Tuesday, 18 December 2007

The strange case of Dr. Sookdheo

Dr Patrick Sookhdeo leads an interesting life. Having left the Religion of Peace (he’s now a Christian) he presumably spends his time looking over his shoulder and dodging from door to door as he makes his way. But Patrick has an impressive track record. Many years ago well before the ‘liberation’ of Iraq, well before multi-culturalism had been discredited, he forecast that Britain would be the victim of Islamic suicide attacks. As you can imagine, he was laughed out of court.

Until the bombs started going off.

Now he’s made another forecast. "In a decade, you will see parts of English cities which are controlled by Muslim clerics and which follow, not the common law, but Sharia. It is already starting to happen - and unless the Government changes the way it treats the so-called leaders of the Islamic community, it will continue."

This is of course exactly what the Islamic Council of Europe has ordered (see this).

No surprise there really, as the process is well underway. What’s more interesting is his views on the so-called moderate Islamic leaders. Referring to the cartoon controversy of last year he say "the cartoons have not been published in this country, and the Government has been very critical of those countries in which they were published. To many of the Islamic clerics, that's a clear victory."

"It's confirmation of what they believe to be a familiar pattern: if spokesmen for British Muslims threaten what they call 'adverse consequences' - violence to the rest of us - then the British Government will cave in. I think it is a very dangerous precedent."

Bang on the button. What happens in effect is that the ‘moderates’ tell us ‘we’re against violence, but we can't be responsible for what an unrepresentative element does. Therefore, cave in to our demands

That's what dhimmi Britain has done and continues to do. The Danes are about the only ones to get a handle of this so far.


Anonymous said...

These 'moderates' here get the best of both worlds. They can keep their hands clean and at the same time get their way.

Anonymous said...

We all laughed a bit before the bombs went off. September 11 was not the day things changed, but the day when the west woke up to how much things had ALREADY changed. I read somewhere a question which is very relevant. What journalist had in his roledex the phone numbers of the MCB or the ICE before september 11? Answer probably none. By September 12 I bet they all had them.

The west has woke up and smelt the coffee, the ruling elites in all countries see these colonies yet they turn a blind eye. Why? Why? Why? One reason put forward is that the political parties are dependent upon their votes. Another reason put forward is that there is population replacement going on, and yet another reason is that in post-christian europe people want something to believe in. They don't want to think its just us here with no where to go after death, living in the here and now - so many europeans have converted to Islam. Many others (like me) blame almost all of it on the left, and their stupid liberal laws which allowed all this to happen in the first place.

What ever the reason we have these colonies, and nearly all people within them are dependent upon social welfare. Did you ever notice how jihadi's and their communities are dependent upon welfare??? The French government cannot even control the 'youths', it's all gone beyond this doctors predictions.

No western government is going to do what it needs to do to rid us of the scourge of islam. One theory I'd put forward is if we can't outbreed 'em nuke 'em, now that last comment is really gonna bring on the heat....
fore away you dhimminis'!

Anonymous said...

Brilliant! nuke 'em. You really think thats a solution, you idiot?

SAVANT said...

Nuking is tempting, but my own choice is separation. Bring back the 'sus' laws where cops can ask for identity based on reasonable grounds, limit the legal appeals (all at taxcpayer expense) of rejected asylum seekers, throw out all illegals and withdraw from Article 44 or whatever it is of the Geneva Convention