Saturday, 26 June 2010

The "French" World Cup debacle

What caused the French World Cup fiasco? Man for man one of the most talented team in it, they collapsed and exited in a way that can only be described as shameful. I have my own explanation: It wasn’t a French team, it was a motley collection of Africans and children of Africans.

Now your response might be ‘Savant would say that, wouldn’t he?’ But here’s my theory. First, they had little or no loyalty to France. We saw this in earlier times when even third generation Frenchmen of North African descent – to a man - cheered Algeria in a match against France. When the latter won these ‘Frenchmen’ rioted. Similarly when France played Senegal in the WC in Japan the same Frenchmen supported their African brothers.

Various other leaks now emerging from the French camp show that the players’ mutiny originated with a perceived racist remark from one of the white coaching staff, resentment that all the management and coaching staff were white, and that Anelka’s expulsion stemmed from his violent verbal attack on "this white management team". It’s also emerged that the team were reluctant to sing the Marseillaise.

On the field of play itself I've had confirmed what I had at first thought was my febrile imagination. Namely that the handsome Yoann Gourcoff, one of only two white players on the side, was being ostracised (nobody passed to him) by the rest of the team. What put doubt in my mind was that the other white player, Frank Ribery, a dwarfish thug, was in on the act. But I’ve since learned that Ribery has ‘converted’ to the Religion of Peace – which probably explains why he’s facing charges of consorting with child prostitutes. It also explains why his sympathies would lie with the North African invaders.

On a more general note, the ‘team’ displayed a whole range of typical African characteristics: Disorganisation, selfishness, throw in the towel when you fall behind, over-estimating how wonderful they are.

Anyway, the country has taken this debacle so seriously – Sarkozy has called in all the main protagonists – that the real truth, or at least part of it, will have to emerge. Already my informants tell me that, outside of the MSM, the unspeakable issues I speak about are being raised.

Well, they can extrapolate the team’s problem to the country at large, as the immigrant population grows by leaps and bounds. And remember, they brought it on themselves. It’s too late to go back now.

45 comments:

Anonymous said...

Not unlike the Netherlands' team of the 90's. The Dutch seem to have recovered partially from their 'Stockholm Syndrome', as a result, seem to have a more harmonious team, these days.

Anonymous said...

I believe everything you've stated to be true. Blacks, worldwide, will always support "blood" over everything else. Countless examples, often to the detriment of Western societies, show this to be true. Just look back to the OJ Simpson trial, and now the French soccer fiasco. Racial affiliation is natural, as it certainly is with me, a Yank who unapologetically champions White Anglo-Saxon culture. The old addage, "Blood is thicker than water" has truth to it.

M Schwartz said...

Good analysis Savant.

OT, but I think you need a letter writing campaign to the Irish Times. Apparently there is a lack of privacy for asylum seekers at Eglinton Hotel.

I would urge Savant readers to email the Times (sample email):

"In your article about stress faced by asylum seekers (June 18, 2010) there was something left out: why should financially troubled Ireland be accepting asylum seekers? What proportion of the Irish public support this? The article quotes the Rev Dr Sahr Yambasu as saying “The system needs to change”. Perhaps the sensible and democratic starting point would be placing a moratorium on asylum seekers until the economy improves."

lettersed@irishtimes.com

Mexican Guy said...

When I saw the match between Mexico and France I was laughing to myself. I mean how the fuck can that be the french team when most players look like Africans.

Anonymous said...

The whole thing is a joke. Even if you're not 'racist', how can you identify with a team comprosed totally by those of another race. What if the US were reprexsented by eskimos?

Freddie said...

Yes, I can reassure you that in France this subject is being discussed. I'm here for the full Summer and have numerous French friends so I know.

By the way, the majority of the French feel bad about that notorious hand ball incident.

Anonymous said...

All valid observations Savant but the question emerges how did the team do so well in the last six years?

SAVANT said...

a good point anon 11.40, and I've already thought about it. In my view, ehrn things are going well any 'professional', driven mainly by money, will perform well, even if national pride and team ethic are not very strong.

The crunch comes with problems, and France had lots of them in recent times. Problems show the mettle of an individual and a team. Ttpical African weaknesses, disorder, indiscipline, throwing in the towel when falling behind, using racism as the excuse for everything, these pathologies manifest themselves when the team is up against it.

That's my explanation.

Anonymous said...

When Marine Le Pen makes thta point about players such as Patrick Vieira she is a racist.
When Roy Keane made that very same point he is an astute observer of the footballing reality.
Shame of society for being sexist!

Anonymous said...

Yes Savant, you could be right. It's easy to be good when the going is good; it takes spirit to get things going when the chips are down and this French team showed they had no spirit.

casual observer said...

One other important factor is the manager.A guy who is reported to have excluded players based on their star signs,who controversially left out some of their better players for this tournament(Nasri,Benzema)and who is not popular with a lot of the french public.This team needed somebody who could keep the egos in line and judging by the amount of stories of unrest to come out during the competition the manager obviously exerted little if any control over his players.

Anonymous said...

Anyone fancy a game of 'FUSSBALL'. Ha Ha.

Anonymous said...

This whole issue is opening up now in France. maybe even in England after today's debacle!

Anonymous said...

Another reason to dislike the French or the "French?" To quote something I heard as a child on several occasions-wogs begin at Calais.

Anonymous said...

"wogs begin at Calais". Boy, that takes me back a bit...

Dave C said...

Thought it was "wogs begin at Tallaght"

Drummy said...

Now see that that that prick Dunphy is saying we should seek to have a multi-eythnic team ourselves. What a prat!

Anonymous said...

Dunphy's probably had a back-hander from the Common Purpose tossers. He'd probably sell his arse if he didn't look like Richard Harris, post mortem.

Anonymous said...

That's true about Dunphy. Read the book 'Monkey Man' - a thinly disguised 'bio' of the wanker, and it shows clearly that money is his only goal. No principles whatsoever.

A very funny book as well.

Dave C said...

Anon 20:20

Who wrote 'Monkey Man'? Can only find one book of that title (by a Stephen Price) and that is obviously not the one you are referring too.

Anonymous said...

Yes, that's the one, by Stephen Price. You'll enjoy it!

Anonymous said...

Explain this Savant - Italy. No niggers, and still it got screwed. Surely it wasn't because the nigger hosts failed on protocol by not introducing the current WC holders in the ceremonies?

Italy, all white team, did not make it into qualification.

2006. Italy vs. France. White team vs. niggers. Italy won.

2010. Nigger French team goes nowhere. Italian white team, goes nowhere.

So let's hear some analysis of that.

SAVANT said...

anon 15.44. There are many possible explanations for under-performance. And it's certainly not confined to blacks v whites. In Italy's case the team were very old and well past their peak. They maybe lacked the resilience and motivation to perform.

The French, well, as I said, blacks have the athletic ability but react badly under certain circumstances, especially when things start going wrong. The manager was weak and capricious, ann then there was the 'racism' of the coaching staff. So I think the racial composition did have a lot to do with it.

Anonymous said...

The Dutch had problems like this as far back as 1996 when the blacks and whites rowed. I see Dunphy's saying how great it will be when we have a multikulti Irish team. Well he holidays in Deauville not Saint St Denis. The people who stay as far away from the coalface as they can are the ones telling us how great it is

Anonymous said...

What about the Brazilians. They're not exactly white, never really have been but they seem to have the mental stength to do it without a quota of whites in the team since they've won more world cups than anyone else.
Blacks are good at sports. These French blacks maybe are spoiled, unlike the Brazilians. The Brazilians don't have whites kissing their asses in Brazil. There's less pc bullshit in Brazil because its not a white majority country.

Anonymous said...

Yeah - six months in Brixton or Harlem will cure you of any pc, "negrophiliac" tendencies. I personally know several former liberals who were cured in this manner.

Potgieter

Becker said...

The point is not that blacks don't make good sportsmen - that's self-evidently false. The point is that a mishmash of recent immigrants from Africa and/or Muslim countries have split loyalties - at best.

Brazilians of all races have been there for centuries and blacks there have no other competing loyalties.

Anonymous said...

Crystal Palace chairman Ron Noades, speaking in 1991
"The black players at this club lend the side a lot of skill and flair, but you also need white players in there to balance things up and give the team some brains and some common sense."

I had to laugh when I heard Johnny Giles mention how he hated players with "no brains" when he referred to the black players Aaron Lennon, Shaun Wright Phillips and Emile Heskey.

Germany won three World Cups without a single black player. Bobby Charlton was greater then any black player who played for England. Since black players have entered the England set-up they have achieved nothing in a major tournament.

More mulattoes play for Brazil than blacks. I only saw two full blacks playing for them in the last match and they they had at least two white players.

Whites are capable of outperforming blacks in any a sport even sprinting. Alan Watts a white Scotsman was the fastest man in the world in 1980 and won gold in 100m olympics.

One of the reasons give why blacks are so good at sport is they are "taller and stronger". Well Aaron Lennon is a mere 5'4" (the shortest player in a tournament including Japanes and Koreans!) and Jermaine Defoe and Ashley Cole are only 5'7" and how many great black weight lifters are there? The African teams were on average much shorter than the European teams.

Emile Heskey was only in the team for reasons of affirmive action. The FA wants a certain number of black players in the team to combat the racist BNP and promote multiculturism. The more the better. One day they'd like to see an all black team lining out for England.

A Ferguson said...

Yes, did you ever notice how black players continually get caught offside, or else play onsite an opponent?

When Cisse went to Sunderland, in his late twenties, they had to sepnd a whole day on the training ground showing how not to get caught offside!

Anonymous said...

Well, the "White Pele" (Rooney) certainly didn't live up to the Black one this year! haha! Spoilt wanker.

redneck said...

How can any westerner look at those teo teams and not be struck with dread.

Anonymous said...

Alan Watts a white Scotsman was the fastest man in the world in 1980 and won gold in 100m olympics.

You're taking the piss there. The USA boycotted the Olympics that year. Wells' time was 10.20 I think. A ( real) Irishman ran 10.18 recently btw but the world record 30 years ago was 9.95 or thereabouts.

Anonymous said...

The mainstream would tell you that you are a racist for thinking like that redneck. Anyone notice that Rooney was the only English player not singing the their anthem. The three non-whites on the German team were also not singing their anthem. The Turk Ozil recites the Koran during the anthem. Germany might win the World Cup this time in a wonderful advert for multiculturalism but they might have the same problems as France in future.

Tubbercurry said...

That's amazing about the Turks reciting the Koran during the national anthem. So much for assimilation!

Anonymous said...

I think you're all pissing against the wind in denying blacks' superior sporting abilities in CERTAIN sports. And regretably, I think soccer is going to be one of them.

Anonymous said...

Does this Mick ever comment on the vices of the Irish?

alcoholism
Catholicism
James Joyce
babies, babies, babies

Ian Smith said...

Does this Mick ever comment on the vices of the Irish?

alcoholism
Catholicism
James Joyce
babies, babies, babies

SAVANT said...

Ian Smith - you mustn't be a reader of this blog. I comment on our failings all the time, and on a lot more than you mention.

However, you're way behind the curve on babies: We're now at below the replacement rate, sustained, if I can use that word, only by the fecundity of our new cultural enrichers from Africa and the Muslim countries.

Anonymous said...

"The whole thing is a joke. Even if you're not 'racist', how can you identify with a team comprosed totally by those of another race. What if the US were reprexsented by eskimos"

Americans support black teams all the time, pro and college. Look at the Dream Team. It's too bad Europe is destroyed. Ireland distesses me most. It's not even worth going to anymore.

Anonymous said...

Does the commentator at 22.22 actually watch soccer? He would have noticed that Maradona, Zidane, Cryuff and Beckenbauer were not black. The Portuguese mulatto Ronaldo is more white than black (over seven eighths white). Holland with seven white players, two half Indonesians and two mulattoes have beaten the mainly mulatto Brazil. The mainly white Uruguay with one or two mestizos and one mulatto have and no pure blacks have beaten the nearly all-black Ghana who had one mulatto Boateng. The other teams still in the Cup are mainly white- Germany, Argentina and Spain and Paraguay are mostly mestizos with no black or mulatto players. So much for black superiority at soccer :). While black players may have skill and strength white players have intelligence, composure and discipline.

Anonymous said...

Semi-finals are almost all white. Germany x Spain and Netherlands x Uruguay. But Ghana were robbed by the cheating barsterds!

quattro said...

That's true - and three are European, even after we were told that this tournament represented the 'end if Europe's dominance'

Anonymous said...

Spain is all-white, Germany has a couple of Turks, Uruguay is mostly white, Holland has only one mized-race player, I think.

Anonymous said...

Sarkozi will sort it out... no wait, he's the NWO plant that wants to destroy the True French at the genetic level: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/sarkozy-will-enforce-hitler-s-ideas-of-a-master-race-t21415.html

Success! The French whites have been eradicated: http://www.arthurkemp.com/?p=526

Anonymous said...

Emile Heskey was there because he works well with Rooney. Great idea!