I've referred just a few posts ago to the criminal negligence (at best) of the MSM and its role in the demise of the West. But it’s still a matter of total amazement to me the extent to which the most glaring questions, striking at some of the most vital developments in our lives, can be almost completely ignored or trivialised. One of these relates to 9/11.
There’s a huge body of evidence and whole sites devoted to this – all dismissed by the MSM as ‘nut-cases’ or ‘conspiracy freaks’. And I've no intention of getting into the technicalities of controlled explosions or the shenanigans of Jewish financiers or even of something closer to my own field of expertise, the activities of Israeli technology companies in the overall 9/11 arena.
There are numerous arguments and counter-arguments, most of which I have no special ability to judge. However, some things are totally clear, not denied, in the public domain…. and which conclusively prove that Israeli elements – let’s leave it at that – at a minimum knew in advance of the attacks.
I’ll cite just two – you can get dozens more in the blogosphere.
In October 2000, approximately 11 months before 9/11, a retired Israeli Defence Forces(IDF) officer at the Jewish Gomel Chesed Cemetery in New Jersey overheard a couple of people having what he believed to be a conversation spoken in Hebrew, which drew his attention. He hid behind an 8-foot tall retaining wall and listened in to their conversation as they stood below. Shortly after a Lincoln town car approached the two people -- presumably Israelis -- and the man in the backseat got out to greet them. After normal niceties were exchanged the third man said:“The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September.”The observer who overheard this conversation related it to the FBI on numerous occasions only to be ignored each time. Nothing was done about it, and no investigation into the incident has ever took place.
Then we have the ‘celebrating students’ who jumped up and cheered when the planes hit. The men were detained by the NYPD. The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports.
Initially they were assumed by everyone to be Islamic terrorists or at least their accomplices. The MSM gave it saturation coverage…… until it emerged that in fact they were Israelis. The item then immediately disappeared from MSM coverage. Fast forward a few months (they were quickly released, needless to say) and the same ‘students’ appeared on an Israeli talk show and claimed to be "documenting the event".
Witnesses reported they were set up prior to the first plane strike, and were seen congratulating one another afterward. The five jubilant Israelis were also seen photographing one another. The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smoldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture.
Self-evidently they knew in advance.
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga has told Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies.
He said in Corriere della Sera: "All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."
Andreas von Bulow served on the parliamentary commission which oversees the three branches of the German secret service while a member of the Bundestag (German parliament) from 1969 to 1994, and wrote a book titled Im Namen des Staates (In the Name of the State) on the criminal activities of secret services, including the CIA.
Von Bulow told AFP that he believes that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, is behind the September 11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs, and boost military and security spending. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said adding, "those who differ are labelled as crazy."
Both Werthebach and von Bulow said the lack of an open and official investigation, such as congressional hearings, into the events of September 11 was incomprehensible.
But is it?
As I said earlier, these facts are in the public domain, and to my knowledge, nobody has denied them. (How could they?). So what we have here is the full knowledge that Israeli elements, at a minimum knew about the attack in advance. This is turning everything on its head. It changes the fundamental understanding of what happened that day and how – and why - it occurred.
Knowing this you’d imagine that there would be an explosion of outrage, breaking off diplomatic relations – at a minimum- with Israel (remember a full-scale war was launched on Iraq on the basis of the most tenuous 9/11 connections), a calling to account of those who concocted the official whitewash report, and a relentless pursuit of all those connections. The focus of the so-called war on terror would have been turned on its head.
But what we get is nothing. No public reaction, other than from the ‘kooks’ in the blogosphere. Isn’t that totally and utterly unimaginable? I mean totally and utterly unimaginable? Now I’ve raised this issue with many intelligent open-minded people. Basically they’re not really interested. Isn’t that also incredible? To me it’s as if it was found out in 1942 that it wasn’t the Japs who’d attacked Pearl Harbour, rather the Russians or some other country.
Why is this? We can talk about Jewish media and political control, and that’s obviously a huge consideration. But it’s by no means total. (Israel gets a bad press in many European countries, for example). But nobody runs with what will probably turn out to be the most fundamental paradigm-changing revelation of this century.
Again I ask – why is this?
My own belief is that it can be explained in large part by people’s inability to process something so fundamentally at odds with what they’ve internalised over a lifetime. Cognitave dissonance, if you will. It’s just too awful to contemplate. It’s the way some dyed-in-the-wool Catholics simply don’t believe the stories of child abuse.
I've waited a long time to make this post because I keep thinking that the penny will drop with a loud thud. I'm still waiting.