Tuesday, 25 January 2011

Is Foxman worried?

Abe Foxman, that rancid tub of malevolent deceit, is complaining about the rise in ‘Jewish conspiracy theories’. In a display of chutzpah that challenges even his exalted standards, Abe, a man constantly at war with the facts, bemoans uncontrolled media, especially “the Internet, where conspiracies and rumors spread like wildfire and take on an aura of authenticity.”

Yeah, right, Abe. Unlike the MSM which provide us with the whole truth and nothing but the truth – all of the time. Ok, I got it!

On the positive side, the sight of Foxman decrying unfair media coverage does have great comic value. Because he, and his organisation, embody what Hannah Arendt called "the totalitarian contempt for facts and reality." Indeed, one might say that they provided the gold standard for divorce from reality.

And what specifially is he objecting to? Well, he cites the usual insane conspiracies, like Mossad involvement with 9/11 and Jewish involvement in provoking the Iraq war, before raising, like Lord Voldemort: That Which Must Not Be Named.None, in my view, is more threatening than the charge that Jews control American policy, particularly regarding the Middle East.”

Abe! How could anyone believe that kind of rubbish? And, anyway, where would they find out about it? Not in the MSM, that's for sure. Because when anything likely to be even mildly offensive to the ADL and their ilk turns up, the MSM turn a blind eye so fast they almost break their own necks. Our current reigning orthodoxies demand that we be oblivious to the obvious.

He’s talking here of course about what Helen Thomas referred to as the third rail. You don’t dare touch it. But if you want to know where the real power lies, then ask whom you cannot criticize.

And this is where Abe comes in. Is he actually worried, or is he just reverting to his standard hucksterism, which is always good for more donations and airtime?

I don't know the answer to that.

What I do know is that the refusal of our elites to talk about the third rail does not make it go away. In fact my spare time these days is taken up with trying to understand how the mass of evidence out there, evidence which suggests that our most basic assumptions are 180 degree wrong, that our ‘friends’ are in fact enemies, how this can be ignored or dismissed by the mass of people out there. It’s not as if the underlying data had all been assembled by twitching clubfooted racists with collections of SS memorabilia and slave manacles in their closets.

We can get a sense of why if you look at the accompanying comments on Foxman’s article. In my innocence I assumed that they would almost all focus on the facts I refer to, especially regarding 9/11, Iraq and the takeover of America’s Middle East policy. Instead (at least up to the time I penned this) not a single one did. They all addressed irrelevant and/or unimportant issues (e.g. was Arafat poisoned?) To me this shows the power of That Which Must Not Be Named

Who are the agents? The Huff Post moderators, the editors? I don't know. But I do know their power is awesome.

120 comments:

Anonymous said...

Outrageous article, Savant! Your very best one yet.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Franz said...

Mr Foxman shouldn't blame the internet for the rise of jewish conspiracy theories. The activities of Goldman-Sachs, JP Morgan et al are quite sufficient to explain how those ideas came into being.

Mr Foxman and his ilk are like Tony Soprano in his lowest moments of Prozac withdrawal: He brutalizes some other person and immediatly thereafter demands love, affection and friendship from his victim. If no such thing is forthcoming Tony/Abe is confused and angry.

The concepts of remorse and empathy are beyond their grasp.

While I detest organized Jewry in its current form (SPLC, ADL, virtually all banks), I am certain that there are many decent, non-sociopathic Jews out there. I just wish they would raise their profile.

Financial expert Peter Schiff is a great example of a decent Jew distancing himself from the scum at 85 Broad Street. If there were only more of his kind!

Anonymous said...

Took another look at the site, Savant.

Interestingly enough, although there are the usual totally irrelevant rants and rambles in the comments, there are quite a few posters who are giving Foxman a pasting.
I have never read a Foxman column, so the shallowness of his discourse and the poverty of his writing came as quite a surprise.

"When the first efforts appeared in the 1970s to argue that the Holocaust was a fantasy concocted by Jews for a variety of nefarious purposes, the initial reaction was: who will pay attention to such nonsense?

and

As absurd as the arguments by the deniers are, there is a market for such absurdities, whether to prove that Jews control all information in the world and can therefore get everyone to believe whatever they want; or to rehabilitate extreme right-wing parties who have been delegitimized by the Holocaust; or to show that the Jewish state has no moral justification.

He's concise, I must say, trying to rebut three truths in one sentence.
The articles above, are a cut-'n-paste by the way ... from the original. Note the capitalisation of "holocaust".

Now we move to the moment that we have all been waiting for. I want to do a survey.
How many members of the group feel that:-

(A) The holocau$t happened exactly as we are told ... continuously, endlessly, over and over?

(B) There was far less murder than reported?

(C) The holocau$t was a hoax and a fiction from top to bottom. Beginning to end?

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

once more said...

I think Foxman and the ADL and suchlike are making a strategic mistake. By jumping on everyone who makes even the most timid criticism of Israel and The Lobby, they're running ot of friends fast.

Can't be fast enough for me.

kulak said...

Is he actually worried, or is he just reverting to his standard hucksterism, which is always good for more donations and airtime?

To ask the question is to answer it.

how this can be ignored or dismissed by the mass of people out there.

To ask the question is to answer it.

Louis IX said...

Isn't it sad that it has to be the 90something Thomas who dare to say on CNN that you can say anything against anybody, like against OBama, and everything is fine, but one word against israel, and you loose your job, get in trouble....

Well, about the good jews, there are many, it just depends when and from whom point of view. You know the story of this american journalist, blond, blue eyed but aboslutely not pro-nazi and in fact, rather against the nazis, who was visiting pre-war 1937 Germany and asked his jewish cab driver in an impecable german, notepad and pencil ready:
"Soooo, about this Adolph Hitler, what do you think of him?"
"ahehmmmmm, he's doing good things"

Krokodil said...

We must, however, distinguish between "ordinary" Jews and Zionists, the latter apparently using or discarding both truth and error as they see fit.

Now having said that, I'm actually fairly pro-Israeli, so maybe I'm contradicting myself.

Maybe it's more accurate to say, that if Jews are wedded to Zionism (and probably most are), then they should be completely honest about it, and not try to hide aspects of it with smoke and mirror tricks.

I don't have a problem with Jewish nationalism - or White, Black, Arab, Chinese, etc. nationalism either - just so long as it's agenda is honest, and not using others as stepping stones for their objectives.

Therein lies the problem, I suppose, as nationalism has a habit of getting out of hand - and Jewish nationalism has quite definitely "stepped" on their Western hosts and friends, inasmuch as being hostile to White/Western interests is perceived as being necessary for Jewish nationalism.

Actually, I don't really know if an anti-White agenda really is necessary for Jewish nationalism - maybe there are other reasons for this hostility, though it doesn't seem that likely.

In any event, as far as the West is concerned (especially the USA), the Jews have found a very comfortable home, and I think it's just downright lacking in both wisdom and politeness to go shit on the hand that feeds you.

SAVANT said...

While I detest organized Jewry in its current form (SPLC, ADL, virtually all banks), I am certain that there are many decent, non-sociopathic Jews out there. I just wish they would raise their profile.


My sentiments too Franz.

Anonymous said...

kulak - again you speak in mysterious ways. Can we expect some enlightenment?

iraniboy said...

Answer = C. Whole thing is crock of sh*t.

Anonymous said...

"I am certain that there are many decent, non-sociopathic Jews out there. I just wish they would raise their profile.

Quite. I think that that if one drills down to the very core of the problem it is leftism and left-wing thinking that is the villain. Everything else is distraction and theatre.

Rumours abound that the leftie icon, Mandela is losing his grip on the perch. So, to try and confirm the wishful thinking, I went to the News24 article ... and read some of the comments. Bad move.

Pretty much enough to make you throw up as the white lefties (mostly South Africans who should know better) desperately establish their liberal credentials.

The very thought of the old bastard plummeting into the pit results in many swivel-eyed loons tearing their thinning ponytails and gnashing their teeth. The term "Madiba" is liberally sprinkled like a talisman.

Actual sackcloth and ashes are not yet mentioned, but be patient ...

I seem to have established the earliest left/liberal thinkers before the French Revolution. Has anyone traced them back further?

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Robert said...

Denmark is not a model of humanitarianism.

A Legacy of Dead German Children
By Manfred Ertel

Thousands of German children -- many of them toddlers fleeing the Soviet advance -- died in Danish refugee camps at the end of World War II. A crusading doctor has set out to document their suffering and break long-standing beliefs about post-war Danish humanity.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,355772,00.html

kulak said...

@anon

It's only "mysterious" if you don't have a sense of humor.

But I suppose I might mean three things:

1) Answer to question one is Yes.

2) How? Same reasons.

And lastly, at the end of the day, who the hell cares, really?

kulak said...

@Savant

I am certain that there are many decent, non-sociopathic Jews out there.

In the states we call them German-Americans (the violently sociopathic ones we call Russians.)

Anonymous said...

Sorry Savant - the Jews can organize anything BUT a conspiracy. They even have a saying:
"Put two Jews in a room and you get three opinions."
Jews were fighting a civil war in Jerusalem even while the city was ringed with Vespasian's legions! For fuck's sake!

J.P.

Franz said...

In my earlier post I forgot to mention the "Jewish conspiracy theory" du jour..

Right now the financial elite in Davos is discussing the implementation of a plan to swamp the world with 100 trillion in fresh debt. The kicker: To ensure collection of said debt, some sort of global goon squad will be required.

Guess who figures prominently among the authors of this plan? None other than JP Morgan and the Rothschilds. Goyim's best friends.

If you can stand 84 pages of truly Orwellian banksta speak, I suggest you check out the original document: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_NR_More_credit_fewer_crises_2011.pdf

If you like your "Jewish conspiracy theories" in a more digestable form, I suggest you visit the excellent kingworldnews.com and listen to his latest interview with Jim Rickards.

As I said earlier: Right now it doesn't take malevolent bloggers to give Jews a bad name. The actions of the worst element among them and the filth oozing out from their places of worship (banks) suffices.

Did I get that right Mr Foxman?

Fisticfury said...

@UN "I seem to have established the earliest left/liberal thinkers before the French Revolution. Has anyone traced them back further?"


Jesus?

Anonymous said...

Re Uncle Nastys quiz, answer is B. For sure.

SAVANT said...

UN quiz - I go with B as well on the simple premise that A and C are demonstrably wrong.

E. Henry Thripshaw MD said...

Gotta go with B, Uncle Nasty, although considering the crimes of the tribe in the USSR, we may as well adopt the attitude that C is more correct. I mean when will we see a hollywood film or a museum exhibit about murderous Jewish Bolsheviks or the Ukrainian forced starvation? To the tribe, they have been shoved down the memory hole. As turnabout is fair play, we can do the same with the Holocau$t.
I'm not going to go to HuffPo to read that crap because the site is mostly anti-white hate propaganda. I got banned from commenting for qustioning the wisdom of mass immigration, and I suspect the moderators will ban anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton. The weird thing is that they deleted ALL of my comments I had ever made on earlier posts. It was like becoming an unperson in 1984!

Sigmund Fraud said...

Any sort of squirming from these professional 'Jews', has got to be a sign that they are out of their comfort zone. They will no doubt, start to step up their attacks on the internet. Mr Foxman is hitting70, heaven forbid this state of affairs would stress him out enough for him to have a coronary. Now wouldn't that be a shame!

Bemused stare said...

UN

I would go with B for much the same reason as Savant.

Anonymous said...

B for me. I agree with IS, both A and C are not feasible.

kulak said...

Sorry Savant - the Jews can organize anything BUT a conspiracy. They even have a saying:
"Put two Jews in a room and you get three opinions."


Two jews, three conspiracies.

kulak said...

@U.N.

Re: Quiz.

Suppose that it happened as advertised.

Then as many as 90% of claimed holocaust survivors may be frauds.

Where do a million survivors come from? I can see a thousand, ten thousand but not 30,000 and certainly not the 15 million necessary to justify the current number of claimed survivors according to typical actuarial tables for healthy adults of the period, those who were not starved and tortured for years. Look at Vietnam veterans. Only 700,000 of 2.9 million survive 35 years after the war. Something is wrong here.

Somebody's lying their asses off, and it ain't Norman Finkelstein.

(Oooh! There's a deadly term at that link in the comments:

Holocaust Factualist.)

Anonymous said...

So now we have it that Jew's can't organize a conspiracy? You guys better get in line.

Anonymous said...

“the Internet, where conspiracies and rumors spread like wildfire and take on an aura of authenticity.”

Would this be the place where it was pointed out the Duke University rape case was a conspiracy to elevate Selena Roberts?
That the shooters in Columbine were not obsessed with Marilyn Manson?
That the Virginia Tech. shooter was obsessed with a film (Oldboy?)which featured a guy pointing a gun at his head and another at the camera? (The very same film that 6 months later the Daily Mail was full of praise for so sorry if I got the name wrong)
That all the mass shootings after the introduction of Prozac were undertaken by those on Prozac? (The MSM seem to have stopped this information getting out as people might not believe the Prozac is brilliant stories)
That an Oscar winner faked much of Bowling for Columbine? (You know who I mean this paragon of anti-establishment, the fighter for the working man from Davidson, Michigan)
Yes, the MSM is to quote someone "all professions are a conspiracy against the laity" and the Internet is the voice for the voiceless to keep it in check.

Heraclitus said...

good post anon 17.31. "all professions are a conspiracy against the laity" - that originated with George Bernard Shaw, who originated in Dublin!

Krokodil said...

I'd also go with (b) on UN's quiz - I suspect most people on this blog would.

I think the main question is, did many Jews perish during the War because of the brutal conditions one automatically finds in war - or was it a systematic attempt by the Nazi regime to enact a genocide against the Jewish people?

Many people of different nationalities suffered or died as a result of the sheer scale of the War (all wars brutalise, and WW2 was the biggest war in history, so brutalised even more) but, clearly, there were no specific programs to annihilate whole nations or ethnic groups - with the possible exception of the Jews.

Due to the internet, I have become a tad skeptical of the Holocaust story, whereas pre-internet I considered Holocaust-denial on a par with flat-Earth theorists.

The Holocaust basically encapsulates three things: (1) There was a specific order (Wannsee protocol) for the extermination of European Jewry.
(2) Poison gas was used as the most efficient means of delivering death.
(3) Some six million Jews were deliberately murdered by the Nazis.

There are other, lesser, aspects of the Holocaust, but I think the above sums up the gist of it.

So, then, how true are the actual claims?

One way of looking at the whole matter is to not look at the Jews, but rather the Nazi regime. The Nazis were blatantly and unashamedly anti-jewish and, even before the War, showed that their hostility towards the Jews had real menace.

Once the War had begun, the Nazis could operate under far greater secrecy than before. Also, as stated earlier, wars brutalise, and the idea that the Nazis wouldn't have been any more nasty or hostile towards the Jews than in peacetime, is surely nonsense.

The Nazi regime had many unpleasant policies towards many groups of people, including ethnic Germans. They carried out a policy of mass euthanasia of "retards" and those deemed to be a burden on the state during wartime. If they could do this to their own (vulnerable) people, would they have had any particular concern for the Jews, who they despised and hated?

Lets also be clear, Hitler's main lieutenants were, for the most part, thoroughly unpleasant people. With the possible exception of Goering, most of the Nazi bigwigs were very hostile towards the Jews. I do feel that this regime lent itself towards sociopathy, at least for some of it's principal adherents.

Now, does any of what I've said prove the Holocaust? No. But Im a little cautious to simply turn 180 degrees and discard the whole story.

Was there a specific order to exterminate Europe's Jews? I don't know, but I believe it's possible.

Was poison gas used in the Eastern concentration camps? Ditto above.

Did six million perish? It's possible but I suspect the figure is smaller, and possibly much smaller (which would not eradicate it as a crime).

That the Jews, and probably Zionists especially, have used the Holocaust to their advantage is beyond doubt. That the premise for their use of it automatically spells falsehood, is less clear.

I'm prepared to be convinced one way or the other - but the demonising and criminalisation of revisionists/deniers manifestly doesn't help the "orthodox" position.

Anonymous said...

krokodil - an excellent summary. In fact nothing else needs to be said. Bravo!

Anonymous said...

Krokodil said:-

The Holocaust basically encapsulates three things: (1) There was a specific order (Wannsee protocol) for the extermination of European Jewry.
(2) Poison gas was used as the most efficient means of delivering death.
(3) Some six million Jews were deliberately murdered by the Nazis.

There are other, lesser, aspects of the Holocaust, but I think the above sums up the gist of it.

So, then, how true are the actual claims?


Very concisely put, Krokodil, and a point that I should have made in my original post.

Right now, I think points(2) and (3) above can be rebutted almost immediately. I shall attempt to do that in future posts.

Having said that, and seeing that the response -- so far -- to my original query, leans very strongly to (B) ... i.e. "There was far less murder than reported. -- I guess I have to declare my interest.

Right now, using an earlier analogy, I feel that if (A) The holocau$t happened exactly as we are told is at the left hand side of a bar graph reading zero to one hundred percent, (C) The holocau$t was a hoax and a fiction from top to bottom. Beginning to end? sits at the right and (B), of course, is at 50%.

Right now,I would be hovering between 80 and 90%

I feel that to declare a solid hundred percent conviction of something that I never witnessed first hand -- and, in fact, happened before I was born, would condemn me as a looney. And rightly so.

Here's where things get interesting though. Documents, long hidden, are being continually unearthed and dusted off -- and most of all, read. Many of these reveal a great deal of, shall we say, hanky-panky on the part of the historians (i.e. the guys who won)

But, more later.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Speaking of conspiracies, I refer you to Gilad Altzmann ... a renegade RSP.

“The Jewish population in the UK is 280,000 or 0.46 per cent. There are 650 seats in the House of Commons so, as a proportion, Jewish entitlement is only three seats. The conclusion is pretty obvious. With 24 seats, Jews are eight times over-represented. Which means, of course, that other groups must be under-represented, including Muslims…If Muslims, for instance, were over-represented to the same extent as the Jews (i.e. eight times) they’d have 200 seats. All hell would break loose.”

A question must be raised here. Why are Jews overwhelmingly over-represented in the British parliament, in British and American political pressure groups, in political fundraising and in the media?


And most revealing ...

"As I have mentioned many times before, there is no such a thing as Jewish conspiracy. It is all done in the open. In front of TV cameras from all over the world, listed Israeli Propaganda Author as well as British Foreign Secretary David Miliband gave the Israelis a green light to operation Cast Lead, suggesting in Sderot that “Israel should, above all, seek to protect its own citizens.” Miliband, in practice, made us all complicit in a colossal war crime committed by Israel."

My emphasis.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty.

PS. Savant, please delete the previous (unfinished) version of this post. More haste, less speed.

Thanks.

UN

Anonymous said...

On the question of good, bad or indifferent jews, this writer/researcher takes no prisoners, period!

...and, he also offers up a few points on the "holocaust" in his essay "The look" for those who are interested.

SAVANT said...

That sounds interesting Unlce Nasty. Can't wait!

Anonymous said...

Just for interest's sake -- they're trying John Demjanjuk ... again.

http://tiny.cc/da40b

A few quotes ...

For elderly Holocaust survivors such as Jules Schelvis, **whose entire family was murdered in Sobibor, a verdict is far more important than retribution: "Justice must be done and be seen to be done, the sentence is almost irrelevant," he declared as the trial opened. He is one of the very few to have survived Sobibor.

** More smoking Grossmutters ...

"We are not quite sure when it will end," said Michael Koch, one of the lawyers representing the families of Sobibor victims. "If things don't go in our favour, we could still be here in October."


If they're charging by the day or hour, they will be.

And another instance of writing your own rules:-

The court must also decide whether to accept an argument put forward by the prosecution, which has no legal precedent in post-war death camp trials. This proposition, backed by historians' research, maintains that simply by being employed as an SS guard in Sobibor, Mr Demjanjuk would automatically have taken part in the mass murder of prisoners.

That last one could have come from the US Democratic party.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Piet said...

Good one Uncle! I can see how you got your name!!

Anonymous said...

They're Heeeeere!

http://tiny.cc/dwgb8

The hidden censors of the internet

Journey with us to a state where an unaccountable panel of censors vets 95 per cent of citizens’ domestic internet connections. The content coming into each home is checked against a mysterious blacklist by a group overseen by nobody, which keeps secret the list of censored URLs not just from citizens, but from internet service providers themselves. And until recently, few in that country even knew the body existed. Are we in China? Iran? Saudi Arabia? No – the United Kingdom, in 2009. This month, we ask: Who watches the Internet Watch Foundation?

Okay ... the article is nearly three years old, but ...
Perhaps we'd all better check this out.

https://www.hushmail.com/

It's free and encrypted.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

For those of you who may visit the Demjanjuk trial:-

http://tiny.cc/da40b

I invite you to note the reporting. Taken verbatim ...

For elderly Holocaust survivors such as Jules Schelvis, **whose entire family was murdered in Sobibor ...

... He is one of the very few to have survived Sobibor.


The weasel words most used when reporting a trial whose outcome is not yet known are "alleged" or "allegedly".

Both conspicuously absent in the reporting.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Once again, Savant, please forgive and delete the botched double post.

Thanks, UN

SAVANT said...

Re the censorship of the web, the technology is there to do that. For example a totalitarian government would have little difficulty but in our democracies they'd have to, in my opinion, break the law to apply such inspections. I believe the so-called net neutrality initiative will be used for this.

Anonymous said...

Just decided to re-visit the Demjanjuk show-trial (damn!) Kangaroo Kourt (Damn!!) Star-Chamber proceedings, whatever ...

(Where's the damn strike-through HTML code, just when you really need it?)

And this caught my eye ... again.

The court must also decide whether to accept an argument put forward by the prosecution, which has no legal precedent in post-war death camp trials. This proposition, backed by historians' research, maintains that simply by being employed as an SS guard in Sobibor, Mr Demjanjuk would automatically have taken part in the mass murder of prisoners.

Stay with me, now.

Taken to its logical conclusion ... should, let us say, a delivery guy have dropped off a pizza at Sobibor and decided to pick up a few extra reichsmarks or kopeks by taking out the garbage or sweeping the floor ...

He would be standing in the dock, next to the Butcher of Majdanek, sorry, Sobibor -- on trial for his life as an employee of the forces of Eeeeeevil.

Hear that horrible bubbling sound?

That's Nancy Pelosi filling her knickers.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Growing up in the 80s, I remember that Russian WW2 dead was put at 20 million. When I met Russians in the early 00s, they told me it was 40 million. So Uncle Nasty et al, do you think that next to 40 million Russian WW2 deaths 6 millions Jewish deaths (and remember there were 3 million+ Jews just in the Polish shtetls at the time) is inconceivable? How many did the Einsatzgruppen kill? Auschwitz and other death camps have been well-documented by legions of eye-witnesses and survivors, many of them Gentile. While I agree that certain unscrupulous Jews like Foxman have milked the tragedy for their own ends, we must not forget the facts. And remember what Hitler and his crew did to Germany, once considered the most civilized of European nations. Also remember that next to the genocidal binges of Mao and Stalin, six million is very feasible.

J.P.

Anonymous said...

Yes, 'alleged' is a great word. It gets you out of all sorts of trouble while smearing the intended victim.

Anonymous said...

@Uncle Nasty. The fact that Jews are 8 times over-represented does not mean that there's a 'Jewish conspiracy'. Jews always over-achieve in everything. Part of it is due to tribal networking I'd say, but only a part.

SAVANT said...

Hear that horrible bubbling sound?

That's Nancy Pelosi filling her knickers.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty
======================

What a ghastly thought!!!!

Anonymous said...

See Irael Shahak's piece on Foxman and Jewish rage.
unfortunately he is a liberal jew that will sink Israel.
See Christopher Bollyn on 911
Good Jews need to speak out against Banksters and Liberal jews destroying white nations :
All the lies regarding ww2 will be exposed ,its too late to control the internet it will only ad fuel to the fire.

Anonymous said...

28 January 2011 08:11 says:

"While I agree that certain unscrupulous Jews like Foxman have milked the tragedy for their own ends, we must not forget the facts."

....and just what are the "facts" according to your unnamed sources?

It also appears you're treading rather lightly here when using phrases such as "certain unscrupulous Jews like Foxman". Have you read parts of the jewish "bible" called the Talmud, lately?

The simple fact of questioning the "holocaust" from a negative point of view can land someone in jail in some European countries.

Just from that fact alone, reveals to me, the real truth of this issue is being squelched. Why does real TRUTH need such a defense mechanism put in place to that draconian degree? Because their "truth" may not be true after all.

Check out Auschwitz concentration camp's diminishing death numbers HERE.

...and strangely, the "holocaust" industry didn't quite take hold until the 1960s, and it was never mentioned in Churchill's voluminous wartime recollections after WWII.

As in any industry, there is always money to be made...and when have jews turned down that opportunity??

More on this issue can be read here, among other sources.

However, your one question of "How many did the Einsatzgruppen kill?" is still an unknown to me.

Anonymous said...

I've read about Christopher Bollyn on 911. Did the piece air on CNN? And if so why didn't the country explode in anger? Just askin'

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

@Uncle Nasty. The fact that Jews are 8 times over-represented does not mean that there's a 'Jewish conspiracy'. Jews always over-achieve in everything. Part of it is due to tribal networking I'd say, but only a part.


Both quotes on that post were from this site, which I recommend.

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/connecting-the-zionist-dots-by-gilad-atzmon.html

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

28 January 2011 08:11 says:

....and just what are the "facts" according to your unnamed sources?

Thanks for that. You saved me quite a bit of work.

A most telling quote was:

"The Jewish-owned New York Times reported in 1945 that Soviet Russia supplied the figure of four million Jews having been put to death, "in the gas chambers of Auschwitz." However, in July of 1990, the Polish government reduced this figure to 1.1 million and it was accepted by Jewish groups. Despite this evidence, the "official figure" of six million dead was not lowered to three million.

Three million reduction -- officially, but if one goes here:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_Jews_were_killed_in_the_Holocaust

a quote:

"About six million.

Since 1945-46, the most commonly quoted figure for the total number of Jews killed has been an estimate of approximately six million. This figure, first given at the Nuremberg Tribunal, has been confirmed again and again by later research."

Well, actually no.

The February 1943 copy of Reader’s Digest article "Remember Us" written by Jewish Hollywood script writer Ben Hecht was long before Nuremburg (Nov. '45 - Oct. '46. Hecht conjured up a Jewish death toll of 6,000,000 on page 108.

This number quoted in the middle of the war at the time when, according to professor Raul Hilberg’s 1985 three-volume account, The Destruction of the European Jews on page 885, the main chambers of Auschwitz were still under construction.

So ... Hecht was first?

Not even close. The six million figure holds a fatal fascination for the RSPs.

"In the American Hebrew Magazine of October 31, 1919, there appeared an article entitled "The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!" By Martin H Glynn, former governor of the state of New York. This article begins, "From across the sea, six million men and women call to us for help ..."

Image:- http://tiny.cc/i17rt

Okay so that was the first, then? Er, No ...

On page 482 of the article on 'Antisemitism' in the the 10th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1902) is found the words: "While there are in Russia and Rumania six millions of Jews who are being systematically degraded..."

And so on and so on ...

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

May I recommend this article? Written by a lad with the good Scottish name of Shraga Elam.

A quote:-

"This was also the case of the important Nazi agent Jaac van Harten, whose money financed in 1945/46 the illegal Jewish immigration to Palestine and acquisitions of weapons. Van Harten was crucial for the flight of Nazis out of Europe, but the agents of the Mossad Le'Aliyah Beth who protected him, could not care less. He himself found refuge later in Tel Aviv, where he got the protection of no less than Golda Meir, the de-facto foreign minister at that time (1947). Till the 60s Van Harten kept contacts with his former Nazi boss, Friedrich Schwend, who was then working in Peru with other famous Nazis like Josef Mengele and Klaus Barbie. Schwend was considered to be a kind of finance minister of the planned Fourth Reich.

Wheels within wheels within wheels, folks. Never a dull moment.

The whole post here:-

http://www.stateofnature.org/holocaustReligion.html

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

From the same site (mentioned above)

Beside the fact that such peace is also in the interest of many Jews, the dismantling of the Holocaust Religion due to their own efforts will benefit most of the Jews. Because as history teaches, the downfall of every power is bound to happen sooner or later. In this case one can reckon with a fierce Anti-Jewish backlash, which should be considered as a direct result of the arrogance and immorality of the pro-Israel lobbies propagating the Holocaust Religion. As the main sources of the extraordinary and abnormal influence of the Holocaust Industry are clearly the special relationships between the U.S. and Israel, once they come to an end, the situation will change dramatically for sure.

Already now there is a growing popular discomfort with the Holocaust Religion & Industry and their constant and inflammatory swinging of the Auschwitz and/or Judeophobia bludgeon. This strong irritation is canalized in many countries primarily by the radical right wing, who are not too afraid to formulate loudly a critique against this disproportional and hypocritical Zionist influence mixed with fiery Judaephobia.


http://www.stateofnature.org/holocaustReligion.html

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

"I've read about Christopher Bollyn on 911. Did the piece air on CNN? And if so why didn't the country explode in anger? Just askin'"

Most intriguing. I've just read a big chunk of the article, myself.

http://www.bollyn.com/index.php

Interesting how the hebrew to human ratio in the US administration right now, is very similar to the ratio prevailing in Bolshevist Russia in the twenties.

Just noticin'

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

SAVANT said...

Uncle - FYI, your last four posts were designated as spam by Gargle. Seems that questioning the Holocaust gets their attention!

Anonymous said...

SAVANT said...

"Uncle - FYI, your last four posts were designated as spam by Gargle. Seems that questioning the Holocaust gets their attention!"

Sorry about that, SAVANT.
This, stolen from the comments of the links from ANONYMOUS 28 January 2011 08:11, ain't going to help matters.

Time Magazine, March 18 1985:

‘How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? “I will never know” Wiesel says. “I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”

Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under ‘Buchenwald’:

“In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions.”


Wiesel, it should be pointed out, was the individual who, at one stage, actually stated that (against all laws of physics) there were so many corpses buried at one spot that "Geysers of blood shot out of the ground ..."

I'd pay good money to see that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Wiesel

You'll notice that Wikipedia (normally so fast to update) have not quite got around to mentioning Wiesel's exposure as a fraud in 2009, having stolen the identities and the official Auschwitz serial numbers A-7713 and A-7712 of another Wiesel born in 1912 and his brother in turn (Born 1900) -- and claiming the numbers for himself and his (possibly fictitious) father.

The circus moves on.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

SAVANT said...

Uncle Nasty says "Interesting how the hebrew to human ratio in the US administration right now, is very similar to the ratio prevailing in Bolshevist Russia in the twenties."

That's true. But begs the question: If Jews are so cohesive and tribally focused, how come Stalin, one of the few goyim around, was able to out play them so well, resulting in most of them being executed.?

Anonymous said...

SAVANT Said:

If Jews are so cohesive and tribally focused, how come Stalin, one of the few goyim around, was able to out play them so well, resulting in most of them being executed.?

The answer could lie here, in this man ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavrentiy_Beria

A fellow Georgian, Lavrentiy Beria could be called a psycho's psycho. Often described as "Uncle Josef's First Lieutenant", Beria -- who worked his way up through the ranks (very apt word, I feel) of the OGPU, (later the NKVD, finally the KGB) was living proof that sheer ruthlessless and cunning could ensure survival in even the stickiest situations.

Infamous as a sexual predator, Beria was even reputed to have sodomised Stalin as he lay on his deathbed ... a thought that gives one pause.

Boggles my mind, anyway.

Beria attended the Yalta Conference with Stalin, who introduced him to U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt as "our little Himmler".

Onward. Beria covered Stalin's back through his whole career, and was instrumental in the purges of the thirties, forties and fifties, including that of the KGB itself, disposing of almost all the jewish old hands -- and even admitted to poisoning Stalin with warfarin (rat poison) after Uncle Joe's supposed stroke.

It should be mentioned that (toward the end) Stalin was actively seeking to dispose of Beria, as he had done with Beria's predecessors, Nikolai Yezhov, and Genrikh Yagoda.

Beria overstepped the mark, however, in June 1953. His handling of the East German uprising convinced Molotov, Malenkov and Nikolai Bulganin that Beria's policies were dangerous to the soviet state.

In a coup (orchestrated by Khrushchev) in June 1953, Beria was arrested and held in an undisclosed location near Moscow.

After a typical (and speedy) show trial accusing Beria of treason, terrorism, and that old favourite, "counter-revolutionary activity", Beria was convicted and dispatched -- with six others -- by firing squad the same day.

The story goes that Beria, on hearing the inevitable verdict, literally fell on his knees, begging for mercy.

The point of this all, is that Stalin (who privately loathed jews) kept a rabid attack dog in the form of Beria, but even he did not keep the leash short enough.

Subtlety and intelligence are all very well, but never underestimate the hazards of working with rabid dogs. I think one can also point out that intellectuals are often, not very bright.

End: Beria Part one.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

A bit of reading. Great for clearing the mind.

The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust

Manfred Köhler

http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndvalue.html

It may not be what you think ...

Cheers,
Uncle nasty

SAVANT said...

Ok, I'm familiar with Beria and his 'capabilities'. But this doesn't answer the question. And it's not a leading question. I simply cannot understand how one or two psychos (Stalin/Beria) can eliminate all the rest of the leadership (almost all Jewish) if they were the tightly knit ruthless manipulators they're assumed to be. I mean could you see that happening in the US government?

Anonymous said...

Okay Savant. This is a guess, but I think it's an informed one.

You refer, most tellingly, to "tightly-knit" which I think is the key here.

Even the brightest, sharpest, most self-centred, cynical and cunning will crack under four whole generations of betrayal, intrigue, denunciation and paranoia.

Having read Paul Johnson's "History of the Modern World" in which he devoted a whole chapter to the byzantine world of Soviet Russian politics, I cannot imagine surviving a society where you could literally have tea in the morning with your family and by sunset you'd be on your knees in the Lubyanka staring at the tiles with a pistol at the back of your head.

In the worlds of socialism gone mad, the people at the bottom must have lived in purgatory ... but the ones at the top must have existed in sheer hell.

Riding the tiger from dawn till dusk ... one slip and you're done, possibly dragging all your supporters with you.

So ... tightly-knit? I don't think so. I feel that many of the top soviets must have lost all sense of co-operation, adopting the behaviour of a school of sharks. The slightest whiff of blood in the water driving them all into frenzy.

Comments from the group? Help me out there.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Second part of the question. Can I see such behaviour happening in the US govt?

Short answer, yes.

I feel it played out in November 1963 and on a much more sordid and petty scale in The Mena, Arkansas scandal under the Clintons.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Beria Part two.

Stalin, in turn, was well aware of Beria's predilection for very young girls, and on one occasion panicked on learning that his daughter Svetlana was alone at Beria's house. He telephoned the girl and demanded she leave immediately. When Beria complimented Alexander Poskrebyshev's daughter on her beauty, Poskrebyshev quickly pulled the girl aside and instructed her to "Never accept a lift from Beria."

Wikipedia quote on Beria:-

"Since false accusations and confessions of sexual perversion were a common element to many coerced Stalinist confessions and little details beyond the charges were provided, and since a number of other accusations against Beria (treason, counter-revolutionary activities) were reminiscent of trump-up charges of the Stalin era, most historians initially dismissed Beria's reputation as a sexual predator.
However, the 2003 unsealing of the Soviet archives of his case revealed the full text of Beria's detailed confession and the large amounts of corroborating evidence from "dozens" of victims of his sexual assaults, some of which Stalin had been secretly collecting for years prior to his death.

The new evidence on Beria, in the words of Stalin biographer Simon Sebag-Montefiore, "reveals a sexual predator who used his power to indulge himself in obsessive depravity."


His conquests included wives of several senior party officials. Beria was also rumoured to have had forced sex with male members of the party including Mikhail Kalinin, Vyacheslav Molotov and even Stalin (on his death bed)."

Nice lad.

Secondly, Stalin had a total of three wives. His first, Ekaterina "Kato" Svanidze, died in 1907 of typhus after bearing a son, Yakov Dzhugashvili. Much of her family (including her sister Mariko and brother Alexander) would later be executed during her husband's Great Terror.

Stalin's second squeeze -- and the mother of Svetlana, Nadezhda Sergeevna Alliluyeva -- must have been a barrel of laughs. Her Wiki entry:- "After the revolution, Nadezhda worked as a confidential code clerk in Lenin's office. She eschewed fancy dress, makeup, and other trappings that she felt un-befitting of a proper Bolshevik ..."

Found dead in her bedroom in 1932, with a revolver by her side -- the official cause of death was cited as "appendicitis"

Finally Stalin hooked up with a jewess -- or Hadass, if you prefer. Rosa Kaganovich, the sister of Lazar Kaganovich who was reponsible for the 1932-1933 famine commonly known as the Holodomor.
In 1957 Kaganovich -- after backing the wrong horse in an abortive coup against Khrushchev -- was forced to retire from the Presidium and the Central Committee, and was given the job of director of a small Ural potassium factory.

In 1961, Kaganovich was expelled from the party and became a pensioner living in Moscow. one of the few big Commie cheeses who actually died of old age at 97. He got off lightly.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

SAVANT said...

An interesting explanation Uncle Nasty. You could be right. I've read about the same subject quite a lot and the one thought that kept popping into my head was, why would anyone want to live that kind of a life?

But could your explanation also not lead in the opposite direction, that a small cohesive group could better protect itself. after all, that's how you survived (assuming you did) under Soviet communism - you had 'your people' at all infuential levels.

I'm open to suggestions as well.

nemesis said...

I don't think it explains Savant's question UN. I don't think you're prepared to face up to the weakness of your theory.

Anonymous said...

nemesis said...

I don't think it explains Savant's question UN. I don't think you're prepared to face up to the weakness of your theory.

Hey, nemesis. I am always open to new and interesting theories about the ways of the world.

Please share some.

Cheers.
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

SAVANT said...

But could your explanation also not lead in the opposite direction, that a small cohesive group could better protect itself. after all, that's how you survived (assuming you did) under Soviet communism - you had 'your people' at all infuential levels.

I don't think my shark-like analogy is that bad, Savant. Agreed, a small cohesive group has a better chance of survival than a single person under normal circumstances. But, when things go badly off the rails, and in the USSR they did like clockwork, even the most adept and sure-footed person or group can slip.

And in the toxic environment that was the Soviet Union from the Twenties on, one tiny slip was all that was needed.

Why did I post that long screed about Beria and Stalin? More to sort out -- in my own head -- that the environment was a Dantean nightmare even at the top where all the power and influence was.

Imagine it at the bottom. Where we are.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

nemesis said...

I don't think it explains Savant's question UN. I don't think you're prepared to face up to the weakness of your theory.

re-read your post, nemesis, and a thought popped up. I spent a good deal of a Sunday trying to make sense of what's happening around us, and your contribution is three lines of ... what?

Try a little harder, next time, eh?

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Further to earlier comment about the increasing paranoia of the state, I offer you this from our cousins in the US.

Chicago artist Chris Drew got his point across better than he ever intended when he protested government oppression by getting himself arrested for selling silk-screened patches without a permit and filmed the event:

An artist who used a video camera to record being arrested by police is facing up to 15 years in prison.
Chris Drew has been charged with Class 1 felony under the Eavesdropping Act in Chicago, Illinois.
The bemused activist said he did not know anything about the law when he was protesting about restrictions on where artists can sell their work.

Drew expected to be charged with a misdemeanor and released. But it turns out Big Government can be more repressive than he had realized.
Under the Eavesdropping Act, which applies in 12 states, all parties must consent to a recording being made.
Maryland, Illinois and Massachusetts are the only states where it is illegal to record conversations with the police.

What a coincidence: all three of are so totally dominated by Democrats as to be virtually one-party states.

The maximum penalty is three years for a first offense…
But anyone recording a judge, attorney general, state attorney or police officer can be sent to jail for up to 15 years.

All animals are equal. But agents of The State are far more equal than those they rule.


http://www.moonbattery.com/

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Back to the subject at hand. Read, read, read.

http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndWeber.html

Mark Weber is far more focused and concise than I could ever hope to be.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Henry IX said...

Uncle NAsty - you're a great man for links! I now find myself, for the 1st time, questioning the holocaust as well. Can't you leave my head in peace!

Anonymous said...

All German Jehovah Witnesses who went to the concentration camps died. How come they are not worthy of a mention along with communists, social democrats and jews? Not sexy enough?
Academics do not have an agenda to push with them?

Anonymous said...

"All German Jehovah Witnesses who went to the concentration camps died."

That's good news. Less of them coming to my door pestering me.

Anonymous said...

Henry IX said...

"... I now find myself, for the 1st time, questioning the holocaust as well. Can't you leave my head in peace!"

Henry, my head is a turmoil twenty-four hours a day.

Why should you get off lightly?

Seriously though ... I was told all this stuff back in 1968, and needless to say, my reaction was:- "Give me a break ... you're telling me that the whole damn world is lying? That my father and his two brothers went through three or four years of shit during WWII for nothing?"

Well, I kept that up until my own personal epiphany in the mid-nineties, and look at me now.

Thanks for the comment.
Uncle Nasty

Robert said...

Ditlieb Felderer - Charged, tried, convicted and jailed in Sweden. Vilified in the press. Forced to live in exile. Background and contribution: Felderer, at one time a prominent Jehovah's Witness, is known as an early researcher into the physical evidence in every major concentration camp in then Communist Eastern Europe. Felderer took over 30,000 photographs of every conceivable detail in the camps. He discovered that there was a swimming pool for the inmates in Auschwitz, modern hospital facilities, including a gynecological section, as well as an orchestra, live theatre, well-stocked library, and sculpting classes. He discovered the musical score of the "Auschwitz Waltz" in the secret archives accessible only with special permission. He found that an intimate role was played by Jehovah Witnesses in the camps, who cooperated with the SS-Administration, and he exposed the lie of the 27,000 Jehovah's Witnesses killed. (On his initiative and insistence, the inflated number was reduced to 270). For his Revisionist work, Felderer was excommunicated - that is, drummed out of the Jehovah Witnesses' sect.

Anonymous said...

UN and Henry IX. Add me to the list. My head is fucked up too from all this stuff. Wish you'd left me alone!!!!

Anonymous said...

(On his initiative and insistence, the inflated number was reduced to 270).

The Nazis were "anti-enlightenment" because among the "progressives" they had in the camps were freemasons. One of my brainwashers at uni said that a few times on unrelated matters.
That was provisional freemasons as distinct from official freemasons with whom himself and Mussolini had no problems.
And Zolly? Zhaminovsky?'s Behind the Masonic Facade came up with a figure of 540. The "Widows(') Son"s suffered twice as badly as Jehovah Witnesses then.

Anonymous said...

The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution
and Russia's Early Soviet Regime


Assessing the Grim Legacy of Soviet Communism

by Mark Weber

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html

Read and be fascinated

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

A few quotes from the target of my previous post ... to tickle your curiosity, so to speak.

Winston Churchill ...warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a "worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality."

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews."

It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.

Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews.

In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses."


Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:

"Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin's first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins

Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists' vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution -- partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.

The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin's dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds."


These are the people who are compelled to paint themselves, again and again, as misunderstood victims.

I'm sure you will have noticed that in the interests of fairness, that I try to quote as many jewish or Israeli sources as possible.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

"The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you .." very old Polish proverb

Anonymous said...

Allow me to point you towards the trial of John Demjanjuk, who, if you follow this sort of thing, is on trial for 28,060 counts of accessory to murder for allegedly having been a guard at the Nazi's Sobibor death camp.

A decades-long saga, which started in 1981 when the U.S. revoked his American citizenship, alleging he was the notorious Treblinka death camp guard "Ivan the Terrible" and had hidden the information when he immigrated to the United States.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Demjanjuk

In short, Demjanjuk was extradited to Israel, where he was found guilty and sentenced to death in 1988, but the conviction was overturned in 1993 as a case of mistaken identity. He was later deported from the U.S. in May 2009 to face trial in Germany on charges that he was a guard at Sobibor. This is the trial that is currently turning into an embarrasment for all concerned.

Should point out that Demjanjuk was put on trial again in 2001 on charges that he had served as a guard at the Sobibór and Majdanek camps in occupied Poland and at the Flossenbürg camp in Germany.

The point of this post? To show that the first trial was a politically-motivated travesty that has dragged on for thirty years now... and as a warning. Do not get on the wrong side of the zionists. Shades of Tennessee Ernie Ford's "Sixteen Tons."

One fist of iron,
The other of steel,
If the right one don't get you,
Then the left one will.


Mark Weber's expose of the first trial here.

http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndtreb.html

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Robert said...

Interesting article:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/6xksql3

Anonymous said...

Please forgive me if this seems off-topic, but it does pertain to the US and the middle east, so:-

As the world watches Egypt crumble into chaos, with over 100 dead and 2000 injured, the Obama administration continues to be somewhat and rather curiously ambivalent. On the one hand, on Friday, Vice President Biden came to the defense of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, saying that he shouldn’t step aside.

Yet, on the same day, the Telegraph (ala Wikileaks) reported that the U.S. had planned “regime change” for the “past three years” while both President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton demand that internet be restored to the Egyptian protesters.
This morning, Secretary of State Clinton again clarified the United States’ official position, ”We do not want to send any message about backing forward or backing back.”

For all the lack of clarity on where the Obama administration stands, one thing is becoming more and more clear: Signs are beginning to point more toward the likelihood that President Obama’s State Department, unions, as well as Left-leaning media corporations are more directly involved in helping to ignite the Mid-East turmoil than they are publicly admitting.

If it is indeed the case that the Obama administration, with help by private-sector companies and the union movement has led an “internet revolution” in the middle east and toppled two governments within a month, the longer-term ramifications for U.S. relations with other allies such as Saudi Arabia and certain other Arab monarchies, could prove to have much more far-reaching consequences.


http://tiny.cc/cb8z9

I am fast coming to the conclusion that it is dangerous for any country to be associated with -- or even talk to -- the US govt.

Particularly With friends like Hilary ...

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

You might find this interesting:-

"10 Things That The Egypt Riots Can Teach Us About What Happens When Society Breaks Down ..."

http://tiny.cc/mfekb

A quote:-

"When society breaks down, often outside influences are involved. The individual being touted as the new “leader” of the protest movement in Egypt is Mohamed ElBaradei.

So exactly who is Mohamed ElBaradei?

Well, Paul Joseph Watson of prisonplanet.com describes him this way….

ElBaradei serves on the Board of Trustees of the International Crisis Group, who today issued a press release protesting the decision on behalf of Egyptian authorities to place ElBaradei under house arrest.

International Crisis Group is a shadowy NGO (non-governmental organization) that enjoys an annual budget of over $15 million and is bankrolled by the likes of Carnegie, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as George Soros’ Open Society Institute. Soros himself serves as a member of the organization’s Executive Committee. In other words, this is a major geopolitical steering group for the global elite.

Well isn’t that convenient?


Odd how the same old names keep popping up? No?

No wonder a lot of western govts are groping for the the "Internet Kill Switch."

http://tiny.cc/4l3fu

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Okay. Moving on.

I firmly believe that Germany was targeted for destruction by the hoffjuden since long before the turn of the twentieth century ....

but not for the reasons that are popularly believed ... those wicked krauts only hate us because we're so cute and cuddly and intelligent and meek and loving and ... and ... and successful.

Why do I say this? Allow me to make a connection between two events spaced thirty-three years and eight months apart. The events of March 12, 1933 and those of November 22 1963.

First, a tiny bit of history. Please go here:-

http://tiny.cc/c5rso

And read, first, about an historical event that is kept very quiet by the israelites. A few short quotes:-

The Jewish Declaration of War
on Nazi Germany


The Economic Boycott of 1933

Few people know the facts about the singular event that helped spark what ultimately became known as World War II - the international Jewish declaration of war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London (shown above)
described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime.

Even Germany's Jewish Central Association, known as the Verein, contested the suggestion (made by some Jewish leaders outside Germany) that the new government was deliberately provoking anti-Jewish uprisings."

Despite this, Jewish leaders in the United States and Britain determined on their own that it was necessary to launch a war against the Hitler government."

On March 12, 1933 the American Jewish Congress announced a Massive protest at Madison Square Gardens for March 27. At that time the commander in chief of the Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods. In the meantime, on March 23, 20,000 Jews protested at New York's City Hall as rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American shipping lines and boycotts were mounted against German goods throughout shops and businesses in New York City.


... It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a one-day boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany on
April 1.

Notice ... a one day boycott. Ooh, how that must have stung.

1933-1963 End part 1

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

1933-1963 part 2

More quotes:-

To understand Hitler's reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In 1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the resolve of Germany's enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish military high command.

The boycott, in fact, was quite crippling to Germany. Jewish scholars such as Edwin Black have reported that, in response to the
boycott, German exports were cut by 10 percent, and that many were demanding seizing German assets in foreign countries (Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement - The Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine, New York, 1984).


A famous (or notorious, if you wish) New York City attorney and longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermeyer, was elected president of the World Jewish Economic Federation. Upon returning from a conference in Amsterdam, Untermeyer gave an inflammatory speech which was transcribed and printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.

"... Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against the... slaughter, starvation and annihilation... fiendish torture, cruelty and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women and children....
When the tale is told... the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people...
The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived.
And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell....


Please note ... all this in August 1933. My emphasis in bold, and, once again, notice the claimed number of victims ... 600 000. A nice round number -- add another zero and whattaya get?.

1933-1963 End part 2

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

I am pretty sure this proves something. Just what, eludes me right now.

Although the term "Own goal" does ring a bell.

http://tiny.cc/hwh4t

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

A good link, I feel, is like a good wine. Every now and then, you pour yourself a glass and enjoy.

So ... enjoy.

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/roundone.htm

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

P.s Most of the comments were made by people who were on the winning team.

Anonymous said...

All right. So, what does the assassination of Kennedy have to do with all this? Good question. A little patience if you please.

Check this out:- http://tiny.cc/k25xg

It details how Germany pulled itself out of the economic poo-poo of the Weimar republic of the twenties and thirties and managed -- the only economy in the world to do so -- to thrive, when all other countires were on their knees, economically.
It's quite short and easily read, although it is translated from the original German, and suffers from wobbly syntax as well as as some -- how can I put it? -- nationalistic fervour in the writing. A few quotes: ...

First of all you should know that when President Paul Hindenburg named Adolf Hitler Chancellor of the Reich in January 1933, he came to power in a country whose economic deformation and political devastation was similar to that of today’s Germany.
With thirteen and a half million unemployed, a disintegrating industrial economy, ruined agricultural sector, idled trade and moribund shipping industry, the nation was collapsing.
In just two years Germany overcame its crisis and by 1938 our Chancellor and Führer had created an active social state with full
employment –- a state that was the envy of the world!

Mr. Marx always kept quiet about the fact that under the system of ZINSKNECHTSCHAFT (Interest Slavery), the employer is required
to deal in money that has to be repaid with interest.

By lending money, the plutocrats had triumphed everywhere in the world, thanks to the fact that the world’s currencies were based on
the gold standard. International trade (in 1933) was possible only through transactions involving gold or interest bearing loans in
currencies backed by gold.
Following its national revival in 1933, Germany abandoned this financial tyranny, with the result that barter -- the direct exchange of goods -- became possible in international trade.
An example of this is Germany’s exchanging locomotives for Argentinean beef, which did not require international trading credits or a “reserve currency.”

RAFFENDES KAPITAL (money-grubbing capital) capital lost billions upon billions in private profit from interest on international
indebtedness, and SCHAFFENDES KAPITAL (productive capital) won the day in Germany!
That is why, on orders from RAFFENDES KAPITAL, France and England declared war on Germany in September 1939.


As I say, It's quite short. And puts, very succinctly, why Germany HAD to be destroyed. They had adopted a financial model that cut
out the international bankers.

This would never do.

1933-1963 End part 3

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

1933-1963 part 4

A quote on the Federal Reserve Bank from the congressional record:-

"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".

Sound familiar? That was said by Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. These remarks were recorded in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:

Fast forward 31 years.

John F. Kennedy was not a popular figure with the establishment. Since his election in 1960 his philandering had earned him the loathing of the Head of the FBI (Hoover) and his fatal vacillation during the Bay of Pigs fiasco (as well as trashing operations Northwoods and Mongoose) had earned him the contempt and mistrust of the CIA as well as the military. Robert Kennedy did not help matters as he never let go of a good grudge. States that had voted against the Kennedys tumbled into recession as government and military contracts evaporated. On the whole, though, Kennedy was doing okay ... right up to June 1963.

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. Executive Order 11110 gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated ... but were never circulated.

Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were taken out of circulation -- literally within weeks -- as fast as four billion dollars could be retrieved. Farewell to the United States Notes.

Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York.

Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.

Go here http://www.friesian.com/notes.htm to see some beautiful old US banknotes.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

ol' white guy said...

Don't know about the Kennedy assassination, but sure as hell the Fed is a conspiracy against america and is owned by Jews.

Anonymous said...

Central Banks run correctly are not a problem.
The Fed is a problem though.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Central Banks run correctly are not a problem.

The Fed is a problem though.


Actually ... no.

I remember reading a few years back that the were only three or four "Central Banks" on the whole planet that were not owned or partly owned by the cabal mentioned above.

One, if I recall correctly, was Albania, and another, I think, Venezuela. I will do some research.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Tony in VA said...

The Fed is a PRIVATE COMPANY. How the f**k did that come about?

Anonymous said...

Tony in VA said...

The Fed is a PRIVATE COMPANY. How the f**k did that come about?

This is how, Tony. A pretty long but very rewarding read:-

http://www.heretical.com/miscella/mandrake.html

Here is an eye-popping quote:

Congressman Wright Patman, who was Chairman of that committee, asked how the Fed got the money to purchase two billion dollars worth of government bonds in 1933. This is the exchange that followed.

Eccles: We created it.
Patman: Out of what?
Eccles: Out of the right to issue credit money.
Patman: And there is nothing behind it, is there, except our government's credit?
Eccles: That is what our money system is. If there were no debts in our money system, there wouldn't be any money.


Straight from the horse's mouth. See?

There IS NO CONSPIRACY. As long as the great unwashed spends its life on the couch watching Oprah there doesn't need to be.

Enjoy,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Interesting link which gets a bit shouty ...

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message461103/pg1

Headlined:-

what countries DONT have a rothschild controlled central bank yet?

I know nothing about the ins and outs of banking and banking connections. Perhaps a comment from Reg?

Who, now that I think of it, we haven't heard from for a while.

Reg? You there?

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Oh, and while we're at it, Tony, The Federal Reserve Bank was created in 1913.

The first US federal income tax was introduced ... yup, 1913.

Whattaya know?

BTW, you'll no doubt love this from wikipedia:-

"Most developed nations today have an "independent" central bank, that is one which operates under rules designed to prevent political interference. Examples include the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Federal Reserve System in the United States.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank

'Scuse the hysterical laughter. (Snort. Snort.)

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Another interesting quote:-

Robert Hemphill was the Credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta. In the foreword to a book by Irving Fisher, entitled 100% Money, Hemphill said this:

If all the bank loans were paid, no one could have a bank deposit, and there would not be a dollar of coin or currency in circulation. This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash, or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless situation is almost incredible – but there it is.

Sobering thought, eh? One wonders how we have let ourselves be fooled for so long.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Philip Grey said...

It was pointed out in some threads on this site how, despite international opposition from the financiers, Germany turned from a basket case to an economic powerhouse in about six years. and this was during the Great Depression in the thirties!!!!

How can this be? There are some strange things in this world going on. And as UN says, as long as the sheeple are focused on Oprah and the X Factor, we'll never really see any change.

Anonymous said...

There was a man (a sports icon? Tennis player?) who said, late last year, that all we had to do was withdraw all our cash for a day from our bank and the system should shudder.

Being a very wealthy part of the system, I doubt if he pulled out a penny ... but still.

I like the idea of withdrawing every penny -- in cash, no bank cheques -- and keeping it out of the system for, let's say ... a month? Interest rates, worldwide, are close to zero now, so you won't lose anything.

What do you think that would do?

Any guesses?

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Hey Tony in VA.
A coulpe months ago, a video on the Federal Resreve Bank (which isn't federal, has no reserves, and isn't even a bank) was first uploaded on YT: "The American Dream": 600,000 hits in THREE DAYS and thousands of comments. Nearly every poster aware of where their retirement accounts have gone; who's stolen their children's future; who keeps sabotaging the peace process...

Its an animated video, but it details the inception of the "federal reserve"

It is not federal and it has no reserves.
Enjoy the video before you tube pulls it, AGAIN!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU

Anonymous said...

"There was a man (a sports icon? Tennis player?) who said, late last year, that all we had to do was withdraw all our cash for a day from our bank and the system should shudder.

Being a very wealthy part of the system, I doubt if he pulled out a penny ... but still."

That was Eric Cantona, poseur supreme. In fact he did withdraw money, a token amount like €100.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU

GREAT VID. Check it out.

Anonymous said...

One of the more interesting histories of why we are where we are, is The Money Masters ... one of the few documentaries to go back to the mid seventeenth century to the roots of the National Bank of England.

At three hours, plus -- you'll need some bandwidth

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936#

Or here (in 22 segments) if you have a youtube downloader app.

http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/watch?v=lXb-LrVkuwM

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

hector said...

This vid on the Fed is indeed fascinating. Problem is, it's got only 250k views so far. Less than 1% of what any MSM rag would get on the average day.

Anonymous said...

hector said...

"This vid on the Fed is indeed fascinating. Problem is, it's got only 250k views so far. Less than 1% of what any MSM rag would get on the average day."

Don't be too concerned hector, there can be a many as eight to ten or more copies of the same vid on youtube at any time. all with different filenames -- and different hit-counts.

Secondly if a vid is taken down and re-uploaded, its hit (or view) counter re-sets to zero.

Also, never forget, the vid is fifteen years old.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

One thing I love about the internet is the reprinting of historical documents, newspaper articles, speeches. The words and syntax of the articles give one a startling clarity on thoughts and freedoms of all those years ago.

H. L. MENCKEN, 20th century American writer. "The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display." (Treatise on the Gods) The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht . . . ("not wanted.")

GEORGE BERNARD SHAW . 20th century British (actually Irish) dramatist. "This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew. (London Morning Post, December 3, 1925) This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)

MARK TWAIN (S. L. Clemens). 19th century American writer. "In the U.S. cotton states, after the war . . . the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes' wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro's share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew. The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm -- like Joseph.

THEODORE DREISER . 20th century American writer. "New York to me is a scream -- a Kyke's dream of a ghetto. The Lost Tribe has taken the island. (Letter to H. L. Mencken, November 5, 1922) " "Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are money-minded, very sharp in practice. ... The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means -- and he will not. (Letter to Hutchins Hapgood, The Nation magazine, April 17, 1935)"


Got to love a:- "... a Kyke's dream of a ghetto." GBS didn't mince his words either (Go, Oirland!)

Imagine even a top-notch highly respected writer sending any one of these for publication today. He'd be Mel Gibson in a flash. Hear that bubbling sound?

BTW, Clemen's (Twain's) Tom Sawyer caused a recent stir with mention of "Nigger Joe" which has presumably been re-edited to "N-word Joe"

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Scouring the net, so you don't have to ...

"... Consequently, the Senate held Hearings to determine whether Meyer ought to be on the Federal Reserve Board.

At these Hearings, Representative Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, said:

"Eugene Meyer, Jr. has had his own crowd with him in the government since he started in 1917. His War Finance Corporation personnel took over the Federal Farm Loan System, and almost immediately afterwards, the Kansas City Join Stock Land Bank and the Ohio Joint Stock Land Bank failed."

REPRESENTATIVE RAINEY: Mr. Meyer, when he nominally resigned as head of the Federal Farm Loan Board, did not really cease his activities there. He left behind him an able body of wreckers. They are continuing his policies and consulting with him. Before his appointment, he was frequently in consultation with Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Dewey. Just before his appointment, the Chicago Joint Land Stock Bank, the Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank, the Kansas City Joint Land Stock Bank, and the Des Moines Land Bank were all functioning. Their bonds were selling at par. The then farm commissioner had an understanding with Secretary Dewey that nothing would be done without the consent and approval of the Federal Farm Loan Board. A few days afterwards, United States Marshals, with pistols strapped at their sides, and sometimes with drawn pistols, entered these five banks and demanded that the banks be turned over to them. Word went out all over the United States, through the newspapers, as to what had happened, and these banks were ruined. This led to the breach with the old Federal Farm Loan Board, and to the resignation of three of its members, and the appointment of Mr. Meyer to be head of that Board.

SENATOR CAREY: Who authorized the marshals to take over the banks?

REP. RAINEY: Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Dewey. That started the ruin of all these rural banks, and the Gianninis bought them up in great numbers."


History is amazing. Study enough of it, and it keeps repeating like a bad takeaway.

Original post here:-

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

B Boru said...

The only small consolation from this UN is that GB Shaw, McFadden and Carey were all Irish or Irish stock. any chance we'll continue the fight?

Anonymous said...

Central Banks run correctly are not a problem.

The Fed is a problem though.


Actually ... no.

I remember reading a few years back that the were only three or four "Central Banks" on the whole planet that were not owned or partly owned by the cabal mentioned above.

One, if I recall correctly, was Albania, and another, I think, Venezuela. I will do some research.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

UN Again I say Central Banks run correctly are not a problem (The sadly missed Bundesbank). The problem is when they are run incorrectly. When informed of problems in Barings with them lending more than their capital to Nick Leeson's office in Singapoer a Bank of England official anoounced that he would store that file deep down in his inpile so that he would not have to read it.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said:

"UN Again I say Central Banks run correctly are not a problem (The sadly missed Bundesbank). The problem is when they are run incorrectly."

Sorry about that, Anonymous.

You are, of course, absolutely correct, and I misread the meaning of your post.

Genuine central banks -- belonging to a nation, and not run by internationalist parasites would be an excellent thing, I am sure.

I wonder if we will ever see one in our lifetimes?

Weren't the Bundesbank the ones who were going to introduce a world-wide internet bank ... independent and free of any interference (and plundering) from govts.?

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Amazing what you find, if you dig.

The world-famous American poet, Ezra Pound was committed to a loony bin on the express orders of, wait for it, Franklin D. Roosevelt, himself.

Why, you may ask?

1. Because Pound was vehemently opposed to America's entry into WWII, and ...

2. Pound, along with Eustace Mullins and George Stimpson had written the first book exposing the Federal Reserve Bank back in 1948.

From the forward of the book:-

Even though my foundation applications were sponsored by the three leading poets of America, Ezra Pound, E.E. Cummings, and Elizabeth Bishop, all of the foundations refused to sponsor this research. I then wrote up my findings to date, and in 1950 began efforts to market this manuscript in New York. Eighteen publishers turned it down without comment, but the nineteenth, Devin Garrity, president of Devin Adair Publishing Company, gave me some friendly advice in his office. "I like your book, but we can’t print it," he told me. "Neither can anybody else in New York. Why don’t you bring in a prospectus for your novel, and I think we can give you an advance. You may as well forget about getting the Federal Reserve book published. I doubt if it could ever be printed."

This was devastating news, coming after two years of intensive work. I reported back to Pound, and we tried to find a publisher in other parts of the country. After two years of fruitless submissions, the book was published in a small edition in 1952 by two of Pound’s disciples, John Kasper and David Horton, using their private funds, under the title Mullins on the Federal Reserve. In 1954, a second edition, with unauthorized alterations, was published in New Jersey, as The Federal Reserve Conspiracy. In 1955, Guido Roeder brought out a German edition in Oberammergau, Germany. The book was seized and the entire edition of 10,000 copies burned by government agents led by Dr. Otto John.

The burning of the book was upheld April 21, 1961 by judge Israel Katz of the Bavarian Supreme Court.


"Israel Katz of the Bavarian Supreme Court", eh?

Good German name, that ... or is it Scots?

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

PS. I used to be a keen student of the American west as well as the gangster era of the 20's 30's and 40's.

Hardin, Younger and Dalton as well as Capone, Weiss and O'Bannion were babes in the wood compared to these boys.

UN

Anonymous said...

B Boru said...

The only small consolation from this UN is that GB Shaw, McFadden and Carey were all Irish or Irish stock. any chance we'll continue the fight?

Oh yes. One of my favourite quotes is: "Beware the fury of the patient man."

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

SAVANT said...

That's an amazing story (FRB) Uncle Nasty. Something seems to be terribly rotten here.

Anonymous said...

The most interesting thing, Savant, is that it appears that America's finances have been controlled by British banks since the revolution.

Makes you wonder if 1776 was worth it ...

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Savant, it's frightening. The deeper one digs, the stinkier it gets.

And people call me a bastard.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Everybody's heard about the Russian mafia. Ever stopped to wonder who ran it?

Nip across the the Guardian (Gasp! Not the Guardian!!" I hear you say)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jul/02/russia.lukeharding1

In which is pointed out:-

"We learn from the press and political analysts that, against all odds and in spite of the global financial turmoil, Israel’s economy is booming. Some even suggest that Israel is one of the strongest economies around.

"So what is it? How is it that Israel is impervious to the global financial disaster? How can Israel be so rich?

Israel may be rich because, according to the Guardian, “out of the seven oligarchs who controlled 50% of Russia’s economy during the 1990s, six were Jewish.” During the last two decades, many Russian oligarchs have acquired Israeli citizenship.


No!! Crookery and corruption from the hose-noses? never!!!

And who is it that blows the lid off? My favourite Red Sea Pedestrian -- Gilad Altzman.

Oh, and more from Altzman:-

[1] For more information about global organized crime connections with Likud or other major Israeli political parties. Please follow this link

http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/topic.php?tid=147

[2] Also, it is rumoured that, prior to its collapse, Lehman Brothers transferred 400 billion dollars to Israeli banks. I am not in a position to substantiate any of these theories — but I would strongly suggest that it is of some urgency to find out how truthful these accusations are.


Times are interesting and look as though they're getting interestinger.

Sorry about that ... been watching Tim Burton's "Alice" and I think some of it is rubbing off. You know you're in trouble when Lewis Carroll makes more sense that the so-called real world.

As always, Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

SAVANT said...

UN said "Savant, it's frightening. The deeper one digs, the stinkier it gets."

I agree 100% with you there, UN. I'm engaging in a whole lot of deep research and the foundations of some of my most cherished assumptions are beginning to shake.

PS: would you email me at irishsavant@yahoo.ie at some stage.

Anonymous said...

The deeper one digs the deeper it gets.
The awakening is painful indeed.
But without it nothing will ever be fixed.
The dragon will just grow another head.

The world should know, like they did before but were silenced.
Some of our bravest souls tried to tell us but were destroyed.
They didnt have the internet !!!

jocomo2 said...

Uncle Nasty - most of those exposures on the link you provided were by Israelis in Israeli media. Give credit where credit is due. Not all Jews are bad guys, in fact not even a majority are.

Anonymous said...

jocomo2 said...

Uncle Nasty - most of those exposures on the link you provided were by Israelis in Israeli media.

Jocomo2, you are quite right up to a point. I actively seek out the unrighteous and what the MSM call self-hating jews.
I work on the principle that you or I can accuse anyone of anything and merely come off as whiny little girls.

Secondly, I avoid, say, the accusations of known enemies and weirdos. For example I don't feel that a statement of condemnation of jews by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or the Venezuelan whacko carries much weight.

I much prefer the inadvertent slips, balls-ups and smug not-for-publication just-between-us statements of the villains themselves. The testimony wrung from them as they stand sweating in the dock or speaking to the commission.

Secondly you state:- "Not all Jews are bad guys, in fact not even a majority are."

I agree entirely. As I have stated before ... some of my best friends really are jews.

Oldest damn cliché in the damn book, I know, but quite true, for all that.

Jewish friends I have had for decades now although, sadly, I have lost contact with a good deal of them. On the other side, I am inclined to side with Christianity as a force for good, although I am most certainly not a Christian and have met some utterly loathsome christians. Notice the lack of capitalization.

It is the hoffjuden and their arselickers and enablers (Rockefeller, Morgan, Lizzie Windsor) who I hold in utter loathing for what they have done to a world that does nor even know it's being attacked.

Hope this goes some way towards an explanation.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Jocomo2 ... further to what I just said, one of the sanest bloggers I have read is a man named Gilad Atzmon. (whose name I keep mis-spelling. Damn! Damn! Damn!)

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/connecting-the-zionist-dots-by-gilad-atzmon.html

If I ever met him, I would buy him a beer. Even though he is a Red Sea Pedestrian.

Cheers,
Uncle Nasty