Thanks to teacher-paris for this. It's an interesting take but I have major problems with a lot of it.
"Let me come back to the link between the American Civil War and World War I. Both wars were fought in defense of egalitarian democracy, and in both wars white European males were killed in larger percentages and numbers than in any previous war between Europeans.
Did this end the European American’s and the European’s love affair with egalitarian democracy? No, it did not. The carnage of those two wars, fought in the name of democracy, only intensified the Europeans’ love for democracy.
Why? Because having lost his faith in Christianity, the European had to cling to his new-found faith no matter what the cost in human lives. “Better that millions perish than I should give up my faith in egalitarian democracy,” became the implicit credo of the post-Christian European. It was inevitable that the black man would become the god of the democracy-loving Europeans, because the satanic logic of the democratic heresy says that if a black man can attain equality with the European, the new faith works.
We can all dance around the bonfire of Western culture and sing praises to the new faith. The Obama coronation in this country was a religious ceremony in which liberals throughout America and Europe saw their god in the flesh. Of course, it could have been any black man who was crowned, because the liberals’ faith celebrates the generic over the individual.
Remember when Pope Benedict XVI, then Cardinal Ratzinger, said that the next pope should be a black man? He did not mention a particular black man, he just wanted a black man, any black man. Egalitarian democracy, like communism, is an impossibility. A hierarchical structure exists in every society, even if that society denies its existence.
And post-Christian Europeans have retained the elements of a Christian society in a bastardized, demonic form. For instance, original sin still exists, but it resides only in white males. And their original sin was that they did not admit blacks into full equality with whites. Hence, it is necessary that white males perform their mea culpas on a daily basis and take their punishment in a humble and contrite manner.
Likewise, the liberals still believe in saints. However, sainthood does not come as a result of an individual person cooperating with God’s grace; sainthood is conferred on every member of the black race and by proxy to those members of the white race who support the sainted black race.The halfway-house Christians tell us that egalitarian, black-worshipping democracy stems from the Christian belief that all men are created and loved by God. But why, if egalitarian democracy follows from Christianity, didn’t the Europeans, when they were Christian, practice egalitarian democracy?
No unbiased, sane human being could claim our current aborting, porno-crazed society is superior to the older European societies. Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that a Christian people segregates in order to protect their own from contamination, and they make distinctions between peoples in order to ensure that truth has a protected hearth in which to dwell?
When the white race ceased to segregate and when they allowed truth to be trampled by barbarian hordes, they ceased to be Christian.The “Lost Battalion” is the European people who have forsaken Christian Europe for egalitarian, black-worshipping democracy. And every single European who adheres to the egalitarian creed will suffer the same fate as Major Charles Whittlesey [The leader of the 'Lost Battalion' in WW 1].
When the battle is not fought in the name of the God who’s love passeth all understanding, the battle and life itself seem futile. Does the struggle availeth, is the race worth running? It is, but only if He awards the laurel wreath."
Well, the writer makes a number of strange claims:
WW 1 fought for 'egalitarian democracy'? really? I'd have said that raw nationalism, fanned by stupid leaders who didn't realise the ramifications of what they were doing, was the main cause. The ostensible cause was 'the defence of small nations'. Which, as we all know, was horseshit
"Why, if egalitarian democracy follows from Christianity, didn’t the Europeans, when they were Christian, practice egalitarian democracy?". Well, this is a circular argument in that it assumes that Europe was Christian before egalitarian democracy took over. Was it? The ethos of Christianity was surely egalitarian "all men created equally in God's eyes" and the idea (the only practical one), of separating the races runs counter to everything Jesus said and did. Good Samaritan, Mary Magdalen etc. I take the polar opposite view to the writer here. To me, if you follow the word of Jesus you get kinda stuck with lousy neighbours and you gotta treat the black man as your brudda. One of the reasons why I have a problem with it.