Saturday, 20 August 2011

“The best lack all conviction........."

“The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity”

The words of WB Yeats spring to mind whenever I contemplate the latest batch of American Presidential hopefuls. How - in God’s name - can a nation that provides the cream of the world’s technical, scientific, literary, economic, entertainment and entrepreneurial talent toss up such a melange of dross, year after year?

Corrupt bought-and-paid-for clones, or sock puppets like Obama, or know-nothing failures like GW Bush or Sarah Palin. People you wouldn’t vote in as the town’s dog-catcher get to finger the nuclear button. Look at the collection lining up for next year’s contest. Worthless nobodies, without exception.

Well, with one exception actually.

Ron Paul.

Profound knowledge, education and wisdom. Searing intellect. Been proven right again and again. Most definitely not in the corporate pocket, or that of any other lobby. He believes the corrupt racket that is the Federal Reserve should be closed down or trammelled. He refuses to go for the weasel words of evasion and spin. He even straddles the Third Rail by opposing the insane policy of near-bankrupt America transferring billions of dollars every year to Israel. He points out the obvious (obvious to everyone other than the Israel Firsters in Congress) that Iran poses no danger whatsoever to the US, which should under no circumstances even consider a war.

Everything he says and does resonates of wisdom, sensibility and truth.

Surely it’s one of life’s mysteries that, despite this, he gets virtually no mainstream coverage? And if he occasionally does it’s to dismiss him as a frivolous eccentric? In fact it’s no mystery at all. It's not despite, but because of his qualities that he gets this treatment. Or non-treatment. An honest, super-intelligent America-Firster? DANGEROUS!

But now one of the MSM has broken ranks. Jon Stewart has devoted a major part of one show to expose this particular scandal. Be interesting to see how it runs from here on in. Maybe Dr. Paul does have a chance after all.

And may I here reiterate a point I've made on a number of occasions. Stewart is Jewish. A Jewish guy has blown the gaff, not a pseudo patriot of the O’Reilly or Limbaugh ilk. My point? Don’t tar all Jews with the same brush.


john said...

Paul gets very little, and NO positive, coverage in the MSM for precisely the reasons you give. And while he does indeed appear to be the best of those being put forth for the job, he is certainly not the best for it.
And don't give stewart a pass quite yet- I'm sure he has an angle. He has been FAR from right [in both senses of the word] and honest in the past.Genetics will overcome any honest convictions that may have strayed into his brain methinks...

kulak said...

Not this shit again.

Establishment Libertarianism is just a way for white people who don't like the welfare/warfare state to rationalize acceptance of white genocide.

We can survive the Federal Reserve.

(And as the pagan Nordic saying goes Better to be without silver than without honor.)

We can survive a war with Iran.

What we can't survive is what Ron Paul (and all of the others) doesn't like to talk about.

And when he does, he does NOT resonate with "wisdom, sensibility, truth."

Just the opposite.

Ron Paul is anti-racist.

Ron Paul is anti-white.

The Ron Paul "revolution" is as fake as the Reagan.


Aw geez Savant, you think the little brother of the COO of the NYSE is your friend?

Stewart spoke up for Paul! Victory is at hand!

Jesus.*shakes head*.

Vote Obama.

joelgp said...

kulak - I could also say 'not this shit again'. But I won't. What I will say is that not all Jews, not even a majority in my first-hand experience, are anti-white, pro-immigration, pro-black. You are, with respect, simply worng when you say that. And no, those people are NOT pulling the wool over the eyes of the goyim. Having said that I cannot speak for the hochjuden who might be up to all the shenanigans you take such delight in shoving down our throats.

kulak said...

An honest, super-intelligent America-Firster?

Paul is 76. About the same age as me ma.

That means he has seen a lot.

Think about it. How many 76-year-olds are PC?

Yet Paul is.

The REAL objection of Establishment Libertarians to the welfare/warfare state is that, in combination with white genocide, it will make them poor.


I will grant that the little brother of the COO of the NYSE may be YOUR friend.

I doubt the average Tea Partier would agree that he is their friend, and I don't think they're wrong.

I am voting Obama. Not that he needs my help -- I think he'll win handily.

john said...

joelgp - I'll not get into a "census" of jews here, but the inarguable FACT is that the ones behind all the anti-white, pro immigration, zionist-communist etc etc programs and propaganda you cite, are overwhelmingly jew. And if not, they are backed by / beholden a jew run corporation / media outlet / bank / PAC /etc. This is beyond refute, and one of the major weaknesses of Paul. He rightly condemns the federal reserve for instance, but fails in telling the electorate the WHO and WHY of it's creation and power. He does not, to the best of my knowledge, openly "call a spade a spade" , either literally or figuratively. Still, he represents, I believe, the least of all the evils that are currently "in the running".

Hunsdon said...

kulak: You're going to have to break it out for me, brother. I'm a Ron Paul fan. Long time, long time gone. I was a Ron Paul fan back in the 1980s, back in the day of the monthly mailed-out newsletter, and I am today. Spell it out for me, tell me what's wrong with Ron?

To me, he's the best kind of (American) patriot. Did his time in the service, doesn't let that blind him to the idiocies that surround us. For the Constitution, against the Fed. Against the welfare state, against the warfare state.

Break it down for me, brother: just what makes Ron such a debbil? Lay out your arguments, convince me.

Franz said...

Great post Savant. You reached the same conclusion as Arthur Clegg of the BNP who's been writing favourably about RP for years.

Is RP a race realist? No, not in the way as most of us posting here.

Would a RP presidency be to the benefit of white people? Yes. That I firmly believe.

See, the US operates on an invite/invade policy. A war with Iran or whomever else would not only entail killing hundreds of thousands of people, but bringing millions of them to the USA and its NATO allies.

Just look at the preponderance of Somalis in the Western world starting in 1991. That is the invite/invade policy in action.

If, on the other hand, Obama gets another term in 2012 an all out civil/race war in the USA is almost a given.

If neither RP nor Obama make it and another faux conservative like Romney or Perry gets in the white house, it's all over for white America.

They'll ratch up invite/invade, import further gazillions of cheap workers from Mexico and otherwise do just what their Wall Street handlers tell them to do. And white America won't notice because the guy in the WH is "one of them".

PS: Agree on the man Jon Stewart. His family is big in the moneyhandling establishment of NY and depends on the Fed for nourishment. Despite that and despite him and RP being polar opposites idiologically, he saw a guy getting shafted unfairly and spoke up. Done like a true gentleman, Mr Stewart.

Anonymous said...

Unfortunetly, our Presidents are elected long before the voters cast their votes.
It is those that control the media that elect our so called leaders.
Ron Paul doesn't stand a chance in hell to be President.
If he even gets close, the media will obliviate him.
The US is a nation of sheeple that worship the talking heads on our cable news outlets.
CNN, FOX, ABC, MSN, ect.

During the election cycle here in the states, its full media saturation 24/7 to control minds.
A two party system with one head leads to no opitions.
Even if Paul was elected, the power remains in the banks, not the Presidency.

The system is rotten from top to bottom.

pino said...

I have a number of Jewish friends and all are against mass immigration to the west, and most of the things that get people excited on this blog. Some almost fanatical on the issues. And no, they're not pulling the wool over this goy's eyes, I've know them for donkey's years.

SAVANT said...

Could I interject here guys? I feel we're falling into the trap that I call the SAS Syndrome. I'm referring here to the late lamented South Africa Sucks blog. A characteristic here was the the tendency to flame out at one another where there was even a mild disagreement. This had serious consequences, not least in the outing of the Uhuru Guru.

So I make two points. First, I am NOT saying that RP is the perfect candidate, or that he doesn't take positionns of which i disapprove. Second, I'm not saying that Jon Stewart is perfect either - bloody far from it in his case.

If someone wants to point out flaws with either of them, well feel free and I'll publish. But I'll stand over what I've said about both, and the implications of same.

Franz said...

@ JoelGP

..."not all Jews, not even a majority in my first-hand experience, are anti-white, pro-immigration, pro-black."

I don't know about percentages, but I'd second the general impetus of the notion. Every group of people has their outliers, so do the Hebrews. To claim that ALL Jews are scheeming bastards is counterproductive and I think counterfactual.

Chinese have a propensity to be degenerate gamblers, yet not all of them are.

Germans have a propensity to despise humor, yet not all of us do.

The Irish have a propensity to overindulge in strong drink, yet not all of them are lushs.

Erectus has a propensity to be a smelly, violent numbskull, yet there is such a thing as the "talented tenth".

What I would say about the Jews ist that an unusual percentage among them has a propensity to be scheeming bastards. Is it 20%, 30% or 40%? I don't know. But historically, it has always been enough to gain them
visibility as evil scheeming bastards.

With such brethren, being an honest Jew must suck really bad.

My advice to them: Expel the Blankfeins, Bernankes, Rubins, Axelrods and Emanuels from your synagogues. Even if it results in a serious religious schism.

As long as honest, hard-working and god-fearing Jews loyally stand by the side of the aforementioned sociopaths, they'll be smeared by the association.

If they ever cease their misplaced loyalty towards criminals, they'll find life much more progrom-free in the future.

Keir said...

Can't be arsed to comment on American politics. Palin will throw her bonnet in and everyone else (apart from Ron Paul) will make it their avowed policy to exhort people to pray to a supernatural deity to fix everything the way it was. Just wanted to say I force my students to memorise Yeats's poem. "Things fall apart, centre cannot hold, mere anarchy loosed upon the world..." explains everything from the causes of the Great War to the decline of the West.

Heraclitus said...

Franz - not for the first time you encapsulate the situation perfectly. I'd just add that I'm generally within Savant's thrust, namely, it's unfair and indeed counterproductive to make an enemy of every Jew.

kulak said...


I already told you.

This is VERY simple.

Ron Paul is anti-racist.

Ron Paul is anti-white.

Ron Paul does not get a pass because he is against the Federal Reserve.

Ron Paul does not get a pass because he is against welfare.

Ron Paul does not get a pass because he voted against the Patriot Act.

Ron Paul does not get a pass because he is against foreign aid.

Ron Paul does not get a pass because he is against the wars.

Ron Paul is anti-white.

kulak said...

"in a healthy economy, immigrants wouldn’t be a threat to us." -- Ron Paul

For Respectable Conservatives, we are a Culture, and that's all we are.

For Establishment Libertarians, we are an Economy, -- and that's ALL we are.

In a good economy, Establishment Libertarians DEMAND open borders. They say it'll all be just SWELL under FREEDOM.

Only the massive downturn has forced SOME of them to retreat on that a LITTLE, belatedly, reluctantly.

Establishment Libertarians say immigration is a problem because immigrants are attracted by subsidies.

Establishment Libertarians also say Libertarianism will make the country freer, richer, more SUCCESSFUL.

This freer, richer, more SUCCESSFUL country is therefore supposed to be a LESS attractive target for immigration?

Oh, but THEN they won't be on the DOLE.

And that's right.

They'll live in sprawling ramshackle slums without services on the outskirts of big cities, just like in Latin America and Africa today.

And in California today.

And they'll vote.

Establishment Libertarians say they are anti-racist.

What they are is anti-white.

Anonymous said...

I think Paul has real principles. I'm not so sure he's anti-white, even though he did kowtow to the anti-white forces during the last election. Though he has genuine beliefs, he is not perfect and he gave in to pressure. Unfortunately, if he were honest about race, even a little bit, he would not be able to hold his seat in Congress even for a few days.

Franz said...

@ Kulak

"Ron Paul is anti-white"

To quote the Dude: "Yeah, well that's just like, uh, your opinion man."

Many attributes come to mind when I think of the old man, but anti-white is not among them.

He is not a race-realist in the sense that many of us are, but does that make him white-guilt-tripping maniac?

I remember well that Mr Paul was the only man of reknown in Western hemisphere politics who spoke out against spoon-feeding the Haitians buckets full of taxpayer money after the earthquake there.

Then there are his ideas on Israel and the banks. Uttering those got RP called an "antisemite" more times than Oprah had fried chicken for lunch.

Taking and sticking to those positions took courage. Not grovelling took courage. And to point out the obvious: It took more courage than any of us posting anonimously on the internet have.

Let's give credit where credit is due.

You pointed out some obvious flaws in RP's libertarian positions and these flaws are the very reason I am not a card-carrying Libertarian.

Yet not to agree a 100% with somebody does not necessarily imply dismissing that person out of hand. Especially not call that person names. That should remain the perogative of the Left.

To misquote former supreme court judge Potter Stewart: Courage and integrity are hard to define, but I know 'em when I see 'em.

I see 'em in Ron Paul, ideological differences be damned.

nemesis said...

OK - I make one point and rest my case: RP is streets ahead of anyone else in the race as of now.

Anonymous said...

Boers on level 6 genocidewatch

Eimear said...

This problem of the Boers almost makes me weep. Buit a question: Why dont they go to Orania?

Anonymous said...

For those who are to-ing and fro-ing about the vices and virtues of Ron Paul as a candidate, I give you this.

It's long ... but informative.

(2008) Welcome to Western Voices, I'm John Young of European Americans United. My friend and fellow board member Frank Roman won't be producing his usual pod cast today. He's in the middle of moving; but you can rest assured that "he'll be back."

Today I'm going to veer from our well-beaten path of economics, ethics, race and psychology to explore the world of politics. Specifically, I'd like to speak with you a bit about why EAU, as an organization, is supporting Ron Paul.

EAU was the first European-American advocacy organization to endorse a candidate for President of the United States; and the reason we did so has a great deal to do with the underpinnings of our political advocacy, as well as the candidate we chose.

One of the problems that has plagued pro-European-American advocacy for the past sixty years is the way it has become intertwined with totalitarian ideologies. This has caused two problems. First, it has confounded their ethno-cultural message with advocacy for ideologies that are fundamentally incompatible with the folk-soul of our people; and second, it has effectively removed these organizations from the political sphere because philosophical consistency requires them to eschew the democratic process.

(continues ...)

I am not going to weigh in on this argument for two reasons.

I know nothing about Ron Paul as a politician and, at this stage, I no longer care.

It ain't gonna happen. Anyone who is elected to position of First Wastrel will only be there with the permission and connivance of the kingmakers. Besides, who cares? Democracy is all smoke and mirrors -- we know it. Rather like the insurance company's definition of an act of God ... a convenient legal fiction.

You know who they are. They are the ones who have been doing it for two centuries now.

Secondly, I feel that the only way to lasting change in America -- if not the world -- is the targeted assassination of key figures on the left ... a la Breivik. I feel that's where we've gotten to.

John Ayers and helicopter Ben would be a good start, followed by the big cheeses at SPLC and a few members of the black caucus.

Take out, oh, say, a dozen or two of them, then sit back and wait for a week or two. The only thing they value is their own skins.

Too radical? Well, let's put it this way. When you've chipped the milk jug, you can glue the piece back and all is fine.
When the jug has been shattered again and again, then one must look at tossing it and making or buying a new one.

It's been done before. Often. The Poms had no-one they felt would be a half-way decent king, so they imported George the First from Germany aus. It was quite common at one stage.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul does not care about immigration, illegal or otherwise. We can't afford to have a man that dense in the WH.

ironman said...

'Ron Paul does not care about immigration, illegal or otherwise. We can't afford to have a man that dense in the WH.'

Ok. So who you got in mind then?

Anonymous said...

This Young American woman has just posted a video on youtube claiming that not only does race correlates with IQ but commits the greatest pc heresy there is by claiming that racism is natural. Yep some cohonies.

womam as more

Ps. She's also Jewish.

Franz said...

@ UN

"It ain't gonna happen. Anyone who is elected to position of First Wastrel will only be there with the permission and connivance of the kingmakers."

On my gloomier days, I'd be inclined to agree with you. This day however is not one of those.

I agree with you that the democratic process is flawed. Deeply so. Most who make it to the top are indeed subservient puppies.

But if all hope is lost, how do you explain the presidency of Andrew Jackson? Or more recently, the democratic election of Adolf Hitler? Mind you, I'm not comparing Ron Paul to either of those.

Both made it to the top despite announcing in advance that they intended to kick assorted people of influence in the teeth. Hard.

In the end, Americans had ample reason to be grateful to Jackson for administering a well-measured kicking.

In the case of Hitler, things didn't work out so good. The intended kickees put up a fight and ended up doing most of the kicking themselves.

Kicking aside: The point is that sometimes popular revulsion against the Status Quo™ is so overwhelming that radical canidates have indeed sufficient votes to win elections.

When that is the case, the powers that be have to make a choice: Break out the stormtroopers and burn the ballots or board their jets towards the Caribean.

I honestly believe that at some point in the next decade Rahm, Bernanke, Schumer et al will have to make that choice. Depending on what they choose, Americans will then have to a) celebrate a victory, b) put up with it or c) switch into Road Warrior mode.

God knows they have stored enough ammunition for the latter scenario.

Anonymous said...

Back to Airstrip One ...

Those who think I am inclined to be a bit radical in my posts Please check this out ...

... and scroll to:-

Rioters Shoot at Police Helicopter

I don’t believe the footage in this video was really taken in Birmingham. Or it must have been faked somehow. Everybody knows there are no guns in England. Britain instituted a stringent gun control regime in order to prevent exactly these sorts of incidents.

This couldn’t really be happening in England, could it?

Oh, yes it could. And what have the luvvies and the MSM said about it?

Not a lot ... after all this is England ... no?

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Cat ... once again, allow me to introduce you to pigeons.

probably the most telling quote is one from Lawrence Auster, who is ... a Jew.

O'Farrell then quotes a Lawrence Auster article titled Why Jews Welcome Muslims that I've quoted several times myself:

Just the other week I was telling a secular, leftist Jew of my acquaintance, a man in his late sixties, about my idea that the only way to make ourselves safe from the specter of domestic Moslem terrorism is to deport all jihad-supporting Moslems from this country. He replied with emotion that if America deported Moslem fundamentalists, it would immediately start doing the same thing to Jews as well. “It’s frightening, it’s scary,” he said heatedly, as if the Jews were already on the verge of being rounded up. In the eyes of this normally phlegmatic and easy-going man, America is just a shout away from the mass persecution, detention, and even physical expulsion of Jews. Given the wildly overwrought suspicions that some Jews harbor about the American Christian majority who are in fact the Jews’ best friends in the world, it is not surprising that these Jews look at mass Third-World and Moslem immigration, not as a danger to themselves, but as the ultimate guarantor of their own safety, hoping that in a racially diversified, de-Christianized America, the waning majority culture will lack the power, even if it still has the desire, to persecute Jews.

The self-protective instinct to divide and weaken a potentially oppressive majority population may have served Jews well at certain times and places in the past when they truly were threatened. Under current circumstances – in America, the most philo-Semitic nation in the history of the world – it is both morally wrong and suicidal. Not only are the open-borders Jews urging policies harmful to America’s majority population, but, by doing so, they are surely triggering previously non-existent anti-Jewish feelings among them. The tragedy is that once a collective thought pattern gets deeply ingrained, as is the Jews’ historically understandable fear of gentiles, it takes on a life of its own and becomes immune to evidence and reason.... What this means is that in the minds of Jews, any desire on the part of gentiles to maintain an all-gentile country club, or any statement by a Christian, no matter how mild and civilized, that shows any concern about any aspects of the cultural and political influence of secular Jews in American life, is an expression of anti-Jewish bigotry that could easily lead to mass extermination, and therefore it must be ruthlessly suppressed.

Lawrence Auster's site is here:-

All I will contribute is: Eschew the troublemakers, Lads -- you know who they are ... and get rid of the notion that every goy wants you up the chimney.

Behave yourselves. Control the knaves among you before it's too late and you run clean out of friends.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

I think you have to be a certain age to find this funny. I nearly wet my combinations ...

A lonely older lady, aged 75, decided it was time to get married. She put a want ad in the local paper that read:

"HUSBAND WANTED. Must be in my age group, must not beat me, must not run around on me, and must still be good in bed. All applicants must apply in person."

On the second day of the ad she heard the doorbell ring. Much to her dismay, when she opened the door, there sat a man in a wheelchair. He had no arms or legs.

She asked sardonically "You're not expecting me to consider you, are you? Just look at you. You have no legs!"

The old man smiled, "Therefore no chance to run around on you!"

She snorted, "You have no arms either!"

Again the old man smiled. "Nor can I beat you."

The old lady raised her eyebrows and gazed at him intensely.

"Are you still good in bed?" she asked.

The old man smirked and said, "I rang the doorbell, didn't I?"


Anonymous said...

Music Break

jocomo said...

UN - this from Auster and your own comments reflect my views exactly. There is this deep visceral fear, rational or nor not. It's becoming highly irrational by now, in my view, because it's leading to the exact opposite of what is intended.

Many Jews are speaking out against the depradations being visited by their kin on the west, but many many more need to.

tokyo paddy said...

Uncle Nasty - your drastic solution might provide some short-term satisfaction, but in fact it would be playing into the hands of the real powers. Also, given the way these powers are now prying, you might need to be careful saying such things or you might experience the midnight knock!

Anonymous said...

At first thought, this may seem irrelevant ... but when one considers the way the world is turning into a comic opera, maybe it ain't.

I refer to the reports of Tripoli falling to the Libyan rebels who seem to be led by Gilbert and Sullivan.

Or perhaps Laurel and Hardy?

The above is probably the most sensible assessment of what the hell is going on.

Uncle Nasty

George said...

I am voting Obama. Not that he needs my help...
Yeah, some people bought Edsels too.

store man said...

Definite - vote Obama 2012. Remember, the worse the better. Let it get totaly fucked up, then the white masses might wake up from their stupor.

Corkonian said...

Ok - off topic. But I was down in Tralee today and found that every second person I passed was black. I ask, what the fuck are they doing in such numbers down in the arse-end of Kerry?

Anonymous said...


Re Tralee

I'm sorry to hear that?!?
I remember staying there a couple of nights during a hitch hiking holiday in Ireland 22 years ago.

I think I've mentioned it before. I saw no blacks whatsoever in Southern Ireland bar one in a youth hostel in Cork which made for a magical holiday there.

The Ring of Kerry looked like a picture book, fairy tale paradise. No trash just heaven to be in.

I can't believe it's been contaminated to this extent in just 20 years...?

kulak said...


No it's not my opinion.

Ron Paul is anti-racist.

Ron Paul is anti-white.

but does that make him white-guilt-tripping maniac?

No, it just makes him silly and not a danger to the anti-white establishment.

The highest aspiration of Respectable Conservatives is to be respected by liberals.

But Establishment Libertarians have PRINCIPLES!

THEIR highest aspiration is to be part of the anti-white establishment AT ALL.

Yet not to agree a 100% with somebody does not necessarily imply dismissing that person out of hand.

Whatever we do, we simply MUST not dismiss anti-whites out-of-hand, if we agree on so much!

Tre gouche!

The idea that Paul would be good for whites is a statement of values.

We can stop foreign aid.

We can stop welfare.

We can stop the wars.

All we have to do is compromise with white genocide.

Ron Paul is the WORST candidate running.

He's the enemy who most LOOKS like a friend.

kulak said...


I'm not a European-American, I'm an American. Everybody else is an Honorary American, and they all know it.

Interesting perspective on Paul, and in the long run I agree to this much:

Paul (and the larger Tea Party) are a passing fad, a last gasp.

The last gasp of compromising with white genocide.

Anonymous said...

Corkonian - maybe they went ti Kerry 'cos it's the only place as wild as where they came from !!!

kulak said...


Did I say something wrong? :O

Anonymous said...

Oh well they got one of them and saved a few females...

Anonymous said...

So kulak, youre saying give Obama another 4 years so he can really fuck things up? Maybe you're right.

Bemused stare said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So kulak, youre saying give Obama another 4 years so he can really fuck things up? Maybe you're right.

22 August 2011 16:47

That about covers it. It would be better by far to have him win 2012 and go directly to jail in 2014 than to have some white guy tuck the sheeple in bed to sleep again.

Franz said...

@ Kulak

I get it now. You dislike Libertarians. With a vengance.

I'll not even ask about you what you think about making friends and influencing people who consider themselves mainstream as of know. Trying to induce epiphanies in those quarters. I think I can guess the answer.

I guess we agree to disagree.

But let me ask - and no sarcasm or ill will involved here - do you see any possible alliances for race-realists? Or is your vision of the future a small crack-cadre of warriors shooting it out with the Feds? A Breivik-redux scenario writ large?

How will you recruit? Who will provide you with shelter, information and nourishment?

I'd really apreciate the insight into your mind, as you seem to articulate the absolute hardcore position, albeit with more eloquence than most.

Anonymous said...

I could'nt agree with you more.

I was in Tralee last Spring and was horrified and astounded at the number of pavement apes I encountered.I meant to post this at the time.

And I mean pavement apes.The fuckers were everywhere on every pavement,blocking normal movement,defying you to say anything.

I'm no spring chicken,but I'm big and strong and fit.I walked down Tralees streets with niggers bouncing off me.My diminutive wife,for once,walking behind me.(Her rightful place of course.Not all of the Islamic code is wrong or evil.)

Male apes,female apes,child apes.Some were so horrendously ugly that it was impossible to tell their gender.If indeed they had a gender.

I saw an albino ape.I saw a young ape with floppy red hair,almost white skin but with full negroid features.Hideous.Its mother had to be white.

Anyway we got back to our hotel and were going to invent a family death in order to book out two hours after booking in.But fuck that,we decided,we'll tell the truth.And we did so.

The Manager(Estonian by his name)refunded our deposit with a sad smile.

We won't be back.


jocomo said...

Franz - you pose the perfect question to kulak. And very elegantly. I think he's got a tremendous brain allied to icy logic. But it does break down, IMHO, in that it seems nobody can be an ally.You're either 100% on-side, or you're an opponent. Maybe that's true. But if it is our cause looks doomed.

S. Thompson said...

I agree with Kulak-vote for Obama. Have you ever seen the Youtube video where Jamie Kelso talks to some young Paul supporters? Their views on racial issues mirror those of the average libtard. Despite his good intentions and his adherence to his principles, he will not be able to dismantle the current power structure. The result could be civil war along racial lines. Every year, the demographics will change making it more unlikely that the white man will win this hypothetical conflict. It's possible that we will lose-but it's better to go out with a bang than a whimper.

Anonymous said...

So, S Thompson, what do you propose we do?

Anonymous said...

tokyo paddy said...

... Also, given the way these powers are now prying, you might need to be careful saying such things or you might experience the midnight knock!

You're right, paddy. My mother used to define a fool as a person who said what everyone else was thinking.

This was whenever I shot my mouth off ... a lifetime habit, I'm afraid and, seemingly unbreakable.


Anonymous said...

Going back to Yeats's poem there is the third line ...

" Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;"

Which, I am afraid, is where we all are, right now.
We have reached a point where no-one ... and I mean no one in a position of influence or power can be trusted.

Stupid, egregious, easily-disproved lies roll off their collective tongue.
Politicians and wannabees have never been known for their veracity, but they have reached a stage where, if one of them should say it's raining outside, I would go and lie on the driveway face-up for ten minutes before conceding that this -- maybe, perhaps, possibly, could be the case.

The stupider(?) ones love this state of affairs, simply because they will not be called on their lies and can get away with bigger and better ones in the future.

Hillary Clinton, for instance, stating that she had to duck mortars and machine-gun fire when landing at Sarajevo, when it was so easily disproved.

Lying becomes a habit that is very hard to break.
The downside is that, after a while, not even your friends, family or flunkies will believe a word you say.

"Call security! Now! The mob is breaking into the south wing!!"

"Er ... yes, ma'am. Sure, Right. Er ... anything you say, Ma'am ..."

Radio silence ...

Quick pop quiz, here. Can you think of a politician anywhere in the world who could be called moderately trustworthy ... and not merely less of a charlatan than the others?

Thought not.


Franz said...

@ mr a

"I saw an albino ape.I saw a young ape with floppy red hair,almost white skin but with full negroid features. Hideous."

Great observation on the alleged beauty of "hybrid vigour".

I noticed the same thing while spending time in Latin America. The place where - as the MSM is telling us - all people are great looking and luscious and dance Salsa all day in tight fitting clothes.

Well, there are some great looking Latin Americans. Thouh not so many as the Telly would have you believe. Far fewer. And most of those gorgeous creatures are white with very little admixture of Indian blood.

But the great majority of the racially mixed lumpenproletariat looks like their faces have been run over by a car. And then the driver put it in "Reverse". And then "Drive". And then... infinity.

The funny thing is that in those places where miscegenation is prevalent, there are few "OK"-looking people.

There is a minority who look great, then there are the Orcs and prescious little in between those extremes. Funny that.

P.S. If you want to maintain your German, check out that little video I made:

Anonymous said...

'Quick pop quiz, here. Can you think of a politician anywhere in the world who could be called moderately trustworthy ... and not merely less of a charlatan than the others?'

Blair, Sarkozy??

Anonymous said...

I realise that this may be stating the obvious, but seeing it all in one article is a bit alarming.

Why Amazon Can't Make A Kindle In the USA

An economist is someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.

(Old joke based on Oscar Wilde’s quip about a cynic.)

Yesterday I noted how conventional cost accounting inexorably focuses attention of executives on increasing short-term profits by cutting costs.

The same thing happens in economics. Take a recent economic study that set out to shed light on role of Chinese businesses vis-à-vis American consumers. Galina Hale and Bart Hobijn, two economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, did a study showing that only 2.7 percent of U.S. consumers purchases have the “Made in China” label. Moreover, only 1.2% actually reflects the cost of the imported goods. Thus, on average, of every dollar spent on an item labeled “Made in China,” 55 cents go for services produced in the United States. So the study trumpets the finding that China has only a tiny sliver of the U.S. economy.

So no problem, right?

Well, not exactly. The tiny sliver happens to be the sliver that matters. What economists miss is what is happening behind the numbers of dollars in the real economy of people.
How whole industries disappear

Take the story of Dell Computer [DELL] and its Taiwanese electronics manufacturer. The story is told in the brilliant book by Clayton Christensen, Jerome Grossman and Jason Hwang, The Innovator’s Prescription :

I am reminded of a favourite movie: "The Second Civil War" in which Idaho secedes from the Union, provoking (you guessed it) the Second Civil War.

Much funnier (I think) than "Idiocracy", there is a scene where the US Prez orders the nuking of the rebels, only to be told that bombing won't work as Taiwan and China won't supply vital components for the Nukes.

Irony totally lost today.

Highly recommended and made in the mid 90's, a lot of the satire (then) has proven to be understatement (now).

Check it out.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

"Ok. So who you got in mind then?"

Eh. Isn't there anyone? I may vote 3rd party for the first time.

Anonymous said...

I don't know if anyone has been following the case of Edgar J. Steele ... reported extensively by Harold A. Covington.

Long story short ... Steele has been framed by rogue elements in the FBI, and is currently incarcerated.

The charge was that Steele conspired in the attempted murder of his wife -- a charge one might add, that has been denied by the aforementioned wife. A more appalling miscarriage of US justice is hard to imagine.

Shades of the USSR Show trials of the 30's and 40's.

Some of the story here, with lots of links on the site:

Well it gets better.

August 18, 2011


Private Attorneys No Longer Allowed

In a stunning, far-reaching and precedent-setting ruling issued by the Idaho Supreme Court this past week, the right to confidential communications between attorneys and individuals charged with crimes under the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution henceforth is no longer enforced in Idaho.

Without comment, the entire bench of the Idaho Supreme Court has ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution no longer applies within the boundary of Idaho. This result was obtained from the summary dismissal of a complaint lodged against Assistant US Attorney Traci Whelan by Attorney Edgar J. Steele, formerly admitted to practice before all courts in the states of Idaho, Washington, Oregon and California, as well as virtually all Federal Courts up to and including the US Supreme Court.

Steele’s complaint about AUSA Whelan’s behavior first was sent to the Idaho State Bar (ISB), and then was forwarded to the Idaho Supreme Court because Whelan herself sits on the ISB attorney committee.

The US Constitution grows a little more ragged every day. If I were in America, I would be concerned.

Uncle Nasty

PS ... the Wikipedia summing up -- notable as much for what it doesn't say as what it does.

Other links:-

The SPLC has really got a hate on for Steele.

Enjoy and be informed.
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

For those who are still interested in who actually got all the money ...

Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion From Fed

By Bradley Keoun and Phil Kuntz - Aug 23, 2011 12:19 AM GMT+1200

Citigroup Inc. (C) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) were the reigning champions of finance in 2006 as home prices peaked, leading the 10 biggest U.S. banks and brokerage firms to their best year ever with $104 billion of profits.

By 2008, the housing market’s collapse forced those companies to take more than six times as much, $669 billion, in emergency loans from the U.S. Federal Reserve. The loans dwarfed the $160 billion in public bailouts the top 10 got from the U.S. Treasury, yet until now the full amounts have remained secret.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s unprecedented effort to keep the economy from plunging into depression included lending banks and other companies as much as $1.2 trillion of public money, about the same amount U.S. homeowners currently owe on 6.5 million delinquent and foreclosed mortgages. The largest borrower, Morgan Stanley (MS), got as much as $107.3 billion, while Citigroup took $99.5 billion and Bank of America $91.4 billion, according to a Bloomberg News compilation of data obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests, months of litigation and an act of Congress.

“These are all whopping numbers,” said Robert Litan, a former Justice Department official who in the 1990s served on a commission probing the causes of the savings and loan crisis. “You’re talking about the aristocracy of American finance going down the tubes without the federal money.”

It wasn’t just American finance. Almost half of the Fed’s top 30 borrowers, measured by peak balances, were European firms. They included Edinburgh-based Royal Bank of Scotland Plc, which took $84.5 billion, the most of any non-U.S. lender, and Zurich-based UBS AG (UBSN), which got $77.2 billion. Germany’s Hypo Real Estate Holding AG borrowed $28.7 billion, an average of $21 million for each of its 1,366 employees.

It's ... interesting reading. Your tax dollars well spent.


kulak said...


(I like your posts at amren, BTW.)

though [Paul] did kowtow to the anti-white forces during the last election

Q: What's the difference between Ron Paul and the other Republican candidates on immigration?
A: He means it!

@all, OT:

Vdare needs money. Pony up, Americans. Every little bit helps.

@all, OT:

Wife and I had a rare movie date the other day. Went to see "Cowboys & Aliens".

Synopsis: Whites, Mexicans, Native Americans, and criminals -- but no blacks -- team up to repel the gold-lusting aliens who kidnap their peoples and put them in a trance and take their organs. Aliens' ship is destroyed by a suicide bomber.

Afterwards the wife asked me "Did you notice there weren't any black people in it?"

"Why no, I didn't. No wonder I liked it."

I'm so proud of her.

Anonymous said...

I note that VDare needs money. Again. I have ponied up a number of times but ask why. VDare is a blog - a very good one for sure, playing avital role. The expenses it incures must be not too much larger than any other blog. So why the constant appeals for money?

Rob said...

@Anon 09:25
Apparently Vdare pays its writers, and it does have good writers. But the notice that's up in place of the home page says they have to pay for an expensive redesign of the site. If the redesign is in the aesthetic rather than the technical sense, that's just a crazy waste of money.

Anonymous said...

You may find this funny ...

US Congress Moves to Israel in Deficit-Reduction Effort

US Congress Moves to Israel in Deficit-Reduction Effort

August 12 2011
Disassociated Press

In the wake of the announcement that 81 US Congressmen are leaving on an AIPAC-sponsored junket to Israel, the new SuperCongress announced today that the entire legislative branch of the US government will be moved to Tel Aviv. The reason, according to informed sources, is to save on travel junket expenses to reduce the national deficit.

Relocating Congress to Israel is expected to significantly lower the cost of AIPAC-sponsored junkets: Airfare costs will be eliminated, hotel costs reduced, and "preferred customer" cocaine and prostitution discounts taken advantage of. The move should bring a noticeable reduction in the hemorrhage of US taxpayer dollars to the Zionist state.

The purpose of the move, according to informed sources, is to lower the deficit, not throw another bone to AIPAC. "Who do you think is paying for these travel junkets to Israel? That's right, the US taxpayer!" said a SuperCongress spokesperson on conditions of anonymity. "The Israelis force Congress to cough up billions of US taxpayer dollars in aid to Israel. Then Israel recycles those dollars by buying even more congressmen. It's a vicious circle. We can't stop it, so we might as well make the best of it, and just move the hell over there and be done with it."

According to the Christian Science Monitor, Israel cost the US taxpayer about 1.6 trillion dollars between 1973 and 2002 -- putting the total today at around 2 trillion dollars. Informed sources speculate that as the news spreads that Israel and its US assets orchestrated the 9/11 attacks, American taxpayers may eventually demand their money back.

Uncle Nasty

W Baker said...


You may have noticed the distinctive attraction of many pro-white whites on your blog for some sort of Armageddon (the psuedo-theological notion has been such part of American culture for so long, that it's become second nature to a lot of people). They'd rather go off the cliff at 90 or 85 mph with an Establishment Democrat or Republican than vote for a libertarian. Since they've never been on the opposite end of the state's (in this case, the US's) guns, they have no idea of its barbarity and destruction. Nor do they understand just how financially bankrupt the country is.

They fantasize about a perfect white world in North America. The new Scandinavia - of two generations ago. How this will happen they haven't a fucking clue. Deportation, race riots (they particularly seem to like this idea), payments to other races??

Why would one wish financial collapse and/or civil bedlam on a place they love? Their aims could be much more easily considered in peace rather than chaos.

nemesis said...

I have been keeping tracks on that Edgar Steele story. Outrageous. Don't know what the ultimate objective is though.

Anonymous said...

"US Congress Moves to Israel in Deficit-Reduction Effort"

Maybe they're gone over to ask the Israelis to reduce their annual demands on the US Treasury!

kulak said...


He's got principles!.

kulak said...

Wait a second...

O.K. There IS one valid argument for voting for Paul, which NONE of his supporters have put forth:

1) He'll end welfare

2) He thinks the justice system is filled with racism and will pardon all non-violent drug offenders

Happy-happy holding hands in a rainbow circle to follow.

But Obama is still the better choice.

kulak said...


So kulak, youre saying give Obama another 4 years so he can really fuck things up?

Things'll get fucked up anyway, but they'll get fucked up faster, and there won't be a white face on it.

Maybe you're right.

If I am right it is only because I do my best to adhere to the one TRUE principle:

Anti-racist is code for anti-white.

It NEVER fails.

And the ONE thing we do NOT compromise on for ANY reason is white genocide.

All else follows.

Look to the man to your left.
Look to the man to your right.

Dress your lines.

Ignore the howlings of fuzzy-wuzzies. Ignore the waverings of the peacetime commissioned Officers. Either we or the fuzzy-wuzzies will settle with them.

Set your ear on the Gunny.




awakened said...

kulak - with all due respect, your formulation doesn't exactly seem a surefire recipe for eventual success.

Franz said...

@ W Baker

Great observations. But if you really want to see people who are in love with armageddon, check out the average survivalist blog.

Many/most of the people there have the impression that the collapse of society is some kind of fun activity after the end of which they themselves sit pretty on top of a mountain of gold, ammunition and canned food.

Of course, after the collapse Gisele Bündchen leaves her now useless Quarterback husband in order to shack up with the nearest survivalist she can find.

What never enters the equation is the notion that somebody else could take away their gold, ammo and food, not to mention their Gisele.

Subcultures intersect and the not-so-secret wish for the end of the world seems to be the intersection of choice for survivalists and a subgroup of white nationalists.

Considering the current economic and demographic bomb primed to explode in the Western hemisphere, their wish has a good chance of actually coming true. It even appears to be the most likely scenario at this point.

I fear however that the most ardent apocalypse-believers will still be disappointed. In the sense that The End™ will turn out to be rather less... cinematic than previously imagined.

The End™, fiction:

The End™, fact:

Anonymous said...

off topic savant, but years back while in Dublin i wandered into a pub i beleive named Mooneys that had me mesmerised with its bas releif ceiling which consisted of all fruits and veggies known to man. my thought at the time was of the trades people who put these up there and the paint work applied to same. but on other hand the poor guys who had to wash it down in pre no smoking era of pubs.john old rtd chicago copper.

B Boru said...

That WAS Mooneys, John. Much changed now.

jeanne said...

I fear however that the most ardent apocalypse-believers will still be disappointed.

Fin de siecle Russians were longing for the end, too. Did not turn out too well, though most did not live to see it.

Things can always get much worse.

Anonymous said...

Franz said...

@ W Baker

Great observations. But if you really want to see people who are in love with armageddon, check out the average survivalist blog.

Many/most of the people there have the impression that the collapse of society is some kind of fun activity after the end of which they themselves sit pretty on top of a mountain of gold, ammunition and canned food.

Sadly, Franz, I agree. Too many people ... especially those who are so insulated from the realities of the world (usually because of a lifetime in the better suburbs) feel that it will be a big party with guns, log cabins, solar power and readily-identifiable Bad Guys.
Their view of collapse is informed by Hollywood fiction ... "Red Dawn", etc. They will not allow themselves to conceive a future closer to "The Road."

I have lived in a collapsing society, and visited one or two more, and your reference to the Thirty Years War does not go unheeded.

However I feel that the UK, the US and many parts of Europe have been the unwilling -- and mostly unknowing -- hosts to a subterranean war that has carried on for three generations now.

The activities of the US, UK and Scandinavian govts. (in particular) simply mean that the war is becoming more visible. The reality begins to leak out of the cracks in the MSM dike.

I guess I should point out that the dike referred to is the dutch variety ... rather than the diesel.

I'll finish in referencing a movie I saw years ago called "I'll Never Forget Whats'isname" ... one of Oliver Reed's first flicks in which Orson Welles (as the head of an ad agency) says (more or less):-

"... in a hundred years time, the earth will be a mile deep in garbage. My job is to see that we're on top of it ... and not underneath."

I feel pretty much the same way. It's not going to be pretty.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

By the way, It appears that Julia Gillard's collection of Australian Marxists is in trouble.

I am trying to get a handle on the Oz political scene, and wonder if anyone who knows, could tell me why there is such a (seemingly) huge amount of radical lefties in Australia.

Where do they come from? And what the hell are they doing in Oz? A country that, thirty years ago, said openly "Keep Orstrylia Woit!"

Could an Aussie reader (or someone who knows the history) please enlighten me?

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Where do they come from? And what the hell are they doing in Oz? A country that, thirty years ago, said openly "Keep Orstrylia Woit!"

Their "enlightened" offspring ru(i)n the country now.

Sic Transit Gloria Mundi

Anonymous said...

"My point? Don’t tar all Jews with the same brush."

and no one does.

Anonymous said...

Australia has always had 'white' lefties - very radical ones at that - and - many are Jews.... Jews which once lived in South Africa when it was white ruled.

These bastards were arrogantly anti white South Africa but loved living there under the luxury of white rule as it suited them. They screwed it for what it was worth and left for other uhhm 'white' conservative shores like Oz and NZ and are now doing the same there. The locals cannot see through them they're so gullible... just as hardly any Brits were/are aware Amy Whinehouse was Jewish! Collectively the white masses are are as gullible as fuck and too afraid of being clocked as 'racist'

Peter Hain's family was/is like this. They lived in Kenya spouting out against white British colonialism whilst enjoying the luxuries of it.

When it all ended they fled to South Africa and began their subversive activities there until they were effectively booted out on terrorism charges.

The rest of Hain's life is documented history as most are well aware. He's a despicable piece of self loathing white trash who continues to do 'marvellously well' for himself thanks to his creeping and the Marxist/Fabian establishment pampering his arse.

Can you imagine this dog ball going back to live in South Africa - a country whose "Freedom" sic he fought so passionately for?!?

Australia and New Zealand is FULL of "white" shit like this and they will put the knife in just as Hain and accomplices did with SA and Rhodesia. Look how Hawke and co jumped on the anti apartheid bandwagon during the 'bad ol days' of apartheid. White South Africans were vilified over there to the same extent as they were in the UK and elsewhere.

Observe "Kylie" with her gyrating spastic jerking niggers who surround her on the dance floor in her vids.

It's puerile shit

Anonymous said...

Irate: Love this blog. Always have. (Wish you would post more often though - imagine my chagrin when I blow on over to the Savant, only to discover that there's nothing new since Tuesday. Though of course I love reading the comments on this site - especially UN's).

Please do me the honor of considering blogrolling / following me over at :

I'm proud to say that Sarah does, as well as some others you like (JAY).

I used to get a huge number of visits through, but sadly that excellent site went down a few months back (I've been in a funk ever since).

Thanks mate if you can !



Anonymous said...

By the way, for those of us who are unsure of the calibre of those who are running the show:-

Steve puts it very well.

DSK case dropped

Not surprisingly, DA Cyrus Vance Jr. dropped charges against former IMF boss Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

I must say that I feel like I've been lied to by my Hollywood thrillers. Here we have a case in which hundreds of billions of dollars and the leadership of a great power are at stake. In a movie, there would have been a superbly engineered conspiracy countered by brilliant agents on the other side.

But, as far as I can tell, every single real person involved in this story acted like a complete idiot with a time horizon of about 90 seconds to 90 minutes.

I've seen shoving matches in an alley between a homeless guy and a transvestite streetwalker that involved more careful planning than this.

New Yorkers can sleep easier tonight, secure in the knowledge that people like Vance are safeguarding the public trust.


Artur said...

Mister Savant :

I see now that I made my humble blogroll request before seeing your reference to Zasucks.

What happened to those guys? I swear I spent more time on that blog than anywhere. It truly was excellent.

I wish it were back. And I submit that by being gone, there are a lot, LOT of people out there like me who will never know the truth about post-apartheid SA.

Anonymous said...

While we're talking about reprisals and revenge (Well, I am anyway) I am sure our Financial Fundi's ... Reg, Franz, Savant will have something to say about this:-

CRASH 2 EXCLUSIVE: Lies, damned lies, and ratings agencies…how America intends to defend its global credibility.

Why fear stalks the corridors of S&P and Moody’s

Imagine you went to a laboratory to see if the snake-oil you were just sold was any good….and when you got there, it turned out the snake oil was produced by the lab’s owner. Well, the ratings agencies are similarly independent. And as recent events show, bullets are flying in all directions as big business and the Fed seek greater control over what goes up or down.

and ...

But S&P itself isn’t unscathed from the battle. A reliable source told me last Wednesday that the Fed remains hopping mad about losing its Triple A, and sure enough yesterday S&P President Deven Sharma was the recipient of a bullet in the brain…nothing whatsoever to do with Geithner of course, perish the thought. The replacement is a bloke called Doug Peterson, who works for Citibank…and has been an active promoter of US trade interests overseas for most of his career.

And ...

At the same time, we have S&P – Downgrader General of Governments – being thought too harsh by those very same Federal authorities. As a result of which, the boss man is replaced by another whose main hobby is pursuing US trade interests.

And finally, I am reliably informed via Washington that in the last fortnight, Justice Department and SEC investigations into both Moody’s and S&P have been stepped up considerably.

What all this represents is a volley of warning shots from a desperate American Establishment: ‘no more inconvenient downgrades fellas – or else’.

Truthfully, is there any difference between these babies and a 1930's Chicago gangster?

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Eat your heart out Europe. This is common here where I live.
You can buy pretty much any weapon you want here!!

We have sooo many gun shows and stores to buy shotguns, hand guns, rifles, assualt rifles. We are loaded to the gills with guns here!!!
It doesn't make sence to me how you guys across the pond are not allowed to own weapons?? wtf??

Fuck, I can go to Walmart and buy a shotgun and as much ammo as I can shoot.

Franz said...

@ Uncle Nasty

"The activities of the US, UK and Scandinavian govts. (in particular) simply mean that the war is becoming more visible."

I agree completely. The Western hemisphere will - with a high probability - go through serious convulsions in the next decade(s).

Making sensible preparations vis a vis gold, ammo and food is entirely prudent.

What prompted me to speak out however is the pipedream that preppers and race warriors will just have to wait for the apocalypse... and then get to strut up and down mainstreet, sporting their FALs, with aryan supermodels clinging to each arm. Revelling in being the king of the hill.

About a decade ago, I visited former Yugosavia when warlike business along the Kossovo-Macedonia border was flaring up. I was a young guy, making enough money to travel and I figured: "I'll see myself a war during my vacation, just for kicks". That impulse took me to other locations as well, but I digress.

Anyhow, that was the situation along the Macedonian border, back then:

What went on there was as close to the apocalyptic race-war scenario as could be imagined. Muslim, dark hued Albanians vs Christian lighter complexioned Slavs.

The funny thing: I saw no proud race warriors reigning supreme.

It was an affair of neighbour A setting fire to neighbour B's barn in the middle of the night. In retaliation neighbour B sneaks up on neighbour A's wife on her way to the village and rapes her.

There was war and there were victims, but no "The Wild Bunch" type of action to be seen. Only ugly stuff.

A race war might be coming. Economic collapse will come with a high degree of certainty. Some of us will probably have to fight for our lives.

But please, let nobody be fooled by the meme that the collapse of society as we know it will be a cakewalk and a highly desireable one at that.

Anonymous said...

The survivalists are positively drooling about the potential for collapse.I sometimes read them for a laugh:their excitement is building.

Some may indeed survive up in The Rockies,but in this scenario,as Franz said,someone else may well take away your guns n' ammo.And ammo runs out,guns rust.A Remington becomes less useful as a club than a tree branch.

No.The collapse will be slow.Indeed
,it has been happening for several decades now.

But,just in case I'm wrong,and I usually am,here's a few tips.
Food,cigarettes,alchohol,narcotics and medicenes will all become invaluable.
But so will simple skills.How many know how a diesel works?.How many could maintain,mend or cannibalize a diesel or a generator?.
How many know how to get fuel from an underground tank of a dead filling station?.
How many could hook a generator up to the mains supply of their house?.
How many can make bread?.

All simple things and easy to learn.After all,how many of us are going to be wandering around the mountains,shooting bear and elk?.I have no desire to be Jim Bridger or Jeremiah Johnson.

P.S Franz.That Youtube video does'nt open for me.
P.P.S.Which Mooneys was that?.I seem to remember from my youth that the Parnell Mooney had elaborate plasterwork.


Digby said...

W Baker - I agree with you. There seems to be an almost childish delight in seeking an uncompromising Armageddon. Much like the guy jumping out of the plane with the nuclear devise in Dr. Strangelove..

As for me, I want to on living, albeit in a slightly, make that much, better wa than we've been doing and to change the way we're going.

Rob said...

@mr. a
Wise words. Mundane mechanical and even culinary skills are what most people will need if and when an Armageddon scenario comes to pass. That's not saying they won't need to defend themselves as well. But there's little use in being able to dismantle and reassemble an AK47 while blindfolded if you can't bake a loaf of bread or rig up a generator to stop you and your family from freezing to death.

SAVANT said...

Hi Crimes of the Times. Thanks for the kind words. Duly linked. Would like to post more but Lady Savant takes a lot of feeding. Anyway, as you say, we have really brilliant commentators here - I really look forward to reading them myself!

SAVANT said...

Artur: Re SAS, it's a long story. But the main problem was that the Uhuru Guru and some others were outed by traitorous ex-colleages. Some had to flee the country, one (brother of the UG)committed suicide but this could have been for other reasons.

Anonymous said...

You never mentioned their ruptured cousin - poor guy. Wun Hung Lo.

euroserf said...

Taking up the point of W Baker and others - I'd like to know what the no-compromisers have in mind. Mad Max?

Franz said...

@ mr a

Always depend on an engineer to talk sense. Even about the apocalypse. Thanks for injecting that realism into the debate.

As regards the video, just got to youtube and use the search words "euro schulden merkel". My video pops up as first result. Enjoy!

Anonymous said...

For comments regarding South Africa, Mike Smith is still blogging , is he on your blog roll Savant ? www.mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot .com. Please spread the word about that blog , Mike is really knowledgeable about South Africa past and present.

Anonymous said...

As he observed the booming economy of the colonies, the International Jewish banker, Meier Rothschild inquired of Benjamin Franklin the reason. Franklin replied: "It is simple. In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Script. We issue it in proper proportions to the demands of trade and industry." (From Senate Doc. #23, p.23.)

Realizing how an interest-free currency would shake the Jewish control of world finance, Rothschild and his colleagues began to work so that the colonies would use "Jewish bank monies," instead of their own currency. They did this through the use of their enormous money power and "bought agents" such as Mexander Hamilton. In 1781, Hamilton started the Bank of North America, modeling it after the Jewish controlled Bank of England

If Ron Paul can get rid of the international bankers ,cultural marxism will vanish

Anonymous said...

'If Ron Paul can get rid of the international bankers ,cultural marxism will vanish'

Hilarious! Do you think they'll let RP actually do that? He's toast.

Anonymous said...

Now here's something that could sink Chairman Zero once and for all ...

Scroll to:-

Muslim Brotherhood in Our White House and the Murder of SEAL Team Six

An investigation of President Obama and his administration must commence immediately.

Tarek Fatah, founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress, author and self-described Liberal Democrat Marxist Muslim who campaigned for Barack Obama, revealed the identity of Obama’s White House appointees who have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood (see Muslim Brotherhood in our White House – Vetting Obama).

Obama’s appointees could access sensitive military and National Defense information while in our White House, to include military missions that were planned for SEAL Team Six. Important questions surround the murder of 30 U.S. special operations troops, which included 17 members of Navy SEAL Team Six.

An investigation is fully warranted, starting with the takedown of Osama bin Laden by SEAL Team Six in May 2011, their subsequent murder on August 6, 2011 and the actions of Barack Obama and his appointees before, during and after these events.

Questions That Must Be Answered:
Why did Obama release the identity of SEAL Team Six as the specific team that took out Osama bin Laden?

Never before has a sitting U.S. President done this. Releasing their identity puts a bulls-eye on their backs by providing Al Qaida, Hamas and the Taliban (terrorist groups created by the Muslim Brotherhood) with the information they need to target those specific soldiers. It also openly provided their identity to White House appointees who have alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Now all that was needed was the time and location of a future mission for SEAL Team Six in order to take them out and avenge the death of Osama bin Laden, which appears to have happened.
Did Obama’s appointees know, in advance, that members of SEAL Team Six would be in that chopper at that location when it was taken down by terrorists?

If not, how is it that the terrorists were in that exact location at that exact time, fully equipped with the artillery needed to destroy the chopper and all who were on board?
Why were the SEALs in a standard Chinook chopper instead of the Boeing MG-47E/G (the ‘Darkhorse’ which is a SPECOPS Chinook used by SEAL Teams)?

Through her devotion and acumen, Ann Barnhardt discovered that the chopper the SEALs and special operations (SPECOPS) troops used on that tragic day was a National Guard Chinook instead of their Darkhorse Chinook. Here is more from Ann’s blog:

Hands up all those who think Hollywood will make a terrific action thriller based on this supposition.

No ... what they do is make this:

Their contempt for us is complete.

Uncle nasty

nemesis said...

This MB/Obama/Seal thing has some superficial traction, but I've seen it fairly strongly debunked somewhere. Not that they were lead into a tyrap but that there was no [possible way the WH could have been involved.

Anonymous said...

Watched that.Very good.


PreatorianXVI said...


They even have Jewish-Aboriginals, complete with the garment of the chosen ones in Aussie,

Gillard is a class A Closet carpet Muncher, living with her "hairdresser", they have been slowly subverted by the ones that did SA and now they get their grubby paws on the last two outposts, the other have already been infected.

Keep in mind John Key is also of Chosen decent.

Anonymous said...

She has revived the mining tax, the opposition to which brought her to power, and moved to introduce a carbon levy, condemned by conservative opponents as “Great Big New Tax On Everything”.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of Big brother, who would have dreamed this possible 20 or 30 years ago?

Nearly two years later, no charges have been filed

In 2009, more than a dozen agents with automatic weapons invaded the XXXX* factory in Nashville. The Government seized XXXX and a substantial amount of XXXX from XXXX. To date, 1 year and 9 months later, criminal charges have NOT been filed, yet the Government still holds XXXX’s property. XXXX has obtained sworn statements and documents from the XXXX government and these materials, which have been filed in federal court, show that the XXXX seized in 2009 was legally exported under XXXX law and that no law has been violated.

XXXX is attempting to have its property returned in a civil proceeding that is pending in federal court.

*The XXXX's are mine.

What do you suppose the duly appointed fully armed and armoured agents of the US govt seized from Company XXXX?

Drugs? Arms? Explosives? Nuclear Warheads? Communist Party Literature? Hillary Clinton's used underwear?

Check it out and then tell me that the US goverment -- and its mindless minions -- don't need to be dragged into the street and publicly whipped like a red-headed stepchild.

Uncle Nasty.

PS: My apologies to red-headed stepchildren everywhere ... but it's such a lovely metaphor.


PPS: One day, these termite-souled accountants with their MP5s are going to get their info wrong, storm a really bad place and get their arses handed to them in a paper bag.

Oh, how we'll laugh.


James Lord said...

This guns exporting thing will have to explode once the current regime changes. It's so lethal it's incredible that the MSM hasn't been on to it. Oh wait!

Anonymous said...

In 1963, President John Kennedy wanted an end to the Federal Reserve System, which had a strangle-hold on the United States and virtually the world. By a simple stroke of the pen, President Kennedy dismissed the Federal Resene System and ordered the U.S. governmcnt to restore its Constitutional-mandate of controlling the money. President Kennedy was dead three weeks later. When President Lyndon Johnson took office, he immediately rescinded Kennedy's order and the Federal Resene won another round.

Ron Paul can do it, America is behind him and now everyone knows .

Do some research and see what the owners of the fed sponsor against you with you own money

kudzo bob said...

The Fed is a criminal conspiracy against the American people. Yet in my estimation less than 10% even know it's a private company.

Anonymous said...

" ..a warrant executed against a private individual running a Tor exit node. 'This spring, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) executed a search warrant at the home of Nolan King and seized six computer hard drives in connection with a criminal investigation. The warrant was issued on the basis of an Internet Protocol (IP) address that traced back to an account connected to Mr. King's home, where he was operating a Tor exit relay.' The EFF was able to get Mr King's equipment returned, and Marcia points out that 'While we think it's important to let the public know about this unfortunate event, it doesn't change our belief that running a Tor exit relay is legal.'

Some people have the EFF to help them and some the ACLU. Oh Wait! I guess he was not that type of entrepreneur?

Anonymous said...

And that sounds about right ...

One day a florist went to a barber for a haircut. After the cut, he asked about his bill, and the barber replied, ‘I cannot accept money from you, I’m doing community service this week.’

The florist was pleased and left the shop. When the barber went to open his shop the next morning, there was a ‘thank you’ card and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door.

Later, a cop comes in for a haircut, and when he tries to pay his bill, the barber again replied, ‘I cannot accept money from you , I’m doing community service this week.’ The cop was happy and left the shop.

The next morning when the barber went to open up, there was a ‘thank you’ card and a dozen donuts waiting for him at his door.

Then a Congressman came in for a haircut, and when he went to pay his bill, the barber again replied, ‘I cannot accept money from you. I’m doing community service this week.’

The Congressman was very happy and left the shop. The next morning, when the barber went to open up, there were a dozen Congressmen lined up waiting for a free haircut.

Many a true word ...

Uncle Nasty

d said...

@anon 12.24. I believe that this is just another step in a very serious plan to control the internet and make it like the MSM. The internet wasn't part of the control plan for the media. Now they see it's danger and must move against it. More will follow.

Anonymous said...

I had absolutely NO idea that The Fed was private.


Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

I had absolutely NO idea that The Fed was private.


Truly, Mr a? Then you will find this most illuminating ...

There is a lot here. Forgive the cheesy appearance of the site. They don't have the budget of our lords and masters.
Strongly recommend you view the "Money Masters."

That's your Sunday (and your broadband allowance) shot to hell.

Enjoy and be infuriated.
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Further to my last, Mr a., you may be interested to know that Libya was one of the vanishingly few countries to have its own private reserve or central bank.

That was dissolved about a week into the rebellion, at the same time all Qaddafi's foreign assets were seized.

Syria has its own federal bank:

A quote:- Posted at 02:30 PM ET, 08/10/2011

U.S. sanctions Syrian bank linked to oil exports

By Mary Beth Sheridan and David Nakamura

The Obama administration slapped fresh sanctions on Syria’s biggest bank on Wednesday, a move that could harm the country’s ability to export oil, analysts and officials said.

The new penalty on the Commercial Bank of Syria, a state-owned institution, was the latest step in the administration’s efforts to tighten the noose around President Bashar al-Assad. The U.S. government, with little economic leverage of its own in Syria, has been trying to build a stronger international front to pressure Assad over his crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators.

Notice the humanitarian theatre of:- ... pressure Assad over his crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators.

And who's next on America's hit list? Let me see; Syria, Venezuela and Iran.

Ah yes, Venezuela.

A quote:- Venezuela wants gold back from Morgan, Barclays, Standard Chartered, and Scotia

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez ordered his government to repatriate $11 billion in gold held in banks abroad to safeguard the country from the economic crisis and said he’ll nationalize the local gold industry.

Venezuela has about 211 tons of its 365 tons of gold reserves held abroad at institutions including the Bank of England, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Barclays Plc (BARC), Standard Chartered Plc (STAN)and the Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), according to a government document.

“We’ve held 99 tons of gold at the Bank of England since 1980. I agree with bringing that home,” Chavez said today on state television. “It’s a healthy decision.”

Now who wants to bet that the US, assisted by, oh, let's say ... France, Britain, Holland and a few Scandinavian countries won't invade Venezuela?

Anyone? Anyone?
Uncle Nasty

PS All the info is out there. You just have to look -- through shit-tinted spectacles.


Anonymous said...

If anyone read my post of August 16 you will know of the raid on Gibson Guitars.

You may be interested to know that the CEO of Gibson donated to the Republican Party. The CEO of Martin Guitars, however ...

It’s worth pointing out that Henry E. Juszkiewicz, Gibson’s Chief Executive Officer, is a donor to a couple of Republican politicians. According to the Open Secrets database, Juszkiewicz donated $2000 to Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN07) last year, as well as $1500 each to Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN). Juszkiewicz also has donated $10,000 to the Consumer Electronics Association, a PAC that contributed $92.5k to Republican candidates last year, as opposed to $72k to Democrats. (The CEA did, however, contribute more to Democrats in the 2008 election cycle.)

When warrants as ridiculous such as these are issued and executed, there appears no other reason than because the company or individual at hand is being targeted, not because there is any sort of wrongdoing. As a company, Gibson is a legendary. They’ve done nothing wrong, except, apparently, deigning to have a Republican CEO.

The plot thickens, however.

One of Gibson’s leading competitors is C.F. Martin & Company. The C.E.O., Chris Martin IV, is a long-time Democratic supporter, with $35,400 in contributions to Democratic candidates and the DNC over the past couple of election cycles. According to C.F. Martin’s catalog, several of their guitars contain “East Indian Rosewood.” In case you were wondering, that is the exact same wood in at least ten of Gibson’s guitars.

The Gibson facility wasn’t raided over allegations of tax evasion, charges of embezzlement, or even something as drab as child labor. Not even close. It was raided over what the DOJ deems an inability to follow a vague domestic trade law in India (one that apparently the Indian government didn’t seem too concerned about enforcing) regarding a specific type of wood. Not illegal wood, just wood with obscenely specific procedural guidelines.

(făsh'ĭz'əm) n.

A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
Oppressive, dictatorial control.

[Italian fascismo, from fascio, group, from Late Latin fascium, from Latin fascis, bundle.]

It's good to see the old ways coming back into fashion, no? And here's us thinking that they were abandoned.

Nope. Just retreaded.

Uncle Nasty

hoosier said...

I find it hard to believe there's a plot re the Gibson guitar. After all on both sides they're just minor donors. But still, the reason for the raid is most odd.

Anonymous said...

hoosier said...

... After all on both sides they're just minor donors. But still, the reason for the raid is most odd.

I think the reason is self-evident. The liberal left control the govt. The liberal left is only taken seriously by the rest of the left. They have to support one another in a show of solidarity.

Think about it. The people who control governments the world over are the reeking, shrieking, hirsute and unwashed sandal-wearers of a generation ago.

I have met literally hundreds of lefties in my career and they all have one thing in common -- they hate and fear all those who are not the left. They were and are bullies. therefore, they were and are cowards. The two go together.

Thirty or forty years ago, however, they were would-be bullies without physical strength or authority. They probably spent their formative years fantasising about getting even with those who did not take them seriously ... i.e., the whole damn planet.

They now have authority, so it's payback time. The similarity between them and niggers is amazing -- and far greater than people think.

I welcome anyone else's thoughts on the matter.

Uncle Nasty

Heraclitus said...

UN - not too many of my liberal friends would fit into this category, to be honest. I think the vast majority simply go along with what's drilled into them by the MSM. But doubtless a lot of those in leadership positions today would conform to the characteristicsz you propose.

Anonymous said...

Heraclitus said...

UN - not too many of my liberal friends would fit into this category, to be honest.

You are quite correct ... I did not state my case correctly.

Very, very few of my liberal friends would fit into this category. (yes, I do have a few liberal friends.)

When I refer to the liberal left, I refer to the spiteful, swivel-eyed righteous for whom control and power are everything. The ones who'll sleep the sleep of a baby knowing their finest hour is frightening an 80-year-old woman into hysterics by fining her a week's pension for putting rubbish in the wrong bin.


Anonymous said...

@Uncle N.
Not convinced UN,but I'll read some more.

The Gibson affair does seem strange mind you.(I missed your post on the 16th).
Rosewood is the integral part in the sound of a Gibson.(I own one}but,as you say,just as integral to Martins.
And the Indians certainly could'nt care less.
I'll wait in "hope" for Nike and their ilk to be raided.

And Gibson,a true AMERICAN icon,but a tiny fish in the scheme of things gets busted.

That is strange.