Tuesday, 21 June 2011

A sign of the Great Realignment?

For several years I've been keeping an eye out for signs of the Great Realignment in American politics. What I mean is that, as the Democrats increasingly become the party of minorities and white useful idiots, would the great body of whites start to realign with the Republicans? With every other race shamelessly uniting and promoting its own narrow agenda – invariably at the expense of whites – the Great Realignment would be truly momentous. Whites united in their own interests, as distinct from the interests of every other ethnic group, would be unstoppable.

Well, we don't expect trend-setting from Alabama, but it’s from this unlikely source that dramatic evidence has emerged. An interesting article over in VDare tells us that not only have the once-hated Republicans taken decisive control of both the House and the Senate there, the parties have taken on a distinctly Great Realignment hue.

You see the Republican legislators are all white. Every last one. Not terribly surprising in itself, but you see, the Democrat legislators are mostly black. In the House, the black Democrats outnumber the white Democrats 27-to-12. In the Senate they outnumber them 8-to-4.

Is this a straw in the wind which says that the Republicans will become the White party and the Dems the Party of Minorities?

Surely too early to say. But if the trend grows, America, and the West in general, could be on the way back.

76 comments:

Anonymous said...

Most interesting, Savant. And, on the surface, very positive. But I am afraid that the rot has had nearly three generations to get a foothold and has set in too deep in the very bones of the system...

I think we all aware that whites the world over are slowly (Oh God, sooo slowly) waking up. But the state intel groups are aware of it as well, and the govts. are panicking as their monopoly on influence wanes.

The moment we work towards and pray for, is the moment they dread.

And the signs of their panic are the TSA/LEA sweeps, intimidations and "exercises" happening across America right now.

Eight thousand of them so far, mentioned in a previous post.

You really think the zionists, after all their investment and effort, are going to say: "Oh, all right. You win."?

Me neither. It's going to get bloody.

The only solution I can see right now is not at the negotiating table.

Cheers,
UN

northern athiest said...

Agreed - this would be highly significant IF it foreshadows a general realignment. But Alabama?

Anonymous said...

The Democrats will beome the party of Donkeys. Not as an emblem but every member will be one.

Anonymous said...

Now here's something:

12 Things That The Mainstream Media Is Being Strangely Quiet About Right Now

http://tiny.cc/79r2u

As the mainstream media continues to be obsessed with Anthony Weiner and his bizarre adventures on Twitter, much more serious events are happening around the world that are getting very little attention. In America today, if the mainstream media does not cover something it is almost as if it never happened. Right now, the worst nuclear disaster in human history continues to unfold in Japan , U.S. nuclear facilities are being threatened by flood waters, the U.S. military is bombing Yemen, gigantic cracks in the earth are appearing all over the globe and the largest wildfire in Arizona history is causing immense devastation. But Anthony Weiner, Bristol Palin and Miss USA are what the mainstream media want to tell us about and most Americans are buying it.

In times like these, it is more important than ever to think for ourselves. The corporate-owned mainstream media is not interested in looking out for us. Rather, they are going to tell us whatever fits with the agenda that their owners are pushing.

That is why more Americans than ever are turning to the alternative media. Americans are hungry for the truth, and they know that the amount of truth that they get from the mainstream media continues to decline.


Just a few:-

#9 There are reports that North Korea has tested a "super EMP weapon" which would be capable of taking out most of the U.S. power grid in a single shot. The North Koreans are apparently about to conduct another nuclear test and that has some Obama administration officials very concerned.

#10 All over the United States, "active shooter drills" are being conducted in our public schools. Often, most of the students are not told that these drills are fake. Instead, students often go through hours of terror as they think a hostage situation or a shooting spree is really taking place.

#11 NASA has just launched a "major" preparedness initiative for all NASA personnel. The following is an excerpt about this plan from NASA's own website....


Armageddon? Damn right.

Armageddon outta here. And, I'm taking the dog and my rifle with me.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

While we're there ...

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/10-really-stupid-things-the-mainstream-media-has-said-about-the-bilderberg-group-in-2011

http://tiny.cc/jmkt2

10 Really Stupid Things The Mainstream Media Has Said About The Bilderberg Group In 2011

This weekend, dozens upon dozens of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world will be gathering behind closed doors at a luxury hotel in Switzerland. All of the participants are sworn to secrecy and swarms of heavily armed security guards are making sure that nobody unauthorized gets in. Decisions will be made at this meeting which will fundamentally change our future.

The CEO of Amazon.com will be there, as will the head of Google, one of the co-founders of Facebook and one of the top executives from Microsoft. The president of the EU will be in attendance, along with the president of the World Bank, the president of the European Central Bank, the head of the World Trade Organization and the top commander of NATO.

Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller will be there. Royalty from all over Europe will be attending as well. Past attendees have included several U.S. presidents, Ben Bernanke, Timothy Geithner, Prince Charles, current British Prime Minister David Cameron, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates and current Texas governor Rick Perry. You would think that these meetings would be something that the mainstream media would want to cover.

But unfortunately, the mainstream media mostly ignores the Bilderberg Group meetings, and if they do cover them they just crack a bunch of jokes about "conspiracy theories" and they do their best to play down the importance of the meetings.

Under normal circumstances, a gathering of top executives from Google, Facebook and Microsoft would have the media salivating. So would a gathering of some of the most important international politicians on the globe.

So why doesn't the mainstream media want to talk about the Bilderberg Group?


Why indeed?

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

How about this as a sign:-

http://dissectleft.blogspot.com/

Russia inching away from the greenback

... After Obama's money printing binge has suddenly devalued it

THE Russian Central Bank will pour up to $US5 billion ($4.7bn) into the Australian dollar in a fresh wave of support for the currency, in a move to diversify its reserves and shift away from the US dollar.

The first deputy chairman of the Russian central bank, Alexei Ulyukayev, said that starting from September, the bank would hold Australian dollars for up to 1 per cent of its $US528bn in reserves.

He said at a conference at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum that the last meeting of the central bank's monetary policy committee had approved a list of banks that would buy Australian dollars. "They will place funds on deposit and buy securities (in Australian dollars)," he said. 'I expect (the start of operations) in (the northern) autumn. I cannot say more -- maybe in September, maybe in October."


Fascinating. By today's standards five billion dollars is a joke. I wonder when they'll start talking about real money.

Uncle Nasty

Franz said...

At the national level, there are so many shady characters within the Republican party, so many corporate lackeys, so many outright lunatics, that it seems beyond reform.

I can see strong personalities in states like Alabma or Montana taking the party in a different direction than the national mainstream temporarily, but that's about it.

The problem with the Republican party is that its history is even worse than its present: After the old whig party imploded, the Republicans began their existence by giving Lincoln the nomination, and then supporting his genocidal war against states' rights. During the shameful episode called "reconstruction" the Republicans were the party of carpetbaggers and negros intent to impoverish and humiliate the South.

Only during Roosevelt's administration did the now familar theme of "Republicans=white man's party" emerge. It is thus not hardwired into the GOP's DNA, but arguably only a flag of convenience.

The GOP often promised great things to whites, But has it ever delivered? Methinks that after every election, white Americans habitually find themselves with a dagger in their back. And the GOP's prints are always on it.

Whites putting their faith into the GOP is a bit like the grandchildren of a murdered Kulak voting for the communist party and explaining: "Oh, it's all good. They're the REFORMED communist party now. They will take good care of me!"

P.S. Anybody remember McCain during the 2008 campaign? When he wanted to declare war on Russia for that episode in Georgia? Lunacy, indeed.

S. Thompson said...

This is positive in one sense as it might encourage to become a moderate white nationalist party of sorts and stop wasting their time chasing the minority vote. OTOH, everyday the minorities are becoming a bigger percentage of the electorate. If Republicans just ignore them, their performances in future elections will be tied to dwindling white fraction of the electorate. Also consider the relatively high percentage of whites who are traitors.

Henry IX said...

No question but that the MSM are diligently trying to turn our minds away from the real issues with the kind of bread and circuses that we've come to expect.

But as to whether they are 'hungry for the truth' as Uncle Nasty says, well, I have my doubts. If they were, well, it's out there. All they need to do is look.

Henry IX said...

Maybe the MSM doesn't talk about the Bilderberg shenanigans because they don't know what's going on? Then again, the B. participants control the MSM, so maybe there's more to it...

SAVANT said...

Franz - I have no illusions about the Republicans as they stand. Typified by that scumbag McCain, a prisoner of AIPAC and big business and never passing up on an opportunity for war. But if whites largely abandon the Democrats it will polarise politics along racial lines and thereby change the nature of the Republicans.

Hopefully!

S. Thompson refers to the dwindling proportion of the population that is white. True, but it'sstill far and away the biggest proportion. If this can be unified and the traitors isolated, the big fighback would begin.

Franz said...

@ Savant

I'd love to be wrong about this and you to be right.

However, the European experience suggests that a party with a firmly entrenched treason lobby can rarely be reformed.

The true Fins, the Wilders movement, the Front Nationale and the SVP in Switzerland were all formed for the expressed purpose of giving a home to the ethnocentric vote.

None of these succesful movements are reformed conservatives or Christian Democrats.

The only man who brought about the miracle of turning around an existing party was Jörg Haider in Austria, whom I had the honour to meet once.

When he took the FPÖ over, it was on the verge of becoming just another Libdem party. Three decades later, it is leading the polls in Austria and is very much in the vanguard of pro-white, common sense politics in Europe.

Haider was of course a force of nature and I doubt that his feats can be repeated by lesser mortals, be that in Europe or indeed the USA.

I think the most likely scenario for a change of course in US-politics will be an economic collapse that undermines the credibility of the whole political class and ends the rationale for further extend-and-pretend politics.

That would include the Republicans following the Whigs, the Know Nothings and Tammany Hall to the dustbin of history, making way for a new political movement.

I gather, that this scenario is not nearly as far fetched as people think. After all, Ross Perot nearly managed to put the Republicans out of business after the (very mild) recession of the early 1990s, garnering nearly 20% of the votes in the 1992 election.

I'd wager that many Americans who voted for Dole/Clinton over Perot have since experienced severe buyer's remorse.

Anonymous said...

The latent energy is there - ie the Tea Party movement - but leadership is lacking. As for the white population dwindling: well, the Obama-voting white liberals, like their European counterparts, may be turning gay and getting vasectomies, but out in the heartland whites are breeding like rabbits. That's the future Republican constituency right there. Of course, this is not promoted by the MSM, but you only have to look around you...

JP

Anonymous said...

Elaborate, please sir. What do you mean when you concludeby saying "But if the trend grows, America, and the West in general, could be on the way back?"

SAVANT said...

Elaborate, please sir. What do you mean when you concludeby saying "But if the trend grows, America, and the West in general, could be on the way back?"

I mean that white identity will have become solidly associated with an organised political party and other identities with the opposite party. Whites united will be an unstoppable force.

SAVANT said...

Franz - What you say is true but I think the situations in Europe and Ameirica are quite different. In Europe, whites are the overwhelming majority of every country, even though of course this is rapidly changing. In America they're heading for minority status. Despite the trators and the libtards, I believe that deep down most 'normal' white Americans must see this in existential terms. They must know that an America where they're a minority, well, it wont be America.

European whites would come to know this as well, but as I say, the prevailing figures give them a spurious sense of detachment, at least for the moment.

Anonymous said...

Do you still expect that we will see the rise of a hereditary chieftain around whom we will rally and fight? Hasn’t happened yet- won’t happen ever. Rick Perry and the other Reps are politicians. As soon as their power is threatened by their conservative rhetoric, they’ll turncoat faster than our once-honorable, now disgraced former Segregation guv’nahs

Franz said...

@ Savant

As I said: I hope you're right and I'm wrong. Since I have a soft spot for the Yanks, I'd love to see them stop in front of the cliff and turn back.

Speaking of Yanks, one of reasons I like them so much are folks like Pat Buchanan. Utterly unpretentious, in manner more like a farmer than a scholar, that guy is tremendously well-read with a razor sharp mind.

If you have an hour to spare, see the youtube series: "Patrick Buchanan on his book 'Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War".

@ JP

I have not been to the USA and certainly not to the heartland for a couple of years, as I am not too keen on unsolicited prostate exams, courtesy of the TSA.

With me being out of touch, I'd like to hear more on your observation of whites there breeding "like rabbits".

One of the funny things about demographic trends is how quickly they can change in either direction. You have probably all observed it yourself: If one woman has a child, being a mom is all of a sudden the shi-shi thing among all her friends. Next thing you know, friends of friends are getting on the bandwagon and having babies. It's positivily contagious.

However, I can well imagine a scenario in the future where keeping babies alive is more important than actually having more of them. The world seems to have hit peak in terms of energy and food production.

Humanity escaped the last Malthusian trap by virtue of its inventiveness. Artificial fertilizers and mechanized agriculture have supported a stunning population growth from the 19th century up to now. (http://chartsbin.com/view/28k)

Where the inventions to feed the currently projected population growth rates are supposed to come from, nobody knows. The most brilliant minds of our day are certainly not so much focused on real wheat and pork as they are on fiddling with Facebook's Farmville.

Not to mention the decreasing effectiveness of antibiotics, which is currently on display here in Germany. We have a new superbug that has killed dozens of peole, permanently incapacitated hundreds more and nobody knows what to do against it.

So maybe this is where the survivalist subculture and white nationalism intersect: Small nuclear families, well provided for and protected, may turn out to be the more successful evolutionary model than that of the frantically fornicating dark hordes which - up to now, at least - double their number every ten years.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU7fhIO7DG0

Unfortunately Alabama did not mean business.

Jeremy said...

Franz - as always a stimulating and well-written contribution. But let's just hope your pessimism is misplaced.

Anonymous said...

Looks like the half-life of Chairman Zero might be shorter than expected ...

Obama Ignores Top Lawyers on Libya War

Pentagon and Justice Department Lawyers have ruled that President Obama must get Congressional approval to continue the war against Libya. Obama ignored this ruling, instead asking other lawyers their opinions.

State Department legal adviser Harold Koh and White House counsel Robert Bauer sided with Obama. Ruling it was against the law were Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson and Caroline Krass, Head of the Justice Department´s Office of Legal Counsel.

The New York Times reports that Presidents rarely ignore the legal advice of the Office of Legal Council.


Just imagine the unforeseen results of this. Let's say the US has to pull out of Libya, how long will the allies continue the fight?

An hour? Maybe three?

Then Gaddaffi will be wanting his money back ... won't he?

UN

Anonymous said...

I love books and reading.

A good book is something in which the author lays his ideas, his dreams, even his insanities, out in logical and entertaining form and invites you to come along for the ride.

Some are even educational.

http://dissectleft.blogspot.com/

Ayn Rand Was Right: The Wealthy Are on Strike Against Obama

I think Wayne Allyn Root is partly right below but that the effect he describes is just beginning so far. I think a lot of business people are waiting to see what Nov. 2012 brings forth

The U.S. economy is crumbling. Businesses are collapsing in record numbers. Jobs have disappeared. Tax revenues are down dramatically. Coincidence?

Everything happening today under Obama resembles the storyline of Ayn Rand’s famous book, Atlas Shrugged, one of the most popular books of all time, selling over 7 million copies. Now, under President Obama, Atlas Shrugged has come to life. Rand prophesized a country dominated by socialists, Marxists and statists, where looters, free loaders and poverty promoters live off the productive class. To rationalize the fleecing of innovative business owners and job creators, the looter class demonized the wealthy, just as Obama and his socialist cabal are doing in real life today.

The central plot of Atlas Shrugged is that in response to being demonized, over-taxed, over-regulated, and punished for success, America’s business owners were disappearing — dropping off the grid, and refusing to work 16-hour days to support those unwilling to put in the same blood, sweat and tears. They were going on strike. Because of that the original proposed title of “Atlas Shrugged” was “The Strike.”

They were going on strike to teach that civilization cannot survive when people are slaves to government. That without a productive class of innovative business owners willing to risk their own money and work 16-hour days, weekends and holidays, there are no jobs and no taxes to pay for government. If you punish the wealthy, the risk-takers, the innovators, you kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. In Obama’s America, fiction is becoming fact.

The lesson of Atlas Shrugged is that without the $100,000+ earners paying into Social Security, there are no pensions for the poor and lower middle class. Without the wealthy owners of million-dollar mansions paying $25,000 and $50,000 annual property tax bills, there is no funding for public schools. Without the wealthy paying into Medicare, there is no “free” healthcare for the elderly. Without capitalists motivated by profit, there are no discoveries to eradicate polio or create miraculous cancer and AIDS drugs. Without capitalists motivated by profit, there are no jobs, period! That is what happens when the producers of society go on strike to protect themselves from the looters.


Maybe we should get the wealthy on our side.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Franz said...

@ Jeremy

Thanks. However, I fancy myself rather as a realistic observer than a pessimist.

If you look at population charts (especially in the third world), they look like tech-bubble stocks on steroids. As the saying goes: What cannot be sustained, will not be sustained.

Is that necessarily a bad thing? I reckon no. White people seem to be naturally inclined to do good in hard times. Just compare the response to the recent floodings in the American heartland to that of the Katrina-Superdome-rabble (LOOTIE!) or the Haitian earthquake Zombies.

Another observation in the same vein:

A couple of weeks ago, I met a remarkable man here in Germany who has dual degrees in engineering and physics and - until a couple of years ago - was doing just fine in the corporate world.

Then he got it into his head to take over a farm and apply his ample intellectual capacities to the soil. And write a book about it while he's at it.

While I am not yet ready to burn all professional bridges behind me in the same fashion this guy did, his lifestyle struck me as making eminently more sense than 90% of the things I or anybody else around me is doing. Not only in a spriritual sense, but also because so few people these days are producing REAL, tangible things. There is bound to be a backlash some time.

P.S. Thanks again to the Savant for building this environment where such things can be discussed without fear of prosecution. It is really amazing how this site has grown without attracting the malignant attention of trolls but rather smart and well meaning folk.

Franz said...

@ Uncle Nasty

"Maybe we should get the wealthy on our side."

The Austrian right is - again - very much in the vanguard of doing just that.

I recently saw an interview with Ewald Stadler (the one who told the turkish ambassador to f**k off on youtube) where he proposed scrapping the wealth tax, the capital gains tax and replacing them with a flat fee for financial transactions.

Such a policy would of course massively favor producers and savers over our mutual friends from Goldman and JP Morgan. As these organizations derive much of their income from high frequency trading, even the smallest transaction fee would make them hemorrhage buckets of cash.

The Austrian right has already had some success implementing their fiscal ideas into the law of the land. As a result, thousands of German companies have resettled in Austria. Not as mailbox concerns, but installing real productive capacity there.

P.S. Do you remember the beginning of Atlas Shrugged? Where lightning struck the magnificent oak tree and revealed that it had already been dead from rotting from within? That always struck me as the perfect allegory for the post Lehman state of the world economy.

great white said...

Great allegory that from Atlas Shrugged. Can apply to our whole society.

Anonymous said...

George Clooney being uber-liberal and self satisfied a condition known as "smug"

"Listen, I don't quite know how you compare art.....They are stellar performances and wonderful work, and I'm honored, truly honored to be up here.

And finally, I would say that, you know, we are a little bit out of touch in Hollywood every once in a while. I think it's probably a good thing. We're the ones who talk about AIDS when it was just being whispered, and we talked about civil rights when it wasn't really popular. And we, you know, we bring up subjects. This Academy, this group of people gave Hattie McDaniel an Oscar in 1939 when blacks were still sitting in the backs of theaters. I'm proud to be a part of this Academy. Proud to be part of this community, and proud to be out of touch. And I thank you so much for this."

From the Smug Alert episode of South Park. Not quite Atlas Shrugged but some similarities if you want to check the themes in under half an hour.

Heraclitus said...

My own belief, and I think this is what Savant is getting at, is that a white/non white breakdown taking place among the established parties will make people more race-conscious. Of course this only applies to white people, as all the others are very very conscious of it.

Shaunantijihad said...

Good. Would you want to be associated with this Erectus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNZczIgVXjg

If classified as Sapiens, would you reckon he's a moron, imbecile or idiot?

Anonymous said...

Do you still expect that we will see the rise of a hereditary chieftain around whom we will rally and fight? Hasn’t happened yet- won’t happen ever.

We will be culled, our gene pool sifted and purified, until it does happen.

However long or quickly that takes, however few remain.

Southern governors had a big handicap whites of the future won't have. The same handicap South Africans had.

There was a big rich white world from which they did not wish to be ostracized.

This is why, for now, I support socialism.

A big disadvantage of capitalism and all the white man's magic is that it takes fewer whites to support everybody else.

Anonymous said...

@U.N.

Maybe we should get the wealthy on our side.

Don't worry too much about "The wealthy." They will come, kicking and screaming all the way.

We don't go to them. They come to us. They must be subordinated. They, more than anybody else, have sinned against the nation and cannot ever be trusted.

The simple proof of this is the fact their wealth.

It is not possible today to be a rich man and not give, or have given, in order to get rich, tacit consent to white genocide.

For most of them it's not tacit. It's absolutely explicit.

Confucious was right.

"When the country is well-governed, poverty and a mean condition are things to be ashamed of. When the country is ill-governed, riches and honors are things to be ashamed of."

They will be shunned and shamed.

Some will be shamed by their own conscience. They can be redeemed by supporting the nation.

The rest are fair game for the wolves.

Tony Va said...

Can't come soon enough. This from Today's Daily Mail:

Babies born to ethnic minorities outnumber number of white toddlers for first time in U.S. historyRace change driven by younger Hispanic women having more children than white women

Whites still make up 80% of over 65s


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2007181/Majority-babies-U-S-born-ethnic-minorities.html#ixzz1Q8zPQtlN

Anonymous said...

@ Savant: You blogged: "I mean that white identity will have become solidly associated with an organised political party and other identities with the opposite party. Whites united will be an unstoppable force."

HERE, HERE!!!!

Anonymous said...

Advice to rich whites:

Establish a paper trail of contributions to the race.

You're going to need it.

I understand the timing might be tricky for you.

Jump too far too soon and the PC police get you.

Jump too late, and I get you.

... and every poor colored will help me.

Food and medical care and a plasma TV are rights, ain't they? :)

But that's what you get for your love of money.

Anonymous said...

Franz -

I mean white FAMILIES. Big families, too - and not just Mormons!

JP

Anonymous said...

Now this man strikes me as a righteous Jew.

He is righteous because he will work with us, and he doesn't demand a seat in our councils.

Jews only join white organizations in order to get control of them or spy on them.

euroserf said...

I've just read this link about this Eskin guy. It's just amazing that an ultra Orthodox extremeist Zionist can resonate with white nationalist objectives. We sure can live with this guy. I just need time to get my head around it.

Anonymous said...

Frequent white, American female lurker here. No, there will be no great realignment in US until the gov. defaults, which I think is inevitable. Then areas of the 'fly-over country (the Midwest) will be the last refuge of whites. We only have to deal with black Chicago, St. Louis, and Memphis. We have farmland to feed ourselves and are non-urban hunters extraordinaire. A few Western states will be included--Wyoming, the Dakotas, Idaho--mostly white states. 47% of our national population pays no income tax and
40% of the same population are on some form(s) of welfare. Can one
see what will become inevitable????

RegThe Hedge said...

I've been looking around for more info on Harold Covington and I'm struck by the nastyness and uglyness of a lot of the details. Obviously I wouldn't expect anthing good from the various Marxist hate sites. However Harold Covington described as a neo nazi is quite off putting. Also (if the Marxists are to be believed) he has a history with groups like combat 18. Combat 18 are anti Irish and they seem to be a bunch of violent losers who haven't ever actually done anything. I won't bore you with the details but the sum total is most of the nationalist groups seem to be low intelect losers who probably have prison records for petty and probably violent crime. In fact they seem to be the exact type of people they accuse the immigrants of being.

Now I do know I have been programed to think the way I do about people like these. However, the programing doesn't work on me for some reason, otherwise why in the world would I be posting on Mr Savants blogg? No, in fact it is not programing or anything else. The majority of people in these groups seem to be the type of people I would never associate with in fact I'd cross the street to avoid them. Yet there stands the black, the bearded muslim, the Indian from India etc etc etc and I really don't want them in my country. They have no reason to be here, there can be no satisfactory reason. I just want them gone. So there you have it, at some level at least I think the same as the people I don't want to be associated with.

I suppose the reason you don't see decent people out there being nationalists is down to the Orwellian society we live in. Anybody who is educated and cultured cannot come out because they would lose their livelyhood. Yet, as long as good people don't step forward we let the scum Marxists portray us all as neanderthals.

RegThe Hedge said...

What I'm trying to say here is that considering my views on non whites I would be labeled a neo nazi however that is a nasty name that conjures up all sorts of depraved connotations. I am not a neo nazi or am I?
My views.

-) No Misogenation. White people disappear when they mate with non whites.
-) White lands for Whites only (I don't mind < .5% non white).
-) I value non whites cultures and I'd happily support their efforts for ethnicly pure homelands (need to save ourselves first though.).
-) I would support the carrot approach to returning non whites but I would not rule out forced repatriation.

I suppose the difference between what I would view a nazi and my own views would be gasing. However I'm guessing the Germans did encourage the Joos to leave first before going for the end solution.

Hmmm. There doesn't seem to be much difference between my views and that of a nazi. I really am not happy about that however I do take solice in the fact that these views I harbor have only surfaced because of what thoses bastard Marxists have done to my country and continent. Essentailly I am having a human tribal reaction to the invasion of my homelands and the endangerment of my children and grandchildren by people who I rightfully see as a threat.

Franz said...

@ Reg

If I were you, I would not get hung up on the word "Nazi". I find that - especially in the English speaking world - its use has been so inflationary that it has lost all meaning besides being the vaguest ersatz-shorthand for "vile in a non-PC way".

What you are obviously repelled by is the realization that you share a lot of your opinions with a bunch of tatooed, habitually drunk, wifebeating and half-witted skinheads.

I once knew some of these guys here in Germany and ever since then, I kept my distance from these folks. Their collective repulsiveness makes them useless for democratic campaigning while their lack of discipline makes seem doubtful fighting material at best.

Not to mention that many skinheads are given to drunken ramblings, which makes it difficult to imagine them forming the kind of hush-hush, clandestine underground force that Mr Covington seems to recommend.

Win over just one engineer, just one carpenter, just one farmer, just one productive and respected person to the cause of white nationalism and you will do your race a greater service than the leader of a dozent indolent skinheads who waste their days drinking beer and listening to old skrewdriver records.

SAVANT said...

@Frequent white, American female lurker. First, welcome back. Second, I fell exactly the same. The crunch will only come when the crunch comes, as in a precipitous dollar collapse and/or a state going bankrupt. I don't expect this realignment to take place under business as usal conditions.

SAVANT said...

@Reg. There's a formal philosophical term that relates to the dilemma you describe. Eludes me for the moment. But yes, there's a vicious self-perpetuating circle whereby 'decent' whites are prevented from joining 'active' groups like EDL and Combat 18.

J Bull said...

Reg - don't worry. I agree with Franz. The term Nazi has been debased to just mean anything the libtards don't approve of. In any event, as an Englishman, I sometimes ask myself were the Nazis as bad as they were painted? They were bad, of course. But I'm just not sure that they all were the embodiment of evil that we've been lead to believe.

I also read Pat Buchanan's book on the origins of WW 2. Thjought-provoking, to put it mildly.

Shaunantijihad said...

Frequent white, American female lurker -

Socialists have stolen the milk from your breasts to raise an army against you.

That's the most concise way I can say it. We need White women to turn. We can't do it without you. Have babies with us, lots of babies. Never threaten to take our homes and businesses because you fancy a bit of something different. Be loyal to us. Forever. That is what we need most of all. Naturally, it works both ways.

Anonymous said...

Reg, if I may give the benefit of my own experience. I have been called racist; fascist; Nazi and, hilariously, a slave owner by a dumb fucking Norwegian in 1972 (no kidding).

On occasion, these epithets would worry me ... until I realised that they were coming from people who really, really thought that Che Guevara was a hero of the people, Bono was a sincere, generous soul and that Nelson and Winnie Mandela were saints.

I too, have read the Wikipedia entries on Covington. May I suggest you download and read one of the books (preferably two) and then go back and read the Wiki entry.

Or, far, far better. Go here:-

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/

Download and simply listen to one of the Radio Free Northwest broadcasts, then say the man is a loony.

Never forget that they who write the opinions on Covington write the same opinions of us.

Cheers.
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

SAVANT said...

... The crunch will only come when the crunch comes, as in a precipitous dollar collapse and/or a state going bankrupt. I don't expect this realignment to take place under business as usual conditions.

I am afraid that I feel exactly the same way. A Martel, a Cid or a Sobieski will only arise in the very darkest hour -- if at all. They would be howled down only minutes before ...

Cheers,
UN

Anonymous said...

I object! How come only the left gets to have thugs?

You think Mr. Commie-Professor invites his pet thugs to his wine-tasting party with the Senator and Banker?

Y'all's problem is you's lackin' what they call Will to Power.

That makes you "decent".

If the bard can be believed, Henry number 5 didn't turn his nose up at thugs.

They were his thugs.

Sometimes, sure, you gotta shoot your own dog, like ol' Henry did.

That just makes the other dogs MORE loyal.

Anonymous said...

J Bull said...

"... I sometimes ask myself were the Nazis as bad as they were painted? They were bad, of course. But I'm just not sure that they all were the embodiment of evil that we've been lead to believe.

I also read Pat Buchanan's book on the origins of WW 2. Thjought-provoking, to put it mildly.


Further to J Bull's post above, I am currently trying to track down the details of the massacres at Lidice --

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidice

and Oradour-sur-Glane ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oradour-sur-Glane_massacre#History

Which as far as I can tell were awful ... but I then refer you to:

http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/eisenhowers-death-camps-after-wwii/

as well as Churchill's little deal with Uncle Joe at the conference of Yalta.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Yalta_conference

Nobody comes out of a war with clean hands.

Cheers,
UN

RegThe Hedge said...

Thanks for your comments Franz, Savant and Mr Bull.

Uncle Nasty I have not expressed myself well. I have almost finished the Brigade(on your recomendation) and I very much enjoyed it. I have listemed to his podcast and I do not think he is a nut. I do think he is ahead of his time and in the future we'll look back on him as a patriot hero. He has no problem with being called a nazi which proves a disconnect with whats going on around him or maybe it proves he is pure, he does not let the Marxists interfer with his views. If the latter then he is going to be a beacon when the time comes.
I still think he should have a problem with being called a Nazi. The Nazis did some horrendos things. Albet I am now convinced they did less than they were accused of. Either way the Nazis are not something to aspire to.
Although I am non praticing I think the Christian vales should drive the white nationalist movement. Do onto others. . . Of course, the works both ways. If you bust my chops then I reserve the right to go old testiment.

RegThe Hedge said...

05:48 Anon.
Lol. Interesting point.

Anonymous said...

Reg'
I was'nt living here when "The Landsdowne Riot" occured,but were not Combat 18 behind that?.
If so,they proved themselves to be not very good at actual combat while getting hammered by the Gardai.

Of course,back then the Guards were still allowed to and capable of dishing out suitable treatment.I doubt if they could today.

mr.a

Franz said...

@ Frequent white, Savant and Uncle Nasty

Regarding your thoughts of collapse as a precursor to any sort of awakening, I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the ideas of american historians William Strauss and Neil Howe. They are in no way part of the race-realist right, but I think that you would tremendously enjoy their writings nonetheless.

Their basic premise is that American history is a recurring sequence of generational archetypes. That being: Prophet, nomad, hero and artist.

Strauss and Howe went out on a limb in the 90s and predicted that America would face a major crisis (a "Fourth turning" they call it) in the early 2000s. A crisis of the magnitude of the revolutionary war, the civil war or the great depression.

What I find so appealing in their work is the overwhelming amount of generational research which they present for their model of cyclical history.

Also, their model provides a striking explanation why a largely linear thinking humanity is constantly blindsided by events which individuals thinking in cyclical terms are able to predict perfectly well.

Real world example: Linear thinking people see globalization, see the cult of multiculturalism and deduce from that: "Gee, two generations from now, we'll all be brown."

On the other hand, cyclical thinking individuals see the same symptoms but say to themselves: "Well, cramming all sorts of people together like this has never worked out before. I better get a second passport so I can get the hell out of Dodge when it all unravels."

Linear thinker: "Stocks have gone up. I better buy, buy, buy."

Cyclikal thinker: "Stocks have gone up so much, I better take proftis and get out."

Linear thinker: "There has always been an abundance of cheap oil. Therefore it will always be there."

Cyclikal thinker: "Gee, that hybrid car don't look so bad."

You get the idea.

There is a huge wikipedia page on Strauss and Howe as well as a multitude of articles excerpts and so forth on the internet. those wanting a hardcopy of their work can buy their books "Generations" from 1991 or "The Fourth Turning" from 1997.

Again: These guys are not race realists, but merely brilliant scholars. As far as I am concerned, this makes their work even more appealing because by exposing ourselves to outside ideas, we can avoid caging ourselves into an exclusively right wing positive feedback loop.

Kevin Rafferty said...

Franz - I've been reading stuff on the net (there's lots of it there) since reading your post. Superb! I'm ordering the hard copy Monday. Thanks for the heads up!

J Bull said...

Uncle Nasty. There have also been numerous cases where Allied troops massacred Italians and Germans who had surrendered. As you say, nobody comes out of ANY war with clean hands.

Anonymous said...

@Reg: Do onto others. . .

If Japan was being invaded, would you not encourage the Japanese to defend themselves?

Heck, if a black country was invaded, wouldn't you encourage them to defend themselves?

Do unto yourself as you would have others do unto themselves.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

If Japan was being invaded, would you not encourage the Japanese to defend themselves?

Heck, if a black country was invaded, wouldn't you encourage them to defend themselves?


Hell. If israel was invaded, I'd expect them to defend themselves and would be shattered if they didn't ... But I wish to Christ that the fucking israelis would stop getting in the way of my defending myself.

I remember well, the alliance between israel and South Africa in the 60's, 70's and 80's, and like many ex-SA's I am grateful for it ... but, and this is a big "But", my gratitude wears paper thin over the years when confronted with treachery after treachery perpetrated on whites by the pathological handful of jews who don't know when to fucking stop!.

Their pathology is glaringly obvious in their bone-headed refusal to realise when they're on top -- and even more telling, to realise when they have fallen off the perch and rolled into a hole to stop digging!!

Terry pratchett put it beautifully in describing the insanity that sometime overtakes desperate people.
They dance in the light of their burning bridges.

Cheers,
UN

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Re "The Landsdowne Riot" - thrue, Combat 18 weren't very good at Kombat and got the shit kicked out of them However, our local boys in blue, having been inadvertantly locked out when all the trouble was going on, took out ther frustrations on anyone within baton's reach once they got it.

Anonymous said...

This is good ... well, not good, exactly, but it should be read:-

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/american_denial.html

To our American cousins, please read.

American Denial

By Steve McCann

Many of us who immigrated to the United States from either war-ravaged or totalitarian countries, where freedom was either unknown or the quintessence of daydreams, find ourselves baffled by a trait common to the majority of Americans: the belief, consciously or subconsciously, that the worst cannot happen here. That somehow the demoralizing images and disturbing experiences of those elsewhere are confined to those poor souls and will never find their way to American shores.

While this characteristic is found across all political and economic strata, it is particularly rampant among the current ruling class in the United States, who by their control of the culture and education, have ingrained that sort of thinking into the psyche of the vast majority of Americans.


Really. It's a brilliant read.

Cheers,
UN

SAVANT said...

Uncle N. My view exactly. During a recent trip there where I met with some very high powered poeple (e.g. CEOs, professors etc.) I was amazed at their complacency. I even began to question my own views. (Not for long of course!).

Franz said...

@ Uncle Nasty

What the article describes is not strictly an American phenomenon. Here in Germany there is some "angst" vis-a-vis certain subjects such as nuclear power. However, many people - and especially the "elite" - are 100% certain that:

a) our economy is collapse-proof.
b) hostile minorites will be assimilated and eventually turn out to be fine Volkswagen-engineers.
c) the people of the EU will perpetually bend to whatever orders emanate from Brussels.
d) military actions such as in Afghanistan and Serbia have no consequences whatsoever.

This comes back to what I remarked upon earlier: Linear versus cyclical thinking. The current crop of leaders has been so shaped by past experiences of prosperity, that their brand of linear optimism really has become a sort of pathologic delusion.

Much like another bunch of leaders, not so long ago: "Tractor production is up, electricity is up, the defense industry is humming. The 90s will be known as the golden decade of the Soviet Union."

What swell forecast that turned out to be.

Anonymous said...

American Denial

America is different.

We've got blacks and Mexicans.

And, increasingly, Chinese. And muslims. And Indians.

That's how I know America was the whitest country on the planet.

White countries are for everybody!

The traffic cameras here have begun to be taken down.

They net cost the state money, under Diversity.

Tee hee. :))

Lots of cameras are needed only under diversity. But lots of cameras only works in white countries.

And that's how I know Britain is still white.

essex-boy said...

"I know Britain is still white."

You're serious, right?

Anonymous said...

Here's something interesting. Remember Barbera Spectre? The creepy little hebrew hamster who said that we would just have to adjust to joos telling us how to behave?

http://www.wvwnews.net/index.php

She's popping up on more and more sites all the time.

Once again, they cannot stop crowing. It's hardwired.

Cheers,
UN

Anonymous said...

Aaah, those crazy Scandinavians ... Last bastion of liberty, always on guard -- protecting the freedoms of all concerned.

Well, almost.

http://tiny.cc/kbm2e

Denmark Police Propose Ban On Anonymous Internet Use

The Huffington Post

Imagine if the police knew exactly what you do online: All the porn sites you scan secretly, the vitriolic comments you leave on blogs, the number of hours you spend playing Farmville.

In Denmark, police have recommended to Parliament that it create laws that make it impossible for citizens to surf anonymously. According to Danish-language blog Computerworld Denmark, the proposal is intended to help investigate terrorism.

In the proposal, locations providing open Internet, like cafes and libraries, would have to confirm a user's identity, with some form of official ID, before letting them get online. Companies may also have to register and verify users' identities before providing access, as well as retain records of user logs.


Well, never mind. Australia will man up to it. Australia is full of rugged, individualistic, tough, ah, Australians, right?

Aussies wouldn't put up with this crap, right?

Aaaah, No.

http://tiny.cc/e9zyh

Telstra, Optus to start censoring the web next month

Australia will soon become one of the few countries to have controlled internet censorship.

MOST Australian internet users will have their web access censored next month after the country's two largest internet providers agreed to voluntarily block more than 500 websites from view.

Telstra and Optus confirmed they would block access to a list of child abuse websites provided by the Australian Communications and Media Authority and more compiled by unnamed international organisations from mid-year.

But internet experts have warned that the scheme is merely a "feel-good policy" that will not stop criminals from accessing obscene material online and could block websites unfairly.


Notice the little reference -- almost an afterthought -- to "and more compiled by unnamed international organisations from mid-year ..."

Who was it said he could see the lights of Europe winking out, one by one ...

Cheers,
UN

Anonymous said...

from Holland ... it appears that Moroccan immigrants (Moroccan??? WTF did Holland ever have to do with Morocco?) ... are now disrupting funeral processions.

Why? Because they can.

http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2011/06/failure-of-community.html

A failure of the community

Cultural enrichment takes many diverse and sometime unexpected forms. In the Netherlands this week, there was an uproar about what seems to be the latest trend in cultural enrichment (NL), disrupting funeral processions:
In Amersfoort yet again a funeral procession was disrupted by youth. Students of the [islamic] primary school Bilal flipped their middle-finger and were seen cheering as a procession of mourners drove by.

The head of the school told RTV Utrecht he will speak to the children about their behavior. Additionally he would like to introduce the bereaved to the children, to make them realize what they have done.
The bland reporting by RTV Utrecht not withstanding, it became clear quite quickly the 'youth' involved were Moroccan children, reported to be between 9 and 11 years old.

This isn't the first time something like this has happened either. Back in the end of May, a funeral procession was similarly harassed by Moroccan 'youth', circling the procession on their bike, cheering and shouting 'Jews, Jews, Jews'. In an item on Dutch TV (NL) CEO of the funeral organisation UVZ relates the incident during the funeral of a 17 year old girls. At the start of the procession, the lead car is approached by young Moroccans wanting to know if the occupant of the coffin is a muslim. After hearing the negative answer, they proceed thumping and kicking the funeral limousine, saying 'Good, one less dog'.

That this has happened, is happening, that such is being done by Moroccan children as young as 9 to 11 even, is enough to descend into a blood-thirsty rage by itself. But this isn't the most infuriating aspect of the story. That distinction goes to the combined attempts by director and staff of the Bilal school and the MSM to downplay the incident and refocus the issue.


I have now reached the point where I do not even see these creatures as human. They, like the somalis, the wetbacks, the jamaicans ... are merely the expendable ammunition -- the plague fleas. I do not see them as the problem.

I see these implements growing out of control, soon now.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

THis take on the Moroccans in Holland. No surprise there. There's an almost perfect corelation between their numbers and behaviour. The higher the numbers, the worse the behaviour. Well, there were warned.

Anonymous said...

Amazing what you find when you dig.

Found this:-

Conversation at a Grocery Store

and it was here:-

http://the-classic-liberal.com/statists-grocery-store-jennifer-hawkins/

and it's not a bad read, but here was the gem:-

Our conversation came to an end, and I could see the look of complete bewilderment on the face of the woman who had been the most vocal. I knew two things: (1) I had not convinced her of my point of view, nor had I sought to do so, and (2) she had heard ideas that were unfamiliar to her. Having heard them, they will remain in her mind; she cannot unhear them.
At some point she will hear them from someone else and they will not be so unfamiliar.
When she hears these ideas a third or fourth time from others, she may be inclined to think to herself: "I've always known that."


And this is the key. Do not be afraid to introduce a racist/race-realist thought into those fluffy little heads. The shock of the new is always frightening, but, if that sentiment has been subtly planted -- and becomes familiar or non-alien -- the next person who makes a realist statement will have an easier time of it.

Until it comes all the way round to you, again.

Small steps.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

"A sign of the Great Realignment?"

The Netherlands to Abandon Multiculturalism

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/06/the_netherlands.php

Could this be real? Could it be feel-good fluff? Please read and tell me what you think.

A few quotes:-

Soeren Kern, Hudson New York, June 23, 2011

The Dutch government says it will abandon the long-standing model of multiculturalism that has encouraged Muslim immigrants to create a parallel society within the Netherlands.

A new integration bill (covering letter and 15-page action plan), which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads: “The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people. In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society play a central role. With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society.”

The letter continues: “A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens. It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands. The integration will not be tailored to different groups.”

The new integration policy will place more demands on immigrants. For example, immigrants will be required to learn the Dutch language, and the government will take a tougher approach to immigrants to ignore Dutch values or disobey Dutch law.


My opinion? Bullshit through and through. It's driven by politicians ... increasingly desperate politicians.

Notice that nowhere is there mention of "Reduced" immigration or "Stopping" immigration or the dreaded "R" words.

"Roundup and repatriation" or maybe even "arrest and expulsion."

Never forget these are the ones who subjected Geert Wilders to the inquisition a few short days ago.

Politicians do learn ... yes, but usually only when the flames are licking at their feet.

Cheers,

UN

Andreas said...

Uncle Nasty - re comment 3.55. You are SO SO SO correct. I have found clear demonstrable evidence to support what your saying. The progression - it's amazing! I would advice ALL ON THIS BLOG to do such an approach! It works!

Andreas said...

About Holland. May be your a bit negative. There is big change coming there. Muslims attacking funeral's might be a straw too far. Dutch frineds really pissed over this, I can tell you.

Anonymous said...

There is only one way that things will begin to turn around.

The enemy, and I call them that advisedly, have all the time, all the money and all the media. With these, they can take years to alter everyone's behavior.

We don't have that time.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/5203698/Swedish-preschool-goes-gender-free

At the Egalia preschool in Stockholm, gendered pronouns are out. Staff avoid using words such as ''him'' or ''her'' and address the 33 children as ''friends'' rather than girls and boys.

From the colour and placement of toys to the choice of books, every detail has been carefully planned to make sure the children don't fall into gender stereotypes.

''Society expects girls to be girlie, nice and pretty and boys to be manly, rough and outgoing,'' says Jenny Johnsson, a 31-year-old teacher. ''Egalia gives them a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want.''

The taxpayer-funded preschool, which opened last year in the liberal Sodermalm district of Stockholm for children aged one to six, is among the most radical examples of Sweden's efforts to engineer equality between the sexes.

Breaking down gender roles is a core mission in the national curriculum for preschools, underpinned by the theory that even in highly egalitarian-minded Sweden, society gives boys an unfair edge.

Many preschools have hired ''gender pedagogues'' to help staff identify language and behaviour that risk reinforcing stereotypes.


As I say we don't have the time.

you will notice the panic and consternation of the parents whose children are part of this experiment.

Some parents worry things have gone too far. An obsession with obliterating gender roles, they say, could make the children confused and ill-prepared to face the world outside.

''Different gender roles aren't problematic as long as they are equally valued,'' says Tanja Bergkvist, a 37-year-old blogger and a leading voice against what she calls ''gender madness'' in Sweden.


What the fuck is wrong with these Eloi? I don't dignify them with the term "People".

I an sure that Jenny Johnsson, the 31-year-old teacher above, would change her views quite radically if she were giving them from a wheelchair with her jaw wired up.

It will come to that.

UN

Anonymous said...

Politicians do learn ... yes, but usually only when the flames are licking at their feet.

A decade ago or more they were warned of this problem so does this now constitute flames licking their feet?

Clogheen said...

The Swedes will soon learn what happens when you interfere with nature. Sickening.

Anonymous said...

Now this guy has got it ...

And you know what? It's almost legal

http://exiledonline.com/wn-38-ira-vs-al-qaeda-i-was-wrong/

A quote or two:-

Back in 2005, when the Al Qaeda hoax was hitting its peak, I wrote a column called “Nerf War and Real War: Al Qaeda vs. IRA.” If you want a good quick lesson in why dummies like me have such a hard time understanding guerrilla warfare, even when they’ve got all the info they need right in front of them, just read that article. I re-read it yesterday, after a reader pointed out that I’d praised Al Qaeda for going all out and was being inconsisent in yesterday’s blog for saying they blew their assets.

That reader was absolutely right. All I can say is that what I wrote yesterday still seems true to me. It’s something that’s been percolating in my head for a long time, and I’ve checked and rechecked it.

What I wrote back in 2005, praising Al Qaeda for going all out and sneering at the IRA for pulling its punches, was stupid. Totally wrong. Typical loudmouthed crap by a hick who hadn’t thought hard enough about guerrilla strategy.

The only thing I can say in defense of that 2005 article is that I had the facts right; I just read them wrong. By “the facts” I mean the basic difference between the IRA’s strategy and Al Qaeda’s: The IRA never used all its strength, played very cautiously, did just enough mayhem to remind Britain they were still around, hadn’t been broken. They even refused to do vengeance attacks on the UDA/UFF/UVF/LVF “Loyalist” hit squads that would kill Catholic civvies to try to force the IRA into a tit-for-tat Catholic vs. Protestant gang war.

Al Qaeda played all out, spent all its assets in a few years. In my dumb-ass 2005 article, I called the Al Qaeda method “real war” and the IRA’s slow-perc campaign “nerf war.” That was ignorance talking, boyish war-loving ignorance. I wanted more action, that was all.


and ...

The guerrilla has to opt out of protecting territory. Or the people who live in it. More bluntly, the guerrilla has to watch them die, sometimes pretty horribly, because counterinsurgency warfare runs on terror, and plain killing doesn’t do it, so the CI teams start killing guerrillas’ families in the sickest ways they can come up with.

That was tried with the IRA many times. I’ve been reading up on it, and the counterinsurgency methods the SAS taught to the Loyalist hit teams were as sick as anything from the Middle East. Check out the “Shankill Butchers,” a hit team from the LVF that used power tools, hatchets and improv dentistry to kill Catholic civvies as nasty as they could.


Check it out. It reminds me of a quote fom Dan O'Neill; a San Fran cartoonist who said he was in favour of violent revolution as long as no-one got hurt.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Further to my last:-

http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/

"In 1994, they took the idea of non-lethal warfare a notch up by doing one of the most revolutionary things any guerrilla army has ever done: IRA mortar teams dropped shells on the runways at Heathrow Airport, totally stopping air traffic… but the shells weren’t even designed to explode. Intentional duds. That’s amazing; I’ve never heard of anything like that. It shows how far they’d come by that stage, away from the simple Al Qaeda maximum-blood crap I bought into in that earlier article. In contemporary urban guerrilla warfare, at least in Western Europe, killing civvies is counterproductive. What you want to do, what the IRA had mastered by the 1990s, was messing with the incredibly fragile and expensive networks that keep a huge city going. Interrupt them and you cost the enemy billions of dollars, and they don’t even have any gory corpses to shake in your faces. Fucking brilliant, and I was too dumb to see it!

...The real crunch came when Lloyd’s of London went under. Guess why. Yup, it was the hundreds of billions of dollars they’d paid out for every highrise and pane of glass that had to be replaced after those London bombs went off.


It's brilliant. What do the fuckers worship above all else?

Money.

Start taking it away from them.

Cheers,
UN

SAVANT said...

Most insightful, UN. Not sure the IRA saw it exactly in money terms, but yes, it sure worked.