Saturday, 8 January 2011

A smile of serenity

These are hard times. Unemployment and poverty stalk our lands. A smile is hard to come by. Unless you happen to meet Mumtaz Qadri. Look at that smile of serenity that graces his countenance. Satisfaction at a job well done.

Yes, Mumtaz has every reason to be happy. As a diligent follower of the ‘Prophet’ he’s gone and done as that psychopathic pedophile has instructed. In this case planting 26 bullets into the body of the guy he was supposed to be guarding, Punjabi Governor Salman Taseer. Why? ‘I am a servant of the Prophet and the punishment for insulting him is death’.

Which it is. This makes Mumtaz a ‘good Muslim’ (is that an oxymoron?) and not a misunderstander of Islam, the term Western dhimmis use to explain away such atrocities. And how did the unfortunate Taseer insult the ‘Prophet’? By referring to Pakistan’s blasphemy law, which is regularly used as justification for killing Christains, as ‘an anachronism’. That’s enough to get you killed in Dar-al-Islam, folks.

I'd love to show you a picture I saw in the Irish Times, which showed Mumdaz just after his ‘capture’ - beaming, and in what seems to be the relaxed and smiling company of his fellow 'bodyguards'. No, he hadn’t been wrestled to the ground, far less gunned down as he was half way through his 26 bullets. So what were the other bodyguards doing? Good question. What can be said is that they were not bodyguarding.

Why in God’s name doesnt the West get out of those Islamic hell-holes? Trying to impose anything approaching normalcy on these deluded savages is not only a demonstrable failure, it’s actually counter-prdoctive.

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Big money is calling the shots. Our governments are puppets to large corporations.

Ironically using our monies to enlarge there future profits.

Big joke isn't it.

Robert said...

warm fuzzy news
January 8, 2011

Egypt’s Muslims attend Coptic Xmas mass, serving as “human shields”
Yasmine El-Rashidi, Al Ahram, Jan 7 2011

Egypt’s majority Muslim population stuck to its word Thursday night. What had been a promise of solidarity to the weary Coptic community, was honoured, when thousands of Muslims showed up at Coptic Xmas eve mass services in churches around the country and at candle light vigils held outside. From the well-known to the unknown, Muslims had offered their bodies as “human shields” for last night’s mass, making a pledge to collectively fight the threat of Islamic militants and towards an Egypt free from sectarian strife. “We either live together, or we die together,” was the sloganeering genius of Mohamed El-Sawy, a Muslim arts tycoon whose cultural centre distributed flyers at churches in Cairo Thursday night, and who has been credited with first floating the “human shield” idea. Among those shields were movie stars Adel Imam and Yousra, popular preacher Amr Khaled, the two sons of Pres Mubarak, and thousands of citizens who have said they consider the attack one on Egypt as a whole. Dalia Mustafa, a student who attended mass at Virgin Mary Church on Maraashly, said:

This is not about us and them. We are one. This was an attack on Egypt as a whole, and I am standing with the Copts because the only way things will change in this country is if we come together.

In the days following the brutal attack on Saints Church in Alexandria, which left 21 dead on New Year’ eve, solidarity between Muslims and Copts has seen an unprecedented peak. Millions of Egyptians changed their Facebook profile pictures to the image of a cross within a crescent, the symbol of an “Egypt for All”. Around the city, banners went up calling for unity, and depicting mosques and churches, crosses and crescents, together as one. The attack has rocked a nation that is no stranger to acts of terror, against all of Muslims, Jews and Copts. In January of last year, on the eve of Coptic Xmas, a drive-by shooting in the southern town of Nag Hammadi killed eight Copts as they were leaving Church following mass. In 2004 and 2005, bombings in the Red Sea resorts of Taba and Sharm El-Sheikh claimed over 100 lives, and in the late 90’s, Islamic militants executed a series of bombings and massacres that left dozens dead.

http://niqnaq.wordpress.com/

uhuru said...

In fairness there's a lot of tolerance if not goodwill towards Copts in Egypt. The Egytians are very far from being the worst. Still though, the guards for the church were mysteriously withdrawn shortly before the attack.

Anonymous said...

Why? Because we don't have any leaders. We have bitch-boys. But it will change.

RegThe Hedge said...

I didn't think I'd be shocked at the tactics of the UK establishment, after all I am Irish and I know about the attrocities the British establishment have inflicted on us. I'm quite confident UK schooled people have no knowledge of the attrocities but there you go.
Governments, no mater who they are, are a buch of dirty low lifes so with that here's a video of an Englishman fighting the genocide of his people. Listen to the dirty tactics of the UK government.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He7I_MRrXik&feature=player_embedded

Franz said...

Actually, that smiling young man really does belong to the "good muslim" category as far as I am concerned. After all, he stayed in Pakistan rather than kidnapping white girls in England, selling skag in France or fencing stolen goods in the USA. As a Pakistani he has every right to effect political change in Pakistan and I for one won't judge his methods. It's his country and as long as he stays there, he may bump off whomever he sees fit.

Sadly, I fear that Western countries have become deeply entangled in affairs which should only concern Pakistanis themselves. Remember that American Pentagon-powdermonkeys have been mouthing off about the AfPak theatre of operations for years. I have no doubt about two things:

1. Within a couple of years operations in Pakistan will be no longer confined to drone strikes but will resemble an acutal hot war.
2. A flood of so called "refugees" will deluge upon Europe and America. After all, there's always space for one more camp of saints to be erected on our soil. Such are the fruits of foreign interventionism.

Krokodil said...

Quite right Savant - why does the West bother? Although, as anon at top says, probably it's the dosh talking. It usually does.

I'm reminded of an amusing story regarding the cricket world cup of 1999. Pakistan played Australia in the final and were utterly thrashed. So disgusted were the Pakistani fans that a number of death threats were issued against the team. The captain at the time (Wasim Akram?) said that the players needed police protection when they got back to Pakistan. Unfortunately for them, a number of Pakistani police said that that wouldn't help, as they were the ones wanting to do the players in!

Of course, more recently, the Sri Lankan cricket team were offered cast iron guarentees of security from "militant" attacks. However, they came under attack anyway, and it would appear that the Pakistani "special forces" guarding them were, well, not quite up to the job of offering effective protection (fortunately, none of the Sri Lankans were killed).

Having police/army protection in Pakistan appears to be a seriously dubious proposition.

Anonymous said...

Please go here:-

"Immigration controversy leads to political assassination

http://isteve.blogspot.com/

You may find this very interesting ... No, it's not the same assassination. It's an older one.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

And here's another essay that I highly recommend ...

Genocide by Stealth

By Sarah, Maid of Albion. A person whom I admire immensely as she tries to get to the very bedrock of things ... rather than allowing herself to be deceived by the sparkly bits on the surface ...

http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/

Please take the time and read.

A Quote:

"Who can forget the words of Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev, (1) author of “When the Irish became White” and co-editor of the “Race Traitor” magazine, when he said: “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” or “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.” and of course: “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”"

Am I the only one who feels an overwhelming urge to re-educate Professor Noel Ignatiev?

More on him: It's old, but ...

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/harvard_genocide.htm

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Franz said...

Remember that American Pentagon-powdermonkeys have been mouthing off about the AfPak theatre of operations for years. I have no doubt about two things:

1. Within a couple of years operations in Pakistan will be no longer confined to drone strikes but will resemble an acutal hot war.
2. A flood of so called "refugees" will deluge upon Europe and America. After all, there's always space for one more camp of saints to be erected on our soil. Such are the fruits of foreign interventionism.


Franz makes a wonderful point here.

US foreign policy appears to be:-

(1) Pick a country ... any country.

(2) Bomb and shoot the living snot out of it.

(3) Declare a cease-fire and invite the survivors home for supper.

(4) Give those that arrive, refugee status.

GOTO (1) above. Whattaya know? A closed loop.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Krokodil said...

Quite right Savant - why does the West bother? Although, as anon at top says, probably it's the dosh talking. It usually does.

I have always felt, Krokodil, that it's power not money.

When you have sufficient power, money just ... follows.

My take on it, anyway.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Apart from saying This is how you win, I post with no comment.

http://tiny.cc/dlgqe

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Krokodil said...

Uncle Nasty - no doubt you're right, but I think power and (very big!) money go together.

kulak said...

Actually, that smiling young man really does belong to the "good muslim" category as far as I am concerned...

Spot on Franz.

beppo said...

With reference to Professor Noel Ignatiev, he provides a good example of a simple and time saving technique which can be quite illuminating after a while: whenever somebody is linked to huge swindles, curruption, campaign contribution to politicians, anti white/western activities,Goldman Sachs,Russian mafias/billionaires-on-the-run simply type into Google search the name and the word Jewish.

Anonymous said...

@Beppo: Could you explain a bit better that search you suggest??

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

@Beppo: Could you explain a bit better that search you suggest??

Try this:

1. use ANY search engine but Google.

http://tiny.cc/19vmh

2. Type in (without quotes) "russian mafia jewish"

3. And voila, you'll get this:

http://searchy.com/index.html?q=russian+mafia+jewish&s=Search

or this:- http://tiny.cc/lurdu

and, for example, this:

http://tiny.cc/uam1c

Ain't technology wonderful?

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Krokodil said...

"Uncle Nasty - no doubt you're right, but I think power and (very big!) money go together."

I firmly feel that sufficient money equals power, and sufficient power equals money ... once again, endless loop ... endless feedback.

By that token, virtually unlimited money equals virtually unlimited power.

This is why the endless Hollywood feel-good drivel about the feisty young (usually liberal) chick who fights back at the big bad corporation -- and WINS!! --usually has me in stitches.

You really think a corporation like say, Martin Marietta, JPL or Raytheon couldn't make Julia Roberts and Sean Penn disappear without trace? Simply not show up for work?

After all, nearly fifty years ago, they whacked a president in the most public imaginable manner, and THAT one has yet to be settled.

The "they" above is a generic "they", by the way.

But how much is enough? Depends on where you live.

R5000.00 (five thousand ZA Rand) or approximately 570 Euro will buy you a hit from any corrupt cop in South Africa.

Remember the currymuncher who had his wife capped in Cape Town? He probably drew the money from an ATM.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

PS. Notice how THAT one slipped off the radar?

Anonymous said...

Remember the currymuncher who had his wife capped in Cape Town? He probably drew the money from an ATM.

PS. Notice how THAT one slipped off the radar?

now that you mentiin it, yes"

Anonymous said...

Ohhh, baby. On a roll today.

Another one from the You-can't-make-this-shit-up department.

This is not a racissss piss-take.

Yes folks, I challenge you to read this with a straight face when you realise that it is, indeed, genuine.

http://www.pidginbible.org/Concindex.html

And now, I finally know where the boogs get it from.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Some village in Calabria is being saved by being settled by immigrants.
Now if this village is controlled by the 'Ndranghetisti why oh why aren't the liberals wetting their knickers over people trafficking?

Anonymous said...

anon 20.29. have you any more details?

Anonymous said...

But you've got to give it to him, however, that he is "tres" handsome.

Anonymous said...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12138404

But his project has not met with everyone's approval. After lunch, he stops at a door and shows me two bullet holes in the glass. Mr Lucano believes it is evidence of intimidation by the Calabrian mafia, the notorious 'Ndrangheta.

So that is enough proof for a liberal

PS That obnoxious waste of space Pamela I is finally(?) to be kicked out of Ireland today. She must be glad as she really misses her son in Nigeria ;-(

Anonymous said...

@Anon. 1 Jan 22:09. Yea, about as handsome as two camels shagging.

Anonymous said...

Whoopee! That bitch Pamela Izobegovic, or however you spell it, is on her way back to Nigeria? A lawyer friend of mine estimated that her endless lists of appeals easily amounted to over €2 million in fees and expenses. And that's just for one family.

Still, I'll only believe it when her black ass is back in Lagos.

Robert said...

'Gentile sperm leads to barbaric offspring'


Rabbi Dov Lior rules that Jewish Law prohibits sterile couples from getting pregnant using non-Jewish man's sperm, as it causes adverse traits. On subject of single mothers he says, 'Child cannot be 100% normal'
Kobi Nahshoni
Published: 01.12.11, 08:30

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4006385,00.html


Rabbi Dov Lior, a senior authority on Jewish law in the Religious Zionism movement, asserted recently that a Jewish woman should never get pregnant using sperm donated by a non-Jewish man – even if it is the last option available.

According to Lior, a baby born through such an insemination will have the "negative genetic traits that characterize non-Jews." Instead, he advised sterile couples to adopt.
Lior addressed the issue during a women's health conference held recently at the Puah Institute, a fertility clinic. His conservative stance negated a ruling widely accepted by rabbis, which states that sperm donated by a non-Jew is preferable to that of an anonymous Jew, who might pose a genealogical risk.
"Sefer HaChinuch (a book of Jewish law) states that the character traits of the father pass on to the son," he said in the lecture. "If the father in not Jewish, what character traits could he have? Traits of cruelty, of barbarism! These are not traits that characterize the people of Israel."
Lior added identified Jews as merciful, shy and charitable – qualities that he claimed could be inherited. "A person born to Jewish parents, even if they weren't raised on the Torah – there are things that are passed on (to him) in the blood, it's genetic," he explained. "If the father is a gentile, then the child is deprived of these things.
"I even read in books that sometimes the crime, the difficult traits, the bitterness – a child that comes from these traits, it's no surprise that he won't have the qualities that characterize the people of Israel," he added.
'Kids born to single moms become criminals'
Lior condemned artificial insemination and sperm donation in general, saying that they lead to waste of sperm, unclear genealogy and other Jewish law offenses. He warned against undergoing intrauterine insemination at hospitals, where the workers may mix sperm samples for one reason or another - a major halachic violation.

On the subject of women who freeze their eggs to use at a later date, the rabbi asserted that instead they should concentrate their efforts on getting married younger.
"Our public has been influenced by a part of the Western culture in which every woman, instead of becoming a mother, needs to get a Masters Degree," he lamented. "The role of women – child rearing – is not less important than an academic degree." Lior noted that there is nothing wrong with attaining a profession, but it should not be a priority.
Moreover, the rabbi spoke against single women getting pregnant.

"We can understand the desire of every woman to have a child, but according to our Torah it is impossible to address the demand of a certain woman when it can cause someone else suffering," he said.

"If a child is born without a father, he cannot be 100% normal." He stated that rabbinical literature defines these kids as "criminals and subjects of other negative phenomena."

Robert said...

'Gentile sperm leads to barbaric offspring'


Rabbi Dov Lior rules that Jewish Law prohibits sterile couples from getting pregnant using non-Jewish man's sperm, as it causes adverse traits. On subject of single mothers he says, 'Child cannot be 100% normal'
Kobi Nahshoni
Published: 01.12.11, 08:30

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4006385,00.html


Rabbi Dov Lior, a senior authority on Jewish law in the Religious Zionism movement, asserted recently that a Jewish woman should never get pregnant using sperm donated by a non-Jewish man – even if it is the last option available.

According to Lior, a baby born through such an insemination will have the "negative genetic traits that characterize non-Jews." Instead, he advised sterile couples to adopt.
Lior addressed the issue during a women's health conference held recently at the Puah Institute, a fertility clinic. His conservative stance negated a ruling widely accepted by rabbis, which states that sperm donated by a non-Jew is preferable to that of an anonymous Jew, who might pose a genealogical risk.
"Sefer HaChinuch (a book of Jewish law) states that the character traits of the father pass on to the son," he said in the lecture. "If the father in not Jewish, what character traits could he have? Traits of cruelty, of barbarism! These are not traits that characterize the people of Israel."
Lior added identified Jews as merciful, shy and charitable – qualities that he claimed could be inherited. "A person born to Jewish parents, even if they weren't raised on the Torah – there are things that are passed on (to him) in the blood, it's genetic," he explained. "If the father is a gentile, then the child is deprived of these things.
"I even read in books that sometimes the crime, the difficult traits, the bitterness – a child that comes from these traits, it's no surprise that he won't have the qualities that characterize the people of Israel," he added.
'Kids born to single moms become criminals'
Lior condemned artificial insemination and sperm donation in general, saying that they lead to waste of sperm, unclear genealogy and other Jewish law offenses. He warned against undergoing intrauterine insemination at hospitals, where the workers may mix sperm samples for one reason or another - a major halachic violation.

On the subject of women who freeze their eggs to use at a later date, the rabbi asserted that instead they should concentrate their efforts on getting married younger.
"Our public has been influenced by a part of the Western culture in which every woman, instead of becoming a mother, needs to get a Masters Degree," he lamented. "The role of women – child rearing – is not less important than an academic degree." Lior noted that there is nothing wrong with attaining a profession, but it should not be a priority.
Moreover, the rabbi spoke against single women getting pregnant.

"We can understand the desire of every woman to have a child, but according to our Torah it is impossible to address the demand of a certain woman when it can cause someone else suffering," he said.

"If a child is born without a father, he cannot be 100% normal." He stated that rabbinical literature defines these kids as "criminals and subjects of other negative phenomena."

Krokodil said...

Well Robert, I can simply have a laugh at these particular Jews and their somewhat odd views of things. I really don't feel any need to froth at the mouth and roll about in anguish because a race different to mine hold these views. I truly couldn't care less.

However, where I do care, is when the same race of people decide to get seriously uptight and militant about any other group/race who hold the same views as they propound. That's quite a different matter.

The Jews need to recognise their inherent hypocrisy in these matters. Either chill with so-called "anti-jewishness", or allow other peoples of the Earth their own "prejudices."

I am not anti-jewish at all. I am a supporter (and admirer, in many respects) of the Israeli state - especially their military prowess and, as much as I feel the Jews have an inherent right to a land of their own, in the land of their forefathers, I am a kind of Zionist myself.

But the Jewish hegemony of the media and popular culture - and increasingly of politics, in the West, is a very dubious matter. I'm no fan of that at all.

More to the point, I do not want the Jews, or any other race (including my own) to see themselves as superior and on a different plane of morality or criticism to any others. A level playing field - or no playing field at all!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12138404

But his project has not met with everyone's approval. After lunch, he stops at a door and shows me two bullet holes in the glass. Mr Lucano believes it is evidence of intimidation by the Calabrian mafia, the notorious 'Ndrangheta.

The BBC article is such a load of smarmy vomitous PC bullshit, one must just shake one's head.

The left have this passion to always make their drones look like heroic little poofs fighting eeeevil and monolithic racism and intolerance.

Lefty theatre.

One can assume that if the Calabrian Mafia even notice Lucarno's existence, they regard him as beneath their contempt.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Nemesis said...

Taking some obscure radical rabbi and taking that as representative of all Jews. Guys, get a grip. Really.

Robert said...

Obscure?
Dov Lior (Hebrew:, born 1933) is the Chief Rabbi of Hebron and Kiryat Arba in the southern West Bank. He is also the rosh yeshiva Kiryat Arba Hesder Yeshiva[1], and also heads the "Council of Rabbis of Judea and Samaria".

Lior is considered by many to be a leading scholar of the Religious Zionist camp. In the late 1980s the Attorney General barred Lior’s election to the Supreme Rabbinical Council following a public outcry over statements he made suggesting that captured Arab terrorists could be used to conduct medical experiments. Lior also issued a religious edict saying "a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail".

[edit] References1.^ a b Gershom Gorenberg, The End of Days: Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount, Free Press, New York 2000 p. 164
2.^ a b Nadav Shragai, 'Top Yesha rabbi says Jewish law forbids renting houses to Arabs'’ Haaretz 20/03/2008
3.^ a b Rabbi Lior Speaks Out Against Hiring of Arabs Yedioth Ahronoth
4.^ Rightist rabbis brand gov't policy on settlements worse than White Paper Jerusalem Post
5.^ Chief Rabbinate: Holy Land assets cannot be turned over to Vatican
6.^ Haaretz, 2010 Aug. 23, "Those Noisy Barbarians, Dov Lior, the Chief Rabbi of Hebron, Doesn't Want Jews to Take on Boogie-Woogie from the Jungle," http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/those-noisy-barbarians-1.309629
7.^ Khalid Amayreh (20 May 2004). "Rabbi supports killings in Rafah". Al Jazeera. http://english.aljazeera.net/archive/2004/05/2008410111651456766.html. Retrieved 17 March 2010.
8.^ a b "The List: The World’s Worst Religious Leaders". foreignpolicy.com. April 2008
9.^ Stephen Lendman (20–26 August 2009). "Religious fundamentalism in Israel". Al Ahram Weekly. http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2009/961/focus.htm.
10.^ Haaretz, 2010 Aug. 23, "Those Noisy Barbarians, Dov Lior, the Chief Rabbi of Hebron, Doesn't Want Jews to Take on Boogie-Woogie from the Jungle," http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/those-noisy-barbarians-1.309629http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/those-noisy-barbarians-1.309629
12.^ http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4006385,00.html

Anonymous said...

Oooo-Kay.

"... a public outcry over statements he made suggesting that captured Arab terrorists could be used to conduct medical experiments. Lior also issued a religious edict saying "a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail".

Now that's what I call a right-wing jew. I think I could talk to this guy.

Consider my question on the other thread answered.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Pastor Wright as attended by Barack Hussein "I am too thick to understand his anti-white rhetoric" Hussein was not a hate monger because he was on the right side just as this obscure non-obscure rabbi is.

Anonymous said...

On another site there was a Thread on a Rabbi calling for Palestinians to be brought to the ovens.
One post that got removed was "He was only helping them to make bread".
Israel apologoists who have no problem with Rabbis using Nazi images (Was he the famous lice rabbi as well?) have no sense of humour (frowns)

Robert said...

http://diversityischaos.blogspot.com/2011/02/afghan-physiotherapist-will-be-executed.html

An Afghan physiotherapist will be executed for converting to Christianity
Said Musa, 45, has been held for months in a Kabul prison where he has been tortured and sexually abused by inmates and guards. Musa, who lost his left leg in a landmine explosion in the 1990s, has worked for the Red Cross for 15 years and helps to treat fellow amputees. He was arrested in May 2010 as he attempted to seek asylum at the German embassy following a crackdown on Christians within Afghanistan. He was visited by a judge who told him he would be hanged within days unless he converted back to Islam. But he remains defiant and said he would be willing to die for his faith. Defense lawyers have refused to represent him, while others have dropped the case after receiving death threats. Musa was arrested after a TV station showed western men baptising Afghans during secret ceremonies.