Tuesday, 31 March 2009

Sorry pal....

A poignant comment from a US-based reader who's read my post on England's self-destruction.

"England has always appealed to me as a place of refuge from America's festering racial quagmire...a place where cities weren't under siege from destitute "African-American" blight. England has always been my fantasy escape, my "Plan B." How often have I daydreamed about living in a civil and polite society within the confines of my primary ethnic (WASP) group!

According to this blog, however, it seems that leaving America today to go to England would be tantamount to jumping from the frying pan into the fire. I don't know which would be worse: living here in an increasingly degenerate black-influenced society, or living in a society being transformed by Asian-Muslim & African/Jamaican cultures.

Yuk. What kind of choice is that?? If what you're reporting is as bad as is claimed, my question is, how could England, a self-governing ISLAND nation, allow the fabric of its society to become so compromised?"

Of course, if the writer were to base his hopes on British TV he'd get a different view. Here the cultural re-engineering is in full swing. I mentioned Coronation Street in a post a couple of weeks back and they're at it again. Now we have a hospital scene, black doctors and nurses, patiently explaining medical intricacies to distracted white patient. So true to life.


As Josef Goebbels said, if you keep repeating a lie often enough people will eventually believe it.

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

The nightmare hasn't really got started yet,that's for sure

kulak said...

It ain't over until The Doctor is black.

kerdasi amaq said...

Kevin Myers is interesting today, Mar 31, he's denouncing immigration and multi-culturalism.

Does Finance take precedence over do-goodery in times of economic crisis?

Anonymous said...

If I were you, I'd definitely stay in the U.S, as the weathers better and fuel is cheap enough to enable freedom of movement. Britain is today, pretty much a nation, quickly going down the chute. Do you want to do an exchange?

Anonymous said...

There's a good paper by I thin Kevin McDonald that shows people might on the surface buy into this crap, but deep down they dont and the resentment cud erupt any time.

Let's hope soon!

Anonymous said...

Wake up people. Cold, frank dialogue MUST begin in order to save Western societies. Fact: every majority-black political entity that has ever existed has proved to be a staggering failure. (Detroit, MI or Newark, NJ, anyone?) And what black countries have ever existed that flourished and thrived? Haiti, perhaps? Liberia? Zimbabwe?
Based on 2000 years of recorded Western history, then, can a hypothesis which states that black societies are incapable of civilized prosperity be proved?

Anonymous said...

Bring back the Flying Columns to deal spontaneous death blows to the New Invaders. Strike sheer terror into these Chimps! In the long run its either us or them and since "them" are criminal scum taking away our future I would welcome death to scourge these undeserving filth from our lands.

Anonymous said...

You do know Savant that Josef Goebbels was referring to the generic Jews when he made that comment?

Our beloved sickly sentimental fanny pang Christianity could never have come into existence without these tactics.

IsraeliEejit said...

My family in Britain tell me the place is diabolical.
30 years ago there were the odd Pakistani families here and there, but now the place is totally overrun with masses of burka clad women everywhere. Mosques have sprung up like mushrooms.
Apart from that, you've got all the Eastern European immigrants. Crime rates have soared, town centres have become no-go areas, with dodgy immigrants lurking next to cash-machines, waiting for people to draw out cash so they can mug them.
Many Britains have emigrated and many others are considering or fantasizing about emigrating. The Christian culture and values as we know them have disappeared.
Any criticism of this new reality is interpreted as racism. Police use kid-gloves when dealing with Muslims, so as not to "upset them".
Experienced British workers are being laid off, in favour of Romanians or Poles who receive a third of the normal wage.
Average Britons are really pissed off with what's going on. It'll probably get worse until there's some kind of erruption.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, parts of London & other cities look like Kandahar now. Or Lubumbashi. You can ride a bus from one end of London to another without hearing a word of English(and I don't count the jiggaboo patois uttered by modern British "yoof" as English).

Johan Potgieter

Cheeky Boy said...

http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2009Apr01/0,4670,AFAdoptingfromAfrica,00.html

This link shows the complete pointlessness of the situation.

Sentiment reigns over reason,we will lose our Countries,there's no doubt about it.

People can never see the writing on the wall until it's too late.

2500 years of civilisation turned to cack

Anonymous said...

The following excerpt from "American Renaissance" discusses how Hurricane Katrina's aftermath underscored inherent differences between white culture and black culture...

" but 50,000 whites [in the Superdome] would have behaved completely differently. They would have established rules, organized supplies, cared for the sick and dying. They would have organized games for children. The papers would be full of stories of selflessness and community spirit.

For blacks—at least the lower-class blacks of New Orleans—disaster was an excuse to loot, rob, rape and kill...

Many whites will realize—some for the first time—that we have Africa in our midst, that utterly alien Africa of road-side corpses, cruelty, and anarchy that they thought could never wash up on our shores.

To be sure, the story of Hurricane Katrina does have a moral for anyone not deliberately blind. The races are different. Blacks and whites are different. When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western Civilization—any kind of civilization—disappears. And in a crisis, civilization disappears overnight.

teacher.paris said...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Off-the-cuff suggestion prompts discussion on what to do with abandoned neighborhoods in Flint
Posted by Kristin Longley | The Flint Journal March 17, 2009 07:45AM
Ryan Garza | The Flint JournalThe view through an abandoned house's broken window looks out on a boarded-up house across the street on East Russell Avenue in Flint.

FLINT, Michigan -- Look in any direction from Bianca Bates' north Flint home, and you'll see graffiti-covered siding, boarded-up windows and overgrown lots.

About half of the homes on her block are burned out or vacant magnets for drug dealers and squatters. It isn't where she thought she'd end up, but it's all she can afford to rent.

"It's a dangerous place to live," said Bates, 21, who lives on East Russell Avenue. "Everywhere you look, these houses are empty around here."

Property abandonment is getting so bad in Flint that some in government are talking about an extreme measure that was once unthinkable -- shutting down portions of the city, officially abandoning them and cutting off police and fire service.

Temporary Mayor Michael Brown made the off-the-cuff suggestion Friday in response to a question at a Rotary Club of Flint luncheon about the thousands of empty houses in Flint.

Brown said that as more people abandon homes, eating away at the city's tax base and creating more blight, the city might need to examine "shutting down quadrants of the city where we (wouldn't) provide services."

He did not define what that could mean -- bulldozing abandoned areas, simply leaving the vacant homes to rot or some other idea entirely.

On Monday, a city spokesman downplayed Brown's comments.

Flint Journal extras At issue
• City officials say they may consider shutting down city services in areas where no one lives, but no plans are on the table to so.


Bob Campbell, Brown's spokesman, said the acting mayor was speaking hypothetically about a worst-case scenario, "not something that would be laid out in the next six months" while he's in office.

But City Council President Jim Ananich said the idea has been on his radar for years.

The city is getting smaller and should downsize its services accordingly by asking people to leave sparsely populated areas, he said.

"It's going to happen whether we like it or not," he said. "We'd have to be creative about it, but it's something worth looking into. We're not there yet, but it could definitely happen."

Flint resident Derrick Young, 39, doesn't think people in his West Austin Avenue neighborhood would bow too easily to such a request.

"We (are) all family over here," he said. "We all stick together."

Even in neighborhoods where more homes are vacant than occupied, Young, who rents, said the city shouldn't interfere.

"They shouldn't be so hard on people, just because they live in a bad area," he said. "They should find more ways to fix it up and rent it out."

The concept of "shrinking cities" isn't new to urban areas similar to Flint.

Last year, the city of Youngstown, Ohio, proposed incentives to encourage people to move out of nearly empty blocks and relocate to more populated areas closer to the heart of the city. Some people were offered upward of $50,000, according to news reports.

The idea was to shut down entire streets and bulldoze abandoned properties so the city could discontinue services such as police patrols and street lighting, according to a CNN report.

The problem came, understandably so, when officials asked residents to move.

Abandoned and foreclosed homes are on top of the list of major challenges facing Michigan cities, said Arnold Weinfeld, director of public policy and federal affairs with the Michigan Municipal League. The organization surveyed several cities that cited declining property taxes as the No. 1 problem, he said.

In the past three years or so, cities in Michigan have lost a combined $147 million in property taxes, he said.

"That's bound to have an impact on local services," he said. "There's no question it's an issue. Each community is going to address it differently."

Brown took over last month after former Mayor Don Williamson resigned facing a recall election. His replacement will be elected Aug. 4.

Brown is focused on economic development as a key to revitalizing Flint, Campbell said. The city also has the advantage of having the Genesee County Land Bank, he said.

"Cities such as Flint might be forced to make difficult choices at some point," Campbell said. "However, what he's all about is having an economic development plan in place so we don't have to seriously consider that as an option."

Bates said the idea might make some people happier, but she doesn't see how it would help the city.

But her roommate, Gabrielle Daniels, said it sounds like a good idea.

"Let's get these kids out of these bad areas," she said. "Get them out of drug houses and into safer neighborhoods."

© 2009 Michigan Live. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2009/03/city_of_flint_shutdown_offthec.html

Cheeky Boy said...

THE COMING ANARCHY
by Robert D. Kaplan
How scarcity, crime, overpopulation, tribalism, and disease are rapidly destroying the social fabric of our planet


A very interesting and accurate piece i'm sorry to say.
Wouldn't be so bad if we had strong and clear leadership but with the losers we've(all Europe)got can't see how we can meet the disaster that's coming our way.

They can send our troops to fight in a useless manufactured war but not lift a finger to save our own way of life....

Just have to pray for such a crisis
that there's no choice but to act.

Anonymous said...

@IsraeliEejit

Why are your only criticisms against muslims and eastern Europeans? Because you have a hatred of Muslims who recognise the Jewish Problem and you have a hatred of Eastern Europeans who also by all indications understand the JEwish problem becasued they have lived under Jewish led communist for decades(I've spoken to many of these people).

What about the Nigerians who are far fucking worse than those (white conservative Eastern Europeans) who are LEGALLY allowed in the EU (discounting scummer romani gypsies? Where is your complaint of the criminal blacks and asians?

Your attempt to hi-jack and steer the Irish right into a Neo-Con direction makes me fucking SICK. This Jewish kike tactic will be firmly opposed.

Anonymous said...

These degenerate up-their-arse superficial Celebs like Madonna and Brad Pitt & co, are in service of their liberal handlers by encouraging the adoption of the worst dregs of humanity as something both moral and fashionable. If this race suidical trend of liberal death continues the outcome is only too obivous for the West. The proverbial "dark ages" will take on a literal meaning.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 17:41, don't you believe IsraeliEejit? I do. I believe he's talking through his arse.

Cheeky Boy said...

Anon's right,i'd ethnically cleans the lot,Paki's,Indians,Africans,Chinks,Jews,all of them.

All they've bought is shit...

Jews because their only concerned for themselves and also because they gave us Marxism,Freudian psychobabble,a Fraudalent money system,radical feminism,Franz Boas anthropology etc

Just look up that Jew Cunt Noel Ignatiev from Harvard and his 'Destroy The White Race' shit...I'd like to do him!

Cheeky Boy said...

That should be 'cleanse' and 'brought'. Sorry for the spelling mistakes. I do so hate illiteracy.

SAVANT said...

Cheeky Boy - again I'll make the point. The poeple you refer to are Jewish, and yes I'd like to 'do' that bastard too. But my point is, some of the most effective opponents of these people are also Jewish.

Anonymous said...

@ Savant

"But my point is, some of the most effective opponents of these people are also Jewish".

Eh, and exactly who might that be Savant? The Jews greatest tactic is to play both sides to reach the same goal. Either your comments are some bizarre attempt at humor, damage control or just painful irony.

SAVANT said...

anon 1.19. Not sure what your point is. You seem to suggest that I cant be serious in saying that you get jews on both sides of every argument, while at the same time you say that they do exactly that to 'achieve the same end'.

You cant have it both ways.

There is abundant evidence of jews being on both sides - if you want to find it, which I doubt in your case. For example the Bolsheviks were heavily jewish, but so were many of the Czar's top security people.

The Neocons were/are almost all Jewish, but their most effective opponents were also Jewish. Same with the Wall St. banksters. If they do get nailed you can be sure that the nailers will be disproprtionately jewish.

Anonymous said...

"anon 1.19. Not sure what your point is. You seem to suggest that I cant be serious in saying that you get jews on both sides of every argument,[...] "

No, I'm not suggesting that, because I agree that Jews are on both sides of every argument. You however state that "some of the MOST* effective opponents of these people are also Jewish"
*emphasis mine

There is where I find your humor, because the Jews are not effective opponents at all when both sides are working towards the SAME goal.

"[...]while at the same time you say that they do exactly that to 'achieve the same end'."

as that is exactly what I mean. This is the only way I have it , and I repeat :The Jews greatest tactic is to play both sides to reach the same goal. And if the initial dissent does not suit them , they will twist it to where it does. Thus giving the illusion that they fight for the gentiles interests, when the opposite is entirely the case. Like the neo-cons trying to influence the right by up-playing the muslims plague and downplaying the Jewish problem. The fact is both of those groups have to be dealt with in time.

There is indeed an "abundant evidence of jews being on both sides".This is something to which I am no stranger of. Lets look at the examples:

South Africa's case. Where in the end the only people to benefit were the Rothschilds banking consortium that remained there, while whites lost all power.

"For example the Bolsheviks were heavily jewish, but so were many of the Czar's top security people".
And what great "security" they offered...these were known infiltraitors and insideres that helped weaken the power further. It must be said that by the time of the revolution the Czar regieme was in a vunerable condition.

"The Neocons were/are almost all Jewish, but their most effective opponents were also Jewish."
Do any of these "opponents" mention any more than the "zionist" issue, rather than the Jewish Problem? Even when "zionism" is raised it is deflected to define evangelical white christians who somehow magically are the vex of evil behind Bush. Effective? No, sadly the Iraq war continues to this day and benefits Israel more than any other nation.

"Same with the Wall St. banksters. If they do get nailed you can be sure that the nailers will be disproprtionately jewish."
All we got was Madoff the rest are still there or got away cleanly. The fact that the federal reserve still exists is a good indication nevermind the countless other usury parasitical bankers.

Both capitalism and communism seemingly work in opposite directions but they have the same outcome: the destruction of nations and peoples, while the bankers take all. Both must end and a third way founded. Yet all we hear in the MSM is the same rabble of deceptive nonsense. I trust that you too Savant will come around to this some day.

Anonymous said...

teacher paris - yes. in fact whole areas of the US are like Flint has now become. Just less noticeable becaus ethey're just small parts of big cities. But it's on the way.

SAVANT said...

anon 18.15: well, you could be right. I dont think so, though. You can make everything look like a conspiracy if you want to interpret facts in a given way. It seems highly implausable to me that there's a jewish cabal somewhere, cackling in a backroom, assigning different roles to different people. e.g. 'you pretentd to be on this side, you on that...'

Could be, but I doubt it.