant, misogynistic, undemocratic, homophobic, genital mutilating, head and hand cutting, polygamous, child bride-fucking Muslims. They follow the lead of the perfect man "The Prophet" (Peace Be Upon The Fucker - PBUTF).
Yet they get a free pass on everything. They’re constantly ‘offended’ by everything and anything in Western Civilisation, and we bend over backwards to remove even the perception of such offence. When they hang homosexuals in Iran, or cut the heads off adulterers in Saudi Arabia, or when a young girl becomes an honour killing victim in the west, the chattering classes and the other victim groups are silent.
So for those reasons Muzzies get my coveted Top Victim award.
Do you agree?