Sunday, 17 May 2009

I can still be surprised

We all should of course by now be inured to the sheer effrontery of those foisting the benefits of diversity onto us. But sometimes your breath can still be taken away. Take for example this from Huffington Post contributor John Ridley.

"Here's the upside to minority population growth: America is the only western industrialized nation with a fertility rate above the 2.2 percent replacement rate. That means we have a healthy, growing pool among laborer and consumers. People to make stuff and people to buy the stuff being made, which is key for both short-term economic recovery and long term economic health.

And also in that regard minorities, who traditionally lag in home ownership, will also fill the "home ownership gap" left between sellers and buyers as boomers continue to age and downsize. Also, as minorities are typically steered into higher priced loans, they will inadvertently and disproportionately help prop up the banking system."

Can you really credit that this could appear in one of the world’s leading blogs? This cretin doesn’t seem to realise the most basic fact about the financial meltdown – that it originated from giving house loans to those very minorities he refers to.

And get this. He bemoans the fact that blacks aren't procreating enough! They’re showing too much sexual restraint! I kid you not. “And blacks aren't really pulling our weight. Despite the stereotypes, we're apparently procreating at a modest 1.3 percent rate.”
Well, could be true – and let us pray to God that it is. But whenever I see a black cultural enricher here in Ireland she’s invariably surrounded by a squad of children, all presumably sired by different fathers who of course are nowhere to be seen. Well ok, they'll be at the welfare office, alright?

So according to Ridley, what America needs is lots more violent, welfare dependent, low IQ criminals. An America that resembles Detroit, Chicago or East LA. I've already shown here a listing of the 30 most wanted criminals in Holland. Gentle readers have provided me with links for similar statistics for the US and the UK. Even I, a race realist, was stunned at the tiny (less than 10% overall) of white criminals, even though all three countries on aggregate are overwhelmingly white. For a while more anyway.

Which leads me to my next point.

Just like the cultural enricher in the UK who felt as a half-breed Nigerian she’d ‘improve the image’ of the beautiful law abiding city of York (it’s that way because it’s 95% white) Ridley bemoans the fact that due to immigration restrictions and the low black birth rate, the date when whites become a minority will be pushed back by about ten years.

“Well, now you can add at least ten years to that date. Which means the champagne will have to stay on ice a little longer,” Can you just imagine if whites were to celebrate a corresponding racial turnaround?
Could someone remind him that, had his forebears not been taken to America as guest workers he would now, instead of being well paid by whites to write anti-white bullshit, be scampering around the jungle or begging food from some Western aid agency.

How in God’s name do we allow these people get away with this kind of thing?


Anonymous said...

Again, you hit the nail on the head. It's so refreshing to hear un-politically correct common sense and truth

leadpb said...

2.2 replacement? That's because of the flood of Hispanic immigrants, not because Americans are humping like they mean it! Without immigration we-- we being all races in America-- are currently birthing BELOW replacement level.

Forgot where I read this, I'm sure it's around the 'net.

Anonymous said...

I think every black American shud be taken out of here, given a free trip to Africa and then asked whther they want to come back. And after they do, tell them to shut the fuck up complaining about their treatment in the US!

Anonymous said...

Whites are been set up for their own replacement. Now arrogant blacks and other non-white "minorities" (30-40 million blacks in the USA is a minority?)will casually spout their ruinous takeover of native white homelands without a blinker of irony or order of magnitude.

Another irony is that for the first time in Irish history new plantations of foreigners have being met with celebration rather than swords and javelins.

Anonymous said...

Hear, hear! Well said, Savant. And I challenge any American black who complains about conditions in America to spend one day in sub-Saharan Africa, and then decide where he/she would rather be. (Funny, but word has it that there is no rush to immigrate to sub-Saharn Africa by any group of people.)

Anonymous said...


The last I read the black birthrate in America is roughly 1.9children per female. The white birthrate was 1.87 children per female (that doesn't mean the dad was white though).


The international left, in an effort to unmake the west, obviously resorted to their last arrow in the quiver, wide open immigration, because its the only way they could win.

The Soviets were defeated economically. Every Soviet satellite state had to fence its populace in, because they wanted to leave. Cuba had to do the same thing. There is only one solution for the left: swamp the west with the third world where there is nowhere for the west to retreat to. Its amazing that this seemingly -desperate- tactic was the best one all along. So afraid are whites of being called "racist" (thanks to Herbert Marcuse and Theodore Adorno's invention of political correctness which acts as a 'positive' social control using shame and social retribution for dissenters........heavily aided by the media), that they are afraid to mention their displacement concerns in person, only anonymously on the internet.

Blacks have never built a modern state on their own because their culture is matriarichally arranged, with women choosing the men, and men "showing out" to attract women. The only way to "show out" to them is by being the biggest and baddest dude. The nice guys get frozen out. "Big man" societies like this never get anywhere, because they do not harness the awesome power of "regular-guy" cooperation and brainpower to build things and enforce good behavior.

Blacks in America are uneasy about the Hispanic and Asian Immigration here because they are becoming less of the populace also. The guy in the video is a damned idiot to be honest with you, financially illiterate and/or willingly decietful.

Anonymous said...

What I'd love to know, and wud be interested in the readers' views, is there any chance of a fighback? Will it tsart somewhere and spread? Or are whites going to self-destruct?

Anonymous said...

"I think every black American should be taken out of here, given a free trip to Africa and then asked whether they want to come back."

One black American reporter had an eye-opening experience when he was assigned to Africa. He was none too pleased in what he experienced in his ancestors' homelands. Read HERE.

Also, one has to question how many of these not vetted South African teachers may have emigrated to western White countries, and perhaps taken employment in our own schools. Frightening!

Anonymous said...

Whites in the American heartland - places like Kansas and Texas - are breeding at above the replacement rate. The whites who aren't - and who are dragging the overall white figure down - are those lefty urbanites(many of them gay and lesbo, no doubt) in places like LA, SF, NY. These latter whites are hardly going to help the cause of white survival: they don't own any guns, for a start.

J. Potgieter

Anonymous said...

So you're justifying slavery then? No surprise really.


Anonymous said...

"So you're justifying slavery then? No surprise really.


Wtf do you get your ideas woman? First off, nowhere in the western hemisphere is slavery practiced. It is abolish and outlawed in the West but in your beloved Africa it thrives black on black.

Secondly, black slaves were sold by black chiefs in Africa to Jewish merchants who brought them to the American colonies in their droves. As the Jews of the time called them "black gold" (75% of slave owners were Jews and this was documented by a jewish historian himself).

Anonymous said...

Although the ancestors of today's black Americans were forced to come here, nobody's stopping them from going back to "Mother Africa".

(Except there's no welfare in Africa.)

Anonymous said...

anon 15.06. Have you any evidence that Jews held 75% bof the slaves? Never heard that one before.

Anonymous said...

It must be remembered that at any time in history Jews held a monopoly in slavery. Even today this continues in the guise of white eastern European women kidnapped to a life of prostitution (this thrives in Israel). Jewish merchants under the guise of being Dutch and British sponsored Oliver Cromwells destruction and enslavement of Ireland -- where 80,000 Irish were taken as slaves("They were white and they were slaves" by M.Hoffman) to south America, Asutralia and Barbados(whereupon they were beaten starved and murdered--detailed in the book "to hell or Barbados").The below are quoted from Jewish sources:

"The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates....If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644."

"All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, Jews in the North were to own black servants; in the South, the few plantations owned by Jews were tilled with slave labor. In 1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South, where they were always outnumbered at least 100 to 1....But very few Jews anywhere in the United States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds." United States Jewry, 1776-1985 (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1989), p. 586.