Friday, 13 August 2010

Sweden continues to celebrate diversity

Thanks to Teacher Paris for leading me to the following story.

A 16-year-old girl Beatrice ”Bea” Fredrixon was murdered 4 May 2010 in Vasteras, Sweden. She was found in the Raby wood not far from a school. She had been killed in a very brutal manner, by kicks, marks in the face from shoe stamps, marks from stranglehold and finally the throwing of her against a big boulder that finally ended her life. She was going to meet her boyfriend in the wood and discuss important matters.
.
Her boyfriend, and murderer, the 17-year-old Barzan Kamal Othman Khoshnaw, an Iraqi citizen, came to Sweden 3 years ago with his mother and little brother. His parents are divorced and his father still lives in Iraq. The previous winter, Barzan went back home to see his father, who happened to see a picture of a Bea embraced by Barzan in his sons cell phone. The father was furious. Back in Sweden, Barzan was changed. He often lost his temper and was very sad, according to Bea’s mother.
.
According to the law court’s investigation Barzan killed Bea because he thought she was pregnant and because she did not want to have an abortion. But to tell his father that he was going to be a father himself, was out of the question. This led to her death. The motive of the crime is stated to be honour-related, according to the preliminary investigation. Later examinations showed that she was not pregnant.
.
The court sentenced Barzan to 3 years’ secure youth detention for murder, duress and abuse of the legal proceeding. He also will have to pay damages of 18.900 euros to Bea’s family (which is commonly paid by the Swedish tax payers anyway).
.
At the same time, he rendered his family a big favour. Since the regulations in Sweden, unlike the rules in Denmark, Norway and Finland, do not permit minor criminals to be expelled after a sentence has been served, the prosecutor could not insist on expulsion. According to Swedish law, it is too inhumane to expel young criminals that are so young, despite the fact that the crime is a brutal honour-related murder.
.
Since Barzan at the time for the murder did not have a permanent residence permit (PUT), the process of investigating if the family has the right to get the PUT is interrupted. A PUT will be granted unconditionally for the murderer and his whole family. This is the result of the Swedish principle of obstacle of execution.
.
The moral is: if you want to be sure to have a permanent resident permit in Sweden, see to it that one of your minor teenagers, or yourself, if you are under 18, kills someone.

"Those whom the gods wish to destroy........................."

40 comments:

E. Henry Thripshaw said...

How does this insanity manifest itself in the nordic countries in an even more extreme fashion than in the anglosphere?
Britain was the first country to experiment with "universal" citizenship in the 1950's when immigration from the commonwealth countries was encouraged as a sick substitute for the lost empire.
America became the 2nd in 1965 after a 40 year struggle over immigration law which tireless and well funded Jewish organizations eventually won allowing them to let in endless millions of unassimilable 3rd world aliens.
So far, so bad. But while marxist England and ashkenazi controlled America commit national suicide by the design of their hostile elites, what could possess the previously homogenous satellite nations of scandinavia to kill themselves as well?

kulak said...

The death of any child sickens any parent more than it ever can the childless.

But this case I shall not yet grieve.

Her parents may yet forgive him.

Anonymous said...

EHT - I agree with your analysis. Re your question, the influences that you refer to in the US were not, unfortunately, confined to that country. Their poison spread everywhere. And don't forget that much of their genesis - if you'll pardon that word - came from Europe. I refer mainly to the Frankfurt School, Gramsci et al.

Anonymous said...

sweden has gone insane, no doubt of it. this liberalism has come full cicle to bite them on the ass, the only ones i admire over there are the skin heads who tell it like it is, if sweden falls into the facist net she has no one to blame but herself.

Big Bill said...

These are the poor, oppressed refugees that the lefties and neocons want to import into the USA straight from Iraq.

Anonymous said...

Dont get it. What principle of obstacle of execution?

Louis IX said...

Very sad story. It seems we can see the OBVIOUS but how can we explain that so many smart people can't see the same?
I mentioned earlyer these two talented writters, Carl Hiassen and the late Stieg Larsson. The first authored "Lucky you", where the main character is an AA female who seems to have special abilities with animals. In Hiassen's story, she wants to protect turtles against a bunch of vicious and degenerate white supremacists who, of course, are animal abusers among other genetic defects. I understand the need to break stereotypes, but what stereotype ? It's actually funny that this morning in the Dallas Morning News, there is a short article titled: "You have no experience with animals, therefore you're hired!" about an investigation for animal cruelty against the recently hired chief of the County Animal Shelter. Among other things, this individual would have left a cat agonizing for days without doing nothing. A person noted that the Chief of the shelter had actually no experience at all with animals before being hired, and ask 'how on Earth was he hired?'. Well, the answer is in the picture: the Animal Shelter County supervisor was AA. Could a white have been hired to this position without any experience with animals ? OBVIOUSLY NOT.
Is saying that a stereotype prejudice that a talented writter, Carl Hiassen, wanted to fight with his story? Probably. But this is scarry than smart indiviuals like him don't see as we do here. Was money, Hiassen's only drive to write a PC book? I doubt it, his character could have been a white girl fighting inbred white supremacists without impact on the sales of his book, so Hiassen acted on his own will. Anyway, this is scarry because I am not smarter than Hiassen. If he is right then we all are wrong in this blog.
The other guy, Larsson, had the same attitude. This writter was extremely bright, but still couldn't refrain from castigating the psychopathic torturers in the 'The girl with the dragon tattoo' among swedish antisemit white neonazi supremacists (and rapist too, like for Hiassen). They could have been just psychopatic and rapist, nope, they had to be racist, nazis and so on (and white obviously). All these smart writers cannot be so blind. Maybe there is some Stockholm syndrome of some sort in these smart ass writers, maybe the all population has a shithole syndrome of some sort.

Talking about shitting in your pants, any volunteers to take the jobs of these 'cowardly french soldiers' sent to clear minefields that the 'courageous soldiers of tsahal' planted to dismember lebanese kids ?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/08/10/vbs.cluster.bombs/index.html?hpt=Mid

Louis IX said...

Very sad story. It seems we can see the OBVIOUS but how can we explain that so many smart people can't see the same?
I mentioned earlyer these two talented writters, Carl Hiassen and the late Stieg Larsson. The first authored "Lucky you", where the main character is an AA female who seems to have special abilities with animals. In Hiassen's story, she wants to protect turtles against a bunch of vicious and degenerate white supremacists who, of course, are animal abusers among other genetic defects. I understand the need to break stereotypes, but what stereotype ? It's actually funny that this morning in the Dallas Morning News, there is a short article titled: "You have no experience with animals, therefore you're hired!" about an investigation for animal cruelty against the recently hired chief of the County Animal Shelter. Among other things, this individual would have left a cat agonizing for days without doing nothing. A person noted that the Chief of the shelter had actually no experience at all with animals before being hired, and ask 'how on Earth was he hired?'. Well, the answer is in the picture: the Animal Shelter County supervisor was AA. Could a white have been hired to this position without any experience with animals ? OBVIOUSLY NOT.
Is saying that a stereotype prejudice that a talented writter, Carl Hiassen, wanted to fight with his story? Probably. But this is scarry than smart indiviuals like him don't see as we do here. Was money, Hiassen's only drive to write a PC book? I doubt it, his character could have been a white girl fighting inbred white supremacists without impact on the sales of his book, so Hiassen acted on his own will. Anyway, this is scarry because I am not smarter than Hiassen. If he is right then we all are wrong in this blog.
The other guy, Larsson, had the same attitude. This writter was extremely bright, but still couldn't refrain from castigating the psychopathic torturers in the 'The girl with the dragon tattoo' among swedish antisemit white neonazi supremacists (and rapist too, like for Hiassen). They could have been just psychopatic and rapist, nope, they had to be racist, nazis and so on (and white obviously). All these smart writers cannot be so blind. Maybe there is some Stockholm syndrome of some sort in these smart ass writers, maybe the all population has a shithole syndrome of some sort.

Talking about shitting in your pants, any volunteers to take the jobs of these 'cowardly french soldiers' sent to clear minefields that the 'courageous soldiers of tsahal' planted to dismember lebanese kids ?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/08/10/vbs.cluster.bombs/index.html?hpt=Mid

Louis IX said...

Very sad story. It seems we can see the OBVIOUS but how can we explain that so many smart people can't see the same?
I mentioned earlyer these two talented writters, Carl Hiassen and the late Stieg Larsson. The first authored "Lucky you", where the main character is an AA female who seems to have special abilities with animals. In Hiassen's story, she wants to protect turtles against a bunch of vicious and degenerate white supremacists who, of course, are animal abusers among other genetic defects. I understand the need to break stereotypes, but what stereotype ? It's actually funny that this morning in the Dallas Morning News, there is a short article titled: "You have no experience with animals, therefore you're hired!" about an investigation for animal cruelty against the recently hired chief of the County Animal Shelter. Among other things, this individual would have left a cat agonizing for days without doing nothing. A person noted that the Chief of the shelter had actually no experience at all with animals before being hired, and ask 'how on Earth was he hired?'. Well, the answer is in the picture: the Animal Shelter County supervisor was AA. Could a white have been hired to this position without any experience with animals ? OBVIOUSLY NOT.
Is saying that a stereotype prejudice that a talented writter, Carl Hiassen, wanted to fight with his story? Probably. But this is scarry than smart indiviuals like him don't see as we do here. Was money, Hiassen's only drive to write a PC book? I doubt it, his character could have been a white girl fighting inbred white supremacists without impact on the sales of his book, so Hiassen acted on his own will. Anyway, this is scarry because I am not smarter than Hiassen. If he is right then we all are wrong in this blog.
The other guy, Larsson, had the same attitude. This writter was extremely bright, but still couldn't refrain from castigating the psychopathic torturers in the 'The girl with the dragon tattoo' among swedish antisemit white neonazi supremacists (and rapist too, like for Hiassen). They could have been just psychopatic and rapist, nope, they had to be racist, nazis and so on (and white obviously). All these smart writers cannot be so blind. Maybe there is some Stockholm syndrome of some sort in these smart ass writers, maybe the all population has a shithole syndrome of some sort.

Talking about shitting in your pants, any volunteers to take the jobs of these 'cowardly french soldiers' sent to clear minefields that the 'courageous soldiers of tsahal' planted to dismember lebanese kids ?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/08/10/vbs.cluster.bombs/index.html?hpt=Mid

Louis IX said...

Very sad story. It seems we can see the OBVIOUS but how can we explain that so many smart people can't see the same?
I mentioned earlyer these two talented writters, Carl Hiassen and the late Stieg Larsson. The first authored "Lucky you", where the main character is an AA female who seems to have special abilities with animals. In Hiassen's story, she wants to protect turtles against a bunch of vicious and degenerate white supremacists who, of course, are animal abusers among other genetic defects. I understand the need to break stereotypes, but what stereotype ? It's actually funny that this morning in the Dallas Morning News, there is a short article titled: "You have no experience with animals, therefore you're hired!" about an investigation for animal cruelty against the recently hired chief of the County Animal Shelter. Among other things, this individual would have left a cat agonizing for days without doing nothing. A person noted that the Chief of the shelter had actually no experience at all with animals before being hired, and ask 'how on Earth was he hired?'. Well, the answer is in the picture: the Animal Shelter County supervisor was AA. Could a white have been hired to this position without any experience with animals ? OBVIOUSLY NOT.
Is saying that a stereotype prejudice that a talented writter, Carl Hiassen, wanted to fight with his story? Probably. But this is scarry than smart indiviuals like him don't see as we do here. Was money, Hiassen's only drive to write a PC book? I doubt it, his character could have been a white girl fighting inbred white supremacists without impact on the sales of his book, so Hiassen acted on his own will. Anyway, this is scarry because I am not smarter than Hiassen. If he is right then we all are wrong in this blog.
The other guy, Larsson, had the same attitude. This writter was extremely bright, but still couldn't refrain from castigating the psychopathic torturers in the 'The girl with the dragon tattoo' among swedish antisemit white neonazi supremacists (and rapist too, like for Hiassen). They could have been just psychopatic and rapist, nope, they had to be racist, nazis and so on (and white obviously). All these smart writers cannot be so blind. Maybe there is some Stockholm syndrome of some sort in these smart ass writers, maybe the all population has a shithole syndrome of some sort.

Talking about shitting in your pants, any volunteers to take the jobs of these 'cowardly french soldiers' sent to clear minefields that the 'courageous soldiers of tsahal' planted to dismember lebanese kids ?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/08/10/vbs.cluster.bombs/index.html?hpt=Mid

Robert said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtHwKz5XuTw
saga
prayer for the dying

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP3rKRh0h5k
Saga
ode to a dying people

Anonymous said...

her parents should have told her no.
i hope the other girls learn from her death

blueboy said...

Lious IX - Carl Hiassen and the late Stieg Larsson were brought up at a time, like me, when there was a need to fight against a lot of the things that PC addressed. Problem is, it's gone totally over to the other side now, as we all know, but they haven't moved.

Californian said...

Wow, three whole years in "secure youth detention" for murder, duress and abuse of the legal proceeding jail.

Is this common in Sweden?

LouisIX said...

Sorry for the duplicates.

Blueboy, according to wiki, Hiassen is born 'March 12, 1953'. 57 is not that old. And he is a Journalist, meaning that he must read the newspapers. Therefore he must know like everybody else the truth vs the media hype. Allright, enough with those guys.

About Michael Moore now. You might not like him, but I do because he was courageous to stir the shit. However, Moore is now stuck. He has surrounded the issues: Capitalism, neo-cons, consumerism, greed etc. But he hasn't touched the core yet: the jews. Independantly, everything he said is true, but so far, nothing makes sense: why would America try to self destruct through consumerism, bad food, economy, foreign policy, immigration, etc. ?
Maybe he's watching Mel Gibson and has second thoughts about telling the truth? The fact is that we need more assholes, but as long as an asshole like Moore and and asshole like Bill OReilly keep fighting, there is no hope for the US of A.

Blueboy said...

Lious IX - I think 57 is old enough to have experienced the pre-PC era. But I agree with you that none of them will take on the Jews. It's instant media death - ask Pat Buchanan.

However, why would the Jews want to have America totally fucked up? I can go along, to a point, with the idea that a mongeralazied, de-nationalized america is easier to control. But to drive it to destruction, as is now happening, I just don't see it, sorry.

Anonymous said...

Blueboy said...

"However, why would the Jews want to have America totally fucked up? I can go along, to a point, with the idea that a mongeralazied, de-nationalized america is easier to control. But to drive it to destruction, as is now happening, I just don't see it, sorry."

Perhaps the answer is that, when one proposes - not one, but many - society-altering concepts, there is a possibility that things can get out of control.

It's called unintended consequences.

For even the sharpest (and most cynical) people, juggling two or three political balls requires a good deal of concentration. I refer to uncontrolled immigration, feminism and, say, general political correctness (basically Marxism for the new millennium).

Where things go wrong, however, is when your very appreciative audience - commonly known as Lenin's useful fools - begin to thrown in a few balls of their own.

Now we have animal rights nuts (PETA), environmentalists, global warmists, save-the-cheeeeldren loonies, assorted phony charities, anti-smoking-drinking-trans-fat whackoes and all your similar vacuum-brained associates standing in the wings with armloads of balls that THEY want to insert into the ever-increasing stream.

What to do?

You can't ignore them, after all they're nominally on your side.

You can't condemn them as nutters in case they turn around and accuse you of the same.

So. You welcome them and their excesses with open arms ... all of them.

Even the totally unhinged and dangerous ones. You never know when you might need them.

Stark raving crazy? Even the ones who will murder unborn foetuses and call it "Pro-Choice"?

The courts who will drag a six-year-old boy into court for peeping under the skirt of his four-year-old neighbor?

The other court that imprisons a man for wounding an armed thug attacking him in his own farmhouse?

I think what is happening now is the equivalent of the mad boffin who stitched the body parts together, fired the lightning bolt into the cadaver, and watched his creation lurch towards the village.

That was last Monday. Now it's Wednesday ... and the shuffling steps returneth home.

Whoops.


Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

However, why would the Jews want to have America totally fucked up? I can go along, to a point, with the idea that a mongeralazied, de-nationalized america is easier to control. But to drive it to destruction, as is now happening, I just don't see it, sorry.

Then ask South Africa, if you don't see it. Same thing, different country. Some parasites actually do kill their hosts in the animal world.

Anonymous said...

I got a laugh out of that Uncle Nasty - you have a great way with words!!
ha ha

W Baker said...

Anonymous, 14 August 2010 22:02, had it right. Her parents are as much to blame as the Iraqi.

I'll concede that kids have it rough now a days. They're bombarded with multicultural flights of fancy. Imagine yourself at 13 or 14 and your society tells you at once that we need to go around the world and straighten out these unenlightened 3rd and 4th worlders while at same time inviting them into our homes and mimicking their very same dysfunctional cultures.

That's where parenting comes in. Or, sadly, in this case where it fails.

Anonymous said...

"However, why would the Jews want to have America totally fucked up? I can go along, to a point, with the idea that a mongeralazied, de-nationalized america is easier to control. But to drive it to destruction, as is now happening, I just don't see it, sorry."

There's just one other reason they may not care about their host country. They have Israel, a ready to serve, nuclear powerhouse waiting for their return. Also, I personally don't think the Hard-line Zionists give a shit about your average Jew.

Anonymous said...

I can not understand the point of the saying "those that the Gods want to destroy they first make mad". Surely if you are mad then ipso facto you are destroyed so it strikes me as a bit of a tautology, "those that the Gods want to destroy they first destroy". Very pithy.

I much prefer the Neitszche effort "madness in individuals is rare, but in nations, groups, epochs it is the rule".

Louis IX said...

Unintendend consequences, true, but also, it is not just about 'surviving'. The question is 'do Americans just want to survive or do they have higher aspirations'? Brazil or South Africa survive very well and if America's future is to ressemble Brazil or India, it will survive just as well. In 2060, America could very well be a 'liberal democracy' made of an ultrarich caste controlling the fate of millions of ultrapoor mestigos citizens (citizens, but who don't vote), with wealth driping from the top down to the slumps at the bottom.
Is it just a coincidence that Indians immigrants become so successful in America 2010? they seem to arrive already perfectly adapted and fit perfectly in today's american mold without having to adjust and it's the white dude who feel uneasy and unfit in his own country. It's a sign. Like Pythons proliferate in Florida because Florida already ressembles a tropical country.

The necessary ciment in America circa 2060 will be a strong police force, private or otherwise, and a total control of internet. Obviously, in this picture, America cannot be the economical and technological power that it was earlyer and that power will have switched back to Europe, Russia or China. This is a perfectly viable future for America and I don't think that the elite right now wants anything else than America's 'survival'.

concerned joe said...

I too think that the US is headed for a Brazil-type situation within a couple of generations. And its' a great point about how the Indians can fit into such a society.

But like so many others I ask, why?

Why would anyone, or than a direct enemy of the US, want this to happen?

Michael said...

Thank you Uncle nasty. Given how your comments are both accurate and highly amusing, I do wish there was an uncle nasty's blog.

Ben10 said...

Talking about invasive species, there is this funny discrepency within the very popular and very PC green parties in Europe.
Take the french ecologits, they want zero economical growth, energy saving instead of production, preserve biodiversity such as local flora and fauna, they fight against genetically modified crops and they support the fight against invasive allogen species such as african bees, turtle or fishes. They have a good point, but they also support immigration.
Why do they care to keep african bees out of Europe if most of their grandchildren are african anyway?
Who told them that 'french' people circa 2060, being african themselves, could not enjoy african bees in their backyard and plant palm trees instead of european oaks ?

Anonymous said...

"There's just one other reason they may not care about their host country. They have Israel, a ready to serve, nuclear powerhouse waiting for their return. Also, I personally don't think the Hard-line Zionists give a shit about your average Jew."

A very good point and one with which I heartily concur.

By the same token, Bill Gates, the Rockefellers and all the goy zillionaires regard us as lower than crocodile piss. I have had a few encounters with the wealthy ... and one memorable one with the EXTREMELY wealthy. None of them were much fun.

Cheers,

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Savant,
have you seen this?

http://tinyurl.com/23g8tck

First they came for the bloggers....

Malcolm IX said...

That time had to come. Internet offered a short relief window for freedom of speech, but the window is closing. Everywhere you look, US, France, now Ireland, they are talks about prosecuting unpolitically correct blogs.

Maybe Savant should offer a disclaimer, like he doesn't endorse or take responsabilities for any posts on his blog. That he doesn't discriminate his posts based on race, sexual orientation, age etc. Maybe also that he suffers from discriminations himself. Best of all, Savant should propose some sort of Affirmative Action for minority bloggers and put a picture of himself not naked, but with a T-shirt with MLK, Marx, Obama or no pasaran sign. No shame, I think Bob Dylan was doing commercials for Coca Cola at the end.

Louis IX said...

Now that I think about it, everything make sense. This morning in the american TV news, was the case of a 15years old teen who was bullied and commited suicide. They actually dug the shit in her 'past' and found that the girl was living in Ireland before the US. They must have dug in her computer because they found that, while in the Irish school, she was involved in some sort of racist rant against a muslim girl. They actually showed her rants on TV!!!, like "p... muslim". What's 'p...' for ?

SAVANT said...

Thanks for this link. yes, it's bad. Note how the policeman 'encourages' people to report. Fucking great - as if we didn't have enough crime for them to worry about.

As some of the other posters say, the internet is being curtailed more and more. Zngr showed us that in Finalnd a non-PC blogger got JAILED, and as you all know, Google have severely curtailed this blog.

I might have to do some of the things that anon 16.05 suggests, else I'll just disappear.

Anonymous said...

@Louis IX, "P..." stands for Paki, short for Pakistani.

Anonymous said...

Just a little something to throw some fuel on the fire ...

It would appear that -- after years of being told that he was the finest mind of the twentieth century -- Albert Einstein was, after all, not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

In fact, he could be one of the biggest con-artists of the twentieth century.

http://tiny.cc/gvprq

Perhaps the tribe are not quite as sharp as they like to make out.

In fact, now that I come to think of it ... exactly who was it who said that the Chosen Ones are brighter than whites?

Could it have been the RSP's themselves?

People do not believe me when I mention being (literally) expelled from Sunday school at the age of eight for asking the wrong questions.

But it's true.

I guess some things never change.

Have a good weekend.

Uncle Nasty

Zngr said...

As to E. Henry Tripshaw's question, why on earth would Nordic countries experiment with diversity, the answer lies with the European Union, the current version of Marxism, that is, politically correct and diversity politics, or both. Of course. Nordic countries are not in the least immune to the ideas spread in the late 60s and early 70s - quite the opposite as Norway and Sweden have attempted at being torch carriers. As much as it would please me in many regards, Nordic states do not live in a bubble that exists outside of the rest of Europe and were wealthy enough (unlike, say, the Baltic states) to play with social engineering of the sort diversity politics require.

The major movers of EU's origins, France and Germany (who without the EU might be at each others throats physically by now or something) both had a motive for multiculturalism or mass immigration: France their old colonies whom they regarded more or less a part of what is France which lead to and still leads to immigration from the colonies, Germany the need for cheap industrial labour from Turkey and the Arab countries and their Nazi past. By taking in a lot of immigrants they could therefore prove they were now inclusive and racially sensitive and not about to spawn further Hitlers in the near future! And the immigrants were supposed to leave and go back home after the factories were finished and automated anyway... Netherlands and Belgium simply followed suit, the Dutch probably suffering some similar guilts and emotional baggage as the Germans.

The small Nordic countries have an additional need to "show off", that is to be even more EU-centric in their thinking than the major EU countries in hopes of scoring and storing some points for the future. This is entirely behind Finland's turn of the century immigration politics, as multiculturalism as a political ideology is much extolled and respected in the EU-sphere of thinking as a virtue on itself - irregardless of it's actual consequence to hapless and unpleasantly surprised populace whom it is inflicted upon. (Naturally, without asking, for no European population would vote for mass immigration or population replacement if given the opportunity.)

Zngr said...

Sweden needed labour in the 60s and 70s like the rest of Europe and also possess an intelligentsia who are very politically aware, social democrat, culturally sensitive with which I mean relativist and highly marxist, these qualities naturally coming supplied with a healthly dose of hatred of "white" and European cultures. You will not find a single other European country in which the indigenous population is ready to go into such lengths of hysterics over Palestine, or enjoy displays of snobbish anti-Israel and anti-USA sentiment nor emit such an aura of sensitivity elitism as the Swedes. As Mona Sahlin said, Swedes, the general massses of whom she despises (despite having held several ministerial posts over them) have "no culture of their own"... while Gustav Adolphus rolled in his grave in Riddarholmskyrkan (which happens to be a magnificient building of almost seven centuries in age), twice for good measure, I must imagine.

As for Norway I suspect they might be conducting a social experiment: apparently their socialist government noticed at some point in the 90s that Norway is "lacking" in diversity and multiculturalism, things which all self respecting Western countries should have in abundance according to the then zeitgeist as I've explained above, and simply opened the floodgates to hundreds of thousands of third worlders during a span of a few years (much like Labour in UK at the time). The hordes that are still arriving a decade later are indeed so vast in numbers they often have to be housed in tents for lack of free buildings available, not helped by the fact asylum seekers who end up in Norway have a peculiar penchant for burning down the very immigration centers they are housed in.

So, unfortunately despite European countries are so distinctive in their past, their culture, their language and their habits they unfortunately in the case of immigration and political correctness share very much the same general political sphere. Like Finland or Norway, unless the immigrants are coming in on their own, they decided to practically drag them in and shower them with enough gratuitous benefits to ensure the word will get around. The immigrants are not even asked to integrate, work or do anything that would contribute to their host country but to simply sit around and breath, existing as tokens of diversity which egotist politicians and intellectuals can use to show off their supposedly non-judgemental and ethnically aware ideals. Merely thinking of this useless waste of social capital and money (funded entirely by the taxpayers of course) naturally makes even a calm and sensible person such as I tremble in rage.

I think it was Uncle Nasty who said that none of this madness needs a constructed plan or any one single sensible reason, it is simply a shambling monster which was accidentally created by shooting en electric current through a corpse built of dead and intellectually dishonest ideals and now it's come home to greet it's makers.

rebelliousvanilla said...

Henry, the US had universal citizenship since 1865. Or what, you think the slaves were given citizenship based on ethnic reasons? lol.

I'd like to point out that Sweden never exported her culture, but imported Americanism after WW2. The thing with Germanic people is that when they do something, they do it with reckless abandon - including fucking themselves up.

For some reason, I don't really feel sorry for these people like this chick. After all, since their beliefs are those that come around and bite me in the ass, why should I feel sorry for them? This is something I wonder about related to retirees. Considering they didn't do squat to stop this insanity, and for instance in the UK, if I was an English girl of my age, I'd inherit an invaded country with a ton of debt, why would I feel any loyalty to paying retirement benefits?

Robert said...

Swedish Television (SVT) with their song "mix up (the races)"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlY2Rc3rx54&feature=watch_response

SAVANT said...

Well, the only thing about this is that any Swede looking at the creatures he/she is supposed to be 'mixing up' with would cringe.

rebelliousvanilla said...

Ha, all the Swedish people I know(and most aren't due to sites such as this) dislike the state television.

SAVANT, c'mon, don't do what my country does. If you recall that picture of our girl dating the black dude, some comments on news about her say that she is into zoophilia and since they want to marry, a woman said she hopes she won't have a monkey kid. While we do call Africans monkeys(and Gypsies crows for that matter), the zoophilia thing was a bit of a stretch that not even I thought of. lol

jasonx said...

Nordic countries like to brag about how advanced they are but what good is that if your also suicidal.