Thursday, 12 August 2010

The New Democracy: 1 person, 6 votes

These elections can be damn annoying when they don't produce the right result. Say you're a minority group which can't seem to get people elected, what do you do? Come up with new policies? Broaden your voter appeal? Hire a top notch PR outfit?

Or get a judge to give each of your supporters six votes?

Now that's what I'd call a solution. But what judge could be crazy enough to do such a thing?

Gentle reader, I give you U.S. District Judge Stephen Robinson. This learned judge found out that Hispanics in Chester NY, who number about 20% of the population, weren't getting any of their number elected to the local council. The majority selected their own representatives.

So what, you might ask? It's called democracy.

Well, in this case the majority is white, that's what. And we can't have whites voting as an ethnic block, can we - even if it's fine for every other ethnic block to do it. So he gave each of the legal Hispanics six votes. How about that?

Read about it here


Anonymous said...

Christ-I hope somebody files a lawsuit to stop this-the American founding fathers must be spinning in their graves.

Anonymous said...

I also read that a judge somewhere else in the US decided to levy taxes to encourage integration. Might as well hand the whole country over to them.

kulak said...

If Willie Gheen is against it, I'm for it.

"It encourages racial voting," said William Gheen, president of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC. "It works only when a minority votes in a racist fashion … instead of choosing candidates on their qualifications."

It's not minorities he's worried about voting racially. They already do and always will.

This development is absolutely a great thing for whites. It properly aligns short term behavior with long term consequences by telling them this:

If you have 20% Mexicans -- to do the shit work for less than you'd have to pay a fellow white -- then you will also have Mexicans in your hallowed council halls.

You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

kev rafferty said...

I think this development has positive aspects as well. As kulak says, it's going to further enlighten whites on the extent to which they're being screwed.

Anonymous said...

keep ireland white.or the outcome will be mass violence not the irish but the cunts who are destroying our country.

Reactionary_83 said...

Rather than blow a fuse about such stories, I now instead welcome such incidents. The more they happen (and with greater intensity), the more people will realise how corrupt the system is and the sooner it can therefore be dismantled. I expect the upheaval to be nasty and will make the total violence of world war 2 look like a walk in the park but liberals are to be held responsible for bringing it about.

Anonymous said...

It's like the system called STV that they use in Ireland.

Anonymous said...

If Willie Gheen is against it, I'm for it.

Yeah, Gheen is a fool-or a govt operative-who thinks unlimited immigration is fine as long as it's legal.

Cumulative voting is a half-assed semi-proportional method of electing representatives. More sensible forms of proportional representation have been good for anti-immigration parties in Netherlands, Italy, Austria, Denmark and elsewhere. That's because end stage liberalism, Cultural Marxism, or whatever you want to call it is hegemonic in the West and most people are sheeplike and take their cues from their masters. PR-as normally implemented- allows the non-sheeplike minority to be heard.

Anonymous said...

Unbelievable. Why not let the judges just pick their favorite candidates, instead of having these stupid votes in the first place? Fuck the will of the people - just look at AZ and CA - it's the PC judge's view which counts.


deep dudu said...

Potgeiter - it's heading that way. Goes right back to the Supreme Court awarding Bush the election in 2000, but now activist judges are intruding into every sphere to enforce their idea of 'diversity', 'fair' taxation, or whatever.

Zngr said...

what the FUCK