Thursday, 11 November 2010

Lebanon 1870 - USA 2020?

This is from "The Land and the Book" by W.M. Thomson,Protestant minister, published in London in 1870. This country is a splendid example to us of multi-culturalism in action. Just wonder how much relevance it has for the futures of the USA and other western countries currently under siege?


"Lebanon has about 400,000 inhabitants, gathered into more than six hundred towns, villages and hamlets.The various religions and sects live together, and practice their conflicting superstitions in close proximity, but the people do not coalesce into one homogeneous community, nor do they regard each other with fraternal feelings.The Sunnites excommunicate the Shiites; both hate the Druse, and all three detest the Nusairiyeh.


The Maronites have no particular love for anybody and, in turn, are disliked by all. The Greeks cannot endure the Greek Catholics - all despise the Jews. And the same remarks apply to the minor divisions of this land. There is no common bond of union. Society has no continuous strata underlying it, which can be opened and worked for the general benefit of all, but an endless number of dislocated fragments, faults, and dikes, by which the masses are tilted up in hopeless confusion, and lie at every conceivable angle of antagonism to each other.


The omnific Spirit that brooded over primeval chaos can alone bring order out of such confusion, and reduce these conflicting elements into peace and concord. No other country in the world, I presume, has such a multiplicity of antagonistic races ; and herein lies the greatest obstacle to any general and permanent amelioration and improvement of their condition, character, and prospects.

They can never form one united people , never combine for any important religious or political purpose ; and will therefore remain weak, incapable of self-government, and exposed to the invasions and oppressions of foreigners. Thus it has been, is now, and must long continue to be a people divided, meted out, and trodden down."

28 comments:

kulak said...

No other country in the world, I presume, has such a multiplicity of antagonistic races ; and herein lies the greatest obstacle to any general and permanent amelioration and improvement of their condition, character, and prospects.

Wrong. So obviously wrong.

kulak said...

Just wonder how much relevance it has for the futures of the USA and other western countries currently under siege?

None besides white genocide.

How does the good minister explain the Roman empire? He can't.

How does he explain the fall of the empire? "Breakdown of traditional values" or some such nonsense?

Lebanon's problem in 1870 was very simple.

It didn't have enough white people.

We still have more than enough white bodies to turn things around.

If we don't regain our will, then yes, America will become like Lebanon.

It will become just another non-white nowhere that nobody thinks about.

Nobody has Bolivia or Lebanon in mind when they say the world is going to end.

And everybody knows why.

j mcl said...

Isn't it amazing that with so much evidence so long ago nobody has seemed to learn?

kulak said...

In Africa, civic participation means genociding the neighbors.

In Latin America, it means bribes, machine politics, peasant uprisings, and military coups.

So of course when Putnam looks at diversity in America, he doesn't see civic participation.

Anonymous said...

Tea Party victories last week offer some hope. Leftists cling on to isolated outposts on the West and Northeast urban coasts.

Tired ole white guy said...

True, but are the TP much use? They're falling over themselves to show that they're not 'racist'. Can't see them achieving much with that 'tude.

Anonymous said...

At the risk of sounding off topic ... (I seem to be saying that a lot these days) can any of the NG tell me the origin of this rather hideous image --

http://wiganpatriot.blogspot.com/

Scroll down to the very last image on the right-hand sidebar entitled "Islam is Love ..."

Does ANYONE know what the real story is behind this? I've seen some pretty dreadful crap -- in reality as well as on the internet -- but this disturbs the hell out of me every time I see it. And I see it often.

Why do I want to know? Because I often bump into some starry-eyed lefty who thinks that only the extreme muzzies are a problem.

This is ammunition, but I need to be sure of the facts.

Thanks,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

I'm a dispassionate person ... until I see someone actively trying to destroy a nation's children.

I'm talking about white children, of course. Black children I regard as blow-fly maggots who will only grow up to be niggers, anyway.

So, I direct you to this site:- http://tiny.cc/wpeya

In which it is pointed out that USAID (the US State department) is propagandizing Russian children to become the type of mini-slut so common in the western world. There is even a link to a PDF of the document called "Happy, Healthy and Hot." In which Russian kids (I am NOT making this up) are advised on whether to hide their HIV status or not ... and how HIV positive status is not a drawback to a happy kiddie-poo sex-life. 'Scuse the shout, but I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP.

Please go there ... you will NOT believe what you're reading. At the point when your piss begins to boil, open and read the document -- link at the foot of the article -- and make up your own mind as to whether the time has come for a bit of freelance garbage takeout a la Covington.

I think if I were a Russian, I would be re-connecting with emigre relations, now in the new world ... and making plans.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Clogheen said...

I've checked those links. I tell you, there's some firece retribution coming to those people who do them things. Rise up!

Krokodil said...

re: Uncle Nasty
Your comments regarding black children are pretty disgusting, all said and done.

I've thought you've had a few sensible comments to make from time to time, but that's just seriously uncalled for.

It is possible to be anti-multicultural, anti-ethnic immigration etc. and, indeed, to hold all sorts of other views on the "right", without resorting to that kind of language.

Nor am I making a mere polite point here, but I know of black people who have done, and are doing, a good job of raising their kids to be decent citizens (however much it isn't the norm). As well, I certainly know of whites who've done a bum job of raising their children in both South Africa and the UK.

Elaine said...

Here here krokodil. Just feeling the same thing myself. One of the things I like about this blog is that it can discuss such important issues and hardly ever descends into the kind of verbiage we get from uncle Nasty.

Well named, I say!

Anonymous said...

Elaine and Krokodil.

I accept your comments. Put, I might add, in a very restrained and civilised fashion ... which is probably why I like this blog so much. I shall endeavour to keep the editorial comment to a minimum in the future

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty.

Happily I can still be a mean, pernicious bastard in the dark recesses of my alleged mind :o)

SAVANT said...

That's fine UN.........just don't become TOO nice!!

Anonymous said...

Checked the links and it seems to be a UK publication (the porno advice pamphlet). No wonder once-great Britain is swirling down the toilet...

Potgieter

Anonymous said...

If, like me, you spend your life wondering just who really, really, really runs the show ... check this out.

http://captainranty.blogspot.com/

I don't say that it's gospel, but it's sure interesting.

But, be warned ... It's looooong.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

kulak said...

@Tired ole white guy

True, but are the TP much use?

As they are today, not in themselves.

Their use is in what the anti-white left makes of them.

kulak said...

@Krokidil

Your comments regarding black children are pretty disgusting, all said and done.

I understand your point.

Everything's cute when it's little, to a white person.

Even a crocodile.

It's always white people who save whales and snails. And niggers.

It's easy to be sentimental about them when you're safe and supreme. It costs you nothing.

When kept in proper proportion.


Nor am I making a mere polite point here, but I know of black people who have done, and are doing, a good job of raising their kids to be decent citizens (however much it isn't the norm). As well, I certainly know of whites who've done a bum job of raising their children in both South Africa and the UK.


But THAT's got nothing to do with ANYTHING.

Elaine said...

kulak - I don't see how what krokodile said is disgusting. What You said, well, may be.

Anonymous said...

Elaine said...

"kulak - I don't see how what krokodile said is disgusting. What You said, well, may be."

Hmmmm. Second mildly derogatory post from Elaine here in a week ... and an inaccurate one from the actual context of the post. Do I detect the faint aroma of burning straw man?

Tread lightly, my dear, and please note, what you got from me was a mere statement. No one could construe it as an apology.

Try poking Kulak in the eye, however, and there may be a problem.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Krokodil said...

Right. Just a couple of comments; after that, I shall leave the matter alone.

Uncle Nasty, you came across as having realised you'd gone too far - and acknowledged it (to which I thought: good for you, as it's much easier to tell anonymous people online to **** off). Are you changing your mind now?

Re: Kulak, how do you know I'm "safe and supreme", as you put it? Stop assuming what you don't know. I speak PRIMARILY from personal experience.

The "left" like to portray those on the "right" as fascists, nazis, hate-mongers etc. I reject that labelling (many of the most arrogant fascists are to be found firmly in the liberal camp). Using the kind of speech that I objected to above unfortunately tends to fulfil the right-wing caricature so beloved by those on the left.

That's partly my objection but, mostly, I genuinely AM disgusted to hear any (especially innocent) human being being described in that manner. To state the obvious, NOBODY chose their race, gender, place of birth etc. By all means have a go at those who do wrong - call them any name you like - but let's just wait for them to do wrong first, OK?

At the risk of sounding heretically liberal here, let me make the following shocking statement: not all darkies are bad and many, many whities aren't good either.

I speak from both personal and impersonal experience.

As has already been pointed out by others, this blog takes a generally sensible view (though I enjoy the hilarity of a lot of it) of the matters that confront white civilisation, and the West in general. That's why it's popular, in my opinion. Matters can be debated in a sensible manner, with reasonable discourse (not always, but that's blogging for you). Be nice if it stayed that way.

Heraclitus said...

krokodil - amen to that. I too know some nice hard-working blacks, even one Nigerian family here in Ireland. I too feel uneasy at the language of some blogs and that's one of the reasons why I like this one.

Still, the comments from kulak, uncle nasty and some others are really insightful and possess great humour so much of the time. They also provide some great links. I'd hate to think that they'd become neutered, or neuter themselves as a result of this interaction.

Krokodil said...

Heraclitus - totally agree with you. Hope I wasn't implying anything else.

If I've made an issue about anything, I hope it's to be seen entirely within a very specific and limited context - nothing beyond that at all.

It's not my intention to cramp anyone's style, especially major contributors such as UN and K. I only objected to somethong I felt was NOT in tune with UN's normal input (I think that's a fair enough assessment).

In any event, I'll go no further with this matter - too much discussing of mole-hills risks the creation of mountains.

Respect to all.

Anonymous said...

Don't start becoming PC on us now for Chrissake!

Rob said...

Our rulers already know that lebanisation is our future. That's their agenda, by default if not actively. The only thing that might be said in their favour is that some of them are too stupid to foresee the consequences of their policies.

Anonymous said...

"Our rulers already know that lebanisation is our future. "

Question is = why? Why have they this future in mind?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

"Our rulers already know that lebanisation is our future. "

Question is = why? Why have they this future in mind?

I have to agree.

From what I can tell, it seems to all about the money and the power. It appears that there are many people to whom "More than enough" is simply not sufficient.

I find it strange to have that mindset as, to me, anyway, more than enough is, well, more than enough.

What does intrigue me, though, is ... what do you do, when you have absolutely everything? And more to the point, the money (or wealth) does exist.

So, where is this huge concentrated mass of wealth? And what the hell are they going to do with it? I have images of the old comic with Scrooge McDuck swimming in his money pit.

It seems to me that the world heads towards a blasted wasteland covering the face of the planet with a giant walled off citadel in which the elite slurp mint juleps and wade barefoot through money, while coffee-coloured peons scratch a living out of the arid soil.

If this is the plan, it's not much of a plan.

It reminds me of the characters in "Meet the Robinsons" who keep telling the inept villain that he hasn't thought this through ...

The question holds:- why? Why have they this future in mind?

Does anyone have a sane answer that will fit on the back of an envelope? Seriously?

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

SAVANT said...

Uncle N. I have exactly the same question as you and onon. I just cannot understand why our 'leaders' are doing this. I really don't know. Unless they actually are totally deluded and have bought into this whole multicult bucket of crap.

Yes, I really do not know.

Robert said...

Lord of the Rings & Enoch Powell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh9OA9wzsOg