Thursday, 30 December 2010

Portland: Green with envy

In this post I revealed that Portland Oregon had been designated America’s ‘most European’ city. Presumably this was because “it’s got loads of pedestrian areas, trams, bike lanes, cobbled streets, is environmentally friendly, has lots of clean high-tech enterprises, and its crime rate is among the lowest in the country”, I explained.
.
But Portland had a terrible dark secret that threatened to spoil everything: It was – peer anxiously over shoulder- not ‘diverse’, you see. Almost all of the citizens were, shudder, white. If only, if only, we had more diversity, they whispered… for instance large numbers of blacks, Muslims and Hispanics……..the mind boggled at how wonderful it would then be.

Portland is a green city too of course, but envy would make them go a deeper shade of that colour if they knew about Jos, a ‘vibrant’ city in central Nigeria. This splendid metropolis luxuriates in the kind of diversity calculated to give Oregonians wet dreams. Black, brown, Arabic, Lebanese, Christians, Religion of Peaceniks, animists……….you name it, they’re there.

And as you’d imagine, they’ve all been enthusiastically celebrating diversity like mad for years. This has lead to literally thousands of deaths over the last ten years, with vast stretches of the city burnt to the ground in the process. The police do their best – one video on Yutube shows them lining up suspects and then, to the great amusement of the onlookers, machine-gunning them to death.

But there's only so much they can do - people just want to celebrate diversity. And what better time to kick it off again than the Season Of Good Will? Yes indeed, and it duly began about two weeks ago. A Muslim man, Al Hadji, had started to rebuild a house burned down during the last inter-cummunity celebrations. Some local ‘Christians’ questioned his entitlement to do this. Not wishing to spend the required time or money on the services of a conveyancing lawyer, the Christians resolved this contractual impasse through the simple expedient of hacking old Al to death.

Before you could say ‘diversity is our strength’, the Religion Of Peace responded, lead by a radical Muslim sect known as Boko Haram (not to be confused with Procul Harum, of Whiter Shade Of Pale fame). Anyway, Boko decided to ‘reach out’ to their fellow diversocrats and, well, here’s how one report described it. “Dozens of armed men attacked the church, dragging the pastor out of his home and shooting him to death. Two young men from the choir rehearsing for a late-night carol service also were slain. The group of about 30 attackers armed with guns and knives even killed two people passing by Victory Baptist Church.”
.
Soon the whole vibrant city was celebrating diversity with gusto. By the end of it witnesses reported dozens of bodies piled up. ‘Most of the bodies appeared to be women and children killed by blows from machetes. Mr. Kosoko said the dead lined the streets of Dogo Nahawa, a village about three miles south of the city of Jos.’

The Portlanders are clearly missing out, although they did get something to whet their appetites recently in the form of Somali ‘refugee’ Mohammed Mohammed (wonder what religion he is?), who apparently “fled chaos in Somalia for new life in America.”
.
Indeed he did.
.
And part of this new life involved trying to blow up his fellow Portlanders over Christmas. As one does.
.
But Portlanders understand.
.
Here’s Jeanne Faulkner of The Oregonian: “Let's show the world how Oregonians really feel about our immigrants, refugees and people in desperate, impoverished countries like Somalia. Let's show them we really care about them.
.
Clearly Jeanne is a smart lady with a keen practical understanding of the whole situation. That being the case she’ll be pleased with this news: Jeanne, there are lots and lots and lots and lots of new Mohammed Mohammeds on their way to you for their ‘new life in America’.

82 comments:

tired ole white guy said...

Dear God, what a cretin this Jean Faulkner is. How are such people let loose on the street on their own?

Jimmy said...

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/overdetermined_randomness/

quent said...

I know a guy who worked in Jos on 'development'. He said it's Africa in microcosm.

Anonymous said...

A terrible thing to say - but it'd have served Portland and their moonbeam politicos right if the bomber had succeeded.

Bemused stare said...

A s I constantly keep saying, liberalism is a mental defect.

Aviatrix said...

Interesting to think what Oregonians would think had this guy succeeded. Education by death, someone called it.

Bemused stare said...

Our people were pariah's for knowing the truth. Our own blood turned on us and even supported the destruction of our state. How much of this, http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/Burned-body-is-body-of-missing-12-year-old-woman-928023.php#photo-1 ,will they need to experience? How many tears must they shed, before they wake up to reality? When will your people realize we were right.

Anonymous said...

If anyone on this thread has a user account with Oregonlive.com they should let them know that someone 5000 miles away has a better grasp of the situation there than their so-called expert journalists!

CrystalClear said...

Mr Savant, as always your charming sarcasm hits the nail on the head!

If the caring people of Portland would like some immigrants how bout giving political asylum to the white families fleeing South Africa.
Oh wait - they're white....

Californian said...

Jeanne Faulkner of The Oregonian: “Let's show the world how Oregonians really feel about our immigrants, refugees and people in desperate, impoverished countries like Somalia. Let's show them we really care about them.”

Taken to its logical conclusion. Ms Faulkner's statement would mean that Oregon would open its doors to several tens of millions of Africans. Portland would become another Jos or Mogadishu or Harare (or whatever they are calling Salisbury these days). Of course, this is not quite what she and her fellow diversocrats mean. What they want to do is take in a token number of Africans so they can feel good, perhaps even thinking themselves the equals of a Madonna who actually adopted an Africa child.

But here's a thought: if Ms Faulkner really, really believes in what she says in public, then why does she not go to Somalia or Rwanda or Nigeria or other majority rule paradises, and then:
* teach the locals that "diversity is strength,"
* inform the locals that "violence solves nothing,"
* sing the praises of multiculturalism, which means not massacring Christians (or anyone else) for their religion?

Of course, we shall not see her making such a trek. Too bad, because it would solve a lot of problems here in America if such enlightened people as herself would self-deport to Africa and spare us her ideological hallucinations.

Anonymous said...

Californian said:-

"But here's a thought: if Ms Faulkner really, really believes in what she says in public, then why does she not go to Somalia or Rwanda or Nigeria or other majority rule paradises, and then:
* teach the locals that "diversity is strength,"
* inform the locals that "violence solves nothing,"
* sing the praises of multiculturalism, which means not massacring Christians (or anyone else) for their religion?"

Could it be that Ms Faulkner has read the story of Amy Biehl and feels that pontification is far safer than practise?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Biehl

Cheers, and a Happy New Year to all.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

When clicking onto the Oregon Live link above, I scrolled down to read this paragraph...

"We've sponsored tens of thousands of Africans, including Somali refugees who've come to Portland after escaping civil war, starvation, violence, disease and abhorrent conditions in refugee camps. Currently 8,000 Somalis call Portland home. We've welcomed them and continue to do so, despite the alleged actions of one messed-up teenager."

...and then the irony of this pathetic paragraph presented itself with an advertisement from the United Way charitable group displaying a photo of an unemployed, White, middle-aged, American man holding his downcast head in his hands.

"One messed-up" journalist is certainly in need of an education here, and one that requires a little travel away from that quaint, and "hideously white" burb she now occupies.

Detroit city ain't that far!

quent said...

Jesus Christ - 8,000 Somalis in Portland???? They deserve everything they get - and they WILL get it.

Bemused stare said...

"Jesus Christ - 8,000 Somalis in Portland???? They deserve everything they get - and they WILL get it."

In less than five years the number will be 30 000. In twenty years Portland will be trashed.

Californian said...

Could it be that Ms Faulkner has read the story of Amy Biehl and feels that pontification is far safer than practise?

My salutation to such liberals is, "May you follow in the footsteps of Amy Biehl!"

Anonymous said...

Bemused Stare said In less than five years the number will be 30 000. In twenty years Portland will be trashed.

I agree. The blindness is just beyond belief.

Anonymous said...

There's simply no shortage of other U.S. locales that the "there are none so blind..." Ms Faulkner can gain first-hand experience for herself before hastening Portland to commit white racial suicide.

To wit: Gwinnett County in Georgia.

Anonymous said...

One for you Savant, Hope this new year brings on some commonsence, Sir.
Haphttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SACko0kBunY&feature=relatedpy New Year!!

Anonymous said...

Reg said (among other things):-

... The liberal nazi politicians will be replaced once people are not bombarded with the liberal muck. All a few "respected" newspapers have to do is point out the fact that the king is naked.

Absolutely spot-on observation.

The very, very first thing one has to do is win the propaganda war -- or -- not lose it.

Thanks to the dumbing down of the general public, we can happily discount the pernicious influence of the press and the printed media of yesteryear. LIFE magazine -- once famously referred to as the magazine for those that can't read, its sister publication TIME (for those who can't think) Newsweek, New York Times, the Guardian, Figaro, PRAVDA, Isvestia ... all heading towards bankruptcy or already tipped over the edge.

Lenin, always a practical and cynical man, and a hundred times more intelligent than the Georgian thug, Stalin, once stated that cinema was the most powerful medium of propaganda ever conceived.

And he was right. Cinema today, in the hands of the hoffjuden offers the endless list of liberal whoppers. The "Color Purples", the "To kill a Mockingbirds" the "Schindler's Lists".

The last non jew-dominated film company (Disney) was infiltrated and finally taken over by the tribe in the nineties.

Television, cinema's slutty little sister, struts closely behind, sowing the smaller but more invidious seeds of disinformation, half-truth and deception. Television, however, goes one step further in actually telling you that the theatre you see is real.

Think about it ... how many people have you met, whose sole view of the world is informed by what they see in film and on television?

Cheers to all,

Uncle Nasty

End Media Delendia Est part 1 (continued next post)

Anonymous said...

Begin Media Delendia Est part 2

How many people leave the cinema after watching Men in Black, I am Legend or I, Robot and are not convinced -- even on a superficial level, that Will Smith is a resourceful and talented dude?

How about the Green Mile, where the (needless to say) black giant is not only innocent as the driven snow, but the closest thing to Christ on this plane? Or the Matrix series where a wise, motherly woman of indeterminate race mouthed the incomprehensible platitudes that convinced the fanboys that they were hearing something profound and aaaaawsome?

Or the astounding anti-American, anti-military anti-corporate hatchet job:- Dances with Smurfs or Avatar as James Cameron insisted on calling the retelling of Disney's Pocahontas. I am amazed he wasn't sued for plagiarism.

How many people watched Monster's Ball and felt that a Georgia redneck cop could overcome his prejudice and actually fall for a negroid waitress? A film that Roger Ebert (naturally, as he is married to a negroid) called the best film of 2001.

"Despite numerous positive reviews of the film, some black activists urged a boycott, notably
Miles Willis of the "Milestones" jazz program on Pacifica Radio's KPFT. His statement, championed
by syndicated film columnist Esther Iverem, included the following: "Imagine the seething
indignation that a Jewish man might feel while watching a story in which the widow of a Nazi
concentration camp victim has an intimate relationship with the SS officer that shoved her husband into one of those ovens at Auschwitz!" [Wikipedia quote]

Notice the rather neat dovetailing here. One fictitious story not-so-subtly supporting another. Esther Iverem, BTW is also a big-mouthed jungle bunny. Go to:-

http://seeingblack.com/contributors.shtml

And see who she hangs out with.

How many watched the token wise-old-darky Morgan Freeman in Se7en, Dark Knight, The
Shawshank Redemption, Evan Almighty
and Invictus and thought to themselves:- "hey, maybe having a jigaboo for God (Evan Almighty) or even a president (Deep Impact) isn't such a bad idea ..."

Oh, wait ...

And who can deny the power of film to stir powerful emotions? Who could watch The longest and most expensive concentration camp joke ever ... Schindler's List without bursting into tears -- or hysterical laughter?

Cheers to all,

Uncle Nasty

End Media Delendia Est part 2 (continued next post)

Barney the non-carnivorous dinosaur said...

But..but..can't we all just live together and like one another?

I mean, it works for me on the wonderfully uncomplicated world of children's television (hmm, actually it seems to work also on adult television too. Strange that).

So why not in the real world?

All together now: "I love you, you love me..."

missingWMD said...

To true Uncle Nasty. The brainwashing is never-ending. And as any good propagandist will tell you, repeated long enough it will be accepted as the truth. Especially when the target has become stupified from the mind-numbing drivel on TV.

Anonymous said...

Begin Media Delendia Est part 3

So ... what is the point of this post?

Convert, subvert, smother or destroy the leftist media. First and foremost and above all else. They are the viper in the hearth.

Sean Gabb, the radical Libertarian, in his manifesto for getting England back states that the very first act of taking back should be the total, immediate destruction of the BBC. Not taking over, not controlling, not reigning in, but destroying. Utterly.

Swooping at 4:00 AM, armed guards at every entrance, kicking out every employee ... not even allowing pot plants out. Clearing the structure, floor by floor, office by office and then torching the edifice. Then plowing salt into the ground.

Or even better ... sealing the place and auditing every directive, every memo, every communication -- in or out -- for the last fifty years. To be used as evidence in the upcoming trial.

Needless to say, this extends to all the subversive media planetwide ... all of them.

Once the media have been rendered ineffective -- and only then -- can the gangrenous limb be sawn off and the recovery begin.

Once again, as New Year reading, I recommend Mister by Alex Kurtagic and Tomislav Sunic, The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail and the "Covington Chronicles" as they are popularly known. In the Covington books, the writing is extremely uneven, but hey, they can be had for free. Oddly enough, the Covington books are set in Oregon and washington states.

Cheers to all,

Uncle Nasty

RegThe Hedge said...

True Uncle Nasty, knowing what the problems are and coming up with a solution is the easy part. Implementing your solution is another thing entirely. For that you need money, piles of money.
I´ve said it before but the people who have a fire down below should get the hell out there and make money. Then you can buy some tv stations and start spewing out your propadanga. I personally believe people are waiting for that little boy to start screaming the king has no clothes. I don´t think it will be difficult to get the majority of white people to hop up on your band wagon.
I´d like to think other realists are out there with a plan like mine cause it is the only way it will change. Don´t rely on someone else to do it.

Anonymous said...

That whole part of the country is infested with libtards and hippies of the worst possible variety, most of whom are long past the point where the good slap of reality they never received in this life would do them a shred of good. Let them have the entire contents of Detroit for all I care.

J Bull said...

Yes, that's what I'd love to do to the BBC. Bear in mind though that some changes are taking place there. It seems there's a bit of a reaction against all the peecee bullshit.

Anonymous said...

This is for Reg, who, as far as I know, is the most financially connected or financially literate person on the blog.

I am not sucking up, here, by the way. I am trying to make a point and would welcome opinion from anyone who knows more about finances and economies than me ... i.e. pretty much everybody.

I am fairly sure that wealth -- in the old fashioned sense -- is not like energy. It can be created and, as we are all discovering, it can be destroyed.

Fractional reserve banking (all banking really) -- as I understand it -- allows banks to accept as deposits one dollar of your real wealth (or one pound, Franc, Krone, Deutschmark or whatever ...) at low or no interest rate and then lend out ten fictitious, non-existent or straight bullshit dollars at higher interest rates, using your lonely little greenback as security or surety.

As I said, my understanding is limited.

So ... what I am asking is:- All the real wealth has been sucked from the taxpayer and now resides in the coffers of ... who?

Where is all the money? What form does it take? Where does the actual wealth reside? Under the world's biggest mattress? In Scrooge's money bin?

Seriously ... where is the actual money?

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Henry IX said...

LoL Uncle!! I've asked myself this question 1,000 times.

I await Reg's response (or that of anyone else who knows) with keep anticipation.

Krokodil said...

Ha ha Uncle Nasty, you're on a roll...but for all that I have to agree with you.

The MSM is inherently lefty, except of course for those reactionary types at the BBC and Guardian - only kidding!

Unfortunately, as you've pointed out, many, possibly most, people base their reality on movies and crappy TV programs. I've met so many of these idiots!

As for the scumbag bankers, I saw a documentary several months ago in which some apparently financial boffin said that because there had been no arrests and criminal sentences for the aforesaid criminals, don't be surprised to see these brazen chancers do the whole thing again (only worse this time)!

Those who have responsibility for greasing the financial wheels of society, need to understand that they are not only beholden to their own fiscal interests. Oh gosh, I am dreaming again.

Anonymous said...

J Bull said...

"Yes, that's what I'd love to do to the BBC. Bear in mind though that some changes are taking place there. It seems there's a bit of a reaction against all the peecee bullshit."

Reaction ... mmmm, yeah. But, is reaction enough?

After all, we are a reaction, and I'm afraid we matter very little in the grand scheme.

I recommend:-

http://www.vdare.com/gabb/100127_police_state.htm

... and Sean Gabb's attempt at a solution, freely downloadable here:-

http://www.seangabb.talktalk.net/hampdenpress/culture.htm

Read them and weep for what has been lost.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Robert said...

Saturday, January 1, 2011
Savages...

A married couple, Federico Ferrari, 27, a Marine currently home on leave from Afghanistan, and his wife Kaylin, out for what they hoped would be a pleasant evening at the movies, was viciously attacked by a group of up to 60 black ‘youths’ for having the audacity to ask a small group of teen girls to please quiet down in the theater.

Predictably, the girls went nuts, hurling profanities, etc… back at the Ferarris.

Kaylin Ferrari then went and notified the theater’s management of the situation, whereupon the management removed the girls from the theater.

Shortly thereafter, the Ferarris, their evening now ruined, decided to leave. What they found upon exiting the theater was that the group of girls was laying in wait for them, now accompanied by a large group of their homies.




As my husband and I left, about 10 black girls surrounded us. All under age. They kept asking me to hit them and I said no. Then 6 black males hit my husband from behind and ran. None of them had the balls to go face to face with him, they just ran. Then Charlotte's husband said he had a firearm and to follow him, as the black cloud descended on us. Literally about 60 of them.

A black boy took off his shirt and started walking towards my husband and I had seen enough. I walked up to the boy and put my hands up and said “stop it, just stop” before I knew it he punched me in the face and knocked me unconscious and I was on the ground. Apparently (of course) he hit and run due to him being a coward. My husband ran after him and the crowd then come towards me. Charlottes husband pulled out the gun to get them away from me.

-source

Anonymous said...

Robert - that's the kind of vibrant diversity that places like Portland are missing. For now.

RegThe Hedge said...

Uncle Nasty I can´t possibly give your question a comprehensive answer. I´d have to spend a week or two compiling a document to do it any justice.

What I would prefer to do is lend my backing to material that is already on the internet. FYI I have a general knowledge of banking and I specialise in bonds and derivatives.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936#

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1eO2DVomjY

The material is pretty basic and a little wrong in places but for our purposes I think the vids are excellent.

I´m not trying to be lazy and to prove that I´ll have a look around the internet for material that can give better and more full coverage of the creation of imaginary wealth. I can also answer less broad questions. It´s really just a time thing. I´d happily sit in a pub all night and go through the details of the financial system (the part I know about) but typing it out with the attention to detail and accuracy that I´d need would be quite arduous.

RegThe Hedge said...

Robert...
Are you suggesting that Negros are the only ones who do that type of thing? They aren´t. Almost the exact same thing happened to me in Dublin fifteen years back. Obviously there were no Negros amoung the group because Negros didn´t exist in Dublin fifteen years back. A friend of mine also had a similar thing happen where he actually got a good kicking from it.
I don´t want to offend anyone here but quite a few seem to believe only Negros are violent. The answer is, poor kids who grow up without parents supervision can become ferile and act accordingly. If you are American I can see how your experiences of ferile kids would be all black because the blacks seem to make up the poor population there. It is because they have bad parents not because they are brown in colour.
Don´t get me wrong here. I am not pro black. I hate multiculturalism and I am viciously against immigration from third worlders. I don´t know if blacks are more prone to violence or if they are as stupid as people here seem to think. I do know though that white people are a unique race on this planet and since they remove a black swan when it shows up in England for fear of upsetting the natural balance then they should bloody well do the same if a Negro washes up on our shore. In two hundred years white people will be fucked due to low birth rate and the fat ugly bitches who do seem to reproduce in large numbers seem to prefer (I say prefer but I mean has to settle for) primitive looking apes from Africa. However, all the worlds problems aren´t down to the black and jew.

Anonymous said...

Leftist wing-nuts will insist on "embracing" diversity until it's TOO late for their cities to reverse course.

Imagine embolden blacks creating this scene in the 1950s or 1960s. Ha!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10b2ZTYmmWA

Reg says: "I don´t know if blacks are more prone to violence or if they are as stupid as people here seem to think."

U.S. Dept. of Justice facts and figures may be helpful to your query. Note HERE, that just 13% of the population are responsible for over 52% of ALL homicides, and that's only ONE category!

"....because Negros didn't exist in Dublin fifteen years back."

See... what you've been missing out on? ;)

Anonymous said...

I bet those Portlanders can't wait until their diverse-city reaches Detriot proportions... http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/gallery/2011/jan/02/photography-detroit#/?picture=370173054&index=0


shaunantijihad

kulak said...

Happy New Year Savant!

So I was at the local club store yesterday and got corraled by two guys selling satellite TV service.

After their initial pitch, I told 'em I wasn't interested in 100s of channels, or movie channels, but there were a few of them I liked, some of them for kids, and I named 'em.

Number 1 salesmen said they also had National Geographic, Discovery Kids... and Jewish Living or Jewish American Life or something like that.

I sighed. "We'll have to lock that one," I said.

They worked so hard to not laugh.

Anonymous said...

IRELAND ARE YOU READY FOR THIS TYPE OF CLEANSING, THANKS TO BONO AND THE MARXIST IRA YOU WILL HAVE IT SOON ENOUGH;

kulak said...

@Reg

I don´t know if blacks are more prone to violence or if they are as stupid as people here seem to think.

They are.

But EVERYBODY does better in a white society, which leads REALLY SMART people to say stupid shit like this:

It is because they have bad parents not because they are brown in colour.

Irish yout in America USED to go into darkietown just to pick a fight. For fun.

They and darkie fought pretty much with fists, not guns.

It was a white country.

O.K., so your boyfriend got kicked.
He's still alive.

Channon and Christopher, on the other hand, got what bolsheviks today can only fantasize about while watching a Quentin Tarantino movie.

There is just no comparison in behavior.

But there's nothing wrong with being pro-black.

Mr. Lefty is not pro-black.

Mr. Lefty is anti-white.

fisticfury said...

I've read your suggested list Uncle Nasty and I fully concur. I would add some Christian-related material too though, given that this will be the bedrock of the fight back.

kulak said...

@U.N.

Mister

My gut tells me to disagree.

How does it end?

Any better than 1984, which was good government propaganda?

Bemused stare said...

RegThe Hedge said...

Robert...
Are you suggesting that Negros are the only ones who do that type of thing? They aren´t. Almost the exact same thing happened to me in Dublin fifteen years back.


Not even in the same ballpark Reg. I reckon most of us who have not lived a completely sheltered life have had our ass handed to us at some stage by two or more twits who didn't have the balls for a fair fight (I know that lesson).

Believe me, you ain't seen squat until you see what happens when South African chimps lose their banana.

What, with white kids would involve a couple of loose teeth and black eyes becomes hacked of limbs, impalement and being set on on fire etc. Wait until they transform your place into their preferred environment. "Dan gaan die poppe dans maat" Translation for you, run for the hills..

I don´t want to offend anyone here but quite a few seem to believe only Negros are violent.

C'mon Reg, you really don't think we are all that simple minded do you? Hell, the last time my Gramps and his mates decided to vacation around Europe, 50 million or so people took a dirt nap. I doubt if anyone here is under any illusions about what our people are capable of when we catch a bad case of nastiness.

The issue here is one of dealing with a race who a) have no concept of living in an ordered and civil society and b) demand that our people accept this or be labelled with that devastating R word.

SAVANT said...

Thanks for the NY wishes kulak - many happy returns.

When you say "Mr. Lefty is not pro-black. Mr. Lefty is anti-white." you got it on the button.

proud redneck said...

Jesus Christ if that gorilla tried that in the old South he'd be swining from a tree within the hour. (anon 15.34)

RegThe Hedge said...

Kulak,
1) I´m not stating facts. I don´t know, I don´t have any experience with blacks. Very few blacks show up in the areas I work in and there are no large numbers of Negros where I live. I´ve already associated a bad upbringing with bad behavour. Negros who live in darkietown would be poor, they would be brought up by mama Negro with no real control and they would have scum as role models. I´m not saying they don´t have a natural propensity for violence and stupidity I am saying they have all the influences that a white person needs to become a scumbag.
I take your point about killing as opposed to beating. A killing would be pretty much unheard of in Ireland years ago certainly nobody or very very few would get kicked to death.
2) I´m not a woman.

Bemused Stare,
The loosing the banana you mentioned is down to hate. The Negro in SA hates the White because they see the white in "their" land with all the wealth. Hate turns a kicking into a murder. I´m in Spain now but I live in Belfast. I know about hate. Have a look at Lenny Murphy from the Shankill butchers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenny_Murphy. He´s just one from thousands.

I have looked about and the evidence for
"a race who a) have no concept of living in an ordered and civil society"
is overwhelming. There are no successful Negro countries. In our societies they invariably end at the bottom of the heap. I know all this stuff I am just saying there are a number of factors that work against the Negro both in our societies and in his lair. These same factors work against Pakis and you see plenty of succesful Pakis So it´s hard not to figure the Negro has something congenitally wrong with his brain. Either way I don´t really care. I don´t want mixing or them living in Europe. We have a lot to loose and the Negro (along with the other muds) has a lot to gain.

I always had a real problem with this idea that we are decended from the Negro. Frankly I never believed it and I´ll explain why in another post but I was heartened to see a report on the news here that a new find has brought that "decended from Negro" theory into question. Like I said I´m in Spain at the moment and it is on the Spainish news so hopefully you lot will be cheered up when that bit of news makes it way to the English language media.

RegThe Hedge said...

Kulak,
1) I´m not stating facts. I don´t know, I don´t have any experience with blacks. Very few blacks show up in the areas I work in and there are no large numbers of Negros where I live. I´ve already associated a bad upbringing with bad behavour. Negros who live in darkietown would be poor, they would be brought up by mama Negro with no real control and they would have scum as role models. I´m not saying they don´t have a natural propensity for violence and stupidity I am saying they have all the influences that a white person needs to become a scumbag.
I take your point about killing as opposed to beating. A killing would be pretty much unheard of in Ireland years ago certainly nobody or very very few would get kicked to death.
2) I´m not a woman.

RegThe Hedge said...

Bemused Stare,
The loosing the banana you mentioned is down to hate. The Negro in SA hates the White because they see the white in "their" land with all the wealth. Hate turns a kicking into a murder. I´m in Spain now but I live in Belfast. I know about hate. Have a look at Lenny Murphy from the Shankill butchers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenny_Murphy. He´s just one from thousands.

I have looked about and the evidence for
"a race who a) have no concept of living in an ordered and civil society"
is overwhelming. There are no successful Negro countries. In our societies they invariably end at the bottom of the heap. I know all this stuff I am just saying there are a number of factors that work against the Negro both in our societies and in his lair. These same factors work against Pakis and you see plenty of succesful Pakis So it´s hard not to figure the Negro has something congenitally wrong with his brain. Either way I don´t really care. I don´t want mixing or them living in Europe. We have a lot to loose and the Negro (along with the other muds) has a lot to gain.

I always had a real problem with this idea that we are decended from the Negro. Frankly I never believed it and I´ll explain why in another post but I was heartened to see a report on the news here that a new find has brought that "decended from Negro" theory into question. Like I said I´m in Spain at the moment and it is on the Spainish news so hopefully you lot will be cheered up when that bit of news makes it way to the English language media.

Anonymous said...

fisticfury said...

I've read your suggested list Uncle Nasty and I fully concur. I would add some Christian-related material too though, given that this will be the bedrock of the fight back.

An excellent point here, I think -- and one that I have been wanting to make for a long time. While I freely admit to being -- in the words of Spike Milligan -- the worst Catholic since Ghengiz Khan, I have always felt that Christianity has been a civilizing influence on the rest of the planet.

And i refer here to historic Christianity. The Christianity that wore chainmail and a tabard ... with a broadsword in one hand and a bible in the other (figuratively speaking) ... whacking the heads off the infidels (our bloody infidels -- not theirs) and burning their camels to the ground. The Christianity that travelled up the Nile with a crate of scriptures and a monkey-tail Snider. The Christianity that kicked seven shades of shit out of ten thousand screaming niggers at Blood River.

That's my kind of Christianity.

Not the namby-pamby, we-must-embrace-diversity, soggy-cucumber-sandwich, damp handshake and weak tea crap that passes for mainstream Christianity today. Notice I say "mainstream" with the same contempt I would use for mainstream media. I refer to the Blut-Und-Eisen Christianity found in some of the more interesting blogs.

The point of this ramble? We need a rallying point ... and what's wrong with the historical rallying point that chopped these bastards up at Acre, Jerusalem, Malta and Lepanto? All it needs to do is purge itself of the lefty slime, re-grow a pair and stand up.

According to this (admittedly outdated) link:-

http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html

Christians still outnumber the camelbangers by about 25% ... so, offer the other cheek by all means ... and then smack them back so damn hard, their eyeballs rattle.

I'd join up in a flash.

Oh. And from Bemused Stare:-- ... Hell, the last time my Gramps and his mates decided to vacation around Europe, 50 million or so people took a dirt nap. I doubt if anyone here is under any illusions about what our people are capable of when we catch a bad case of nastiness.

The issue here is one of dealing with a race who a) have no concept of living in an ordered and civil society and b) demand that our people accept this or be labelled with that devastating R word."


Too true, Cobber. Too true.

Someone once said:- "Beware the fury of the patient man."

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

oncemore said...

Reg: Blacks ARE more prone to violence. They have higher levels of testerone, their pre-frontal cortexex are less developed and they are more impulsive. All contributers to violence and crime.

Anonymous said...

Reg Said:-

"I was heartened to see a report on the news here that a new find has brought that "decended from Negro" theory into question. "

Me too.

Puts me in mind of a delightful piece of doggerel from years back ...

Roses are reddish,
Violets are blueish;
If it weren't for Jesus,
We'd all be jewish.


Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

RegThe Hedge said...

Kulak,

1) I´m not stating facts. I don´t know, I don´t have any experience with blacks. Very few blacks show up in the areas I work in and there are no large numbers of Negros where I live.


I don't quite know how to tell you this, Reg, but if this is true, then either you are the luckiest man in the world or, in the words of Russell Crowe:-

" ... do not be troubled. For you are in Elysium, and you're already dead!"

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Bemused stare said...

RegThe Hedge said...

Bemused Stare,
The loosing the banana you mentioned is down to hate. The Negro in SA hates the White because they see the white in "their" land with all the wealth.


As you have said Reg, you have little experience in the matter. I on the other hand have spent 4 decades up to my eyeballs in the matter. Their behaviour is not necessarily anything to do with us.

Have you ever dealt with someone who will stab their little sister to death at dinner over the last piece (I kid thee not) of KFC? Or someone who will carve up their child in the backyard to sell the parts for juju medicine? Or someone who will "discipline" a 3 year old by sitting them on a hot stove plate? Or someone who will rape a baby until it's insides fall out because the idea simply occurred to them?

And no, these are not rare, isolated incidents. This is run of the mill life in my country and nothing whatsoever to do with white people. Unless of course you want to haul out the old bullshit chestnut of "apartheid" to somehow explain how they went from "geniuses who built the pyramids", to being on a par with "orcs."

All of this does not even have anything to do with hate, it is merely as I said, day to day occurrence.

Anonymous said...

Krokodil said...

As for the scumbag bankers, I saw a documentary several months ago in which some apparently financial boffin said that because there had been no arrests and criminal sentences for the aforesaid criminals, don't be surprised to see these brazen chancers do the whole thing again (only worse this time)!

And here, Krokodil, you have put your finger on the nub of the matter.

Five short years ago, I am convinced that these crooks would have been dragged out and turned into lamp post decor.

Now?

They boast about it and no one lifts a finger.

Where did our balls go? When is the tipping point?

I dunno.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

"Where is all the money?"

Most of it's gone.

Your house is real value, your weeks labor is real value. Both can be invested to create more value, and both can be lost.

Money isn't real value. It's just a convenient token people use when they enter into an agreement to exchange real wealth. Money represents value, but only as a promise. It's only as good as the word of the person handing it to you.

When you deposit your weeks wages into a bank you and the bank have entered into an agreement, with tokens, as to how that agreement is going to be resolved. You invested a week of your wages with tokens, say $1000, and the bank promised to pay you back $1100 next year.

When the bank then loans out your money to someone else charging 10 times the interest it offered to pay you then another agreement has been made with someone else. Hopefully everyone sticks to their word, and no one gets burned. But at this point we're dealing with promises. Each party is not actually holding the real wealth written down on those tokens.

And sometimes things go wrong, or people get tempted, and the numbers on those token sheets don't represent reality anymore and can't be paid back. That's when money disappears.

Yes, a few sharks might have grabbed some of your nickels and dimes before it all went south. That always happens. But when the economic reality underneath the paperwork doesn't support the promises on the paper, then money truly disappears.

It's not that Scrooge crept off in the night and is now holding your $1100 in his secret account. No, your money is just gone. Flushed down the rat hole of empty promises.

True wealth can be stolen or burned. But promises made on paper are worth no more than a whisper and can just evaporate.

In 2008 almost all the money in Iceland's 3 major banks went missing. A few people got rich before the collapse. But the dollar (krona) value of all the money that was lost never existed as real wealth in the first place. It was only empty promises.

patrick

GOP-crap said...

I dont fully follow Patrick's logic. You see, given that money is merely a token representing 'real' wealth, and given that the real wealth is not being destroyed by war, fire etc., what we have is a misrepresentation of the real wealth, or else someone getting an 'undeserved' share of the real wealth.

Am I not correct?

Anonymous said...

Reg says: "I have looked about and the evidence for
"a race who a) have no concept of living in an ordered and civil society"
is overwhelming. There are no successful Negro countries.
"

Here's a rather forthright analysis of that understanding written by a brave Black journalist in Nigeria.

...and getting a little off-topic here, but:

GOP-crap says "I don't fully follow Patrick's logic. You see, given that money is merely a token representing 'real' wealth......."

The near bottom end of this link should explain all you need to know.

Anonymous said...

Like Bemused Stare and Krokodil I also spent my life with the problem.

How does one define it without sounding like a foaming-at-the-mouth racisss?

Many years ago, before Barclays Bank disinvested from South Africa, they commissioned a documentary film on the huge annual migration of Wildebees (the African Gnu) across south and central Africa ... and the hardships these creatures encountered.

The doco began with the full herd, literally thousands -- if not tens of thousands -- of the creatures. So many, in fact, that one could not see the ground beneath them.

It followed the herd as the migration took its toll. Predators, thirst, starvation, falling off cliffs. There was one memorable scene where the wildebees crossed a swollen, angry river. Many were swept off their feet and carried downstream to drown. The first hundreds that got across safely -- churned the banks of the river to slippery mud so those behind began to flounder in the mud with those behind them, in turn, crawling over the trapped ones and crushing them into the mud.

Exhausted and panicked, now many of the trailing creatures could not gain purchase, and were swept away. Another camera crew filmed the aftermath of hundreds of bloated wildebees carcasses washed up, for miles, on the banks downstream.

Long story short. The herd was reduced to one (yes, one) confused and starving wildebees calf staggering into a small black settlement where a handful of adolescent jungle bunnies stoned and hacked it to death.

Did they eat it? No, they weren't hungry.

Did they skin it and wear it? No, they had clothes.

They did it for fun.

And that, my friend, is Africa.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

GOP-crap said.

"I dont fully follow Patrick's logic. You see, given that money is merely a token representing 'real'
wealth, and given that the real wealth is not being destroyed by war, fire etc."

Actually, I said that real wealth could be lost...

"Your house is real value, your weeks labor is real value. Both can be invested to create more value, and both can be lost."

So, real wealth can be lost, or by your words "destroyed by war or fire etc."

But money, as a token representation of real wealth, is a mere promise of wealth, and that's a whole different thing altogether.

patrick

Anonymous said...

I think GOP-crap is correct here.

But in fairness, I may not have made my query clear. I am quite aware that money is a symbol of wealth -- and not wealth itself. Just as gold and silver are symbols of wealth. Far more substantial symbols indeed, but symbols nonetheless. After all a gold coin will not warm you when cold or nourish you when you gnaw on it.

What i was saying was not so much "Where is the money?" But more, "Where is the genuine, bedrock wealth that the money symbolises or represents?"

What's happened to that?

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

I don't think the problem is that money is just a promise. In a modern economy you need a medium of exchange. I can't barter for everything I need because as a programmer, few people really need my services but I need the services and products of lots of people. The problem is with the nature of money itself.

Ideally a medium of change is transportable and has some value. People always point to gold. Gold only had value because it was used to settle international debts and local currency was backed by it or used for coinage. However, the first known instance of money was on Crete and the coin had an image of a goat. The wealth was in the fact, not that it was gold, but that the royal family guaranteed that this coin was worth a goat. If you could not get a goat from somebody, then the royal treasury would guarantee you a goat.

The real problem is that the perceived value of money fluctuates versus the value of real wealth. We tend to look at it from the other direction - the prices of things fluctuate. This fluctuation means that there are people who can make a living off this fluctuation.

Normally, this isn't so bad. The value of a piece of china is worth more to a European than a Chinese so somebody with a ship can trade in one part of the world and make a living bringing it to another part of the world.

However, other people take advantage of peoples basic desire to get something for nothing and manipulate things to get artificial fluctuations in the value of money such that they make a living off these inflations and deflations.

It gets even worse when other forms of currency are introduced such as stock certificates. Not only can the perceived value of the money be distorted but so can the perceived value of these currencies. We even have derivatives based on the changes in the secondary currencies which themselves are currencies.

A whole industry exists that produces nothing of value but derives its livelyhood from the fluctuations of all these currencies. Now everybody is speculating trying to guess where the next fluctuation will come from, hoping to make money on it since it beats actually producing real wealth. Soon everybody tries to get in on the game.

This can never go on forever but instead of trying to stop it in its infancy, new schemes pop up trying to keep the game going like allowing people to post date checks in the Kuwaiti stock market.

As long as you have money, you will have the ability to create bubbles and collapses. They occurred when money was baked by gold and borrowing was almost nonexistant for average people. It is just that the creation of new currencies makes the likelyhood so much higher.

patrick does make a good point about money seeming to disappear but I think the reason is really due to our lenient bankruptcy laws and not that it is only a promise to repay.

In the old days a man could be put into some form of servitude to pay off his debts. Companies could be put into receivership at the mear hint of default and the debtor could recover a significant amount of his loss or take control of the asset for himself.

However, today people hide behind corporations, loot them, and file for chapter 11 to allow the looting to go on until legitimate debtors recover nothing. The laws shield crooks on Wall Street as long as they never admit they knew what they were doing was crooked.
If you lost your life savings to Madoff and punched him in the nose on the streets of New York you might be in prison for aggravated assault longer than any of his sons ever would.

We have created a truely screwed up system.

Anonymous said...

I'm with gop-crap on this rather than Patrick. Fact is, the countries wealth is still there. All the buildings, cars, hospitals, skills, professions etc. They're all still there. Sure, the money that claims to represent a claim on those things has been devalued and shifted around, but the things of value are still there.

So why are we all poorer??

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Anonymous of 00:46.

The second link is absolutely priceless, and reminds me of the poverty-stricken Portuguese village who subsisted by taking in each other's washing.

"It's just a jump to the left ..."

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Something interesting on Iceland, BTW.

It appears that Iceland was the one country who said to their banks:- "You're failing? You want bailout too? Drop dead. Fail."

So, the Icelandic banks went titties-up and Iceland is experiencing economic recovery as we speak.

Link:- http://www.lostrepublic.us/archives/5252

I wonder when the U.S -- assisted by the UK and the UN -- will invade them.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Croesus said...

I read something where everyone had debts and this chinese guy came in, booked a room in a hotel, the hotel owner then paid off his debts, which lead to a string of subsequemt paymemts and at the end the chinese guy never took the room but everything was ok. Can't remember the story propoerly but it was thought-provoking.

jocomo said...

anon 8.14 - I think you've explained it, at least to my understanding. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberta_Achtenberg

Was in charge of seeing that "people" could not be discriminated against under some boondoogle of a Jimmy Carter law and when the sub prime thing blew up it was nothing to do with her using the Community Reinvestment Act Politicallymotivatedbondoogle.

Anonymous said...

THE GIANT IN THE FILM GREEN MILE COULD NEVER OBEY TRAFFIC STOP SIGNS EITHER, HIS NAME ESCAPES ME NOW BUT HE WORKED BEFORE STARDOM AT THE SOUTH SHOPS OF THE PEOPLES GAS COMPANY IN CHICAGO ON 107TH ST AND THROOP ST, AND ALAWAYS BLEW THE ONLY STOP SIGN THERE, I PULLED HIM OVER AT LEAST 3 TIMES AND WHEN HE GOT OUT OF HIS CAR HE KEPT GETTING OUT!!!!!!! A NICE GUY AND A VERY GENTLE GIANT ALSO WORE A SIZE 18 SHOE, HIS DEMEANOR AND HUMOUR ALAWAYS GOT HIM A PASS FROM ME,JOHN OLD RETIRED CHICAGO COPPER.

Anonymous said...

The giant referred to is Michael Clarke Duncan who was born in Chicago, Illinois.

he is 6 feet 5 inches (196 cm) and 315 pounds (142 kg) and, from what I have read, is a very pleasant guy in real life.

He also appeared in The Whole Nine Yards, Sin City and was the gravelly voice of the prison guard rhino in Kung Fu Panda

As you may have gathered, I'm a bit of a movie freak.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Savant, I find it strange that you are so often ahead of the curve in your posts.

So, I place this post here, rather than in your Our most important issue: Relations with Jews post as I feel that that particular thread is dying.

Go to Melanie Phillip's Blog ...

http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles-new/?p=789

scroll to Address to Ariel Conference on Law and Mass Media, 30 December 2010

Then, I recommend one read the article, copy and paste it into a word processor, find every instance of "Israel" and replace it with, say "Whites" or "the West" and read it again.

A magnificent case of the biter bit -- or the law of Unintended Consequences.

I originally found this on the Theo Spark website ... an interesting site, but inclined to be very philosemitic and pro-Israel.

Most intriguing.

Cheers.

Uncle Nasty

SAVANT said...

Most interesting link Uncle N. Biter bit indeed!

Interestingly, Blogger/Google designated your post as spam. I wonder on what basis? I rescued it as you can see.

Anonymous said...

@Uncle Nasty and Irish Savant,
Melanie Philips the Jewish lady whose blog was linked to was originally a bit of a leftie like many of her kind.

Quote Wikipedia: After winning the Young Journalist of the Year award in 1976,[1] she spent a short period at the New Society magazine, before joining The Guardian newspaper in 1977 and soon became its social services correspondent and social policy leader writer. Gaining initial attention for articles on the treatment of asylum seekers and immigrants, she broke a story that immigrants entering on a fiancee visa from Bangladesh, India and Pakistan (outside of marriage, subject to annual immigration quotas) were being submitted to virginity tests at Heathrow Airport.[2] The policy was quickly changed.[1]

Is Philips just opposed to Muslim immigration but not other types? She helped to create the problem she now complains about.

SAVANT said...

anon 17.53. I think she's primarily if not exclusively focused on the Religion of Peace. Other opposition to emigration is almost a bi-product. Her other major focus is on Israel.

Don't be too hard on former lefties. I was one you know!!

Anonymous said...

SAVANT said...

"anon 17.53. I think she's primarily if not exclusively focused on the Religion of Peace. ...

Don't be too hard on former lefties. I was one you know!!"

We were all former lefties, Savant. I remember my leftieism very well.

It was a drizzly Easter weekend ...

Thank you for rescuing my post BTW. I think as one trolls trough the right-wing sites, one picks up a layer of electronic cobwebs, so to speak, and these trigger the google alarms.

My theory, anyway.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

The tipping point approacheth ...

Or doth it?

http://tiny.cc/50jxe

Please read and make up your own mind.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

J Bull said...

Yes, I saw that Mail piece. Things are being said now that would not have been said in the past. A friend who works with the BBC also said there are indications of a shift even there.

Having allowed for that, sometime I feel it's two steps forward, one step back.

Still, a few hopeful signs. And if the economy goes as badly as Reg suggests, well, we could be in for interesting times!

Anonymous said...

The tipping point approacheth nearer, quicker, perhaps?

http://tiny.cc/jzht6

This goes some way towards telling those in the UK where their money is going ... or has gone.

Read. weep. This will not end well.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

The tipping Point .. Are we getting there, yet?

http://incogman.net/

It's five and a half minutes long. You won't like it ...

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

pissedoff said...

To reach such a tipping point people will have to know about such things. How many people are aware of this video for instance.

Compare that to the hundreds of millions who watch heroic black surgeons and scientists on the MSM every day.

hector grey said...

Something's happening all right. Tonight's news on RTE (Ireland's national broadcaster) referred to a double killing. Normally no mention would be made of ethnicity, still less that such ethnicity would have had anything to do with the crime.

However, halleyuja, the reporter stated openly that the victims and the 'suspect' were 'of Pakistani origin'. Not only that, but he said that this was likely to have been an 'honour killing' - a practice which is 'widespread in south Asia and has become increasingly common among south Asians (read Moslims) in Britain.'

Trust me, for RTE this is revolutionary stuff. methinks something is stirring!

Anonymous said...

Melanie Philips WAS aleftie but then started writing stuff that was not Gruaniad PC garbage and had to leave her job there. She wrote All Must Have Prizes about the dumbing down of British education.

beefees said...

Ah, Portland! When I moved to this area, the queer mayor was getting charged with raping a 17 year old boy and no one even noticed. Those who did notice thought it wasn't a big deal at all. Later after he gave up his boy toy he started dating Peter Zuckerman, a journalist at the Oregonian. During his time as mayor he managed to focus on really important issues, like banning plastic bags and setting up Occupy Wall Street Camps. The first camp set up in a city park caused $30,000 in damages overnight because the wonderfully well-behaved socialist filth were so worked up they couldn't help but do some celebratory vandalism.

There are illegal Mexicans everywhere. I'm not sure if Portland just ignores them as citizens or just thinks of them as workers so they don't count. But believe me, it seems every violent crime I read about has a picture of a Mexican beside it. They are allowed free rides everywhere, including the major colleges. Portland Community College has special programs just for illegals to get an education.

If I were a Mexican I would sure feel welcome in Portland, driving down Caesar Chavez Blvd on my way to work. Another crumb left behind by former Mayor Sam Adams who renamed the street in 2009 to give "a tangible tribute to the ever increasing Latino community in Portland".

Anyway, I could rant all day. I'm grateful to see someone with the same point of view, even if they don't live here. It is so sad because of all places I have lived and visited, the Pacific Northwest is truly the most beautiful.

Anonymous said...

Savant,

give the "supernatural" things a break.

Don't take unlimited for supernatural, they aren't the same.

Unlimited decay, degeneracy, fecklessness may lead on the other side to unlimited prepotence and subjugation.

Unlimited numb-mindedness may lead to unlimited exploitation or at any rate superiority.

It seems some people's ascent and the fall of Western civilization is driving you nuts?!

You swap effect with cause, you "deploy fallacies" (as you like to say), and now your frustration leads to transcendental explanations even!

There's only one thing I see around me that is transcendental. The gullibility and inability to think of whites.
Their laziness. Their now proudly cultivated ignorance.

You like to imagine whites are all like you :))!
No, man. They are simple-minded, not bright; they don't lust after knowledge, they lust after simplism and ignorance in facts.

The people you love... are starting to even be proud of their ignorance.

I have friends in Switzerland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany.
NEARLY NONE HAS children/planst to have any!

We are beyond the "single child" stage. We are at the "no children"!
And it's regularly the higher-IQ most intelligent people.

Nothing destroys huge civilizations except armed force or themselves.
You may make the point that a central-European country-civilization was destroyed by armed force.
But you may not make the point that Western civilization is being destroyed by armed forces, or by "others".

Others are feeding the self-destructive tendency, sure. But it's not causation.

What made the incomparably superior Greek civilization disappear?
What, if not democracy, liberty, ease of life?

The culprits are never changing.
Civilizations don't survive democracy and liberty.

And, assuming the real causes or our fall were the ones you believe are, it would still easily explained by sociobiology (id est: truth said about humans). No need for metaphysics.
Even if that "Richard Dawkin's insect" thing were true, that were part of the outcome, not the basic cause.

Admit to yourself that what is so frustrating is the unlimited thirst for ignorance and inability to think of the people you love.
OF COURSE others take advantage. It's nature! They would be wrong not to, and you know it.

Don't you see all the people from the third world who do all they can to immigrate into the West, and then bitch about how ugly, dirty, dastardly whites and their culture and civilization are?

:))))

They follow the laws of nature. On a mental level, they know truth and pursue their interest based on their knowledge of truth.
On the other, they repress that knowledge, and feed their ego, satisfying jealousy, inferiority complexes, and all what demands to be satisfied or quenched.
When they do this, they are functioning as organisms.

If Whites have become so obscenely disfunctional and unfit to life that they are an offence to Nature, what can we do?
What but to accept it?